It might have been a bad call but they also blew two giant leads and had a clear as day crease violation which would've tied the game if anything. Additionally, the shot clock would've restart after the crossbar and we do not know what would have happened. I think people only care because it is Maryland....tbh
Initially I was bummed to hear Virginia won on a bad call... However Marylands 4th goal was also a bad call. Bernhardt was clearly on the line - see 3:15 and 3:27. Tit for tat.
While to most it may not seem like it but Cornhole is considered more of a sport than lacrosse. Unbeknownst to many, to compete at a high level, Cornhole requires more athleticism than lacrosse. I do like lacrosse, however.
Bernhardt was in the crease on his dive goal. Granted a much harder call to make, but both teams got a goal they shouldn't have, Virginia's was just so obviously not a goal
The worst part of this call is who called it. Not the ref who was right there watching, some other random job. The Ref that was there played on. He knew what was up - no idea how that got through.
As a Terp fan this is just ridiculous... I saw the game live and it was clear the refs dont understand physics at all because the ball couldn't have bounced to midfield without hitting the crossbar Good video tho
Josh MarshMahlow right?! If the ball hit the portion of the net closest to the crossbar the ball would have just fallen to the go round or at most rolled out towards the crease...
Yes, but that call itself was beyond ridiculous and inexcusable. Not like it happens very typically, anyways. A questionable body check is one thing, but a goal that hits the crossbar? That ref should be fired for that.
@@TheMiller037 No doubt it was a bad call. But Virginia would've gotten the ball back with a fresh shot clock(as the commentators thought was happening), and with their offense, likely have scored to force the game to OT anyway.
@@taylorm3873 I saw the Lax Factor recap, and apparently Maryland had two goal miscalls, and Virginia only had one (the foot in the crease). The point is Maryland got the losing end of the bad calls, and should have been the winner at the end of regulation-- and therefore, should have moved on, not Viriginia. And whether the team with the fewer goals is "winning" towards the end of the season or trending upwards is irrelevant it's the total number of goals at the end of each game that determines the winner. My point is that Maryland had the higher number of legit goals at the end of regulation, and logically should have been the winner, regardless of how they mismanaged the end of the game.
