Mar Mari Emmanuel Explains How Protestantism Started 

You are very confused.

@@johnlacorti6612who are you to say ? Protestantism is much younger then orthodox and Catholicism

@@michaelhowe8674 History states that.

@@johnlacorti6612 Confusion? You must be referring to 200,000 divisions of protestantism? "Endeavor to keep the Unity of The Spirit in the Bond of Peace"

@@Zb-uo2bl Mar Mari Emmanuel is also a pseudo protestant.

You’re not a Christian

My question would be, how did the early Christians live? They had no bibles for 300+ years

@leslieniiattohjnr8483 They did have a Bible of some sort but divided, that's what the fathers quoted to defend the faith. This is the beauty of it, even when the Canon wasn't compiled Scripture was still used as the Word of God to defend the faith.

@@reformedcatholic457 They never had a Bible of any sort! The only scripture they held onto without doubt was the Old Testament, the books written by the Apostles were scattered and in circulation and there were many disputes about which book was inspired by GOD or valid. The Bible didn't exist until the Council of Hippo and Carthage. The only scripture available was the Old Scripture, which was already accepted because they (the early Christians) were Jews and the Old Testament was already part of their tradition and faith. The apostles wrote the books/letters/accounts of Christ around 20 years after Christ died, so what were they reading to the Church when they celebrated the Eucharist? I believe your heart is in the right place, read about the very early Church fathers such as ST. Polycarp, Ignatius of Antioch, and most notably Justin Martyr; who gave a description of how the early Christians worshipped. You realize none of the very early fathers quoted Scriptures but they passed on teachings they had received orally. Also read about the Didache! it's a very important document.

@@leslieniiattohjnr8483to be Christian one must be Catholic because there’s ONLY ONE CHURCH. And the Bible is a Catholic book the protestant Bible is an incomplete and corrupted Catholic book

In Antioch.. That's the real Church.

Paul founded churches but he said even though he founded a church, Christ had already laid the foundation! Read 1st Cor chapters 1,2$3

Exactly and it wasn’t called Roman Catholicism.

Jesus and those before him are Muslim please! Find the truth The truth will save you.

@@mnurliban1713 🤣🤣🤣 The second part from you comment was right! Indeed the truth will set you free. And the truth in person is CHRIST! He said: "I am the way, the truth and the life. NO ONE comes to the father except through me." John 14:6 Don't fall for satans lies my friend!

God bless you, love.

I love it too. Though Protestant.

Love God first. Go based on scripture not on church rulings. This is the problem with Catholicism . Yes I am Protestant Baptist, but over all I follow Christ and go by his word not a pulp’s God bless you ❤

have you ever read Petrus Romanus Last Pope prophecy by "MALACHY" go search and read it once God bless

@@salakerz324yes I too agree with you, but I love many of the Catholics, they’re trying to be close to Jesus as we are. I don’t trust the catholic leaders way at the top though.

Could you explain further?

@@singalong2998 no. I don't quite remember it. Look it up "early Protestant Orthodox relationship" I think there will come up a video by Gavin Ortlund.

@@singalong2998 Truth unites Is the channel of Gavin Ortlund. "THE MOMENT THAT DEFINED IT"

@@uncreatedlogos yeah the patriarch called him a heretic for his beliefs. That’s history clear as Abhraham Lincoln was president of the USA

Lutheran theologians did* Luther was not alive when this happened

Amen. That’s the only true Christian, those without the Holy Spirit do not belong to Jesus, Catholicism and Lutheranism and others are man’s attempt at working their way to heaven. They are all heretics, they’re slanderers trying to corrupt and disrupt the church.

Pride is the Cardinal Sin

@@Jozeemoss “Let the one who boasts boast in the Lord.” 2. Corinthians 10,17

@@JESUSist-GOTT Boasting is not pride when it is in verifiable truth. Boasting is pride when it is blindl, unverified, untested proclamations. That is why you cannot find a single verse in the Bible describing pride as a virtue. Only as sin.

⁠@@JozeemossHe is boasting in the lord, he said he is a proud follower of Christ, that’s boasting

The word became flesh The word is Jesus Christ the word, Gods word the Holy Bible, it is Alive and active sharper than any two edged sword the word also tells us to work out our own Salvation with fear and trembling ( Righteous fear, meaning respecting the word of God and his warnings) God help us to know you in Spirit & Truth and trust in you for our souls sake 🙏

Jesus Christ founded one church and prayed that we be one He founded it upon Peter/Cephas the rock The Catholic Church wrote the NT. Decided the canon of the Bible and copied it by hand for centuries You obviously don’t know what an indulgence is. It’s giving of alms. Scripture says love covers a multitude of sins Luther was right to complain about church leadership But when he broke away and started making up doctrine and taking out books in the Bible satan had won. The fruit of Protestantism is division and confusion

What rubbish your coming out with. The holy Catholic Church never said that. Get your facts right.

