Marc Lamont Hill Debates Parent Objecting to How Race is Taught in School 

he def seems to really have an issue with Asia.

Call it a deflection or a false equivalency, this guy has no justification for his point of view. It's pure denialism about the racism that runs thru American history.

Try to listen. THE POINT he made was Japanese used racist terms for whites BEFORE America existed, so race was not invented by white Americans. Implying otherwise in a book for children is outrageously racist and destructive.

@@j2a2m James has it accurately. Brad was proving racism existed before America was founded. I vaguely remember the ancient Egyptians had racism too. .

@@j2a2m James has it accurately. Brad was proving racism existed before America was founded. I vaguely remember the ancient Egyptians had racism too.

It is no problem at all, people are free to state their opinion and ideas. It is up to you to make a counterargument if you disagree. It is intellectually lazy if you just call things a problem without stating why. You are not going to change anyones mind that way

@doogeehowser simple, because they have an opionion about that opinion, that is what we call debate. Look it up, it is something from long time ago...

@doogeehowser It is more like we have different definitions of "free". Yours seems like "I tell and you listen", mine strives to have a debate with all parties. Yess, even with KKK ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ORp3q1Oaezw.html

@doogeehowser I notice that you are not listening, so I will stop talking now.

@doogeehowser What has Candice Owens said that bothers you so much?

One moment Brad is like it shouldn't be taught, next minute he's like it isn't balanced on how its taught and some things are missing... I'm like can you pick one 🤦‍♂️

@@beigefox6579 You mean the one moment I was talking about a story for five-year-olds that preached one race invented racism, and the next moment when I was discussing a 14-book reading list for an upper classman high school class that lacked balance? Yep. And...? You didn't even pay attention did you. (Eye roll)

Sounds about ⚪ doesn't it?

He wants some c. ** ns added in. 😆 🤣

@@bradschaeffer5736 I wonder if you'd take the same approach as it applies to how the history of the holocaust and anti semitism is taught in schools, Nr.Scharffer.

I did? What horrific actions did I defend? I'll wait.

@@bradschaeffer5736 you are right you didn’t defend so I will apologize for my reaction HOWEVER you low key tried some whataboutisms when you referred to what the Japanese were doing. That had nothing to do with the question.

@@KevinGloverpost24 He asked me if I believed the claim of this children’s book that Whites “made up an idea called race.” I merely offered right off the top of my head an example of how another race, Japanese (who considered themselves a race as much as nationality) brutalized Chinese and Filipinos because they saw them as an inferior race. QED. Plus Marc is wrong about the Caste system. It is very much about race hierarchy. I brought it up for a reason. So herein shows that race is not solely the construct of one race but a sad part of human history. All human history. A book like that does nothing but keep it going. Apology accepted and thank you for that.

typical white response..

@@greenandrew5378 Another intellect weighing in. Not sure what a "white response" even means...other than you are clearly a racist. How proud you must be.

EXACTLY

And, "they", don't want to be called out now on things, "they", are yet doing; that happens better so if melanated people forget about what was done by, "them", historically to melanated people based on the abject practiced racism of, "them". And Irish is still european.

Nooo. We don't want leftist, revisionist, demonstrably false "history" taught. Would you be happy with your kids sitting in a class on race wherein the only books on the syllabus were by Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, etc. and the only articles allowed were featured in Breitbart, Daily Wire, The Blaze and National Review? If not why not? Afraid of history?

That's not history@@bradschaeffer5736 that's white people attempting to focus on what they want how they want and disregard anything that goes against it. It has been happening for generations, the point is we're not listening to your bs anymore.

No. That's history. Like it or not the country in which you currently live (although you are free to leave it at any time) was founded by white males. Sorry, that's not racism, that is just a fact. The majority of whom were NOT slaveholders (some like Franklin were vocal abolitionists even). Being taught about these men is not whitewashing history, any more than learning about Shakah Zulu is blackwashing Zulu history or the Tokugawas asianwashing Japanese history. . And I recall in the history classes I took learning about great women, great blacks, great Indian chiefs, great immigrants who did great things in this country. So I don't know what history class you took. I think you are looking for a fiction class. History doesn't work that way. . As for disregarding...here are a few things I was never taught in history class. Did you know that without the complicity and cooperation of African tribal chieftains the slave trade to the New World would have been pretty much impossible? Did you ever learn how guilty of perpetrating this African slave trade other Africans were? Of course not. Did you learn that Native Americans routinely raided other tribes, burning their village, slaughtering their men and boys and herding away their women into slavery? That they tortured and committed mass execution? That the great "horse culture of the plains" was only a thing because Europeans introduced the horse to North America? Did you learn about the Rape of Nanking? The brutality of the Sino-Japanese wars? In short, the myriad of sins committed by ALL races in ALL continents? Of course not. That might hurt feelings. . I couldn't care less if you're not listening anymore. You haven't for generations and the collapse of the black underclass is testament to that. So don't listen. Keep yourself down and blame others. All it does is give me one less person to compete with in this world. By all means, be the KKK's useful idiot.

Involvement my ass. Put down your crutch and work hard.

@Tatu Dosu EXACTLY!!

@@Eragon1962 lol crutch?? Explain??Because I have a successful practice here in California…… what does this have to do with anything I wrote??

@Death Rattle , hard workers were lynched too. Now what? Tell the truth.

No we acknowledge our ansestors were slave owners. Yes teach it. Teach it ALL THOUGH. WHITE SUPRIMACY is so racist it makes people fuel racism. Black people are not the only people that suffered. History tells this if you went to a University and have an Education, you'd see that. Indians, Ashians, Mexicans and Jews are they not people too? Were their skin color the reason for mass destruction? Yes. Its time to move on and be free. Obama as a black U.S, 2 term President says something. let says America as a whole isn't so racist

Fact and now is time to tear it down and build back better🖤🇲🇦❤🇺🇲🏳️‍🌈😷

Victimhood

This comment deserves a 1000 likes.

@TOLD YA people like you never want to examine the culture on why some succeed n others don't. Easier to blame n blame systems n not look into that mirror.

@TOLD YA when will he tell black youth to emulate what he did vs what his drug dealing brother did. That intact families vs white supremacy trumps everything in life in general. Keep waiting. Bnc makes money of grievance not solutions. Hence victimhood.

