M20 Comparisons 

Thank you.

A trick : watch series at Flixzone. Me and my gf have been using it for watching a lot of movies these days.

@Christopher Emanuel yea, been using Flixzone} for since november myself :)

Mooney are great.

@@skywagonuniversity5023 The shortest Mooney (M18 Mite) is equally responsive and has "stick" control. I'd like to SQUEEZE you into mine for a flight review but logistics would make it difficult (located in Canada).

Many thanks!

Yes, the long Mooney's have a huge baggage area no more rear legroom than a mid length Mooney.

We didn't have an A or B model to demo, so we left them off. There are only 63 A models and 99 B models registered in the US. Of those, we have no idea how many still fly.

@@skywagonuniversity5023 Sure like to see a comparison between the G and F models. I think the G is an overlooked as a great bargain.

Glad you liked it!

That is very true and observant. Same wingspan and longer and longer equals more stability especially in pitch. Landing the TLS Bravo is very sedate indeed because the elevator is about three feet further away. Also, the longer mooneys do not wobble and yaw so much in turbulence. Good point.

The 201 is the best of the old small Mooneys and the best of the new big engined Mooneys all in one. All parts are available. Lycoming engine, McCauley or Hartzell prop. Huge aftermarket support. Remember Cessna stopped making singles in 1986 for 10 years with no plans to restart. All the other companies have been in an d out of bankruptcy too. Get a 201. An MSE 1987 to 1997 if you can afford it. (Rounded windows)

@@skywagonuniversity5023many thanks ❤

The theory is that the vertical leading edge of the tail reaches forward into the airflow to recover from a spin sooner

They are all four seaters. The E and J have about 1000 Lb useful loads and the Bravo is about 1200 lbs.

OK, just one. The small one.

@@skywagonuniversity5023 hahaha i will take the skidding nose gear contraption thx Skyway

Really? Where else have you seen all three Mooney fuselage options in one place? The "information" is about the differences between them without going into the theory of relativity and creating confusion.

Thank you for the video. Great to see all 3 sizes!

I could come up with a cunning story about short field landings but the truth of it is that it is just a scenic access road to the East end hangars that have never been built. The runway is out of sight on the top of that bank. Up the road to the top, hang a right and you are on the runway.

@@skywagonuniversity5023 that’s pretty cool

Indeed! And, it looks like Mooney is going back into production after a short hibernation.

What it actually is, is the C stretched is a G with 50 gallons and 180 HP. If you stretch an E, you get an F with 200 HP, injected and 65 gallons. The F and the G are the same length as a J (or 201) The J is a factory lopresti assisted aerodynamically more efficient F. The K is a Turbo J with a Continental six in it. So the shorts are the C and E. Mediums are G, F, J and K and the logs bodies are the Ovations and Bravos and Acclaims etc.

​@@skywagonuniversity5023 I know. I own a F. I wanted to point out, that the next step up in length from a C is NOT a J.

@@streptokokke1003 I did not say that a J is the next step up in engine spec or performance from a C. A J however IS the next step up from a C in length. A F also is the same length, a G is also the same length, a K is also the same length. They all have a 9 inch stretch in the area of the rear passengers feet. I have owned them all.

You never know. Just like a lot of aircraft manufacturers, they open and close and change hands. This is about the 6th time for Mooney in their history.

Come on, they are not that bad.

Aerodynamic