@@simonslater9024 >"Holy" Catholic Church Go back to your popery conditioning training your papist before you claim someone else is giving you rubbish.

@@christopherton Semiramis is patting you on the head right now. There were many churches during the time of Paul. His literal epistles show that. Even in the end times Christ speaks to SEVEN churches. The indulgence as it was used back then was monetary pay. Now you use your definition of remission of punishment and claim such a thing as money indulgence never existed. Even if we by pass the whole money indulgence topic, you have a cavalcade of stuff to weed out. Satan had already got your leadership under his foot. But they teach you that your big bad enemy is the protestants for some reason. Not satanism, not occultism, not elite bloodlines, but those evil non-catholics over the horizon. The amount of lowliness I've seen from some of fanatical papist is down right reprehensible. You show more respect toward Islam than you even do non-catholic Christians. Some of you have even given militant atheism a pass just as long as they battle the protestants or non-catholics.

Absolutely, mar mari mixes truth and lies: the apparition of his dead "mother"; praying to the dead saints; infant baptism ; saying that Jesus told him to look in the mirror and then added: you are Me and I am you😢😢😢...this is blasphemous

He said "about 97", while the Eucharist was not mentionned.

​@@Bobbel888 yes he said about 97 theses and that very clearly indicates the inadequate research he has on church history. Well. For the Eucharist, The Bishop mentioned that if Luther knew about Orthodoxy, he wouldn't have formed the protestantism and would have joined Orthodox Church because what he preached was Orthodox and no difference. To which I say. The Bishop is wrong here because some of the doctrines Luther preached were totally different from Orthodox. I then pointed the example of the Eucharist. Luther does not believe that the bread changes substance to the body of Christ, instead he believes the body of Christ is present together with the bread. This is not a minor difference , it is at the core of the two denominations . So the Bishop is wrong. Secondly to say Luther didn't know about Orthodoxy was simply not true. First of all Luther , a trained priest, cannot be ignorant of Orthodoxy , as one of the courses studied in the formation of seminarians is world religions and they also study the great schism.

​@@csmovilesI am a Roman Catholic , and as such I do believe apparitions do occur. And we also pray through and with the saints. My comment was entirely based on this particular video that he shared. Bishop Mari Mari probably had apparition of his deceased mother. Or of Christ. That I do not know and am not in position to call it lies. But there are clear things in history that we cannot lie about, there are clear theologies we cannot lie about.

@@EnzamaRobertAyikobua Yes, he could have been more sensible with sorting Luther as Orthodox candidate :) Guess it's the deeper rooted dialectic break of Rome and Eastern Church that attracts such idea. The central problem, that Catholic Church is hijacked by the "world" as it was in the time of Luther is well addressed.

no disrespect but it more than that. What you understand by the words justification, redemption, redeemer, mediator are different among various groups. the New Birth itself means something different to Rome than it does to evangelicals.

I love how you said that. And that’s a BEAUTIFUL start. And It’s all you need until you realize that you’ve lost that first love and can’t seem to find the way back through just knowing more. Or you’re just going through the hardest time ever. Knowledge and doctrine give confidence no doubt, and a compass for truth, but falling in love with the Savior never gets old. His suffering and tenderness for us is just everything to take you through your darkest moments. Growing in the faith is called Sanctification. It’s how God makes us ready for heaven. Nothing we go through is wasted.

@@loveyourenemy7796 Sanctification I think has Rewards coming with it, but what about the thief on the cross? well how do you explain Sanctification for the thief on the cross?

​@@SimplePerson-zq9tjWell brother, that thief paid a very very big price and he was saved because God needed to show us that if you repent and believe it is possible to be saved no matter what you did. But don't forget that the thief paid with his life. He lost his life, but gained salvation of his sould. Are we that lucky? Or we try to sin, and then be greedy and ask God not to punish us because we are sorry? If you were offered to be crucified right now and leave everything and everyone here including your loved ones, dying in one of the most agonising death that a man can experience, but knowing your soul will be saved, would you do it? People don't understand, that it varies from situation to situation. Take the resurrection of Lazarus for example. Why just God doesn't ressurect our loved ones like he did ressurect Lazarus? Because Lazarus was resurrected for God's glory and power over death to be shown, and also to prophecy the resurrection of Christ Himself. So, the salvation of the thief also was with a reason and was in a specific time. I am afraid we have to work a little bit, we aren't that lucky to be resurrected/saved without moving a finger. Jesus says, I was hungry and you feed me, I was thirsty and you gave me to drink, I was naked and you gave me clothes, I was in jail and you visited me... Jesus says that those people who did all of these things will be saved. For the others, He will tell them to depart from Him because He never knew them.