You really thought I meant they should write a children's book? Really?

@@bradschaeffer5736 Yes since you just got done claiming their books are not being taught in schools lol. I don’t understand how anyone can take you seriously.

@@seanwjones07 Make sense then come back to me.

@@bradschaeffer5736 What you can’t read now ? That makes more sense since you didn’t even read any of the books you were railing against. Hahaha! 🤡🤡🤡🤡

@@bradschaeffer5736 around 9:55 you mention that there are no “Right of center authors” then you say “There is no Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, No Booker T. Washington no Burgess Owens no Candace Owens” the latter two have no business being listed with the first 3 on any list in regards to writing books. So yeah no Burgess Owens No Candace Owens I don’t want even want Terell Owens writing a children’s book on race. 😆

Bullshit, we don't have to give a damn about how you feel about the past.

This is not a debate. This is a discussion.

Which is being racist for the most part

I know it's so frustrating. I'm wondering, how is teaching about racism or decrying racism a 'left-of-center' position?

@@SunnyandNova Tell me what I said that is "racist"? (That word is so overused by people like you at this point it has lost all meaning and is just met with eye-rolls by those not paralyzed by wokeness)

@@bryansiphomartin7462 A left-of-center position puts the primary blame for the underperformance of the black community on the heads of the white "racist system". A right-of-center view offers that the fact that 3:4 black babies are born into fatherless homes, or that the welfare state enervates and creates unmotivated wards of the state rather than driven citizenry, or that public schools have become union-controlled jobs programs that pump out functional illiterates mostly in the minority neighborhoods for a decade may all have more to do with why so many blacks are left behind than "white supremacists" and "the impacts of slavery". Get it?

Additionally, if he understood the difference between racism and prejudice, he would’ve never brought up Japan in the first place.

@@rainbeauxunicorn5237 sure, let's do that. Racism in Japan is when they view people from Southeast Asia as being a different race and generally being just immigrants doing manual labor to send money back home, prejudice is when they create an ethnic group called burakumin out of Japanese people that did "unclean" jobs and proceeded to systemically discriminate against them for hundreds of years, the yakuza are mainly comprised of that ethnic group. It's better socially, and until very recently even legally, to be a different race in Japan, which many Japanese don't consider themselves similar to Koreans or Chinese and claim to be able to see the difference, than to be an ethnic group preexisting in Japan. Racism isnt that stupid power+prejudice statement, we all know the white guy calling a black guy a slur is just as bad as a black guy calling an Asian guy a slur.

@@jaxmiller724… I didn’t ask for any Japanese information. Additionally, no. It’s not as bad. Those two scenarios don’t equate. The context and nuance of those scenarios stem from white supremacy but they don’t carry the same weight.

@@rainbeauxunicorn5237 They literally have nothing to do with white people, it has to do with Buddhism. If a theory is any good it can be applied to other areas and not immediately fail, this isn't math. The claim is that Europeans first created racial categories, which no, they didn't. You just actively care so little about any non European culture that you assume we created everything. Asian countries actively considered each other entirely different races and enacted laws specifically targeting others, they also made ethnic groups out of people in their own society and specifically targeted them. Just because there aren't black people involved doesn't mean it wasn't as bad if not worse and there's a longer history of discrimination based on skin color and perceived racial background all without white people for most of it.

@@jaxmiller724… 😂 clearly you don’t understand white supremacy proven by your first sentence. So there’s no point in reading the novel like response.

There is no need to read all these books completely, Reading some and seeing the names of the authors and the titles is enough to conclude the list is unbalanced and a lot of other views are missing. Everyone has some books he/she did not read or does not know each and every line of. It is a cheap trick of Marc to attack people on details and cause a riot. It is unproductive and does not help to improve the world.

So if I present you with a syllabus that just has Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas you would not be able to comment on its ideological leaning because you haven't read cover to cover every one? Is that your argument? Because that is MLH's. By that right, then you have no right to ever say anything about Sowell until you have read all 50 of his books (there might be one in there that supports CRT after all, I mean how do you know if you haven't read them all right?) or read every one of Clarence Thomas' opinions as well as his autobiography. So, go lock yourself in a room and read everything these two have written or shut up. That's your position?

The problem isn’t that you didn’t read it all. It’s that you couldn’t come up with an example from any of the books that was racist. And yes the concept of race as we know it in America was made by Europeans. Before that there were black skinned Roman emperors. The word race is literally a European word. The Japanese and the Chinese to most people are the same race just different nationalities and ethnicity.

@@RAPXILLA The Japanese considered themselves a different race than the Chinese. Not just nationality. As did the Germans when they invaded Russia. The phrase "Untermenschen" means those they considered racially and socially inferior. Race is a universal construct. This is such an inanely semantic argument that splits hairs to defy common sense. (And I assure you, MLH saw me as a white man more than I did he as a Black man). BTW You don't think when blacks in Africa first laid eyes on Europeans they didn't see them as a different race?

@@RAPXILLA The racism in China and Japan was just as bad and so were the consequences. Were they different in detail? Yes Did it have a different name? Sure But these are just details, the mechanism is basicly the same, one group treating another group as less purely based on not relevant characteristics. Stop putting people in groups, stop think in they and us, learn from history it has had horrible consequences. So do not tell children they are (victim/quilty of) something based on the skincolor. Tell them should judge everyone on things that matter. Don't fight racism by introducing new racism.

Exactly. Well said. I was thinking the same thing. Owens is a conservative shill, grifter, and not a serious thinker. I'm not familiar enough with Sowell to comment on whether he could be included (it would depend on the synthesis question the course comes up with). The course should most likely Booker T. Washington, and Zora Neale Hurston had conservative ideals. I, too, agree, as a liberal, that "self-determination and doing everything to excel" is a quality value. I doubt, though, Brad would agree that both this value and systemic racism coexists.

