Major Evidence of a New Particle Called Glueball: Here's Why It Matters 

Who? Where? Is Anton an actor? I need to know and check it out.

Best line from Stargate: He's a Jafa. Jack: No. But he plays one on TV.

Quiet AI..​@@alecity4877

Solid credentials!!!

@@LingBaneHydraWord

Probably CA glue. And if “100 mile an hour tape” works on Bush planes, I don’t see why the universe couldn’t benefit from its powerful properties. In fact, that may be what the mysterious “42” was referencing; 42 meters of duct tape is all that keeps the universe from splitting apart. 😁

Don't forget the WD40.

Hahahaha!

Duct tape is like The Force! It has a light side, a Dark side, and (as we just saw) it holds the universe together.

It's duck tape all the way down.

Agreed! His videos are getting better and better!

If you have a video with a somewhat garbled audio, i.e. too fast to comprehend, then go to the video's Setting and click on Playback Speed and reduce the speed from 'Normal' to '0.75' and lo the audio becomes acceptable.

@@morganmajurey5805 exactly, and quit bitching

I play at 1.5x playback speed and have zero issues hearing what he's saying.

@@herrpez - I've always struggled with the accent due to the effect it has on his enunciation. 1.5x is impressive!

They change story every other day ... keep the fund coming. All of them are basically CONMAN who know the con game. That is find new particle every other day.

@@nastybadger-tn4klbro we knew that these were at least hypothetically possible in the early 80s. It’s not really a brand new concept, just newly proven.

Or it formed a Bose Condensate.

​@@nastybadger-tn4klOh, boy wait until you find about the budget of the US military...

LOL

To my undergrad, amateur hobbyist understanding, all the stuff is "there" in a field we can't observe, and what we observe as "particles popping into and out of existence" is just the fluctuations within that field. Am I on the right track?

@@ianmoore5502 The way you said it is at least much better than "popping in and out of existence", which is an often-used but very misleading way of popularizing the effects of virtual particles and comes from people misunderstanding the use and meaning of Feynman diagrams. The key concept is that fields have "quantum fluctuations", which is just jargon for quantum uncertainty: If you have a state of known energy, for example the vacuum, or a single proton, etc., the values of the fields, including the gluon field, are necessarily *unknown* due to quantum uncertainty. If one wants to understand the properties of such a state based on a description of the fields, one needs to account for all *possible* field configurations according to the rules of quantum mechanics. Technically, this is very difficult but there exist methods to systematically get approximate (and sometimes extremely accurate) results, for example perturbative field theory which uses Feynman diagrams to organize these calculations. "Virtual particles" are patterns in these Feynman diagrams that have to do with how the unknown field configurations in the vacuum, i.e. the "vacuum fluctuations", affect things. There is nothing "popping in and out of existence", which would imply an observable process.

Think of it as multiple overlapping waves. They usually cancel out each other so you can't observe the peaks and valleys. Once in a while they are out of phase and you can physically see a wave.

@ianmoore5502 The way you said it is at least much better than "popping in and out of existence", which is an often-used but very misleading way of popularizing the effects of virtual particles and comes from people misunderstanding the use and meaning of Feynman diagrams. The key concept is that fields have "quantum fluctuations", which is just jargon for quantum uncertainty: If you have a state of known energy, for example the vacuum, or a single proton, etc., the values of the fields, including the gluon field, are necessarily unknown due to quantum uncertainty. If one wants to understand the properties of such a state based on a description of the fields, one needs to account for all possible field configurations according to the rules of quantum mechanics. Technically, this is very difficult but there exist methods to systematically get approximate (and sometimes extremely accurate) results, for example perturbative field theory which uses Feynman diagrams to organize these calculations. "Virtual particles" are patterns in these Feynman diagrams that have to do with how the unknown field configurations in the vacuum, i.e. the "vacuum fluctuations", affect things. There is nothing "popping in and out of existence", which would imply an observable process.

They are just making this shit up . Zero proof it exist just like a black hole . This is just theories and speculation. They are missing half of the equation by design . They have to invent “dark matter” to make their model work . Imagine a model so bad that you have to include 96% of “dark matter “to make it work! That’s so laughable

@@Etimespacegotta screenshot that one

​@@Etimespace🧐

@@Etimespace how many sides does time have, though?

@@defective6811 it's not awesome. The dude is legitimately off his rocker. Look at the videos on his channel. I came up with similar ideas when I used to do acid, but I was coherent enough afterward to know they were just drug induced ramblings. I don't think he does

@@Etimespace can you people avoid writing like complete schizos?