​@@DefrostedCalvinist Amen ...Well said...Rome does not understand the New Birth that Jesus talks about in John 3:3, 5, and also Titus 3:5, Ezekiel 36:25-27. 📖💥

The Apostles laid their hands on the baptised persons so that they may receive the holy spirit. Did the successors of the Apostles laid their hands on you so that you may receive the holy spirit?

have you ever read Petrus Romanus Last Pope prophecy by "MALACHY" go search and read it once God bless

​@@justthink8952you may try to think and read John 5:1. Are you raised from the dead and been given the supreme treasure?

I am proud to be a Muslim like Jesus Alaihissalam

@@dallasbrat81 I am not dead yet. Were you resurrected? What is the supreme treasure?

"GET AWAY FROM ME, I NEVER KNEW YOU!"

In God realm there's no past no present no future You called it predestination but it's not In our human realm we're bounded by time so we should watch for our steps all life time

A prophet and not God.

@@jamalbaraja6130 who?

The bible is half predestination and half free will and a God that transcends our comprehension able to have both be active and true.

mari is appealing to the uneducated, he's the definition of a populist

@@natmanprime4295 Our Lord Jesus Christ was teaching the poor and the “uneducated” one, while the so called educated ones crucified him.

Luther even sent a letter to the Patriarch of Constantinople, Jeremias II, but the letter never reached the Patriarch during Luther's lifetime

@@Truth4lfe thats how you build a cult

@@walikotabikinibottom893 Yes it did, but the Patriarch rebuffed them and more or less told them to be Orthodox, which Luther, being Western (in many ways, quite Catholic) refused.

This is exactly what I was going to say

The body isnt an invisible thing but actual physical people. You can detach them from Christ but you can from the kingdom

1 Cor 16:22 If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ let him be anathema. MARANATHA!

Okay? No one is talking about someone who doesn’t love the Lord Jesus Christ. If someone didn’t love the Lord, I’m sure they wouldn’t mind

Some of them. But he himself wasn't a very crystal person.

@@vesogry You mean he wasn't a clear person?

@@reformedcatholic457 He wasn't a moral person.

@@vesogry No one is, we're all sinners, hence why he wanted to confess every little sin as a monk.

@@reformedcatholic457 Stop with this nonsense: "We are all sinners".

Same! No icons, just the word of God!

Who Cannoned the New Testament? 😂🍿

@@joehouston2833 The Roman church said they did, they didn't follow it though. Just a bunch of hypocrites.

@@chn92694I don’t think you know the full history, as in the timing of teachings. Do you believe in the Trinity? How does it work? Where did that come from? Where is the love of Christ in calling someone names with little proof or understanding of historical facts. Learn about the early church, and why you believe and interpret the Bible the way you do. You will actually be impressed, not mean. God both allowed and blessed the divisions for His reasons just as Barnabas and Paul did, so they would multiply efforts in spreading the Gospel. Not all of Man’s mistakes happened without God somehow using it for His purposes. We can’t go back. That’s what arguing over the internet is. We must simply humble ourselves and pray. He will heal rifts. We can only make them greater.

@@loveyourenemy7796 oh please, Jesus called the pharisees hypocrites for the same reason, when they valued tradition more than the actual Word of God. And for the record, Luther was excommunicated by the Bishop of Rome not the other way around. They did him dirty. Yes, protestants believe in trinity just like the catholic and orthodox. They just don't believe in the infallibility of the pope just like the orthodox church.

There're have been even masons among patriarchs of Constantinople. And among reformers there were masons too.

interesting

That's nonsense i don't believe this is true

Heresies are often labeled after their founder. The Catholic Church labeled the followers of heretic Luther as Lutherans. Lutheranism Marcionism Nestorianism Pellagianism Arianism Montanism etc...

Incorrect. Prove GOD did not empower the Twelve at Pentecost to judge anyone? The twelve could foregive and retain. You Protestants have no way around history. Why has no Angels ever visited your churches?

​@duanewoodson9804 how do you know ? You stop talking about spiritual things if you're not spiritual. Some of us have the gift of Discernment of Spirits and see angels during services.

​@@audeladuvoileofficiel2138 you are nu.ts

@@audeladuvoileofficiel2138 BS! Now you are a liar. Prove you have any attributes similat to the Prophet Samuel or Joel or Nathan or Isiah! You have never been visited by Melchizedek nor Enoch nor Elijah nor Elisha nor Methuseleh!

Waar haal jij het vandaan dat het 12 personen waren en wie of wat hebben ze ge-of veroordeeld?