You and this interviewer are unfortunately like alot of black folks these days. I was married to a black woman for about 6 years. You all have some anecdotal experience with racist white people, and you've simultaneously felt left out of the white privilege party your whole lives. Now you are in total victim mode, where if someone forgets to shake your hand at a business meeting you automatically go to "RACIST WHITE GUY HATES ME FOR BEING BLACK". You are in a negative state of mind that will get you nowhere in life. Remember, if you want to be an engineer, you have to do the work. It's that simple. Society will never reorder itself just to make you feel better. I suggest therapy

@@smallaxe4935 do you think because you were married to a black woman for 6 years, it gives you some incite to "black" American experiences. News flash I was married to a "white" woman for 15 years and there were times when her Uncles and Brothers would say racist things to me out of her presence overtly and covertly that I would not tell her or make a big deal about, and I am willing to bet your "black" wife did the same things. Not because it did not brother her, but because she loved you and did not want to come in-between you and your friends or family.

@@mikeaskme3530 That's some black privilege to be able to tell a white man he can't have SOME incite into black American experience after being married to a black woman for 6 years. To answer your question, yes, I do feel it gives me some incite. I was also made to feel uncomfortable by my ex and her family on multiple occasions. I was constantly reminded by them of how "white" I was for not knowing a certain song by such and such artist, or for the goofy way I dance, the list goes on. It goes both ways my friend. The difference is that us whites take it on the chin and don't whine every time a black person insults us purposefully or accidentally. You need to work on the pain around your anecdotal experiences with race, and move past it. I started losing my hair in my early 20's. I was rejected by a number of women specifically because of my hair. Did I write off all women as shallow because of this? No. I moved on from the pain and continued to give everyone a chance without judgement. You're too sensitive bro, stand up like you got a pair.

@@smallaxe4935 Your moniker is fitting. Small Axe, small mind,.....and to extrapolate, that is UNDOUBTEDLY basis for why your marriage didn't last long.

Candace speaks truth and you need to know that what they are teaching is MARXISM WITH A DAM BOW IT. Do your research. Your own race is racist. WORD!!!

@@miikojackson3528 she speaks nothing but falsity and is nothing more than a grifter. She cried racism when she was in school but probably doesn't express that to her mostly homogeneous audience because that would contradict with her narrative she uses to be prompted up while emptying people like you pockets.

@@krhodes12345 Candace is a useful tool for white Nationalist. Candace is the type of person that would lead her people to the slaughter house with a smile on her face and a twinkle in her eye. As long as she being paid she has no problem with what she's doing

He's basically trying to do what they've always done, tell us how to think. Conservatives aren't a race.

@@krhodes12345 Your lies don't work. We real American Patriots resist Marxism. You can't sugar coat it , parents aren't going for the lies. Your woke is a dam joke.

The devil will eventually show it self

Off the pedestal with white history!

@Josh Bagdon yes it's brain dead to think white people need to continue pushing their white centric narrative or "conservative" "right-wing" which literally seeks to conserve the white dominant status quo. It doesn't matter if it's said by a grifter like Candace Owens who is paid and given platform specifically because she unabashedly does white people's work for them while having a black face and white husband. Just like Kamala Harris, picked by white Biden to be a black supporter on his ticket. Yes, it's brain dead. We don't need to hear that side. White people aren't used to being sidelined or not getting the ability to approve the way history or the way the world works. It's not "narrow minded" just because you say it is or because we are disregarding the views favored by white people. And for your straw man of "what if all right wing teachers..." Bs all you have to do is go back to before things shifted away from purely right wing teachings.

@@indatube Now who sounds like someone regurgitating talking points.

Can you be specific please?

IT'S ALL ABOUT MARXISM WITH A BOW!!!! Do your research!!

@@miikojackson3528 If it's Marxism, your broke ass has not one thing to worry about. You will never be anything more than a trick for the elite!

Right. If he wants kids reading a book written by Candice Owens, you know this guy is simple minded.

@@V12_smoke my thing is if that’s his desire say it. Don’t sit on that forum without knowing what is in books he’s trying to critique. These individuals like this offer no honest critique of what they disagree with. They simply want to deny the evidence of historical implications of racism and then create barriers to honestly discussing it.

Yet very real. It’s the classic definition of white privilege on full display.

Marc said white people invented race which is one of the most unintelligent things I’ve heard on this show

@@DoubleL. Then who did? Race as a social contruct was created by Carl Linnaeus. A WHITE man from Sweden.

@@jademoni3622 How can someone ‘invent’ something biological though? Carl created the classification system we use for all living organisms, he didnt invent biological differences that different groups of people have. It’s just language to describe a reality. Not to mention, different “races” or “people of different ancestral regions”, if you don’t like that term, have been trying and failing to coexist long before the 1700’s.

@@DoubleL. Yet you fail to answer my question. Who created it? Carl Linnaeus created four groups of races white (Europeans), black (Africans), yellow (Asians) and red (Natives).

@@jademoni3622 I did answer your question….you chose to ignore my question to you. Race wasn’t ‘created’ by any human person. Is there someone that created males and females? Please just take 10 seconds to really think about this. Do you honestly believe everyone looked the same until the 1700’s and then this guy came along and all of a sudden people around the world had different skin colors and different physical characteristics? Lmao

Right lmaooo. Does he even realize he's contradicting himself? 🤔

History will show you that racism wasn't introduced by white people. People are naturally divisive. They'll divide each other based on anything. It's not a problem solely of white people. You can't fix this problem any way you try. I'm sure you yourself are also a racist. How is a racist supposed to solve racism? Labeling white people as being innately racist is racist in itself. I'm black and I've experienced discrimination from EVERY race, including black people.

@@tonytooshort Because teaching faux history is divisive. Another one who paid attention I see.

@@nadianorman2274 👍Wish more truly got it. An awful lot REALIST's are being labeled racists, pathetic and hurtful across the board. Then they'll always be those who use it as an angle, their of prohibition with their version of "bootlegging" in order to monetize. Like MLH and other Sharpton U alums.... The RHI (Race Hustling Industry) has never thrived more.

@@nadianorman2274 who was it introduced by? Is there proof that racism wasn’t introduced by Europeans? People naturally are divisive? Please dive more into this because kids doesn’t seem to share those thoughts or actions. I need a credible source to prove anything you to said to be true or is it just all opinion based?

Truth be told whites don't want to face the racist acts and atrocities they committed against Blacks and other minorities.

