Mps and ceos have all been sent affidavids that laws and statuats are null and void because they're a corporation . But they still send them knocking and stealing
Oh I'm afraid that if I'd caught him clamping my car , his next port of call would have been the hospital / morgue !! ..... I've had it with all of these arrogant tyrants ! Time to get SERIOUS people !
I am from Australia I’ve just read that act he has no legal rite to do what he is doing, unless he is commissioned from the courts not showing evidence he the commits and offence under section 65 of that act
No that is tide mark, if not he has a bit.of a brass neck, but he is a Muppet not a hard man by any stretch of the imagination, hardmen don't go harassing women the vulnerable and the elderly, this something you somtimes step on in the dark 💩💩💩 are you getting it, I hope you are.
@@eccosselion Hard men don't film bailiffs doing their job making an honest living. Bailiffs wouldn't have a job if the hard men who film these videos paid their bills. Bailiffs only "harass" people who don't pay their bills. A real man doesn't keep a vehicle he has defaulted on and fight the matter. He sacks up, pays his debt and gives back what is not his. A child fights matters like these. Not a real man.
Bailiff wasting everyones time while he's playing games on his iPad, basically he's hiding behind it, it's a psychological tactic they all use to distance themselves from the trouble they bring
Fred Zappa he came back in the afternoon and took the clamp off, your right about the car, I scraped it a couple of months later, he thought it would be easy money
Wish this was true but I think not. It is my belief u would have had to sell it before the baliffs completed their paperwork(altered the registered keeper details) and I think you would have to sell for a reasonable amount.
You can make a sales receipt to a family member,and keep it registered under your name. It been registered under your name doesn't mean you are legal owner, example car finance.
The bailiffs push the limits hoping your do nothing, common law says you have the right to protect your property, knock bailiff out and put it to a trail!
Check this fraudsters car reg to see whether its insured for work purposes . chances are it isnt and that is an offence and needs to be reported. He obviously enjoys home visits and when you report him, he will have one.
The police absolutely will not authorised someone to tow a car away with a living being in it. They would open for all sorts of liable action. Sit in the car and they can't do a thing about it.
Northampton County Court...you mean Northampton ProcessingCentre? The place where the typing pool produces the warrants daily. They are never seen by a judge of any description!!!
And here we go again with the Officer not Constable upholding the Fraud, Everything you said was spot on. We have always known the lawful law past down since 1215 and 1688. The police are not the same as Sir Robert Peel 1829 would ever have Envisioned.
Still by law every warrant has to be signed by a judge for it to be an active warrant. And the tribunals and enforcements act 2007 is an old act not law. And since 2007 the act has changed and been edited so it’s a 2018 act now and states that a judge has to sign any warrants that are to be distributed out and if it’s not signed and it’s sent out then the person/persons trying to enforce it are breaking the law. So it’s classed as void until it’s actually signed by a judge otherwise it’s inactive. And statistically by law when they slap on a sticker on the vehicle it is classed as criminal damage but for some reason it’s not taken seriously.
False. A copy of the warrant along with a judge signed Certification is sufficient now. And not criminal damage either as they're doing it under that legislation...
I wouldn't worry. If the car is genuinely only worth a couple of hundred quid they will never remove it. All they want is cash. Removing worthless goods and selling at auction for less than the removal costs is not in their business interests.
@Elliott Peters There was a time the civil enforcement industry did that simply to garner fees. That changed in 2014. And, you're right, they won't remove low-value goods because of it being too much hassle.
Making a complaint about a bailiffs fitness to hold a certificate Making a formal complaint about a bailiffs fitness to hold an enforcement certificate is free, and you don't have to go to court, but it is useful if you do attend to support your complaint. The procedure to make a formal complaint to court about a bailiffs fitness to hold a certificate is prescribed in Regulation 9 of the Certification of Enforcement Agents Regulations 2014. The procedures for making a complaint are laid down in Civil Procedure Rule 84.20. The complaint form is called Form EAC2 downloaded from the HM Court Service website Any complaint made to court about a persons fitness to hold a certificate must be carefully planned, drafted and, where possible, supported by evidence.
