Martin Bashir interviews Michael Barrymore. 

If they all knew one of them would of cracked by now !

@@Cherry-mb1xs Why would they crack? The liars and perverted murderers have all kept quiet for 20 years now. They'll never crack unless the police threaten them all with murder which they should have done from day one. Murder and perverting the cause of justice. Barrymore is a lying, pathetic manchild who will never tell the truth because he craves his freedom and desperate fame. If he had any integrity and remorse he would have told the truth by now but now poor Terry Lubbock has gone to his grave the scumbags who killed Stuart and the incompetent paid off police will let this horrendous crime fade forever.

It's been misleading from day one !!

There is plenty of suspicious behaviour here, but he does say that he was smoking weed but not taking coke and admits coke was found in the house but denies it was his, that he had any or gave any to Stuart. With all that being said what was the story of how Stuart ended up at the house?

Pity u weren’t o Andy’s case 🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣

Not necessarily true. Sometimes in the moment of a catastrophic event your mind will only release bits of the information at a level that you can process it. In some cases it takes weeks or months even for the entire scene to be processed with any clarity.

@@productjunkie9235 That's true, but in this case I think he's just lying. I think Jon Kenney was the actual murderer but that all 3 played in a part in it somehow which is why they all decided to keep quiet.

Because he’s not speaking from experiential memory.

He was there. You werent. Leave him alone!!!

So your previous great pondering and quasi intellectual thesis really just crumbled with the first intelligent counter argument and you were reduced to saying “true but I just think he’s in on it for no reason”. What a pathetic argument and argued you are.

Exactly. He depersonalises Stuart bt referring to him as "the body". He tho is by admitting he is responsible that we will believe everything else. It's one thing being irresponsible for various issues, but not for a death in your property.

Yep total sociopath. Reminds me of murderers when interviewed.

He is guilty of stuarts death and his dathers

​@@Zedekiah_Samuel_Tily_2021100 percent

Were you there

Ye, that's a bit of a stretch.... there's multiple potential levels of knowledge Barrymore had, ranging from 'he could've done the act' to 'he genuinely doesn't know what happened'

creep

Look at his eyes when he's denying it. As for "smoke" that could be a euphemism for crack or h.

@@ernestchadwell9069 It was clear as day he was a coke user..just look at how he acted on telly on his shows. You could tell a mile off.

@@StrawberrySunday212 so by smoke he probably meant crack cocaine. This is an example of how these high ranking people hide the truth in plain sight, to protect themselves from bad karma. He admitted smoking crack, knowing that 99.9% of those hearing "smoke" will assume he is talking about cannabis.

@@ernestchadwell9069 yeah i thought he meant Cannabis.

Cocaine and alcohol will do that to you

Probably just wanted a drug fuelled party Invited some psychopathic p**ftas by accident I don't think Michael did owt himself but his drug and alcohol fuelled mindset enabled the atmosphere this could happen

@@tonyc9460 who is to say that Barrymore isn't a psychopath? Just because he made you laugh when he was on TV doesn't make him a decent person by the way.

@@fourstarfuel9702 any other examples of his psychopathy outside this incident? Just seems he surrounded himself with dodgy characters and paid the price. You genuinely believe the contemporary king of television would throw it all away to drown some poor lad in his pool? Where’s the benefit? He was likely high as a kite and invited some wronguns round.

@@tonyc9460 People do all sorts of reckless things every day that are of no objective benefit to themselves or anyone else. It's not really a point in my view. As far as any other examples go I don't think, after having run away after finding a dead body in your own house, any others are required; though his depersonalisation of Stuart, the way he treated his ex (coming out in the press with no warning), and his public whingeing are all good indicators of a pretty despicable character.

But why would he protect them for 20 years? Ruining his life, his career. All he had to do was tell the truth, what his boyfriend or mate does isn't what he does, so he could report the crime and the public would have understood and Stuart's family would have been happy that Michael Barrymore saved them from 20 years of pain and torment. I have to go back to the argument with George Galloway that Michael had, uploaded on RU-vid as fight night... George says Michael wouldn't stand by anyone as all he thinks about is him, his behaviour on CBB showed that, so would he ruin his life this way for 20 years?