We making it out of the cosmic primordial wave soup with this one 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

😂 I hate when they release all the singles ahead of the album. Now when the Theory Of Everything finally releases, it'll be boring.

New particle free with every monthly copy of "Cosmos". Collect them all!

😂😂

This and the replies are freaking funny as hell.

I wanted Spaceballs.

@@jimmyzhao2673 That's all we'd need, a Druish princess.

@Elias_Avraham That's funny - she doesn't look Druish 😁

Ballons Edit: I just realized that being french, it's only kinda funny cause saying ballon with an English twist sounds funny 😶‍🌫️

Was originally blueballs so count yourself lucky.

Do you know what is the current consensus about the value of the expected "mass gap" in the spectrum of pure SU3 yang-mills? Is it the mass of 0++ glueball or rather a pion rest mass, or something else?

@@ika5666 It's been a while since I read anything on lattice QCD (I am more knowledgeable in theoretical condensed matter), so I am not familiar with recent results --- I don't know if the mass gap has been accurately determined. I would have to look up on the recent literature on the subject --- maybe the value is more firmly determined by now. I remember many years ago one of my former professors gave us a paper with some of the calculations he'd contributed to, in which the mass spectra of several hadrons had been computed and, though close to experimental values, the calculated results didn't quite agree yet with those, but they were better than results from previous years. That's an interesting question you've posed. Are you also a physicist?

@@gildardorivasvalles6368 I m but I cannot find the (consensus) clear answer in the literature.

Can you run Minecraft

"Computronium is a material hypothesized by Norman Margolus and Tommaso Toffoli of MIT in 1991 to be used as "programmable matter", a substrate for computer modeling of virtually any real object."

Is that because the two particles are in a Charmonious relationship?

For every 2 teen dramas on the WB, you need to throw in an Adam Sandler film.

I resemble that remark!

@@jdlech Me as well. Back in the day, at a Caltech Senior Ditch Day, I was playing the part of a gluon in a atom, moving around, along with the other particles. Given that I was the only female in the atom, though, I'm pretty glad they hadn't discovered gluons back then!

Glueball---These guys are hilarious!

A hydrogen nucleus, yes

I had similar thought, that the quarks are flailing around trying to get out of their 'strong force' field prison.

​@@markmcd2780 Really puts the "glue" in "gluon" lol

tbh, it looks like an alien creature and it's 😬

If the hitchhikers guide has any basis in reality, the screaming particles saying "AHH WHY AM I HERE, WHAT IS GOING ON?" sounds plausible

and we still have so much to discover. At first I thought that we would find a “theory of everything” in my lifetime, but now I am sure that will not happen. I have lost hope that the big breakthrough will come in the next few decades

for me it is not a stomach ache, but a love and fascination for the unknown

Think not about about how overwhelming it is, but how astounding and incredible that we're (humanity in general) able to accurately infer properties and behaviour of the smallest constituent elements in the universe, from math equations! Something no modern microscope would ever be able to observe. The universe is an awe-inspiring, terrible, beautiful place, from the largest structures of the cosmic web, down to the tiniest particles in existence.

I currently have a stomach ache and im watching this for relief

Shucks. It ain't nuthing. What y'all nedes to be do is reading that there Bible. Gots all them ansurs y'all fittin to be axin bout. It's a heck of a book.

Agreed, but much of what he talks about actually sinks in.