If you park your car in the same position as the Marston's man, without a doubt the police would have you for blocking the pavement. The bailiffs and police are a happy family, so you waste your time asking the police for any assistance.
So two Political robots, saying an illegally parked car is nothing to do with them. Dereliction of duty, or malfeasance in office is an offence, is it not ? Considering they are there, to make sure there is no breach of peace the man cop has plenty to say about what's happening.
AND THEY WONDER WHY WE RIOT. ALL POLICE SHOULD HAVE TO TAKE AN EXAM ON THE DIFFERENT LAWS STATUTE LAW AND OUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS TRUE LAW. ALSO BLACKS LAW
The copper admits it is civil law not criminal law. He won't ticket the illegal parking right in front of them! What point are the police nowadays? Ffs
he should do what a mate of mine did in a similar situation, remove the unclamped wheels smash all windows and lights, dent every panel with a sledgehammer, slash the seats and do plenty of damage under the bonnet this renders the car worthless. as the bailiffs now own it i wonder what they would hope to gain from taking it, they put a notice on it so they are now responsible for it.
I'm certainly not siding with the bailiffs but we live in the age of the Internet, the warrants they have with them are computer copies. The "wet"/signed warrant is with the courts. That said, bailiffs should be charged for using the Police to assist them, Police are public funded and should not be used by private companies as their personal security/enforcers
Whats this silly bint of a copper doing, getting involved with a Civil issue ? This isnt criminal and you must quote section 26 Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 1, a police constable listed ( 3) commits an offence if he or she .... a, exercises the powers and privieges of a constable improperly and... b, knows or ought to know that the exercise is improper. 2, a police constable guilty of an offence under this section is liable on conviction on indictment , to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or a fine or both. There is a lot more and you have the whole thing on vis, so use it as they would you. We are all equal under law and your Compo will pay the debt.
@Chris Rainbow You've raised an interesting question about Section 26, Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015 and how it applies in practice. I'm a former policeman and now do civil law as well. You're absolutely right - the plod should not be getting involved in a purely civil matter. However, anything involving Certificated Enforcement Agents can quickly change from civil to criminal. I have come across cases involving parking tickets where it has become clearly evident the previous owner of a vehicle has not registered the vehicle or has run up tickets and sold the vehicle. What then happens is either the new owner is blamed or something called data cleansing creeps in whereby the previous owner is not traced, so the debtor details are changed to the new owner's without the court being informed or authorising the change of debtor details. As well as being a breach of data protection laws, it is also fraud by false representation and, possibly, forgery or using a false instrument with intent to deceive or defraud also. I would say if this was explained to a plod and they failed to act, then Section 26, Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015 may well apply.
Northampton court is a bulk centre with no magistrates or judges this is used by council's to sign there own warrants there are three offences he has broken 1 section 244 high way code should not park on pavement unless it is permitted 2 parked on yellow line this is enforced by the council by F P N 3 Highways Act 1835 section 72 it is an offence to drive on the pavement UK wide this is for the police to enforce which in this part the enforce the Highways Act 1835 section 72
If a car crashes into him now. Is he liable? Yes. Why no ticket to say he's causing the risk of death by parking in dangerous place. If car has a baby that dies he will get of with going on a nice holiday and getting time off for stress. Good man or what?
I'D LOVE TO SEE SOMEONE WITH A DOUBLE STROLLER GET PAST THAT OBVIOUS OBSTRUCTION ESPECIALLY WITH THAT DOOR OPEN and did not that female bod say that she could move him on if he was causing a complete obstruction???????
That very same act the bailiff quoeted the tribunal courts and enforcement act. Well see section 26 of that very same act says they must show the authority when asked,if not then bailiff must leave and this becomes null and void.
It's Section 26 of Schedule 12 of the Tribunal Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The enforcement agent must show identity and authority to enter premises to the debtor and any person who appears to him to be in charge of the premises when requested so an ID badge and a warrant of control in this case.
the police are right and i suspect that the marston's guy knew they would vindicate him in this youtube upload hence his decision to get them into the situation. this isn't the way to deal with this sort of thing and honestly i find it ironic that this man is trying to be smart about civil law with his clause about a judge signature, yet was too ignorant to appeal it in court and just binned any prior correspondance, opting instead to come out with a camera phone and a 'fact' he probably read on the internet.
