The set-up is strange. Rather than sitting on both sides, why don’t the hosts sit on the same side and guest on the other side.. so that the guest doesn’t have to look in this direction and that direction.
Change the seating arrangement set up. The two hosts could sit on the same side.. rather than on each side of the guest. So the guest has to look only in one general direction.
Jara shot krishna and died, Jara was Vaali from Ramayan, and Ram Promised him, that he will allow Vaali to kill him in the next avatar, as rama killed vaali from behind and it was against the rule of engagement of war.
@@shadowalphawolf9926 ohh not mahabali brother! I meant vaali but we usually say baali instead of v. the monkey king sugreev brother. Both Vaali and baali is correct but im not sure a baali its just how we say it here in kerala.
I don't know why she never tells how it was Shri Krishn who gave all the Divya gyaan to bhishma to give to Yuddhishitir! Even bhishma asks bhagwan krishn that why is he not doing it himself! How can anyone dare to speak when Shri krishn himself is present there! Even vaac devta won't speak in front of him!
Because He(Krsna) wanted to show the glories of His Devotee(Bhishma) and so He intentionally did this, because Krsna always glorifies His devotees and devotees glorify Krsna❤ ❤ Hare Krishna ❤
@@Adi_Anant_Narayan okiesss Haribollll.... Hare Krishna.... I think ami ji only talks from Itihas perspective and from Mahabharat and Ramayan perspective, and so Bhakti(which is Srimad Bhagwatam) she doesn't elaborate In her many of her talks, while talking about the greatness of Queen Kunti and Maa Draupadi, she doesn't mention their greatness from Srimad Bhagwatam( i.e. how great of Vaishnavis they were) and only from Itihaas
@@this_is_me_trying I am talking with itihaas's perspective only! This is mentioned in Mahabharata itself! Whatever I mentioned in my first comment is mentioned in Mahabharata!
She has read abridged version of Mahabharata by Baroda research oriental Institute (BORI). Which is considered most authentic. Please do a simple Google about BORI abridged version for your own convenience.
The death of Lord Krishna or giving up his body by Krishna is a major interpolation in Mahabharata..And this so called expert who jumps and starts saying other things as interpolation doesn't even give a disclaimer that it maybe an interpolation. Also, the grand son of Krishna is Vajra or Vajranabha, but not Vraj or anything..Ami gantara makes lot of such errors and mistakes like these in many of her interviews.
Well, Karna is a nutcase of a character so can't blame her. Especially when Indian males are such a fan of this character that they jump in to defend all of his misdeeds.
@@user-um2ty5vo4t Here are the below authentic editions of the epic - Bibek Debroy translation of Bori critical edition. - English translation by Kisari Mohan Ganguli (KMG). - Neelkanth edition Sanskrit Hindi version of Gita Press. - Mahabharat adaptation by Shri Rajgopalachari based on Dakshinayat. These sources do cite the same. Ved vyas himself described Karn as the trunk of Adharma tree then what more proof do u want??
Do you even know what that means? Karna has been called the trunk of adharma because Duryodhana had enmity with the Pandavas by standing over the same trunk. Here the trunk of adharma is called the power of karna@@Bunns-ty5fm