It is assumed that more and more space-dispersing energy is pushed inside the space-expanding quarks, so that all the expanding quarks that circulate the space-dispersed energy are exactly the same. Their density and volume in relation to each other can be changed when their speed is accelerated in particle accelerators. When moving in groups, they experience the change in a different way, according to which of them pushes forward and which of them pushes in the background of the first one or the first ones. That is, they encounter expanding energy pushing against them, which affects them differently according to the order in which they encounter the energy pushing against them. And it affects how they recycle this energy that is scattered in space. Naturally, energy also plays a big role, which accelerates their pace. That too changes the density and volume of quarks expanding in space. The speed of internal movement / time. Internal pressure. Well, when the expanding nuclei are collided, it’s no wonder that in the collisions, energy is dispersed/expanded into space in such a way that physicists interpret from this information that there are different quarks in the nuclei. And yes, the density and volume of quarks expanding during collisions are different. Even so much different that one of the quarks is so dense and small compared to the others that no information is obtained from it in collisions. I understand that some parties assume that protons and neutrons are made up of zillions of separate quarks. Well, here’s another time. Nowadays it is taught that protons and neutrons consist of three quarks that are different from each other. The three quarks form a kite, as it were. In my opinion, four would form a much more logical and stable entity. The pyramid. Tetrahedron. Ok, when the expanding quarks are at rest relative to us, they would already be much more congested regions of expanding energy with the same density and volume Of course, their density and volume live somewhat all the time. While the situation lives on all the time, they come to control each other’s density and volume while circulating with all other expanding quarks this space-dispersing energy of which they themselves are composed. So that it completely changes over time. When someone momentarily expands a little faster than others, its ability to absorb the space-dispersing energy pushing through itself into itself is worse due to the fact that its density is lower than that of expanding quarks with a smaller volume at that moment. Of course, more energy dispersing into space pushes through it, because it is bigger at that moment. The situation will recover as the recycling of energy dispersed into space continues. The ability to recycle energy that dissipates into space is faster because its internal movement / time is faster at that moment. It seems strange that no one before me has been able to consider that perhaps the so-called the atom is completely different from what physicists have assumed. Perhaps the volume of matter is also relative. Perhaps it is the case that time is not only relative. Maybe here we have the key to the theory of everything in physics🙂 Love ❤️

You are possibly the chosen one. 👌❤️

Expanding Space is Naked Emperor.

Keep watching, learning, and listening. You'll start hearing the same information from multiple different places, and that's when it'll sink in and start to click.

hope you're homeschooling then. Modern schools don't teach reality these days.

@@zarroththat’s not true at all. We need to stop with this narrative. My daughter told me about glueballs last week and she attends public school. It is much better to have your child learning in a diverse environment where many different people who specialize in different areas of study are able to educate them, and you can educate them as well the other 128 hours of the week! Then they get a double education. This is what I do.

@@2nd-placeYeah, what kind of glue balls? The ones in this video, or just a bunch of kids making balls of glue?

@@zarrothDo you ever find it concerning that your mind jumps to such negative thoughts? Like do you live in that headspace?

​@cameronyeager7482 Most people just think being negative is a more realistic mindset, an extremely toxic mindset.

"We ain't found sh*t!"

"Oh shit. There goes the planet..."

But will she flip the switch?

Out of order? Fuck. Even in the future nothing works.

Cosmic bubbles?

Love your name😅

Smoking glue is horribly unhealthy. That's why God gave us paper bags. Natural. Healthy. American. Amirite?

CCP is one the biggest threats to humanity

@@JohnSmith-fl6qd I don't. It states no reason, only promoting meaningless economic destruction and provocation. That channel exists to create support for the dumbest war we'll ever start. We will not survive if your friend succeeds.

​@@DeletiriumWhat about mouthwash?

I'm huffing glue and chroming, am I qualified to be a particle physicist?

You don't actually need to say quantum when referring to chromo dynamics

And here i thought it was named after that new hit song generated by AI about gluing balls. lol

first publication started in March about this ongoing BESIII-Experiments

​@@Etimespace bro wat r u smoking

​@@wippok42 been wondering that myself

They cheated you out of your nobel prize.

You were way ahead of your time! Working on your PhD at that age! 😁

@@wolfgangkranek376 The next albert einstein, truly

And this one acts like a shadowboxing neuron.

Hes very shy, prefers hotter climates​, and performs free or charge! Just here for a good time. @ridethecurve55

@@ianmoore5502 Underrated comment. Also, it's not a new particle, it was predicted years ago.

That's when you go to the ER after a superglue incident

I prefer the Christmas pudding model

Pac Man has achieved sentience.

I used to use a similar example a few years ago! We are like mario in the super mario 64 video game, trying to figure out how to get out of the game and into the "real world"! and I guess looking into the subatomic, it's like understanding pixels indeed!

I mistakenly thought of Mario rather than PacMan before reading the intervening comments. It is clear some sort of gluonicity is happening here. Gravity doesn't matter to PacMan, but it weighs on Mario. It will take a 33rd degree meson to disentangle this!

@@user-gv4cx7vz8t all laws of physics still apply to the binary code that constitutes both games. My comment talks about Mario and yet the original comment talks about pacman.

