MASSIVE GUN RIGHTS VICTORY 

Luv U

Ok

Greetings from Hungary 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺

Let’s goooo

LET'S GOOOOO

Kentucky rifles were superior even to them, and it's what a lot of marksmen used during the revolution. They used those arms for hunting and naturally kept them afterward. On the contrary the British weren't supplying their companies with the best equipment. Many of them were penal conscripts.

Exactly and the last chance for any real revolution was before WWI when a town knew how to and could forge their own cannons and muskets. The balance of power has shifted so far to the establishment with their drones and thermals and wire guided missiles.

I want my friggin "full send it" lower receiver without having to pay extortion money! 🤣

Also, it isn't like the government of the time didn't expect guns to advance, they knew full well that guns will advance and become far deadlier then they were at the time. Also, as he said, a citizen could own a war ship. Look at the different trading companies of the 18th century, some had private armies larger then the British army. Imagine if a modern company was like that.

By their logic, they would need to go back to printing newspapers and using guys riding on horseback to deliver anti-gun messages because TV and the Internet weren't invented yet.

you mean the ones they keep cancelled for a rainy day, purpose built for the job, i think they call those PDW'S or ("Personal Defense Weapon's") OH the Irony.......

Yeah, let her security detail use 10 round mags, no assault rifles, etc. set an example.

*PDWs would be preferred here. But hey if 9mm can blow up chests, then I bet 5.7mm explode upper half the body.

@@con6lex "bUt iT fIrEs 9mM nOT 5.556"

Unless she is going to do the rest of her BS pressers in front of a scribe who takes notes on parchment with a quill and then delivers the news to her constituents via town crier on horseback STFU.

There were semi automatic black powder weapons that could fire 60-100 rounds per minute. I'd love to see one of these politicians find that out.

@@Froggy28314 yeah, but to be fair, those weren’t built till later

CHECK MARK!!!!!!!

Col Cooper!

That's just it, there is no such thing. Victims don't fight back. But that goes directly against the social credit system of victimizing oneself to gain clout.

as someone thar commits tax fraud, I'm afraid of the IRS

It's all history on repeat. Next we'll see westside story come back with a vengeance lmao

They will fear the Raging Judge 😎

When I see that gun I think of the Founding Fathers vs Predator as some B movie. That is "old painless" of that era. "Ain't got time to bleed."

The 2nd amendment was created so when congress calls up able bodied citizens to form a militia to defend the government from insurrections and foreign invaders, they did not have to arm them, they came armed and ready fight and die for congress, it's in the actual constitution that came before the bill of rights.

Hit em wit da facts my man

The founding fathers believed in a field gun requiring at least one horse and a few men to operate properly

They knew guns would get more advanced. They still protected our rights to own said guns even in the year 3000 etc etc. The whole notion that it was AbOuT MusKeTs is made up to fit the anti gunners narrative.

It also includes anthrax smoke bombs. Pretty please?

Welcome to the US

Dude, i grew up in Maryland. It sucks, don't go there! Save yourself!!

two types of people here

Musket balls were way more inhumane than modern bullets...I'm down.

I'm ok with owning a musket. But just as long as it can sit next to my ak47 and ar15

@@MeOTriO legal .50 cal, im down

I wonder if her security detail can meet to British standard of FOUR rounds per minute?🤣I doubt they can, so ,I’m fine with HER going back to muskets!

DOES THAT MEAN I CAN HAVE A CHAMBERS BLACKPOWDER FLINTLOCK MUSKET MACHINE GUN THAT WAS INVENTED BEFORE THE WRITING OF THE 2A AND WAS OWNED BY A COUPLE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS?!?!? AWESOME!!!!!!!!!

The rats alone would demonstrate how you need a fucking flamethrower in NYC.

Other acceptable answers: "Yo dawg this is Detroit" "Surprisingly I've not been directly shot at in Chicago yet"

Yea.. I think the Supreme Court just slapped that power grab back where it belongs.. in the left wet dream box of unconstitutional 😂😂😂

Special need for self-defense? Democrats!

no they just say that to make it look like we can win without fighting back physically like the second amendment intends so we wont actually stop them from it theyll still enforce the fake "laws" no matter what the court says thats how corrupt government works they dont follow the real laws or the courts orders etc like that unless forced to which is the whole point of the second amendment is to fight back physically against tyranny cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that as shown by the over 100 years now that we've been trying peaceful means of stopping them and have gotten nowhere but more and more "laws" enforced on us as if theyre real cause we havent been actually doing anything that will actually stop them from it if over a century isnt proof that peaceful means wont work then i dont know what would be theres only one option when dealing with tyrants and thats forcing them to stop by fighting back physically against them

Absolutely!

wouldnt use that one around women and kids if I were you

@@Zz-Haze good point lol

Based

Awesome response. Would you believe there were also civilian rifled flintlock pistols? I own one rebuilt circa 1750 with a rifled barrel made about 1725 and a flintlock assembly made about 1715. It's only about a .36 caliber, but it's rifled.