What do you do when they refuse to understand?

They know that there is no counter argument to race and this country's racist history. To even debate is not only a waste of time but useless.

He's doing all this talking and saying nothing smh!! He says it's one side of the spectrum...but that's the way it's always been with their history...one side of their spectrum that was made up. No conservatives participated, because they don't want to address the problem or hear the truth....pulling yet again from their hat of tricks to stop the truth 🙄. It doesn't teach divide....that's what their history taught....now it's a problem to hear real truth !! It teaches truth in its context and he's just going along with others he hear spouting lies over and over again....he keeps talking and talking...wanting us to hear everything and more he mumbling about, but don't want to give the host a chance to speak....or give us a chance to hear his pounts. That's what they do...just talk over and cut you off...but not speaking truth and saying absolutely nothing, sounding like Charlie's Browns teacher. They've adopted lies to debate to keep the history of how they created categorize, and demonized POC in this color...through how they look. They obviously ashamed of what whites did to our ancestors...or wouldn't try to hide it so. They want to create the next generation of piers and deniers, because they know their history is nothing but hate and lies....and it has become nothing but a danger to so called democracy in this country. When they know the truth....they want to suppress it!! They claim they're not racist and want everyone to get along....but their actions tell a different story (characters speak the truth over their words). They want to CONSERVE everything that continues to benefit THEM....and hope we just give up and stay quiet.....then it will disappear into the night!! Our children been uncomfortable....why are they so much better that they can't deal with uncomfortable truth. Well they're going to deal with it soon..m ..Poison Kay Ivey will deal with it soon. She too dam old to be so ignorant‼‼

@@BronzeSista what whites? I'm white and I've never done those things. Do I have to answer for others crimes? How about my children? Are they responsible for something that happened 150 years ago. How about my grand children or great grand children?

FACTS!!!!

it's sad TBH. I learned a lot about slavery and segregation in school, didn't bother me. This guy needs to raise mentally tougher children if learning the truth of our collective history will somehow scar them.

Do you not find it ironic that you use the analogy of a caste system? Where does "caste" come from. Who created it? You just proved my point. Thanks.

@@bradschaeffer5736 in the system of white supremecy color takes the place of caste. In the Hindu system it may have been based on social class. In the white supremecy system it is based on skin color.

@@rudimwongozi2169 Wrong. The caste system very much is based on race and even variations of skin tone within races. And it dates back 3,000 years--which I believe is earlier than 1619 yes? . The very fact that you used the term 'caste' demonstrates that race-based social hierarchies have been in place in decidedly non-European cultures for millennia. You defeated your own argument the moment you cited this--that you are ignorant of its origins (see Aryan migrations) and what it is about doesn't change the fact of history any more than being ignorant of the moon doesn't change the fact that it's still there. . You just validated my argument without even realizing it. That's why moronic racists like MLH should be shunned. Not only do they preach race hatred for profit, they do it based on bogus history that you yourself have just demonstrated.

@@bradschaeffer5736 first off you say I defeated my own argument? I'm not making any argument with you. I don't know you and give much less than a fuck what you think about anything. Is that clear? Yes I made the analogy of white racism to a color coded caste system. That analogy works for me and I don't give a fuck about YOU. Ok? We need to do whatever we can do to help people understand African people's historic grievance with Western European hegemony. That's the spirit in which I relay my thoughts.

@@bradschaeffer5736 I think perhaps you are trying to make the point that white supremecy or white racism is no new thing and no big thing. But that's YOUR issue. Our issue as Black people is to stay away from people like you and not allow the likes of you I'm our inner circles. It will cause less mayhem and mischief in our societies. Call it racist if you may. I don't care. I as a Black person don't care for white people like you. I already don't like YOU and I don't even know you personally. But you're another one of those sanctimonious know it alls with zero self awareness. You can't figure out why people like me CAN'T STAND people like you. You think the problem is me (lol). Or maybe you think the problem is Marc Lamont Hill. No. I assure you the problem is YOU (lol)

He killed Marc. The victimhood narrative is profitable

@@marohan you were watching the wrong show because that babbling idiot didn't kill anything

thank you for not grouping all whites are like him, Im appalled by Brad and his people, and he has an education

@@gjh9299 He was so uneducated, it was painful to watch. How are you bringing a syllabus of books, you have never read to argue about? LOL

That’s not a right-winger. He’s in New Jersey which is a state full of Democrat liberals.

Conservatives aren't a race. What does that have to do with the concept of race being taught? He wants conservatives to control the education of America's children.

@@ewalker1057 Congrats that might be the dumbest thing I've heard so far. We are all dumber for having heard it. The left utterly dominates the education system in this country. Conservatives controlling education is a threat so remote as to be comical.

@@miles3703 What you claim to have heard is reflection of your ears grabbed and the brain between them ability to assess. Has nothing to do with what was actually said. That's why you heard it that way. I am not responsible for your hearing or your brain's thought process. Who says the right should dominate education? The synonyms for education are very similar to those for the word liberal (the left). The opposite is for the word conservative (the right). Education is a forward progressive action of growth. Conservatism is not. Conservatives are the last people to decide the educational curriculum for America's children.

There are plenty of center-left and conservative authors that write on this stuff... step out of your echo chamber.

"Created the categorization of race". Still trying to figure how this is relevant 🤔

I agree. It is what it is! This country was by design to black & Native Americans. I guess we should not teach about slavery or the trail of tears.

Right!

@@MrWhiskeycricket Seriously, this guy literally did not allow Marc to talk, referenced books he hadn't read, and intentionally sidetracked any attempt at serious debate. Disingenuous at best. American history has whitewashed the brutality upon which this nation was built by controlling the narrative from its inception. All that aside, guy was just rude.

@@MrWhiskeycricket IDK. Brad's only concern was that specific Black authors who talk about "bootstraps" weren't included. That is a ridiculous notion and we all know why he wants Candace Owens, Thomas Sowell and Burgess Owens included. One is an economist and the other two Fox News shills. Dude had no real concerns only wanted to advance a certain point of view.