@@copyrightcharacter1166 Exactly. Makes no sense why Barrymore would sacrifice his career by protecting a rapist and murderer. Kenney must have dirt on Barrymore maybe say previous incidents where Barrymore commited rape. Also Merritt must have been involved as well otherwise he wouldn't protect Kenney.

Because they have it on him that he was complicit in the assault too? or helped hide the evidence which is a serious offence.

Protected himself. He has no interest in anybody else. Narcissist at it’s finest.

You mean pool the other one?

He’s guilty of something He blocked me on Instagram after I grilled him.

@@vision-oe7hx what did you say?

@@cetGT3 alot put it that way. He didn't like it.

I personally think he's guilty of perverting the courts. Don't think he physically assaulted Stuart but he did force him to take drugs and has protected Kenny and Merrit ever since.

Probably was your attitude straight off.

MICHAEL SORRY WHAT HAPPEND 100 P.C IN MY VEIW I WOULD HAVE DONE THE SAME AS YOU AND IM AM MARRIED GOOD LUCK YOU SHOULD NOT WORRY

@victoria It happened at the Hospital? Did it buggery Vic. It is, and will always remain extremely suspicious, suspiciously unrevealed I might add. Unless loyalties change, unless every one of them is put behind bars in a bid to get answers, I don't really see a conviction.

@victoria It's the only way I can really look at it now Vic. 21 years now, still no conviction or convictions. Great shame, but they all, or at least most of the 9 people there that night, must know something. It destroyed Barrymore, whether he had anything physical to do with it or not is immaterial. I don't really have any sympathy for him because this happened at a time when he'd gone off the rails with drugs and knocking around with other blokes after leaving his wife which is bloody weird anyway if you ask me. Thanks again.

@victoria Yes, a faith of which has been very widely lost. Look at that bastard Couzens. I know I'me talking about an extreme case here, but even so, the terror and despair he inflicted on Sarah Everard was something you just cannot comprehend. Going back to the Barrymore saga, well, I think our previous conversation was agreeable.

His excuse the hospital did the injurys to Stuart by taking his temperature is dark and speaks volumes of how far he is trying to pull the wool over our eyes its chilling new born babies have their temperature took the same way the most tiny vulnerable of us and the doctors don't hurt them he is chilling rest in peace Stuart I hope one day your true voice will be heard and justice comes at last ❤

He was probably completely off his head, as were they all and it was a big house so it's likely he doesn't know what happened. However he may have supplied drugs to them all and doesn't want to incriminate himself about that due to the drugs laws. I think that's why he is somewhat evasive. I don't think anyone was intentionally murdered and all were probably voluntarily partaking in drugs. Why else would they have gone back there? So I think it's time to move on. Everyone was off their heads and their was a terrible accident with water involved. Water and substances don't mix.

@@markpalmer8083 His house was not actually that big, it was a luxury bungalow, not a mansion and according to reports all of the windows looked out onto the area of the swimming pool. He knows what happened. Stuart died after a violent sexual assault. A crime was committed so I dont think people, including Stuart's family, can just 'move on' until the perpetrators are brought to account!

Yes but barrymore wasnt at fault for that attack but because he supplied the drugs he is being very careful with what he admits. Barrymore wasnt the murderer or the reason for him dying so the fucking hatred this guy gets is a joke just because its happened in his house doesnt make him guilty. Simple

Yes I'm glad I'm not the only one who believes hes a dirty filthy liar .I used to clean houses in his road in Roydon epping.he lived next door to rod Stewart's house.harlow is where I've seen Michael before ....

Look at 3 minutes his lips when he says if they want to drink they couldn't if they wanted a drink his lips stop moving

if Barrymore was drunk and drugged off his head enough to impair his memory, surely then he wouldn’t have had the wherewithal to call his manager, change his clothes and remove any potentially incriminating evidence and then flee the scene well in advance of the police arriving, all of which he did. Barrymore’s memory loss seems very convenient .

