Making a Murderer: 100% GUILTY | Nick Mullen on The Adam Friedland Show 

Wait, I didn’t know this. Like what?

But the nephew though.. getting walked into a confession through no words of his own.

I agree with that.. but still things like the bloodsample having been opened and clearly taken some of it with syringe. You cannot also really trust the cops aswell as the guy. Since the cops also didn't handle the nephews interrogation at all professionally but feeding him the right answers when he clearly had no clue what they want to hear. Was so dim that tought he will just get out if he says what they want. You don't go like: "Noonoo wasn't it more like something sharp you did something like this, noo not knife but maybe having something to do with wood, yes an axe go to prison." I think as bs "documentary" is Leaving Neverland, which has the excat same thing. There is provable lies with the guys and the director straight up said that they are looking it Only from the quilty angle. Not going to the guys earlier scams. You don't make a documentary like that, it's reality tv at that point.

the police found her teeth in steven avery's burn pit.

They are actually working on a doc that presents the other side of the story.

"Or that he was using it as a fleshlight when they arrived."

i cant find anything about head in fridge only remains that bob (bobby) might of dumped on the burn pit, where did you read that at?

​@@pandaberserk3390 lol come on, breh

We are not immune to propaganda. Or being gay.

Fr the first season left enough clues that I was like, “I don’t get. This guy seems guilty? Am I missing something?” And then did what u did and read one sentence on google.

He really wasn't though, but his cousin who testified against him absolutely did it.

He was straight he should have been in jail already

what about the tampered evidence?

@@matthewp9217you realize the police can set up, or just screw up an investigation, on a guilty person right? It’s like some 90 iq shit to not understand corrupt police doesn’t automatically mean Avery is innocent. It’s clear as day Avery is a rapo scumbag and clear as day he did it

Not a tragedy, he was not mentally ill. His IQ was low,.but normal range. That creep admitted to having sex with a tied up Theresa, he told his mommy he wanted to know how sex felt. That moron is still in jail, his conviction was not repealed. He is still jail, where he belongs

He feeds Adam the tight-end his balls

It's actually a different guy. The NFL doesn't allow homosexual players.

That’s Nick Mullens bubba, you were close though

@@domsanchez148you have it backwards. it's heterosexuals

Skol, this is true his bfs are micheal Sam& micheal ore

It was a drive not a walk, DNA evidence is what allowed Adnan out of jail.

The episode was ep 19 Rape science, about 42 minutes in. Nick also mentions Steven Avery and says he's definitely guilty.

@@phytoswillams7835adnan got let out of jail because there was a serial killer in the area at the time that didn’t come up in the trial. The state are yet to decide if they’re gonna bother retrialing hik I’m pretty sure

@@ActuallyNotHayden I keep trying to post a link but it keeps getting deleted. It was DNA that freed him. Just Google DNA and Adnan.

A serial killer whose accomplice was Jay? Who led them to her car? Makes 0 sense

Lesbeens

Which ones which

Another phone scroll?

Throw a fat guy who repeats nicks same joke but also does the laugh track and by god I think we gotta show!!

@@MartinMcfly85 Don’t traumatize me, bro. 😭 🥀

This one for the UK boys

So ahead of it’s time.

A detective on the oj case on record said they plant evidence when they know someone is guilty. Pretty wild thing to admit

Oh word?

It’s literally not though

@@Guyvermectin how convincing

@@Guyvermectin average youtube drooler comment

And he went on to sue Errol Morris and scam him basically

Errol Morris also made a series defending Jeffrey MacDonald, who is 100% and very obviously guilty. So he's fairly hit and miss.

That’s probably what started it all. “The Thin Blue Line” is often hailed as one of the best documentaries every. And every single future documentary maker saw that shit when they were growing up, so they all had to have their own “Thin Blue Line” greatest documentary even which saves the lives of innocent men on death row. Only problem is all these new guys only have actually guilty guys to work with.

@@MJW238 not necessarily. The Netflix series ‘The Innocent Man’ involved a guy wrongfully convicted. I’d say we can’t definitely conclude that either Michael Peterson or Sean Ellis were guilty-both were the subject of high profile docuseries.

@@conscious-typeperson4583 The Staircase was a good series, but I think Michael Peterson was probably guilty, however. I’m just wary, when it comes to any documentary, of basing my views based solely on a piece of media explicitly designed to entertain me and cause me to believe a particular position.

yes it's extremely important for the nation to know about a tv show

To be fair Daily Wire is cancer.

The facts still exist without DW

Fwiw a pretty bland centrist guy was working on the doc before DW bought it and inserted Candace.

Weird point to be making. Most of the people Kim K got out were guilty of drug charges, not violent offences. I don't think a single person she helped had a murder conviction.

That's pretty close to the plot of Primal Fear.

With Stav yelping in the background like a retarded sea lion.

I like this better theyve been talking about current stuff instead of inside jokes from 10 yrars ago

this is infinitely better bc it never panders to the edge-only side of their fanbase

I don’t know where but I can tell you when. The 1970’s

You have 30 grand?