@@MrWhiskeycricket I usually don't buy into the "both sides" argument. It's usually the lazy and non-thinking way out. For example, if the topic specifically is history and more specific a certain event in history and one is advocating teaching from a peer reviewed tome written by an author familiar with the topic such as a history professor or even a dean at a university then it should be considered a bit more than a book written by a college dropout who just has a specific axe to grind. Dr. Hill knows the difference while Brad does not. It's easy to see who's right in this specific instance.

I think the issue is that history IS written from a conservative view. The system doesn't want to change that, and it doesn't matter how disparaging that is to children of color.

@@jazzyone6555 History shouldn't have a partisan perspective, it should just have factual accuracy which conservatism seems to be opposed to. Just tell the truth about history. White folks will be fine. Nobody is going to hate white folks because there is terrible history involving them.

@@georgewmitchell I agree. Unfortunately that isn't the case, and hasn't been since The Daughter's of Confederacy were given free reign to dictate what stories American History portraits.

@@MrWhiskeycricket he argues for a more conservative teaching of history. This typically means that people of color are marginalized or left out all together. American schools teach the same white washed versions of history and often punish children to read beyond the text to find hidden truths.

@@MrWhiskeycricket I agree. The school system as a whole is flawed. Children are actually bring punished for researching history and coming back with facts that aren't in the school books. For example, I know a child that it HEAVY into history, and actually reads books beyond his grade level for fun. He was assigned a report on Christopher Columbus, and did the actual research outside of his school book. He was able to sight all of his resources. He write his report on the REAL Columbus, not the whitewashed garbage the teache was feeling him. The teacher actually recommended that he be EXPELLED for turning in a factual report! The unfortunate truth is that this child was also only one of 2 black children in his school. What was the teacher trying to prove?

The bow on top is MARXISM, won't work . Marc is a woke joke. Get real!!

@@miikojackson3528 Your trolling is tedious!

@@journey9896 That is readily apparent to me. You can always tell when they're brainwashed by the wage thieves. It's him and people like him who actually cause wages to be low. Poor people aren't capitalists. They're the pawns and slaves of capitalists!

Agreed.

Exactly!!!

🤔But I thought we were oppressed ?? So knowing things and working hard actually CAN get us somewhere?

@@U_neekliss Not sure anyone ever stated otherwise... Definitely not Marc Lamont Hill. But you already knew that

Brad aint interested in learning shit

what should he have learned

Lamont tries to mate like he's smart but he's really not in India for as long as Indian has existed the darker-skinned Indians are treated worse because of their dark skin they're considered inferior to the light-skinned Indians

he learned not to do this show again

@@Loveamericasave Marc didnt claim otherwise. He clearly acknowledged the caste system. That's not creating a specific category of race based on inherent characteristics of each race.

He never had him. He has no argument whatsoever. Just another shameless race-hustler. I guess that's what he earned his degree in.

How exactly did he "have me"?

@@bradschaeffer5736 the parent lost because he over stepped. He didn’t even read all the books he’s crying

@@bradschaeffer5736 Unprepared, period.

@@nadianorman2274 apparently we saw two different videos. Either that or your white sheet won't allow you to see what's right in front of you.

Problably because the world is not as simple as gotcha questions want it to be.

@@HansKeesom What gotcha question? That he didnt read books he's complaining about? LOL.

@@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 He did n't read the book cover to cover but enough to get the idea of the book and establish the list is not balanced. MLH is often not aiming at what someone is saying but tries to score a point on something else or on the person. He is dishonest and nasty. If you don't see that, that is your problem.

Explain this. Where was I being dishonest?

@@bradschaeffer5736 He asked if there was 1 out of those 14 books on the syllabus that mentions inferiority and causes division and hatred. Being honest to God the answer should have been "I cant name any because i have not read through all of them". But you knew if you had been honest and said "I dont know" then your reasoning to dislike the syllabus because it causes division would have fell through the crack and maybe exposed your true motive. People do not answer straight up questions in fear of being caught. When he asked you about a book you have indeed read, your response was "i dont remember because i read it a long time ago". Which im guessing, just guessing, that it did not promote inferiority, division and hatred because if it had im pretty sure you would remember. Then instead of being honest and answering his question with "you dont know" you balled up his question, threw it behind you, then proceeded with a question of your own by asking "how many conservative authors are on the syllabus"? The hypocrisy is you expected an answer (which he gave),after refusing to answer his. Then again...your chance to be an honest person and straight up, he asked you would you like to retract that statement and have chance to read those books and come back and discuss it. An honest answer would have been yes or no but again you balled that question up, threw it behind you and proceeded with "well my point on coming here was for the childrens book". (Which you are correct but you entertained the subject of the syllabus) Never once in 20 minutes did you give a yes or no answer to any of Marcs questions yet you expected to receive them from him which he gave. Thats some "King to a peasant" type of action. Whereas when the King has a complaint against the peasant he expects an answer. But if a peasant has a complaint against the king its never addressed.

This town is like that predominantly white, VERY RACIST

@@oranseay2559 Which is crazy, because why would he sit up there as if they're all not trying to preserve what they're all about?

He want them well-rounded therefore not only the one sided perspective of the left. You may not be aware of it but there are a lot of authors disagreeing with your bubble.

@@HansKeesom so where was he back when black kids were getting only the whitewashed version of history?

@@HansKeesom he wants them well rounded with conservative views not historical facts

Exactly

Thomas Sowell!!!!

@@Paul-wu7xd 🤮

@@Paul-wu7xd I don't recall Thomas Sowell having any left leaning authors as contributors to any of his works. So why must left leaning authors have reich wingers as contributors?

Thomas Sowell, 🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴

It's their concept they created it.

@@ewalker1057 Right! And now that it has backfired because it’s not so WIDELY accepted to be an overt racist anymore, they want the narrative of what THEY created to be changed. Now they want to claim EVERYBODY can be racist. They’re even CHANGING the definition of racism to say anyone who thinks their race is superior is a racist. Racism, just like all isms is put in place as a social construct and THEY invented that ism to keep a certain people at the bottom of the social ladder. Well, their forefathers never thought a day would come where their ism would backfire on their descendants. The sins of the father…

@@MegaTamarra you better preach!!!!!

@@MegaTamarra Only white people think their skin color and race makes them superior to everyone else. No one else does that except them. It's all in their literature and their public policies.

