Marian Tupy Says the Earth Needs More People, Not Fewer| Real Talk 

The price of liberty is virtue

Therefore we have been buried with him through baptism into death as Jesus Christ was raised from the dead by his glory of the father we too might walk in the newness of life praise God praying for everyone everyday God bless you all

The sun does a great job of giving us fresh water

I love how us on the right can have conversations. The left...everyone interrupting each other and using blame games.

EARTH NEEDS MORE GOOD PEOPLE NOT TERRORIST, GREEDY GLOBALIST, SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS AND DICTATORS! THE WORLD WILL BE A BETTER PLACE TO LIVE!

On the whole, I agree with him. However, he is incorrect about a few points. The most important is that the price of certain foods in America is so low not only because of increased productivity, but also because of government price controls and subsidies. So while the price of eggs and milk SEEMS low, it's artificial - we're all paying for it with our tax dollars. Big farms receive special treatment, and small family farms are going bankrupt because of this. He's saying our paychecks stretch further than they used to, but they don't entirely because taxes eat up our paychecks. His premise is correct, though.

PRAGERU!!!!!

Multiplying people isn’t a problem in itself. Multiplying fear is.

Don't worry, there are those of us young people out here who are having large families, or planning on it. I'm 24 and married, and while I see so many women my age going full climate-alarmist feminist leftist, swearing off ever having kids... I fully plan on having at least 5 or 6. And they'll be homeschooled well, healthily-fed, free thinking, and as bad-chemical-free as I can get them. There are those of us out here doing this.

thank you

The more people in the world, the more brain 🧠 power there will be in order to solve problems. Everyone knows that's why students are paired up in school when doing a project in class.

Erlich (the most spectacular misnomer known to me), was flamboyantly wrong about almost everything (stressing out an entire generation of children in the process of his rise), yet has paid NO price whatever for his gloriously wrong-headed prognostications. That is ALL anyone needs to know about the contemporary scientific and academic communities in which he has been ensconced.

Not the climate change “information panel” that RU-vid attached to this video.

As we grow in population, the planet seems to provide more... look into volcanic islands. Look at Hawaii. That's a group of volcanic islands. Beautiful lands for cultivation of resources. We have a symbiotic relationship with our planet. It's almost as if we live in a perfect creation...

Until the Lord commands us, we as image bearers are told to be fruitful and multiply. I'm happy to shout early this morning our family has grown by 3 a set of twins and 1 other‼️🎁🤟🔥🙏 praise God ‼️ oh I forgot to mention another one just 10 days ago, woohoo God is so good and deserving of all our praise and worship ❤🎉🎁✝️🎶🎶🔥🤟

I think it's beyond arrogant to assume one way or the other how many people should be on the planet. With that said, the inclination should be towards more life, not the other way around.

My question is if crop agriculture is truly more efficient than animal agriculture, or if it is mainly just a way of killing animals by driving them off of land they would normally live on.

Well, the Florida Panhandle is full, so….

Listen to what the people, who say there is too many people, are saying. They want to see less people, period. Not that they are worried about people, just that they want less. There policies show they want to control to make less abundance, to see others suffer as long as it’s not them. It’s sadistic, it’s evil. Don’t give them the benefit of the doubt it has good intentions.

Jesus Christ died for Our Sins according to the scriptures and that he Was Buried and that he Rose again the third day praise God praying for everyone everyday God bless you all....

1st, 16 April 2024

Is the present human welfare an outlier? No. It’s the result of the human climb up the entropy gradient, from diffuse to dense energy systems. Biofuels to coal, to oil/gas to nuclear. Each step has enabled larger populations and wider horizons for reflection and activity other than agriculture or hunting. Oil was available to Napoleon, but was no advantage to him as there was neither knowledge of nor infrastructure for its utilisation. Who knows what human beings have yet to discover that will enable future welfare? We do know every new insight into nature has enabled increased welfare and more lethal weaponry. It has also enabled the tropical species of humanity to live in a much wider range of habitats than their biology would indicate - including the frigid hard vacuum of space. Many environmentalists today see humanity as eaters and excreters, entirely missing the hands and heads, which is unreasonable. This has to be conceded or what are these environmentalists doing with their signs, and their daily individual exhalations of pounds of CO2? It now appears possible that humanity may one day be able to avert an asteroid strike of the magnitude that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs; in the process saving humanity and the entire biome of the Earth. Reflection may have enabled deflection.

Jesus Christ is Coming soon Are you ready praise God praying for everyone everyday God bless you all

Those who are pushing geneticly modified plants (not the same as selective breeding!)are also pushing world depoliticization maybe you should start researching a more diverse aspect to the subject and not rely to heavily on chat gbt! I don't want to be all negative there are some things that where stated that are proven to be factualy correct! Would like hearing a deeper dive into the main topic ! Thanks!

Chat GPT only gives you one side of the argument - the Left Wing one. So I'd not be relying on it to search google as this guest does.

Bill M is absolutely right !!!

we are in time , where fewer people , produce more, we are looking at our career paths being eliminated by automation and AI. The problem isn't the amount of people, it's the Age distrubution, the pension model , the fact a signficant part of the world's workforce will have no 'use' in a high tech society. We don't need more people and the elephant in the room, is most growth comes from areas that will never be rich, always be a drain

Bill Maher is a pathological narcissist.

Read Genesis 1:28 and 9: 2:05 1 + 7.

This is the first Prager video I have ever disagreed with. The only way the world can support a much larger population, is to completely stop urban sprawl, and move people into high rise apartments. That's not how I would like to live.

I'm sceptical... Housing is more expensive Electricity and Gas is more expensive Water is more expensive. Food is more expensive. In fact everything is more expensive because Demand outweighs supply - and the larger the populations the more demand. How expensive and efficient are desalination plants for starters????

57 comments but only about 300 upvotes? I’m guessing a lot of cowards downvoted this even though they couldn’t debunk anything.

This argument works to a certain point. It doesn’t recognise the possibility that the, say, six percent of innovators might reach a point where human ingenuity reaches its ultimate ceiling, with a reliance on AI, say, taking charge thereafter. I’m not sure I buy the human ingenuity has no limits if it's given opportunity argument. Full of woolly assumptions.

People suck. 8 billion is plenty. The Earth needs more trees and flowers and elephants and owls and bees and stuff.