Make or Buy Decision

Подписаться 318 тыс.

Просмотров 226 тыс.

50% 1

This video shows the optimal way for firms to choose whether to manufacture a product component internally or purchase the component from an external supplier. The key is for managers to focus only on relevant costs-- those costs that differ among alternatives-- when deciding which route incurs a lower cost.
-
Edspira is the creation of Michael McLaughlin, an award-winning professor who went from teenage homelessness to a PhD. Edspira’s mission is to make a high-quality business education freely available to the world.
-
SUBSCRIBE FOR A FREE 53-PAGE GUIDE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PLUS:
• A 23-PAGE GUIDE TO MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
• A 44-PAGE GUIDE TO U.S. TAXATION
• A 75-PAGE GUIDE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
• MANY MORE FREE PDF GUIDES AND SPREADSHEETS
* eepurl.com/dIaa5z
-
SUPPORT EDSPIRA ON PATREON
* / prof_mclaughlin
-
GET CERTIFIED IN FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS, IFRS 16, AND ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
* edspira.thinki...
-
LISTEN TO THE SCHEME PODCAST
* Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
* Spotify: open.spotify.c...
* Website: www.edspira.co...
-
GET TAX TIPS ON TIKTOK
* / prof_mclaughlin
-
ACCESS INDEX OF VIDEOS
* www.edspira.co...
-
CONNECT WITH EDSPIRA
* Facebook: / edspira
* Instagram: / edspiradotcom
* LinkedIn: / edspira
-
CONNECT WITH MICHAEL
* Twitter: / prof_mclaughlin
* LinkedIn: / prof-michael-mclaughlin
-
ABOUT EDSPIRA AND ITS CREATOR
* www.edspira.co...
* michaelmclaugh...

Опубликовано:

28 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 55

@Amicoskates01 4 года назад

I don't want to come off too strong but I love you

@abigailgarcia2634 3 года назад

honestly

@jaredjohns9302 3 года назад

Dont we all!

@itskelohh8173 9 месяцев назад

Gay

@adamrobertson2138 8 лет назад

If you add them up, its 80k, not 70k.

@soudipbhaduri6884 5 лет назад

My Dear Adam it's 70k because 46k and 24k adds to 70k

@rosevi5770 5 лет назад

its 80k really. 21+15+10=46 then 14+20=34. 46+34 =80

@wavvydon4076 4 года назад

Quick maths

@Danny-lc1lb 3 года назад

@@wavvydon4076 I'm never hot

@jordankopal1412 Месяц назад

Hey great video. You explained this to me better then my teacher.

@wraith1154 Год назад

Thanks for the video, helped me. One question though. What about the risk of cost? For example (this only makes your example of internal production look more attractive.) The potential new supplier of the seats has a material delivery issue or has a run of product that does not meet the QC standards of your complany. Don't you have to add a potential cost risk to the analysis?

@mealsandfashion 2 года назад

It was so easy to grasp. Thanks a lot sir

@Phantastikal 5 лет назад

Your videos are the best! Thank you!

@gogomakhoba201 2 года назад

can we perhaps see the question paper because I understand your videos but when I'm in an exam n I'm looking at the question paper I get confused hey like understanding the structure and key words on a question paper in order to be able to answer it properly..... I love your videos

@RamKumar-yu5eu 2 года назад

The total of all those costs are 80000 not 70000

@vivianakech4258 9 месяцев назад

wonderful video.thank you

@kittyind 8 лет назад

Hi Good explanation, wonder how many companies evaluate this way for make or buy? My firm is in similar scenario, however they can buy the product at $40,000 for 5000 only if they buy 25000 units, which is 5 months stock whereby inventory carry cost, pilferage cost is not included. If you have video about similar scenario where by buy decision is dependent not only on the price but of quantity, could you post it?

@sureshwhiteeagle6975 2 года назад

Sir Any way Depreciation is Non cash Transaction so we defer from including in Relevant cost. Is any situation is there to add Depreciation to relevant cost if it can be avoidable.?