@@jamberry8026 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

You're a brainwashed one too.

That Part👆🏼 Marc with the Win 🏆

That white con-artist is only in it for the money, he doesn't care about telling the truth, because it makes him look bad!

@@timross1648 Why am I a con artist? Explain please. What is my "con"?

@doogeehowser Wgar claim was “demonstrably untrue”?

Racism is taught. Let the future generations be taught truth.

Please explain to me who are "my kind."? Be specific.

@@bradschaeffer5736 You don’t need explanation . Your ass knows what I mean.

@Stock Starters thank you

@Stock Starters Terence is completely right. It's a subtle tactic used to impress superiority or dominance. Marc needed to reel him in and dismiss him politely.

brad just got schooled. I replied to his comment and I called him out. lets see how Braaaaad replies.

You guys fell for Marc's middle school debate trick I see. He knows I read the majority of the books, and also knows that I was going down the list in the order on the syllabus to give the viewers and idea of the kind of books that were on it. I said I didn't read the first one and the second one down I did read, let's just put it this way. Think of not just any book you've read over the years but your favorite. Now tell me the main theme. Okay, in one minute, without it in front of you, tell me where in the book it specifically lays out that theme. That was a classic "gotcha" trick. The broader issue was that all the books convey a left of center viewpoint when it comes to race. And Marc had to admit it. Thereby making whether I read one specific sample irrelevant. What do I mean by conservative view on race: Left: (CRT) All inequality that blacks face today, economic, social, educational, etc. are the by-product of systemic racism and thus it is with the white race where the guilt for their plight can be found. Right: There has certainly been racism over the decades no doubt and slavery was an abomination. But the Civil Rights Act is 56 years old. Two generations. In that time has America become more or less racist? Have blacks had more or less opportunity to succeed? So what is holding them back? Maybe it has more to do with 72% out-of-wedlock births and with it all the pathologies that prevent a cohort from succeeding, and schools that pump out illiterates, not mention they keep voting for the party that has turned once thriving cities into war zones. That is what two sides look like. You think any kids in these classes will even get a whiff of the second notion?

@@bradschaeffer5736 Still trying. still barking. still ego. you don't know what two sides are like because you don't listen to others. you treat black people like another side to manipulate or to negotiate with like chess pieces. You ignore what is going on. whether 56 years, 56 days or 56 centuries you don't get to unilaterally dictate and if you'd stop being such a shill for the white race you'd understand but of course you have time to type your drivel but no courage to have a live debate. just get off of RU-vid brad. We are TIRED of your desperate tactics, your projection, your efforts to preemptively use mirroring dialogue, witty retorts and smug replies. We know when you are fake and you are fake. your obsession with out of wedlock birth rates is hilarious since the current children aren't to blame for it yet your ignorance affects them. so again I am far more knowledgeable about this than you and you are a Dunning Kruger ego. get lost. since you are too afraid to debate me just get lost

@@The_House_Velaryon Shouldn't you be looking for a job?

@@The_House_Velaryon you are an unwitting tool of the left.

Like you said opinion

@Jerry Mellerick, but the Catholic and Protestants of Ireland did not fight over skin color, but religious doctrine and dogma, am I right?

@@mikeaskme3530 Correct it was all white on white violence ... this said it was very easy to know who was who - surnames, first names, where they lived - society became pretty close to fully segregated. If you were of the wrong "religion" in an area - death threats, burnings and physical assault was the methods used by both sides to "purify" the area. Mixed marriages more or less died off. I am a Catholic (so obviously bias to some extents) but the Catholics were the "Black Americans" i.e. the oppressed - loads of data to prove same. We had our civil rights marches and the other side responded with police brutality and latter the British Army who actively and systematically targeted Catholic areas. These areas gave massive popular support to the IRA who fought back by killing and murdering the police, the army and "other side". The "other" side organised and equipped their own "death squads", and the violence spiralled out of control. The similarities between Northern Ireland and the current move in the US towards identifying people as oppressed and oppressors is striking. What I am trying to say is the road "of oppressed and oppressor" logical conclusion is what happened in Northern Ireland (from 1969 to 1998). I am saying do not walk down that road, there are no winners only losers. The carnage was not worth it in the end for any side.

@@dendradwar9464 "What I am trying to say is the road "of oppressed and oppressor" logical conclusion is what happened in Northern Ireland (from 1969 to 1998)." That is not the logical conclusion for those who want honesty and truth and some type of reconciliation and you cant have that if the truth is constantly being denied or covered up.

@@mikeaskme3530 And that my friend is exactly what the Catholics said in 1968, more or less word for word

@@mikeaskme3530 My take on this, would be do not focus on the negative instead focus on the positive - what would really make Black Americans lives better - would that be better schools, better hospitals, etc - focus on what society can do to help as opposed to the negative based "oppressed and oppressor" - this is my opinion and of course I could be wrong!

Eh?

Amen!

Marc Lamont hill changes the intended topic himself, so he should mute himself.

He's condescending and immature. Why does he need to yell? Very disgusting.

@@nadianorman2274 who’s condescending and immature??

@I Am Xavier OBVIOUSLY Marc Lamont hill!!! You fall for the race-hustling. Is it because you're looking into it as a career?

White parents hate to hear about real American History explaining the black experience in America.

AMERICAN HISTORY BOOKS ARE FILLED WITH WHITE WASHED BULLSHIT!!

Research didn't proof that. That's just more bad ideology masquerading as Science

Victimhood

@@marohan you seem to love talk about victimhood. What does speaking about black history and what America was built on has to do with victimhood? There are many black people who speak about these topics and they are not seeking sympathy or validation from whites.

@@kfreckle5453 yes they are. Lemont says it everyday. The ball can't move without white allies. They need white people to change the systematic policies that affect black America. Str8 victimhood. Black America can change themselves. Called empowerment.

@@marohan that is why blacks need to stop voting for fucking Democrats and Republicans. Because none of them will ever change shit for blacks.

@@kfreckle5453 I agree with that. But voting 90% one way for a party of abortion, high crime, n against school choice is madness

Everyone is affected by racism. And if we truly want to know the origin of racism against black people then we will see it never even began with the white man. There wasn't any racist literature written by whites pre-dating the literature written by middle eastern muslims that described black people as animals who were naturally born to be slaves.