Cocaine cancels out the alcohol.

You feel sad for Barrymore? The man who got away with it, but not the man raped and murdered in the coked-up rich nonce’s pool? Clive you need to have a long hard look at yourself, I’d suggest starting with your anus and use the mirror from a lady’s handbag, don’t climb on the sink and use the bathroom mirror. You will probably fall down and hurt yourself, Clive. Be sensible Clive for once in your life.

His ex wife write a book. He used to beat her up. She was on a police at risk register. He used to drug her put her to bed and go out on the prowl for men..... sociopath. Google her story in the news it’s truly horrific....

It doesn't surprise me he allegedly drugged people - he always behaved a lot like Cosby - his arrogance and disgust at other people peeking out from his nice/funny guy persona.

@@scarletoharabia3801 why does this not surprise me?

The problem is lie detectors are unreliable because they can be fooled although it's very difficult to do so it can be done. I agree with you by the way Barrymore is acting guarded, and he's changed his account one too many times he claims it was an accident that killed Stuart but another time has gone on record claiming his defence team found a nurse who was part of the team that worked on Stuart when he was admitted to A&E and they stated he didn't have those injuries yet this nurse has never come forward or gone on record about it. And he really fucked up in this interview he repeatedly has claimed he doesn't know what happened but says here he wasn't so out of it that he didn't know what was going on in his house! He definitely knows more than he's letting on I think one of the guests has some serious dirt on him and he and his guests all agreed on what they'd tell the police before any 999 calls were made.

@@wickedwitchoftheeast88 Some people in very high places have protected barrymore

He lying in this interview. Said he just had some smoke then 2min later said he had cocaine at the other end of the house.

Typical personality disorder,able to relax his face to appear like hes genuine and even a victim. Why did he invite Stuart?

Your ignorant assumption on the reliability of a lie detector test makes "my blood boil".

If you accuse me of something I will act guilty when I'm not!! ...So I don't think you can assume guilt just based on that!!

Your so right x

Because he supplied the drugs that all of them wanted so he has to be careful with what he admits to. He never did the crime. Just because it's in his house doesnt make him guilty so fuck off

@@TheTruthIsHere2023 It doesn't make him innocent either.

@@TheTruthIsHere2023 Are you for REAL! MB was interviewed by Pierce Morgan and alluded to the fact he knew or had knowledge on who did commit the murder and rape of Stuart Lubbock but he won't say anything! Now in my opinion MB is a selfish f***er who only thinks about himself and the only reason he isn't spilling the beans is because he might incriminate himself regarding the drugs and or the murder and rape of Stuart Lubbock!

I'd like see the behaviour panel analyse barrymore

Why would he intentionally kill a stranger tho and throw away his career? More likley he's was off his head wasted and a couple of dodgy hangers on mates did it. Then they all panicked and helped stage the drowning and hid evidence

@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 yer for sire I doubt he intentionally killed anyone but its obvious that he knows what happened and he helped whoever did cover it up to try to cover his butt. It was probably the ex tbf and he's likely scared of him

@@lucylu2927 lad was assaulted 100% and probably killed deliberately or at least died during the process. Barry like many other celebs had hangers on and orbiters many of who were no doubt shady characters. For sure he probably has an idea who done it even if he was off his head. Perhaps they were even involved with Jimmy Savile type stuff. That would explain the police cover up. On orders from high up.

@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24well he wasn’t exactly thing

@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 Well, I wasn’t actually thinking, clearly he was highly intoxicated, and under the influence of drink and cocaine

Still no follow through on the March news. Must say, the way he mentions Johnathan's name and touch his nose gives me great suspicion that the answers lie somewhere between the 2.

