As a clarinetist, it’s a such joy to perform this piece ( orchestral version). To me, it’s such an emotional and intimate piece to perform. bravo my friend on your performance!
For convenience: ( 0:25 ) 1. Pavane de la Belle au bois dormant ( 2:11 ) 2. Petit Poucet ( 5:19 ) 3. Laideronnette, impératrice des pagodes ( 8:45 ) 4. les entretiens dela belle et la bête ( 13:10 ) 5. Le jardin féerique ~Enjoy~
What an enterpretation! On the Belle and the Beast in particular (my favourite of all the pieces) you make sang those notes like there were a real conversation between the characters. That is the point: bravo!
Hear hear. I’ve no one to play it with so I’m forced to play the solo. Which is still beautiful but somewhat lacking in my opinion. Some of the notes are just too far from each other to be played at the same time, causing the transcript to adjust entirely, the ending to the last piece would be a perfect example. It just doesn’t sound as impactful as the four-hands.
@@antoniooyarzabal9436 There is another piano solo version, by Lawrence Rosen. Do you know why another one was created? I'd rather stick with the one Ravel knew and approved, but I have to assume there's a reason another one was created.
@@antoinepoulenc I read that Ravel wrote The Mother Goose Suit as a piano duet first and then decided to orchestrate it after that. It's amazing how he could do that and turn it into one of the most beautiful orchestral pieces ever written in my opinion. I remember the first time I heard it I bought the CD of The Montreal Orchestra conducted by Charles Dutoit and by the end my eyes were filled with tears. Dutoit and The Montreal Orchestra also recorded Daphne and Cloe which is just as wonderful. Ravel will always be my favorite. What piano players do you think play Ravel the most to your liking?