3k max lol@@reach4thesports897

The sto

They are pretty chairs lol

It’s so funny they basically convicted those guys because they smoked weed and listened to metal music

@@Yodeller1917it’s so funny that was the narrative their defense and the documentaries went with. If you just look at the court docs, there’s a shit ton of evidence left out. All those guys were violent alcoholics, one of them confessed like 18 times, and none of them had an alibi

No they’re not

@@Guyvermectin look up state’s evidence #500 in the case

​@@Yodeller1917You have not done any research. Damien's lawyer literally did not bother to present an alibi for Damien since they couldn't find witnesses to back up his story. Jesse kept confessing to the crime, even after lawyers told him not to. Jesse said they were all drinking, and tossed an empty bottle of booze away that evening... The bottle was found and had the perps fingerprints on it. Damien was weird, had a history of massive psychiatric problems, and was into Aliester Crowley type black magic stuff.

Always kinda thought the WM3 did that shit lol

The evidence "exculpating" the Central Park 5 was always very weak, IMO.

@@GerardPerry Then you’re just dumb lmao there was never any physical or other forensic evidence to support their conviction in the first place and the actual assailant subsequently admitted to acting alone.

They were guilty

RIP salem settlers and lynch mobs of history, you guys would have loved the internet mob witch hunts and public opinion trials

I’m not a simp for either of them, but Weinstein seems to be what people in saner times used to call a sex pest. Is it enough to give him 20 years in the can (a life sentence basically)? I don’t think so.

God damn

I think what many fail to ask here is: what if Avery also did the rape/attempted murder that landed him in jail in the first place? I don’t trust his first exoneration.

Did he have his hand cut off by Hamas?

Every day I miss his laugh

They had Shane Gillis in the documentary?

​@Avengerie yeah he was the murderer

Making a turd burglar

Adam is unbearable in general

I don't think he meant dated, but that there was already an established connection between the two, like they met or communicated beforehand.

relationship does not mean sex

Not a romantic relationship they knew each other tho

@@SoulshineWavyoh they knew each other? Then he definitely did it. Stupid

Sorry for being too lazy to look it up, but how much of a prior relationship with Halbach did Avery have? Wasn't it just a few times for auto pics?

@@miloseveggies8064 on paper that’s all it was but he was apparently obsessed with her. He would call her work constantly. And while she might have been to his place 3 times, he requested her personally dozens of times. He killed her.

Just imagine someone laughing really obnoxiously after everything Nick says

​@@kieran6417so any cum town fan

“You should get a little pussy freshener upper after you give birth. Like, you should be able to get it tightened back up, in the hospital, if you went through all of child birth, it’s only fair”. -Stav

​@@kieran6417 or inserting some sex joke into every bit. That guy is all dicks, pussies, dick sucking eating ass and fucking.

Wow ya think? I legit thought they got railroaded all these years. Anything I can watch that backs up what you’re saying?

@@maynardthegreat they are not guilty , I have read and watched videos trying to say they are guilty , it’s all BS

@@GaiaMisery yeah I feel like I have a pretty good radar for bullshit. And I’ve went my entire life absolutely certain they got fucked over so this other dudes comment surprised me

​@@GaiaMiseryThey are seriously disturbed individuals, especially the guy, but I agree, everything I've seen seems to indicate there was no concrete evidence to implicate them in the crime.

Know a documentary in that?

That's not true. Sometimes suspects completely fly under the radar. Like Delphi the cops didn't get the most obvious suspect who lived right next to the murder and matched the suspect on video. There have been people convicted and executed and then 20 years later they find the actual perpetrator through DNA. Go to wikipedia list of wrongfully executed persons.

You serious? There’s tremendous pressure put on police and prosecutors to close cases. Sometimes they get it wrong. It’s not the hard to believe.

god you sound straight

It was never conclusive that the cousin committed the murder. All of it was circumstantial evidence. I read an interview from Ken Kratz and he talked about how ridiculous that claim was and there was virtually no evidence for it.

They are guilty a shit

Defense lawyers' jobs are to build reasonable doubt. That's not the same as proof. If she showed it "conclusively" then Avery would be out, wouldn't he.

@@eduardosuarez2414 This is a hilariously naive take.

@@awill3454 You believe the disgraced former prosecutor? Also, the majority evidence is circumstantial, including all of the evidence used to convict Avery in the first place. The circumstantial evidence argument doesn't mean anything.

real + based

Or you could just fucking Google it

Nick does in this video, you can google it too

The evidence is bullshit and could have easily been one of the other family members.

I mean the fact she drove to his house and never made it home and her remains were found on the property is just a baseline. Not really sure about specific details

@@dakrazypenguin they also found her blood in his vehicle. The defenses entire argument in court was basically “well maybe law enforcement planted the blood there”. The FBI tested the samples and concluded the biomarkers typically shown in blood that’s been stored in vials was not present, and the defense brought in an expert to say that the test “might” be inconclusive. They had nothing to really show law enforcement did anything out of the ordinary.

It's true- me and Brendan were watching wrestling when it happened

No chance in hell How did his blood get in the car, there is no answer to that question Some cop with zero stake in the game didn't gather it from a sink and plant it there, that is the most absurd thing I've ever heard

@@frarfarfwasn’t the police department being sued by Avery?

@bossHogOG those cops had no personal stake whatsoever in any civil suit against the city, they could care less. Total bullshit from Netflix