😂 exactly

and Mar Mari Emmanuel isn't even Orthodox

​@@vasyapupkin25But he was from Orthodox tradition, wasn't he?

@@sr3821 He used to be a bishop in the Assyrian Church of the East which is not Orthodox, so no, he wasn't

Actually Romans 9

Nope. Romans 9 is talking about the fact that those who follow God would live lives characterized by faithfully putting their trust in him. God has laid THE FRAMEWORK for what it means to serve Him in the beginning, however the individual remains free to serve Him. There would be no struggle to follow Jesus if you as an individual had unmerited disfavor (destined for hell in the very beginning). Again, the concept of unmerited disfavor is a concept Calvin borrowed from St Augustine who borrowed it from popular Latin Roman tradition, it's not Biblical at all. Augustine's book City of God is just an allegory akin to Pilgrim's Progress, a primer for his beliefs on Christianity. That is all.

More to the point, he got it from Luther, albeit he went further with double predestination. The Council of Orange reads a lot like Luther but specifically excludes Calvin's double predestination.

St. Augustined and the Catholic Church have a view of predestination limited to some. What heretic Calvin taught was a double predestination and rightfully rejected by the Church. Calvin invented what is known as Calvinism.

@@jaytv4eva you haven't made an honest effort to explain Romans 9. Go read it for yourself without rose coloured glasses. I became a Calvinist when I read it fir the first time

Those doctrines are heretical and not found in Sacred Scripture or Sacred Church Tradition

​@@Gandalf_the_GOATNot heretical it is way of life

@@tigstuersumo6454 No its not, and if it is, then give me some Early Church writings or Bible passages.

​@@Gandalf_the_GOAT Challenge accepted: Re justification - that is, God making or crediting us as righteous - through faith alone: -God so loved the world that all who believed may not perish, but have eternal life. -This is the work of God, that you believe in His Son he has sent. -He who believes but doesn't keep my word, I do not judge, but the one who rejects my word will be judged. -Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life. -Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die. -Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst. -Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. There's 10 or so of these in the gospel of John. Note that believes is the same word as faith, it's like Greek has a verb "he faiths, I faith, you faith", etc. It's rendered believe in English. Whoever believes, whoever believes, whoever believes. No qualification. And yet you guys still think after an entire lifetime of faith, you get judged and end up in purgatory, it's absurd. Or Romans 3: But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it- the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. Romans 4: And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing of the one to whom God counts righteousness apart from works: “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; blessed is the man against whom the Lord *will not* count his sin.” - note the future tense. Then Ephesians 2: For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast.

@@Gandalf_the_GOAT I assume you have read your Bible at least once when you ask such a question? But on the other hand these five statements are definitly in the Holy Bible so I can't see why you would call it heretical. The NT is for example filled with 'solus Christus'. In the gospel according to St. John you can find the 7 'I AM-statements' for example. Sola gratia can be found in St. Paul's letter to the Ephesians chapter 2. Let me finish with the last one, Soli Deo Gloria. Is that not the main reason for a Christian to live, to speak and even to breath? God bless you!

WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT ? BITTER PROTESTANT ?

Christ wasn't talking about money. He was talking about sin, and if you sin you are a servant of sin and not God. That's why Christ said you cannot serve both God and Mammon

@@eddardgreybeard If money (mammon) is written, it is written.

@@eddardgreybearddude mammon means riches. aka money.

@@chrisvibz4753 He's one of the 7 princes of hell, dude. Either way, to suggest there can be no structural authority of the Church is objectively incorrect.

Which protestant group out of 800milion?🤔 Just curious. nothing attached

Which one? I would like to learn about protestant and Catholic aswell please.

@@AyantuMSC I am Baptist. What questions exactly would you want to be answered concerning Catholics or Protestants.

@@Explaining_Christianity Thank you. I have many questions but Can you explain what exactly Pulgatory mean? 2. Why Catholics have 72 books in the bible and others have 66?

@@AyantuMSC Hi, Purgatory is a belief particularly in Catholicism, that there is a temporary state after death where souls undergo purification before entering heaven. It is seen as a place of cleansing and preparation for those who die in a state of grace but are not yet fully purified. About your second question, the difference in the number of books in the Bible between Catholics and other Christian traditions is due to the inclusion of additional books known as the deuterocanonical books in the Catholic Bible. These books, totaling 7 (Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees), are considered inspired by Catholics but are not included in Protestant Bibles. Here are some reasons why we reject the 7 books. Protestants do not include the seven additional books known as the deuterocanonical books in their Bible for several reasons: 1. These books were not part of the Hebrew Bible, which was the Scripture of the Jewish people and the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. 2. Some early Jewish and Christian scholars did not consider these books to be on the same level of inspiration as the rest of the Old Testament. 3. During the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century, reformers like Martin Luther questioned the canonicity of these books and ultimately excluded them from the Protestant Bible. As a result of this few reasons above and many others, we believe in the principle of "sola scriptura," which means Scripture alone is the ultimate authority for faith and practice. Since these books were not universally accepted as Scripture by early Jewish and Christian communities, Protestants chose not to include them in their canon.