@@Khamas786followed through? I bet Stuart did

Because he said had a hot tube you don’t need to swim in a hot tube

​@unseen-sf6cz It's called a 'hot tub' not tube

Kenney just been arrested for his murder

@@anthonyrowe6101 about time, hes a liar and a bastard

@@anthonyrowe6101 for starters that wasn't Justin Merritt who got arrested

@@anthonyrowe6101 it was Jonathan Kenney as he's the only person who's currently 50 out of all the people at Barrymore's mansion that night and morning

@@vision-oe7hx ?

Where is your irrefutable evidence that Barrymore 'knows more'? You cannot hold someone to account unless you can prove it.

I picked up on that. Clearly not telling the truth

Something very heinous happened that night. Many more stones to turn and barrymore was and has been protected

I think Barrymore is covering up what happened. He wasn’t directly responsible but I think he knows who is.

@@vision-oe7hx Fair comment, I think a deal was struck somewhere along the line

You have obviously never been totally off your head

@@Alkatrask Not sure you hoped to gain with that comment . I didn't excuse his behaviour , nor did I condone it . I also didn't resort to cheap innuendo to get my point across . Us Brits , as you want to reference the wider population in the UK , do not support rapists and child molesters . So save us from cheap generalisations , because it's really boring . Save you're slang , nonces , for the prison yard . Using those terms doesn't lend any street credibility to your arguments or points . It just smacks of desperation .

@@Actingskintyou are 100% correct. I apologize

Thanks Steven I’m glad you don’t think Barrymore did anything, have you contacted the police and coroner to tell them? Or have they already taken your opinions and put them in the official reports? I’m sure they’ve been waiting for your final say to hopefully close the case. You nonce apologist.

thats a fuking good point

Anthony Bennett's analysis of the case says that Stuart was never in the pool. He's right because the only people who say they saw him in the pool are unreliable. Reliable witnesses (paramedics) never saw Stuart in the pool. Those at the party 'need' him to be in the pool to prop up the drowning claim

I thought it was an indoor pool

@@GuessMyName234 no hun it was an outsider pool

It wasn’t a heated pool ?

It seems to make sense that all 3 were the "offenders".

We were there for a while VS not that long. Barrymore is acutely aware of saying we were there for a while and quickly corrects himself to not that long. He is anticipating being asked why were use there for a while what were use doing. Barrymore then says we AGREED to go to the jacuzzi to have a go. To agree to something they must have debated it. While Barrymore is talking his brain knows what happened. I think this is when they were getting their story together. Stuart was dead at this point and they knew it. Barrymore was the one to do the “discovery” the lifeguard was to pull the body out and the other one called the police. Shared responsibility. Now let’s get onto the “discovery” and the narrative of the drowning. Barrymore needs to persuade the audience there was a drowning instead of just saying what happened. The need to persuade underlies the weakness in his statement. Barrymore done the “discovery” seen Stuart in the Deep End and then was Shocked (The emotion in the correct place of the story-- artificially placed) then the need to tell the audience he Ran back in wanting the audience to know he was in Emergency mode ( which suggests he wasn’t) to get the Life Guard ! It’s a silly story a child would come up with. Hopefully Stuart gets Justice.

He admits to taking drugs!!

Barrymores whole act was making a fool out of people he was a vile bully

He did nothing wrong. Was just kind and people took advantage at his house. Courts and police said he was 100% innocent. Media just stirred it up

horrible man

👀 👏

In the interview with piers he also says, talking about seeing him in the pool, he had ‘very little movement’ I thought that was really odd to say. So he was actively drowning? On his last little breaths? Had someone been in the pool with him and their movement caused the water and his dead body to move?

Good point.

Nothing comes up

100%!

Why they just waffle.

@Lindy Loops Yeah, hopefully the conspiracy of silence will be broken and they'll all finally start talking. I think they all know what happened. Stuart wouldn't get those horrific injuries without making a noise.

@@michaeldouglas9394 He would if he was unconscious. A possibility.

@@r4h4al The thought of that is horrific. Whoever did it would have to be a psychopath.

@@michaeldouglas9394 Oh definitely.

@Lindy Loops Horrible. Like the post above says, whoever raped and killed him was a pure psychopath and needs to be kept away from the public.