Mark Sokol - UFO Reverse Engineering & DNP 4k - Falcon Space 2024

Подписаться 19 тыс.

Просмотров 2,4 тыс.

50% 1

Falcon Space founder Mark Sokol discusses UFO Reverse-Engineering & Dynamic Nuclear Polarization during our Falcon Space lab tour in June 2024.
Mark describes the scientific principles of Dynamic Nuclear Polarization, why Dr. Frederic Alzofon decided to pursue this approach to propellantless propulsion after analyzing data from the RB-47 UFO incident of 1957. He will also compare his approach to utilizing DNP for propulsion with existing materials analysis applications for this technology in industry, and how he is upgrading his equipment to test new sample materials with greater accuracy.
Mark is co-founder of the APEC Conference and founder of Falcon Space, an indy propulsion startup focused on utilizing Dynamic Nuclear Polarization to generate propulsive force. Mark has built & tested a wide variety of well-known breakthrough propulsion technologies, but his core focus remains on DNP experiments in the hopes of validating the theory & experimental claims of Dr. Frederic Alzofon.
With years of hands-on technical experience in the hybrid vehicle battery sector, Mark has applied his knowledge and love of engineering to the realm of alternative propulsion and gravity modification in an attempt to fully explore the many reported experimental claims currently in existence.
LINKS & RESOURCES:
Falcon Space:
www.falconspac...
Falcon Space Labs (Twitter):
x.com/falconsp...
Experimental Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Conference
www.enc-confer...

Опубликовано:

2 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 24

@JamJells 3 месяца назад

It is so exciting to see more scientist open up about the real possiblities of higher levels of energy power than just the gas and coal pathways.

@3ATIVE 3 месяца назад

Hogwash - Test the weight of the whole machine to gauge your "Anti-Gravity Effect". Otherwise all you're doing is measuring a lifting from the internal loadcell via magnetic attraction/repulsion, with respect to the equipment - So, no net effect. FYI: Electron Spin, Rotation and Orbit are NOT the same things. LOL

@mdonoghue1985 3 месяца назад

I think he was generalising the description of spin to make it easy for people to understand. Wouldn't magnetic attraction/repulsion occur at all RF frequencies? I believe he mentioned that the reduction in weight was only detectable at certain MHz frequency ranges.

@cryptoalchemist369 3 месяца назад

great work Tim & Mark

@ericreiter1 2 месяца назад

It is difficult to tell exactly what you are doing. Let me guess. You are doing NMR (or ESR) with a sensitive weight scale on the sample. You obtain a resonance and polarize the sample. Then you perform some kind of spin-flip to see if the weight changes. Right? I expect you know that if you cause a spin orientation by the resonance, your sample will generate a non-uniform magnetic field that will interact with the big magnet to cause a force and effect your weight scale. So, I do not really know what you are doing. I built and ran an ESR spectrometer from microwave parts in an undergraduate lab in 1979. Thank you for sharing. You can look me up to see my work also.

@peterbarratt8699 3 месяца назад

Ask yourself this, Tim; if someone is reverse engineering a UFO, where is the UFO, or the parts from it, they purport to be re-engineering???

@pro.empire Месяц назад

is this for testing for metal? or is it for hating up?

@monyinten 3 месяца назад

Awesome work! Thanks for sharing❤

@EsotericGold_net 3 месяца назад

I would encourage Mark to use some of the samples I gave him. They are unique, I promise you that. ☀️☀️☀️

@JasonPelish 3 месяца назад

As an analytical chemist I can see what you are attempting to measure and I sympathize with your string through the hole gravimetric approach. I would approach it instead measuring resistance to acceleration. Can you envision your method and apparatus? Can you see how to get a clean baseline with a ghetto budget? Get on it.

@eman99a 2 месяца назад

That sounds like you could use ultrasonics to measure resistance to acceleration. Look into how a solid state gyroscope works. It uses what might be described as a tuning fork. If the sample can be mounted to a piezoelectric actuator, the difference of two arms can be measured quite accurately.

@Nobody_114 Месяц назад

In addition to aligning nuclear spins via high frequency rotation, you need to put the atoms in the Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) state at very cold temperatures so that their spins are synchronized (coherent). You have to then compress these atoms together to make the material superconductive to reduce its permeability to Zero, increasing the speed of light in its vicinity. This then allows you to "wiggle" the highly dense centers of the atoms in a coherent way via electromagnetic waves, and that, in turn, generates the intense gravitational waves (GW) that Bob Lazar has been talking about since the late 80's, and that is how the GW are amplified. The problem is coming up with the money to do these experiments outside the US military which has an endless budget.

@brianmcginnis7417 Месяц назад

How do you know that?

@Nobody_114 Месяц назад

@@brianmcginnis7417 There are recent scientific papers published that show the internal density and structures of nuclei. I'm an Electrical Engineer (PhD), but a scientist/physicist at heart and have been studying UFOs, GW, and reading the latest scientific papers regarding related subjects (particle physics, astrophysics, etc) for the past 30 years. Also, I have proof that not the speed of light (C), but 2C (2 x C) is actually the measured relative "speed limit" of the universe (this is in the general case, not in the special case mentioned in my initial comment above). I can explain more if you want. Are you going to attend the APEC conference tomorrow afternoon?

@Nobody_114 Месяц назад

@@brianmcginnis7417 Interestingly, physicists/engineers always measure the resistivity or resistance or the current-carrying capability of superconductors (SC). Nobody measures the speed of light right at or above the surface of the SC inside a vacuum. I think they would find very fascinating results if they do so.

@your20downrange 3 месяца назад

You do realize that as soon as you discover anti gravity, the men in black SUVS will show up and steal your work. Sux, but that's the way it's been happening since Tesla.