What you stated in the last sentence sums up why Protestantism is hypocritical on top of being false. Protestants claim that the Bible is the sole source of their beliefs, and yet they don't like institutional religion. The 1st century Church was institutionalized. Protestants dislike the idea of institutionalized religion because they don't want anyone telling them what they're supposed to believe or do, especially if it's God.

No one denies that. But you CAN be excommunicated from any Christian denomination

@@DMG118 I understand that but being excommunicated from any religious group has little to nothing to do with your relationship with God.

​@@DMG118 The preacher says condemned to hell

@@hdsamte the bible says different

May I ask which region of India? Hello from Germany.

@@Bobbel888 Most likely Kerala where Saint Thomas did his ministry

Proud too be Protestant from India

I'm from Kerala ​@@vitesseextreme

​@@user-dm5nj1qd1hProtestant from India you are joking?

Not applicable when the reference to Jesus doesn't match the correct identity.

🐂💩

Blasphemy.

@@johnjelinek3983how do you know what OP is referencing? John 3:16

@@simonslater9024John 3:16

Correct

As if going to Mass saved anybody ever😂😂 ONLY CHRIST SAVES.

Excommunication is a punishment of last resort to afford the person to repent and return. Even after an excommunication is imposed, the person, upon repentance can be fulled united in communion with the Church again.

@@chrissobolewski5509 the Pope is the ANTICHRIST.

@@javierherrera8782 Christ is present at the Mass. What person would not want to go where the Lord is? Where his one sacrifice is made present to us?

How does one verse Romans 1:17 ? Try to understand why Paul was writing to the Church in Rome, a church that he did not establish? Writing around AD55-60, Rome was largely pagan; early Christians were being persecuted. In AD64, Nero martyred Christians, accusing them of starting the great fire. Rome persecuted Christians until the Edit of Milan in AD 318 when Christianity became a legal religion, with all the others, and persecution stopped. Sola Scriptura developed as a response to refute that the Church was the custodian and authority of Truth of Sacred Scriptures. Any one could read and interpret - Martin Luther’s revolt against Pope Leo X. And the One Body of Christ has reformed to 45,000 Protestant denominations. Not quite what Martin Luther envisaged

You are justified by works and not by faith alone . Book of Saint James in the first bible until Martin Luther chuck it out .

Summed up as Jas 2:26 NET2 For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead. Saved by faith and wotsk is the evidence of salvation

Martin Luther added the word "alone". In other words, he altered scripture.

Christianity is not a religion it's a intemate relationship with Christ.

His grace is his proper title

Still you might educate yourself on precise historical facts.

@@Bobbel888 Like what ?? Please explain

@@arpitalexander8809 Don't get me wrong, I love the Bishop an am aware of his devotion to Christ. If you follow lecture and comments, Luther is a Catholic, not a Protestant, though protestantism developped on a political level based on his questioning Roman Catholic examples. Wrong is the idea, that Luther was an orthodox candidate, e.g. he rejected celibacy as non-biblical invention by the church, while I think Eastern Church also requires this for certain level of priests.

@@Bobbel888 Oh Cool

Amen. Lets put our faith and hopes in Chrisr alone. Let him be The King.

30.000 denominations 😂

There wasn’t even a complete bible until the 4th century. How can sola scriptura be true ?

@christopherton The gospels and letters are 1st century documents. Sola scriptura is a very simple and powerful way to be sure you are correct. It doesn't mean we only follow the bible. It means if something contradicts the bible, we choose the bible over tradition, over miracles, over everything else. Can you add things if they don't contradict the scriptures? Of course. But if your additions contradict the bible, they are invalid. This is why all the main issues with denominations are things that are not clear in the bible. Can we pray to saints? The bible says we only have one mediator, but the bible also says we will become co-heirs to the throne with Christ, so by grace the saints could have already become that. The same goes for Mary. Christian doctrinee differences are very difficult to solve, and there's a reason people disagree. My personal thesis: I love Christ with all my heart and soul and mind, I ask to be saved, and I already apologize for any doctrinal mistakes I might do out of ignorance. I like praying the rosary. Do I make a mistake in doing that? I am not sure. But if I am, I apologize about that and since it's done by faith, it's not counted as a sin.

Faith without Works = ? And works without Faith = ? Ora Ēt... ?