Musicians learn to play first before learning to read partitures. Only after they know what each note sounds like, they can hear the music in their minds. In fact, many great musicians never learned "formal" theory. Math and physics are taught the other way around: If it were music, you'll learn about modular chords and counterpoint, and you'll be scribbling partitures (with the note stems pointing the _correct_ way) long before you ever touch a piano... And that's if you ever decide to dedicate your career to music... Actual music would be reserved to the "college graduates" and the "researchers," because of course there's no way that common people ever find music beatiful and interesting if it's just scribbling notes on paper. No wonder why many people hate math and think they'll never be good at it. But the truth is, equations, numbers, greek letters and the long S are as representative of actual math as partitures are of actual music. Physics is easier to understand, because people see it every day and it's not as difficult to imagine. Carl Sagan, Anton Petrov, Kyle Hill and many other people are making an invaluable service, not only for showing us the music, but for encouraging us to _listen_ to it. Equations and models are simple tools like partitures... The real music, the real physics, the real beauty is in the things they represent.

@@DonVigaDeFierroYes, it is hard to undo the miseducation in science and convince even teachers that the map (or the math) is not the territory. Any symbolic representation or abstraction should be taught after exposure to the original thing itself that is the basis for the mystery and wonder of the universe.

what kind of work do you do ?

@@Fortun.a_Major Then, I was a graduate student in particle physics. Now, I am a professor of electrical engineering.

Tff😄

is that condition related to ligma?

Better than blueballs.

Are there any electrons around the nuclei at all❤️ The atomic model has had time to be modified into a different form even before❤️ Sometimes was theory that the electrons go around the nucleus, etc❤️ Nowadays, there is talk of electron curtains around the nuclei, etc.?❤️ I assume that there is nothing around the cores. In the cores, there would be congestion areas of❤️ expanding energy that would circulate energy scattered in space with all other similar congestion❤️ areas, and at the same time these congestion areas of expanding energy would automatically❤️ push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. Thus, it can be stated that the nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding dark energy❤️ as zillions of separate expanding condensations whose expansion can be accelerated so fast by the❤️ expanding photon, they do not have time push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this stage, a new registrable electron is created/combined from the expanding dark energy❤️ pushing away from the expanding core, which still consists of energy which expanding❤️ Physicists therefore think that they can remove electrons that already exist around the nuclei,❤️ although possibly they can create completely new electrons❤️ In my opinion, physicists should consider this point of view❤️ What makes this view very interesting is that stars would be born on the same principle from❤️ zillions of expanding condensations of dark matter, which would constantly be pushed out❤️ of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies❤️ Expanding galaxies would have been formed in space in the early days of the expanding❤️ visible universe when two expanding supermassive objects passed close to each other❤️ The separate expanding concentrations of dark matter would have pushed through each other❤️ again and again and that would have caused them to expand so fast that they wouldn’t have had❤️ time to push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this point, they would have started to coalesce into new expanding stars❤️ Perhaps with the James Webb telescope it will be observed that stars were born❤️ as if from nothing. But of course not really out of nowhere, you know❤️ The Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies would have been born❤️ in their own 3D big bangs on the same principle❤️ So that the expanding galaxies would be large particles that convey information from the object,❤️ which is quite massive and dense because it radiates energy that has the character of galaxies❤️ Naturally, we wouldn’t be able to detect the object we are moving away from❤️ Galaxies would then be particles that transmit information about it❤️ ❤️

​@@Etimespace dude, quit spamming this crap. No one is reading your essay of word salad.

Ped O' traytore to humanity ? Hmm I don't know if its worth much

@@BoycottChinaa I am not fan of Microsoft, but Anton deserves some recognition, I think .