Get inside the vehicle. Under Elf and Safety Laws, the vehicle cannot be moved wit a person inside and as being in debt is not a crime and is only civil, Police cant get involved so stay there for as long as it takes and do it in shifts with another. If they want to take the piss, so can you and anyway, Bill of Rights 1689 plainly says that the only person that can claim from you is the original creditor, making this idiot a Third Party Interloper and demanding money with Menaces, Blackmail,presenting paperwork that is false, failure to provide ID upon request , Fraud etc are all very serious criminal acts, far worse than debt.
@@jamesbyford7614 I was reffering to DEBT. It isnt a crime to be in debt and should bailiffs turn up without the correct, unsigned paperwork, see section 40 ( 1 ) ( d ) administration of justice act 1970 using a fake warrant of control. Consumer credit act 1974 contract must be shown Para 26 schedule 12 Tribunals , courts and enforcements act 2007, Baliff must show a warrant on demand. Police will only attend to prevent a breach of peace and unless you create one, will only observe and you are well within your rights to get into the vehicle. See also Bill of Rights 1689 which tells us that the only person that can demand monies from another is the original creditor, making these so called " bailiffs " third party interlopers , ie FRAUD, itself a criminal act. These T&Cs you mention..... Are they Court de jure or Court de facto ? Where is the signature ? To whom was it signed ( it wont have been to the bailiffs ) ? Where is the paperwork and signature of said T&CS ( see above consumer credit act 1974 ) I dont see an impending prison sentence, do you ?
@@jamesbyford7614 i see you are quoting laws that are a cross between court de jure and court de facto and as you will know they cant be both so can you qualify which courts you are meaning and under which law they represent please ? Please see Freeman of Gloucester court and Bailiff gets owned in Merseyside, both on YT, thats my evidence, lets see yours.
@@jamesbyford7614 But you havent answered my question and there is a valid reason why i an asking. Are we talking Court de Jure or Court de Facto and have you viewed my evidence ? It shouldnt be difficult for you to answer should it ?
An official court warrant will have the court crest on it,also a case number top left.And signed by a judge.If these things are not in place it’s not a official and not enforceable.Get a grinder with a cutting discs in it.And cut it off 👍
so according to these officers, i can download a free warrant of controls file online, enter someones details and just take their goods? as no judge needs to approve it?
Why do the police always side with the bailiffs, they should have told him to move his car in the first place. If you park like that where I live you get towed away, inept policing again shows it's ugly head once more.
Police came to facilitate the removal of that car, getting street names, allowing him to park illegally, backing up what the private company says while dismissing the person who owns car with things like “that’s not my area of expertise” and “I understand what your saying but that’s between you & the claimants”…. Police don’t know what their actual job is
There is a vast difference between a 'doorstep agent' or debt collector, and a registered licence bailiff. The cowboy debt collectors can be told to leave and that's the law. Recent legislation requires a seven day notice of their intention to visit a debtor. And no goods or chattels can be taken. Check the bailiff's register to confirm the bailiff is on it. A bailiff is required by law to show an I.D. and licence number on request. Any debt for magistrates courts, income tax, child maintenance, are covered by different laws and rights. Check them out.
Northampton County Court Business Centre and who they are… They work together with county courts of England and Wales. They only handle the administration of cases. Cases which >>>> NEED A COURT HEARING > District Judge or Circuit Judge in a county court
Because where the warrant is the result of an unpaid penalty charge notice, there is no hearing or summons. If the ticket is not paid, an order for recovery is issued, this allows the council to apply for a warrant of control.
Bill of rights 1688 Grants of Forfeitures. That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegall and void. www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2 The Bill of Rights 1689, also known as the Bill of Rights 1688, is claimed and recognised to be a landmark Act in the constitutional law of England and it received the Royal Assent on 16 December 1689 The Bill of Rights Act 1689 also states to the effect: "That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of a particular person before conviction are illegal and void." This states that a conviction is necessary before a fine or forfeit can be imposed. Unfortunately this act is not available like the Bill of rights 1688 but for anybody interested, you can visit the Parliament website for reference... www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/revolution/collections1/collections-glorious-revolution/billofrights/
