My comment on "Sixty Symbols" channel on their "Nobel Prize for Black Holes" video: "Black holes don't exist. It's invisible bose-einstein condensates (BECs) and jets. Singularity=energy jet emitter. Blackhole=energy vortex absorber. www.technologyreview.com/2009/06/10/266570/acoustic-black-hole-created-in-bose-einstein-condensate/ www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/slow_light_project/ultra_slow_light/ultra_slow_light.htm www.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/publications/pdf/Slow_Light_1999.pdf www.nature.com/articles/srep40122 www.sciencealert.com/matehmatical-model-of-cold-dark-matter-bose-einstein-condensate-stars Slow light=>"even light can't escape" Do "blackholes" have a powerful magneto-optical trap at the "event horizon" ? I think so..."
This is basically a prime example that you should never take any thing as a hard-fact. If someone says it can't be done, they may not have all the info. Always try, you may have different thought processes than the last guy.