@@camoTiaras you are right

There are objects outside the visible universe that are so massive that they emit energy that has the character of expanding galaxies which born from centre to outside. The center of these objects is under extreme pressure at all times. Extremely fast energy pushes towards them. Remnants of galaxies that have expanded into space. Millions of billions of years of energy that moved through space and was dispersed into space. It collides with the extremely dense energy pushing away from these objects at extremely high speed and causes this extremely dense energy to explode / expand into less dense energy. The speed of the energy dispersed in space for millions of billions of years has accelerated for millions of billions of years and therefore collides with extremely dense energy at an extremely fast speed. The speed of this extremely fast energy begins to slow down and eventually stops in an area of extreme pressure. This extreme pressure compresses the energy that was once scattered in space for millions of billions of years into extremely dense energy. Pushing away from the center of an extremely dense and massive object starts once again when more millions of billions of years of space-dispersed energy pushes into the center of that object, which displaces the energy that was previously pushed into the center of that object away from the center of that object. In the infinite 3D universe, there is an eternal recycling going on, which does not need pulling forces at all to maintain. google: Savorinen Jukka Read How Universe Really Works ❤️ It is assumed that more and more space-dispersing energy is pushed inside the space-expanding quarks, so that all the expanding quarks that circulate the space-dispersed energy are exactly the same. Their density and volume in relation to each other can be changed when their speed is accelerated in particle accelerators. When moving in groups, they experience the change in a different way, according to which of them pushes forward and which of them pushes in the background of the first one or the first ones. That is, they encounter expanding energy pushing against them, which affects them differently according to the order in which they encounter the energy pushing against them. And it affects how they recycle this energy that is scattered in space. Naturally, energy also plays a big role, which accelerates their pace. That too changes the density and volume of quarks expanding in space. The speed of internal movement / time. Internal pressure. Well, when the expanding nuclei are collided, it’s no wonder that in the collisions, energy is dispersed/expanded into space in such a way that physicists interpret from this information that there are different quarks in the nuclei. And yes, the density and volume of quarks expanding during collisions are different. Even so much different that one of the quarks is so dense and small compared to the others that no information is obtained from it in collisions. I understand that some parties assume that protons and neutrons are made up of zillions of separate quarks. Well, here’s another time. Nowadays it is taught that protons and neutrons consist of three quarks that are different from each other. The three quarks form a kite, as it were. In my opinion, four would form a much more logical and stable entity. The pyramid. Tetrahedron. Ok, when the expanding quarks are at rest relative to us, they would already be much more congested regions of expanding energy with the same density and volume Of course, their density and volume live somewhat all the time. While the situation lives on all the time, they come to control each other’s density and volume while circulating with all other expanding quarks this space-dispersing energy of which they themselves are composed. So that it completely changes over time. When someone momentarily expands a little faster than others, its ability to absorb the space-dispersing energy pushing through itself into itself is worse due to the fact that its density is lower than that of expanding quarks with a smaller volume at that moment. Of course, more energy dispersing into space pushes through it, because it is bigger at that moment. The situation will recover as the recycling of energy dispersed into space continues. The ability to recycle energy that dissipates into space is faster because its internal movement / time is faster at that moment. It seems strange that no one before me has been able to consider that perhaps the so-called the atom is completely different from what physicists have assumed. Perhaps the volume of matter is also relative. Perhaps it is the case that time is not only relative. Maybe here we have the key to the theory of everything in physics🙂 Love ❤️

Are there any electrons around the nuclei at all❤️ The atomic model has had time to be modified into a different form even before❤️ Sometimes was theory that the electrons go around the nucleus, etc❤️ Nowadays, there is talk of electron curtains around the nuclei, etc.?❤️ I assume that there is nothing around the cores. In the cores, there would be congestion areas of❤️ expanding energy that would circulate energy scattered in space with all other similar congestion❤️ areas, and at the same time these congestion areas of expanding energy would automatically❤️ push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. Thus, it can be stated that the nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding dark energy❤️ as zillions of separate expanding condensations whose expansion can be accelerated so fast by the❤️ expanding photon, they do not have time push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this stage, a new registrable electron is created/combined from the expanding dark energy❤️ pushing away from the expanding core, which still consists of energy which expanding❤️ Physicists therefore think that they can remove electrons that already exist around the nuclei,❤️ although possibly they can create completely new electrons❤️ In my opinion, physicists should consider this point of view❤️ What makes this view very interesting is that stars would be born on the same principle from❤️ zillions of expanding condensations of dark matter, which would constantly be pushed out❤️ of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies❤️ Expanding galaxies would have been formed in space in the early days of the expanding❤️ visible universe when two expanding supermassive objects passed close to each other❤️ The separate expanding concentrations of dark matter would have pushed through each other❤️ again and again and that would have caused them to expand so fast that they wouldn’t have had❤️ time to push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this point, they would have started to coalesce into new expanding stars❤️ Perhaps with the James Webb telescope it will be observed that stars were born❤️ as if from nothing. But of course not really out of nowhere, you know❤️ The Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies would have been born❤️ in their own 3D big bangs on the same principle❤️ So that the expanding galaxies would be large particles that convey information from the object,❤️ which is quite massive and dense because it radiates energy that has the character of galaxies❤️ Naturally, we wouldn’t be able to detect the object we are moving away from❤️ Galaxies would then be particles that transmit information about it❤️ ❤️

​@@Etimespace Blabbing nonsense won't convince antone

Give him more if he learns not to talk so scratchy and with a clear tone

Quantum mechanics.

