Mark Kermode reviews I Origins 

Having never heard anything about this film just happened to catch it on Sky Movies and was blown away. Really thought provoking and the final scene is beautiful. Recommended.

I have nothing bad to say about this, i found it to be a pretty good film

Michael Pitt is a pretty good actor. He was really good on Boardwalk Empire. But I do not know why so many people "hate" this guy. I think he is one of the few actors that cares about the quality and the art of acting. However this movie sounds like a film I will watch on a rainy day with a nice glass of Shiraz.

Brit Marling's monologues come across a bit pretentious, but she is a joy to watch.

Biologist's already have a pretty good idea how the eye evolved & sounds like this film is spreading more misinformation in the name of entertainment. Also Marks belief in intelligent design or creationism as its otherwise known which he has spoke of in the past with the whole march of penguin or what makes the wind blow remarks, all of which are quite rudimentary & easy to explain leads me to believe any rational person would probably be driven crazy by this film left thing "Christ not this again..."

I really do adore this film!

That's funny. I published a book about this topic last year, with a similar plot in overall pattern, an almost identical book cover to this films poster (!) and even similar characters. The main difference being my book was about the fact that God, as defined in classic monotheistic terms, is neither provable or unprovable - by definition - as is the epistemic basis of empirical science. They are not necessarily mutually exclusive but both, in their base assumptions, are metaphysical and can be accepted or rejected (and then extrapolated from) but not proven. The main problem with this film for me (outside of a striking and disturbing similarity with my own work!) is it succeeds in being dramatically effective while being intellectually trite and reductive. You can't prove or know God exists or doesn't you can only accept or reject the notion as a matter of faith just like you can't prove or disprove that the only things that exist are those that can be measured (you would have to measure and demonstrate, literally, everything to do that). Believe or choose but don't kid yourself that you know or can know.

What's the gasp moment?

I think I will love this film, its right up my street,

Does anyone know what they were on about with the Penguins comment?

Mike Chahill seems like another M. Night Shamalan in the making -- a director with a sense of style sufficiently clever that for a while he manages to con the audience into thinking he's far deeper than he actually is. My sister the biochemist doesn't work with eyes, but no doubt will still scream with laughter at the sections where he attempts to discuss eye evolution.

Can someone call a moratorium on the whole 'Science vs Religion' thing now, it's been done to death.

special movie

In the last 2 minutes, the message of this film becomes clear. To paraphrase: 'It doesn't matter what the data shows. We know better...of course there's reincarnation.' It completely failed to win me over to this point of view with its pseudoscience and contrived sequence of events.

[SPOILERS!] WHY SHE HAD TO GO LIKE THAT?! T-T fckn bishes ...

Thanks for ruining "Another Earth" for me :(