Jesus neither wrote nor reviewed the New Testament, so if you trust the bible you trust humans who wrote books after Jesus was not there anymore to correct them. But Jesus created the Church.

celibacy is not biblical

@@Bobbel888 Demonstrably false. Paul in 1 Conrithians 7 states that it is good for a man to not have sex with a woman. He wishes that people would remain single like him. And finally, he states that those who aren't married can better devote themselves on the concerns of God rather than worldly affairs.

​@Cklert Peter was married as in the bible we can read about his mother-in-law. Clearly, celibacy was imposed because of the catholic interest to maintain their lands and resources and many other reasons. We can see the consequences of this in the lives of some priests who burn with passion and cannot control themselves with kids and women around.

⁠@@andrelima536 Celibacy was instituted to ensure that a priest's son would not take over the local parish.

@@EsotericPenguin indeed

Energy healer and mystic? Didn't God say to stay away from such people?

@@pitAlexx that's what happened when Jesus healed on the Sabbath

God bless you.

Have fun with that the Roman Catholic Church is unrecognizable

The Church was one indeed, paved by the seven Holy World Councils. In 1054 the west was anathematized by the Church because they changed the faith by adding to the nicene creed! Since the truth ultimately cannot be changed. They added fillioque and after they were anathematized they invented crazy doctrines like indulgences, papal infallabillity, and more so, they used the name of the Lord for control and this is why the dark ages came. More so! Peter is the rock which is Christ. He is the cornerstone. Christ appointed His 12, not just Peter. All Bishops were first among equals. All patriarchs are first among equals. And now some of them are snakes and this is why Christ will strike them very soon if they do not repent. Because they keep the Children of Israel as slaves. Just as the pope of Rome! They are the great harlot that fornicate against God and His Church that was, is and always will be only one.

Jesus wasn't Catholic. God doesnt call you to follow a religion, he calls you to follow him. Period.

@@OnlyKingJames you cannot be even Baltized in the name of Jesus and you cannot join His Kingdom if not through the one faith. The Catholics changed it and were cut from the church 1054. The great harlot that corrupted the earth with her fornication is His Church that allowed this.

I am sorry your parents and priests failed you. You must read yoursled back into the Church

@@leslieniiattohjnr8483Very judgemental statement.

@@Knobbgobbler It is what it. The truth is unpleasant and uncomfortable

@@leslieniiattohjnr8483 A blatant lie doesn't turn into "truth" just because it's unpleasant. The criterion for truth certainly isn't uncomfortableness. Study the Kingdom of God in the New Testament and then compare it to the Catholic Church. The apostles wouldn't recognize the church in Catholicism. They would say it's 100% paganry.

@@LOlsson-i9qso where is the Church the apostles will recognize? You can't even tie yourself back to a single Apostle

proties are satanic heretics.

He's just trying to convert some protestans, but yes.

This fake Bishop is a complete joke.

​@johnlacorti6612 why?

As you see over the comments, it's a good discussion base. Leo X simply was the pope of that time and his comrades were "not an example".

also they pray to Mary and Saints

Read the book called, the great controversy, by Ellen G white, the whole history is there.

Wrong. Faith alone is not a biblical principle. Read James. The Catholic Church determined which books would be in the bible.

@@uriahthehittite1672 Jesus said who ever believes in me will live. He said it is finished. And many many versus explains why in faith alone through Christ alone. We accept Jesus our savior we follow him he baptize us with his Holy Spirit and sanctify us. We need to be holy just like he is holy and that happens only through him as he does the work it’s long process and it takes time but it’s not because of us or our work so no one will boast. We don’t need saints to know Jesus, he broke the barrier in the temple we have full access to him because of his grace.

Not true. And how many books did Luther want to remove from the Bible? It was Martin Luther who tossed out the seven books considered canonical since the beginning of Church history. He also rejected the epistle to the Hebrews and the book of Revelation. He also called the epistle of James “an epistle of straw” because James 2:14-26 conflicted with his personal theology on good works.

​@@morant3057incorrect, James wasn't understood in the light of 'faith alone'.

@@SamSups Great, didn't understand something according to his opionion and therefore deleted all the books that caused him consternation. Tell me, where is 'faith alone' in the Bible? Book, Chapter and Verse please.

that is something a protestant would say get out of here 😂😂😂😂

​@@carlosmurillo2264give me verse from Bible where explicitly and exaclty says that apostles were part of any denomination, God does not care whether you Catholic, Orthodox, Protrstant, Baptist, etc.. as long as you believe in The Word, have been baptized and live accordingly to His will not our, sheesh open a Bible for once

​@@IesusChristusVivit The Apostles were called "Christians" in Acts 11:26.