You have no idea what I was saying do you. I said "these classes are teaching that". I didn't say and you will specifically find it in this book on page 22. You fell for Marc's middle school debate trick hook line and sinker.

Nice use of the word Gaijin, while not understanding there's no racial connotation to that word. It literally means outside person, or foreigner. It is equivalent to the Chinese "Wai Guo Ren", or person from an outside country. The word you actually could have used to specifically make your point is a different word, so maybe don't just say things out loud just because you have a mouth.

@@tanjianforever In what period? In what way it is used? 1. In Japanese, the word means, literally, "outside person." In Japanese it's spelled t is often used as a contraction of sorts for gaikokujin ("outside-country person"), meaning foreigner. In its contracted form it can be an insult, but in recent years has been watered down by widespread use in and out of Japan. In actual usage, a better definition would be "non-Japanese" since Japanese people will use it in reference to non-Japanese even when they themselves are the foreigners in a country other than Japan. . 2.From Japanese, literarily meaning " outsider". A derogatory and ethnocentric term used to describe a foreigner in Japan that has round eyes. Other East Asians are not referred as " gaijin". Although its meaning especially since the end of World War II has had a more banal implication. . 3.A Non-Japanese person with round eyes, anywhere in the world. . But yes. Only whites have ever picked up on physical differences between the races. Never before has anyone in the world from the beginning of human history to the 16th century noticed it. Must have been a much less violent world.

@@bradschaeffer5736 yes and none of that specifically is racial. Ethnocentric* is not the same as racism or specifically using racial language. It doesn't reference a person's race (skin color). This contradicts your point that japanese used racial terms as early as 1400. This is not a race based word it is based on ethnic or national background.

So if then by your definition if a Caucasian calls an Asian a "slant-eye" (I hate that term, it is just for illustration) or, conversely an Asian calls a Caucasian "round eye" these are not racist terms because they aren't specifically about skin color? And then doesn't that mean the Indian Caste system, which has hierarchy based on skin pigment, is by definition racially categorizing? Like Marc, you are caught in the web of semantics.

Marc is leading you ASTRAY.

@@miikojackson3528 I'm assuming you're Candace "OWEN'S" black..lol

Someone isn't self hating because they don't agree with you. Just like you are not self loving for believing a lie that makes you feel Better.

@@diranshouse7061 😆😆😆..ok👌..Where's the LIE?? If you can't explain..YOU "the lie"!

@@diranshouse7061 Candace Owens says that blacks are the worst and most muderous race. If that isn't self hate then u dont know what self hate is

@@kipwonder2233 They want Marxism, do your research.

They are about Marxism!!

Exactly and Candace Owens' ideologies are steeped in misinformation

Marc always pauses to allow his guests to finish their point. He goes out of his way to not get to a point where they're talking over each other. This particular guest chose to try to not allow Marc to finish any point that he was making. The guest asked questions then didn't allow Marc to answer.

Yes, the delays interfere with the ability to clearly dialogue. They need to update their video technology to improve in the audio engagement.

@@Dstonebull i agree. It's getting annoying at this point.

@@friendswitdadealer it’s very annoying… the delay is appx 2-3 seconds which causes the appearance of talking over one another. Very surprised that the show’s producer has not raised this as an issue which impacts the show/viewer experience.

There was a delay that agitated the situation and the guest didn’t respect him as the host, Marc gets to be human and possibly triggered

And they want Marxism. Do you some research.

@@miikojackson3528 Do you some basic English. 😂

In regard to Thomas S. he grew up in the south and then New York. When he was in the south, he didn't have plumbing or electricity. Listen to one of his interviews he brings up some good points.

And so, now, do schools and race hustlers with TV shows.

Yes somebody needs to put hands on this monster u got to beat this into his head ur white boys killed of Indians u beast marc dam and his low life idiot is hat boy is not ur friend

Seriously! Why can’t we use a telephone or walkie-talkies or somethin’ that will let Marc spit his game correctly.🤔

If white people did bad stuff, then it should be thought in history. Factual representation of what was done.

It's not wrong. White people have been behaving very badly for a millenia

You comment gave me hope for humanity.

@Lemar Guillary, actually Brad Schaeffer loss the debate by not answering the questions posed to him, and if you cant see this, its because you came into this video wanting to see the moderator.

@@ThePanman48 why because he agrees with you, actually his comment and Brad Schaeffer did everything to deflect from answering questions and if you cannot see this, you are part of the problem. I came into this hoping for a honest debate and Schaeffer came into this debate with what aboutism. There is no counter narrative to slavery, there is no cleaning up slavery, Jim Crow, redlining or anything else that has happened in the US as it pertains to race and if you think there is maybe you should honestly pick up a history book and read one.

@@mikeaskme3530 I disagree. Marc Lamont stumbles when asked why conservative thinkers are left out of CRT which is an interesting question. I have to agree. Thomas Sowell if you agree with him or not would be an interesting point of view within the CRT syllabus. Not sure why he’s left out. The other name I would like to see is Abram L. Harris who wrote “The Negro as Capitalist.” I love the writing of James Baldwin, but he was no economist. If it’s CRT’s aim to highlight the legal and systemic structure why not bring the experts in the convo.

@@Embowafa2004 Thomas Sowell isn't a historian, so why would any of his books be included in a social studies class or a history class, James Baldwin isn't a historian either, as for Abraham L Harris, the only works I have read by him was the "Negro Capitalist" written in 1936 where he argued the "black" business should engage in interracial trade? In this writing, the man conveniently leaves out the barriers to interracial trade, the barriers in acquire capital for "black" business men. Which if you want we can discuss this, but here we are talking about history and the conditions of POC in the early United States, not economic conditions. I could go on and on discussing both subjects with, History and Economics, but some how and I really hate making assumption on anyone's thought process, but some how I don't think you would be honest in a debate on any of the topics. But let me ask you one question and its a History question not a economic question ( unless you want to discuss that as well), why would you need a conservative point of view on History. In my mind we are way to conservative when we talk about historical events, places and people, we tend to shade over the things we don't like or things we don't agree with. As for Thomas Sowell, I am not familiar with any of his works. As far as Dr Hill answer his questions, why didn't Brad Schaeffer answer his. I find when ever i talk to conservatives, or ask conservatives a question on any topic, they never answer the question I ask, but always demand I answer theirs? CRT is not taught in k-12 that is a BS argument, it is a advanced graduate school theory, it is not taught in k-12, never has been.