@africarib Год назад

Depreciation is always irrelevant because it's the result of a purchase made in the past that can't be recovered.

@sureshwhiteeagle6975 Год назад

@@africarib thanks a lot sir

@ferdinandfernando4025 6 лет назад

I really love your contents :) Hope you could make more educational videos :)

@aimua2243 4 месяца назад

Love you

@HalimMondole Месяц назад

Clark Edward Davis Betty Smith Sandra

@jevjake777 3 года назад

I'm a professional in the procurement area for over 10 years and I have to say that this is on-point.

@Edspira 3 года назад

😀

@somkaranbhardwaj5484 2 года назад

Idiot it's 80 k not 70 k , u are really dumb

@bahatimusuhuke8254 Год назад

Total cost is 80,000 not 70,000

@johndupell8021 2 года назад

This account is carrying my managerial grade. thank you.

@bobalzano2296 4 года назад

you helped me pass my online classes. thanks boss

@mjay417 3 года назад

Idk if I trust a video where they got 70k when it’s 80k lol the simplest portion of the tutorial was wrong lol

@britannilattibeaudiere2634 5 лет назад

Thank you, you've helped me pass accounts

@Naba602 5 лет назад

you're a life saver

@tarekalsherif57 4 года назад

Thank you Michael fo the clear explaination , I think we might also consider the opportunity costs such as losing a CM or use of producton space

@nabeelshahulhameed2451 5 месяцев назад

how come the machine cost was neglected and not considered

@JenniferWilson-h9p Месяц назад

Brown Jennifer Jackson Eric Robinson Kenneth

@Arun-kr9xk 5 лет назад

What if the machine had salvage value

@AsadAli-gp5cv 5 лет назад

If the machine had salvage value then it would be taken as a relevant Opportunity cost for producing In house.

@GoGlamMakeup 2 года назад

Thank you

@GoGlamMakeup 2 года назад

May u grow more!

@nandninayyar2514 5 месяцев назад

@josephnguuri3941 2 года назад

Do make use of fixed cost?

@agirlfromafrica6028 2 года назад

Does relevant mean avoidable and not avoidable costs?

@charliebayer4540 Год назад

Thank you!

@FreezelyGaming 2 года назад

Thank god i found your videos. Online management student in managerial accounting and this is an awakening! Thanks

@brianv5666 Год назад

great simple video that gets right to it.

@g00gle- 6 лет назад

So sad that you are not doing any content anymore . Thanks for the video .

@Edspira 6 лет назад

I'll begin posting new content toward the end of this August. My apologies for the delay - I had a big teaching load at my university last semester

@ranaaurangzeb3097 6 лет назад

God bless you, sir :)

@GyanAddict 8 лет назад

Thank you sir.

@mrinalsubash8358 7 лет назад

I found a major flaw in your explanation.If the depreciation cost for saddles is taken away,then the case corresponds to 'buy' condition. But,you are summing up the first three and calling it 46000 for the 'manufacturing' condition.Obviously we need depreciation cost for 'make' right? so how can we exclude that and tell 46000

@cole843 6 лет назад

since depreciation is a sunk cost we will incur the depreciation cost whether or not saddles are made or bought. This makes it irrelevant to the situation.

@kateturner9258 6 лет назад

We still own the machine whether we use it or not so we can still depreciate the asset.

@randomname8616 6 лет назад

But you will only buy the machine if you're gonna make the saddles yourself, right? Like if you would buy them from an outside supplier then you wouldn't buy the machine, so it's only a past purchase when you decide to manufacture the machines yourself. So shouldn't the depreciation/year be added to the sum (assuming the annual production stays the same, and that you keep producing them until the machines break, so you take multiple years and then compare)

@lucaswang9839 5 лет назад

@@randomname8616 i think it being depreciation meaning that you already have the machine, not the decision to whether buy it or not

@mealsandfashion 2 года назад

@@randomname8616 the machine for manufacturing the saddles is already there just as the factory itself and it’s machinery for manufacturing the bicycles. So there’s no cost incurred in making since it’s already available.