Protestantism was a half-hearted attempt at giving up Christianity altogether. Only the watered-down version of the bible is acceptable in this day and age to the point that it is now irrelevant.

@@Gandalf_the_GOAT thank you for proving my point, I was talking about denominations, and you just proved it doesn't mention a single denomination, just to be a follower of Christ

Believe it or not, i am thinking the same thing too.......as they say about the calvinists theory of pre-destination. Thats what the catholic did......and as a portestant, our church are against this "pre-destination" theory.

.....and hearing this things, now i know why orthodox church have in common with protestantism....not all but many of its teachings where similar to protestant church.....i observe this as i watch an orthodox mass......

@Matteo-1 Christ gave the Peter The Keys and Petrine Doctrine(Catholics are Christian, Orthodox and Protestants are heretics and schismatics who must convert to Catholicism for unity). Those outside the Rome do not follow Jesus and are therefore not Christians and outside the Church there is no salvation and only baptized Catholics in a state of grace do(Vatican II is not Catholic and is heretical like Orthodoxy and Protestantism).

Bro God saved me and loved me without that I knew anything about these all dominations.. it's not about them at all but personal relationship with God being born again through the spirit and start the journey​@@johnpolitis7929

CORRUPT DIRTY RU-vid DELETING ME AGAIN

DIRTY DICTATOR RU-vid DELETING ME AGAIN

IMMORAL RU-vid STOP DELETING MY INNOCUOUS COMMENTS

Try convincing an Ortho

Christ did pray for us to be one like he and his father are on. Is that it?

@@leslieniiattohjnr8483 Yes, and the church Jesus has for us is the church that cannot be destroyed, which is the body of Christ. So when we are to be one with the body of Christ, we are connected to God spiritually, not physically to any of the churches. The physical church, regardless of which denomination, is merely a place of worship. The real being one with the body of Christ is through the words of God (Bible) and the presence of the Holy Spirit. I'm sure you can agree with me that there have been some heinous actions done by church leaders before even tho some of them probably still considered the member of the church, if they have not repented, they would not be counted as being one with the body of Christ. So us protestants simply focus more on the spiritual side than the physical side. As the physical is often the manifestation of the spiritual

@@shikyokira3065 Does that mean HE and his Father argue all the time and have different opinions? According to you, we are fulfilling his prayer request by being one. I have never seen or heard any human work in contrast with each other, the only time that occurs is when there is a disease. We have certainly missed his prayer point and we are doing what we think is GOOD! How do we claim to be Christians when we don't resemble the Early Church in any way, especially in terms of worship. Man has created what he FEELS is right for GOD? Protestants (I don't even like to use that word anymore) climg soo much to the idea of SOLA SCRIPTURA yet everything is in total contrast to the Bible, they pick what suits them and ignore what doesn't suit them. The Early Church was one in heart and mind (faith, belief, worship and teachings) as described in the Acts of the Apostles even without the Bible in existence, the Bible should have actually brought us together ❤ as it did amongst them when the Bible came into existence. Protestanism just doesn't resemble the Early Church in anyway. Hypothetically speaking, if St. Peter and the Apostle were alive today, how do you think we would look like? Would there still be denominations? Yes! why? because manking has the innate desire to always create something hmthat fits him. The question is, would they be justified in doing so? NO. I would put my life down to bring all Protestants sects back to the Church. I know the Church is TRUE our FAITH is true. Protestants are just too stubborn and ignorant to humble themselves and one their eyes well enough.

reformation comes from SATAN. counter-reformation comes from GOD./

Just like Adam and Eve, and satan, they all commited disobedience.

@@user-er9zc8ni1s I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. LUKE 13 v 3 KJV

Amen. I left the catholic church. Born and saved since 2016

@@AbletonLiveTechs i left american evengelicalism and embrace the holy catholic church since 2020. Im saved by God in the holy, catholic chruch...

Spoken like a true protestant, which I am one too. However, if indeed the Catholic or Orthodox church is the physical church Jesus Himself started, perhaps we should stop caricaturing their beliefs, for instance, calling it "pagan", while ours is as much pagan to them as it is among us even towards each other. I'm actually considering joining one of the original churches, tired of this bickering among each other over not even being able to discern basic verses, each denomination reading it this way then that way. I don't believe God is a God of confusion

@wesleygafoor7050 I don’t find much difficulty with the verses . You can always look at the classic amplified or search the definitions of words which I do sometimes. However when I say pagan I’m talking the Eucharist worship with the sun imagery , praying to saints that replaced praying to the false gods, the outfits of the po.pe that are exactly the same as Babylonian figures. The architecture with pagan symbols or Masonic things like at the Vatican the buildings representing male and female sexual organs. Their telescope named. L.u.c.i.f.e.r. The idea their leader is infallible, then changing the Ten Commandments . I grew up as a Catholic and I found zero extra knowledge , my relationship with God was always intimate outside of catholic rituals or traditions, and it only grew when I saw a church online that read verse by verse the whole bible. Athey creek. In the Catholic Church all I ever got was the same New Testament stories and almost nothing of the old or revelation, it was just Catholic holidays or rituals, a lot of kneeling and standing .