To be fair, a Geo Metro's already not that far off from actually being a bicycle...

And has been simulated using lattice QCD years before.

Its always good to have actual confirmation data...

yall when there's no evidence "it's just theory who cares" when it's confirmed "bro the theory been saying this for years who cares"

to definitively confirm the glueball we still need more studies!!

@@kiiturii It's cool that they confirmed it we need more of it! It's just funny.

And?

​@@Jeewanu216....and that's a tease so you'll read the Bible, or it describes the 2024 election season!

@@user-gv4cx7vz8t The hell are you talking about? OP definitely ain't talking about 2024 elections, so take your politics elsewhere, this is a science channel. And I've read the Bible cover to cover more times than I can count. KJV, NKJV, ESV, NIV, St. Joseph's, JW, and others. It's rather unimpressive.

@@Jeewanu216 Lost your sense of humor already? It really is the silly season!

@@user-gv4cx7vz8t First, I'm humor-blind/deaf due to autism. If it's not REALLY clear that it's a joke, I won't know it's a joke. Second, Poe's Law makes it worse. It's the internet, and tone doesn't communicate well over text, so without clear indication, there's literally no way to have identified that as a joke.

strange,... but true ?

Yay! (Just don't miss your wedding.)

You really haven't been paying attention then if you think that.

@@jameshall1300 go look what many physicists themselves are saying. Most things in theoretical physics are just further proofs of theories from the 60s/70s Even what this video is about was predicted +50 years ago.

It is assumed that more and more space-dispersing energy is pushed inside the space-expanding quarks, so that all the expanding quarks that circulate the space-dispersed energy are exactly the same. Their density and volume in relation to each other can be changed when their speed is accelerated in particle accelerators. When moving in groups, they experience the change in a different way, according to which of them pushes forward and which of them pushes in the background of the first one or the first ones. That is, they encounter expanding energy pushing against them, which affects them differently according to the order in which they encounter the energy pushing against them. And it affects how they recycle this energy that is scattered in space. Naturally, energy also plays a big role, which accelerates their pace. That too changes the density and volume of quarks expanding in space. The speed of internal movement / time. Internal pressure. Well, when the expanding nuclei are collided, it’s no wonder that in the collisions, energy is dispersed/expanded into space in such a way that physicists interpret from this information that there are different quarks in the nuclei. And yes, the density and volume of quarks expanding during collisions are different. Even so much different that one of the quarks is so dense and small compared to the others that no information is obtained from it in collisions. I understand that some parties assume that protons and neutrons are made up of zillions of separate quarks. Well, here’s another time. Nowadays it is taught that protons and neutrons consist of three quarks that are different from each other. The three quarks form a kite, as it were. In my opinion, four would form a much more logical and stable entity. The pyramid. Tetrahedron. Ok, when the expanding quarks are at rest relative to us, they would already be much more congested regions of expanding energy with the same density and volume Of course, their density and volume live somewhat all the time. While the situation lives on all the time, they come to control each other’s density and volume while circulating with all other expanding quarks this space-dispersing energy of which they themselves are composed. So that it completely changes over time. When someone momentarily expands a little faster than others, its ability to absorb the space-dispersing energy pushing through itself into itself is worse due to the fact that its density is lower than that of expanding quarks with a smaller volume at that moment. Of course, more energy dispersing into space pushes through it, because it is bigger at that moment. The situation will recover as the recycling of energy dispersed into space continues. The ability to recycle energy that dissipates into space is faster because its internal movement / time is faster at that moment. It seems strange that no one before me has been able to consider that perhaps the so-called the atom is completely different from what physicists have assumed. Perhaps the volume of matter is also relative. Perhaps it is the case that time is not only relative. Maybe here we have the key to the theory of everything in physics🙂 Love ❤️

Have you attempted to comb the desert to find one?

@@Etimespaceyou obviously missed the ‘Spaceballs’ joke that this thread is referencing. It’s a line from the Mel Brooks movie of the same name.

@@deviouskris3012 A Glueball or a Spaceball?

😂😂😂😂😂 All Hail Lord Helmet!

I suspect the lack of natural antimatter despite it's equal production prior to the inflationary epoch is where our dark matter comes from. If the asymmetry of matter and antimatter can give rise to the development of 'super mesons' that contain a lot of antimatter, and a little real matter, but don't interact with anything but gravity, and are stable at low temperatures, could explain the normal matter bias and dark matter at the same time. But I may be crazy