Actually its a satellite issue that has gotten worse over the years due to so many outlets and services using satellites...sooooooo frustrating.

Actually if Brad would have just waited to respond and not interrupted as well as given Marc the respect Marc gave to him to finish a statement, the converation would have gone better.

What historical facts did he lay out? Be specific.

@@bradschaeffer5736 The origins of race based classification was definitely one.

@@user-jv8kr4im1t Why? Because he said it?

No because it documented that blumenbach and Carl Linaious (wtfe their names were) Began investigating human classification genius. A Google search could have done better ....😑😒

@@user-jv8kr4im1t And Google told you that from the beginning of human history all the way to the Linnaeus/Blumenbach team or whatever no one anywhere else in the world ever noticed and then contemplated the fact that certain groups look different than their own. Interesting.

I couldn't have said it better. We need an informed person like you on every school board.

@Dark M3ssiAh exactly 💯 and this occurs once their on the payroll of those benefitting from the lies

@Dark M3ssiAh the Bible speaks extensively about the first shall be last and the last shall be first. Evil doers who call good evil and evil good. Nothing is hidden from God.

@Dark M3ssiAh I've read things that would blow the minds of any racist!! Especially the false Christians who dishonor Christ with their false rhetoric

Perfectly brilliant truths...👍🙏✌

The Democrats are no diffrent my friend, I agree with alot of what you speak. The Democrats do not get a pass either, black people in America willingly give their power away to this political system based off false promises and utter lies. It's quite sickening actually, it's so funny to me how one will ever expect an oppressor will teach you the truth and expose themselves for the sake of "fairness", where do they do that at never in history have I seen that or heard of that. Well I guess it's back to the decades old way of doing things of just preying and voting and hoping for the best. The more and more I here and listen to theses "debates", I keep going back to brotha Malcolm's speech "The Ballot or the Bullet". The profound nature of that speech and relevance of it still today just touches my spirit to the core. I just wish my people knew how to flex their power. PTSS (Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome) is a real thing.

Exactly. Racism comes from conservatives and liberals. He wants a black face to counter fact .

@@jamilmccall6553 You are absolutely correct. No pass is given. I just had no reason to address them.

I hate that fake children of God, when you don't want to confess your sins 🤣

@@BronzeSista 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

I know right?? Like god actually exists!

@@troybradley2575 Right! Because “He” searches hearts!

@@lazarusfowsta 😂 He Who??

Such as?

I came on to discuss one topic. "Our Skin" book. Who was it that moved it all around again?

Exactly then has the nerve to go on a show and embarrass himself.

Overtalking was due to a one-second delay. Get it straight. Actually if I was in the KKK in 1960, I'd take off the robe, put on a business suit, and lobby for liberal policies if I wanted Blacks to fail. The Democrat party did what the KKK never could just by passing the Welfare State and subsidizing single motherhood. Unless you think all the Democrat-run inner cities today are in better shape than they were 50 years ago? If so which one. You vote for the very party that destroys you. From the outside looking in it is illogical and self-destructive. They play you every time, and laugh about it at the M Street cocktail parties. (You think Nancy Pelosi or Schumer give two shits about George Floyd? They'd be the first to call the cops if he showed up in their all white gated communities. They USED him. And you let them) And you keep voting for them like turkeys voting every November for another Thanksgiving. But keep thinking conservatives like Sowell and Thomas are the "evil ones'. Democrats need you angry. Because they know they have nothing policy-wise to give you. And you fall for it every election. It's called being a "useful idiot." Well done. Funny you quote Santayana. You guys repeat history every time you vote Democrat en masse. I think there's another more apropos saying: "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing again and again and yet expecting a different result." Einstein. (I think?)

@@bradschaeffer5736 you know what you are correct if you were in the 1960 in a Klan robe you may be a democrat, but you would not get "blacks" to fall for your BS, because "blacks" voted republican up until the mid 60s, and the final passage of the last Civil rights act. But the process began early with Theodore Roosevelt and push to more progressive ideology. Before Teddy republicans believed in a strong central government and throughout the early 1900s, after Teddy, you start to see a realignment, and it solidified after the last Civil rights act. So you are correct on the taking of the robe thing, but incorrect in getting the "black" votes. On a off topic notion, why is it that you think "blacks" are incapable of making their decisions in what is best for them? I love how you brought democrat cities into the conversation, lets look at republican ran states, last in education for all its citizens white and black, last in economic opportunity for white and black, last in health care outcomes for white and black. So why do white people in these states vote against their best interest, I could make broad assumptions like you, but I would prefer to keep the conversation civil, I will be waiting for your reply if you dare?

@@mikeaskme3530 That makes zero sense. Blacks are the most loyal Democrat voters of any cohort. In return Democrats have controlled all the inner cities and public schools for two generations. How’s that loyalty worked out?

I thought Marc performed terribly here.

Totally agree. He needs to be more assertive at times and not let guests like this keep bumping their racist gums

@mrjaybee73 Marc Lamont hill sounded like actual racist here.

@@nadianorman2274 Do you know why? Be cause he IS an actual racist!

@@nadianorman2274 Really did he make strong man arguments?

Because he is disputing the claim that race was a category created by white people. Even Marc talks about Europeans, so, it is not just a discussion about America.

@@robertmadison1205 Good answer to a bad question.

@@robertmadison1205 race on the basis of skin color was in fact a European concept. Prior conflicts were not about skin color.

@@keishapuryear8180 I think that is largely true, but it is coincidental to some degree, as the Age of Exploration is what propels Europeans to the technological and economic forefront and also brings divergent cultures together.

@@robertmadison1205 Sir have you ever studied the onset of slavery and classifying people by skin color? There are countless resources that chronicle it. I get that many people weren't taught the truth, but lacking the knowledge is no excuse to dispute a book that speaks the truth.