@heythere6983 Will have to look up all that. Might be made up conspiracies. Fair enough, thank you for sharing your experience with me. Haven't been to a church in a long time and feel the need for a traditional one, which is why I'm looking into it. I'm glad you found one that aided your spiritual walk. I'm just reluctant to trust subjective things like feelings or personal revelation and interpretation of scripture

consider the unity of church, Epheser 4.

Confession is an important thing in order to live a victorious christian life. We all get stuck in sins sometimes that we can't get delivered of without that sort of accountability. If you're able to make it on your own just you and Jesus - then God bless you, but most people aren't.

An idiot alone, a heretic alone, an incult alone. You were nothing if it were not by the Catholic Churc.

that doesn't make any sense.

it does​@@allthingsgardencad9726

Rice alone, water alone, cabbage alone, cheese alone, sugar alone, no taste alone

Absolutely unbiblical.

That is Anglican. Study again.

@@andrewrestu4982 if you're saying that I'm incorrect when I say that Henry was protestant the only one that needs to study is you

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@rp-2f I think what he is saying is that Henry VIII founded the Anglican Church which is Protestant but not the Protestant movement as a whole.

@@dhoff648 which proves my point even further.

@@rp-2f but Protestantism already existed. The reformation started in 1517 with Martin Luther’s 95 theses. The Church of England was founded in 1534.

God bless you.

Hell Save u from heaven

@@vinnygoombatts1458 God bless you. Praise the Lord

Oh...how you miss scriptures

You mean all those who died catholic starting from 1st century AD are going to hell? God just abandoned those who lived between that 1500 years?

@@frost1804 there was no Catholic Church this early bro. It was the Early Church that was devolped by many different beliefs within it. The Catholic first became more seperate from the Orthodox Church centuries later.

Elect and reprobate is true but God does not make that choice. He knows the choices we will make but he doesn't brand someone reprobate/elect at the foundation of the world or in our mothers' wombs. A reprobate would have no culpability for his/her actions here on earth if God predetermined that person to be a reprobate before they even drew their first breath. We make that choice and it's arrogant for someone to say I was once saved and always saved. Then there's the other side of someone who heard of Christ then hears about Calvin's doctrine but is struggling in their sin and they say to themselves I must be that person who is a reprobate so once damned always damned. We die daily and try to follow a narrow path. God's grace is there to pick us up when we fall but it's arrogant to know if the state of our souls tomorrow would merit heaven.

@@buzztrucker God foreknows who will repent and who will not as God is allknowing. He picks and said that the self righteous cannot enter heaven. But those that repent have been given life and kept alive and been drawn in by the gospel trough the grace of God. The point of election is to give all glory for our salvation to God alone.

God created us in His image to share in His creation for eternity. Yet death came into the world through Satan. And as love is a free choice, man has the choice to love God or turn to evil ways. Hod takes no pleasure in any of His creation turning away. The Genesis account of Esau and Jacob, used by Paul in Romans, has been completely misinterpreted by Calvinism.

@@chrissobolewski5509 Genesis 50 verse 20: But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. Its telling you cant put your finger on what Calvinism has wrong.

@@Eskon2 I sense you may have quoted Gn50:20 out of context. Here we have Joseph forgiving his brothers following the death of the father Jacob. His brothers fear retribution for having treated Joseph badly, yet he forgives them by telling them that what they had intended for evil, God turned into good. The gifts of prophecy Joseph had been given by God, saved the tribe of Jacob, to become the 12 tribes of Isreal whom Moses then freed from slavery some 400 years later. Nothing to do with Calvinism.

THE ONLY REASON FOR THE SPLIT IS BECAUSE OF THE DIVISION IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE !

It was not his decision. He became a gear in a sequence of civil wars resulting in reformation.

He made them apocryphal the inter testamental books weren’t removed until the 17 or 1800s

The Catholic and the Protestant New Testament are exactly the same. Where they defer is in the books of the Old Testament………….where the Protestant and Hebrew Bibles are exactly the same.

@@michaelcerean1990 And that's what going back to the teachings of early fathers and the Apostles

Ive read that apocryphal books are questionable in historical accuracy and some were written long after the time the supposed authors lived (ex. Enoch).

Was the stupid Christian