Favorite copypasta

My favorite copypasta

It's the Tally ho lads that always get me....Never gets old

Military grade in the 1800’s was 1. Cheap enough to mass produce 2. Sturdy enough to give to the next person after the first is killed 3. Accurate enough for at least half the shots to hit a giant block of troops on the other side of the field Military grade doesn’t mean the best there is, it means it suits the needs of the role it’s used in

@@aviowl Funnily enough, that's the definition of "military grade" today.

@@kholoblicin always has been. Military grade can theoretically mean anything if the military doesn’t have standards for it

@@aviowl The point is that leftists are saying we aren't allowed to have military grade weaponry... which is blatantly not true. It's hilarious to see commies like you backpedal when your lies get obliterated with Christ-backed truth.

@@aviowl Turn to Christ before its too late, sir.

What's a pistol permit?

@@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket Why are you still living there and giving those people your tax dollars?

Y'all have to have a permit for pistols? Rip. Sorry y'all have that shithole city ruining your state and their laws.

@@aa-yt7wo something that you need to even touch a pistol in this shit hole if you are over 21, I walked into the store with my approval letter, bought a pistol and did the background check but couldn't put my hands on MY pistol until i showed up with my physical permit. You need a class, 4 character references, an employer reference, pay out of pocket for fingerprints with the county sheriff's department, then wait for your approval (or denial) letter

As a fellow NYer, this doesn't convert your ownership permit to a ccw. You still have to apply for a cc permit, which technciay they can still ldeny you for any reason they want or require more of their already outrageous requirements and hoops to jump through. All this does, unfortunately, is say they can't require you to tell them why you need one or show proof.

I think it’s okay that Americans don’t have east access to hand grenades. All firearms should be accesible tho

The fact that arms isn't defined, means that after another couple of massacres, it'll be re ruled abs out won't be favorable to the gun community. You've had your chance to get your house in order, but just shouting " muh freedum" ISN'T it.

Everything up to a nuke as far as I'm concerned. Nobody should have nukes, especially governments.

Grenade launchers are cooler.

@@jesuschristislord7754 until we are an interstellar space faring civilization.

You spelled Ak-47 wrong.

@@Ashpect AK-12? AK-47/AKM is extremely outdated by modern standards.

@@matthewblackwood9653 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

The AR-15 as a platform is old hat. More than half a century of production.

Yup and sadly for the Anti-Gunners the 2nd says "Arms" not Muskets. They have such a hard time understanding the Definition of "Arms".

Make America Great Agein! Greetings from Hungary 🇭🇺

they won't be coming back in blue states, they'll just ignore the ruling.

Time to apply strict scrutiny to all gun laws!

@@username65585 yes precisely! there at least half a dozen 2A cases in the 9th circuit alone that are going to go our way now because of this.

Hopefully the nfa is next

Because they’re too busy abusing children.

@@goldsea1678 oh ya, cause Texas is so much worse then Commiefornia, where people write signs on their cars begging criminals not to rob it. S***don't happen in the red states, minus the blue s***holes hot zones you f*****moved into.

Well this is really "enforcing" a past gun "law"

Same with Arkansas

@@goldsea1678 source?

Lmao, yes

People got murdered by the cops for simply having weapons and refusing to surrender them.

So CO's red flag law got abused almost immediately? Whoda thunk it?

@@Chaos89P yuuuuup. Weird, right? That's why the sheriffs in multiple counties refuse to enforce it

Holy smokes 😂

And warships to carry them around with.

You can still own a canon. I believe they are suggesting the 2nd amendment would only include weapons invented at the time. An AR15 can multiply your force more efficiently than any black powder weapon available at that time. You could argue that muskets were military hardware at the time, but you can never know what the founding fathers would have thought of these new capabilities.

What do you mean automatic weapons were always legal to own? No no no they just had muskets which totally weren't even that effective at all so you probably shouldn't even own those anyway you'll just hurt yourself. The 2nd amendment is outdated why do you need to hunt now you can just buy meat so we should outlaw crossbows and bows aswell just to be safe. What do you mean the 2nd amendment isn't for hunting ?

@@randomidiot8142 Privatized warships* Virgin Leftist vs chad warship fleet owner.

That statement makes me cringe so hard. Cause the men who founded a country could have never forseen weapon advancement even though it was happening in their lifetimes!

His... heart?

and with that, they nullified Heller.

@@DriveCarToBar How do you mean?

wow🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑

@@DriveCarToBar doesn't matter if they say they uphold the constitution or not they're still taking our weapons because we allow them to by not fighting tyranny physically like the second amendment intends cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that

@@DriveCarToBar improved upon heller FTFY

[insert joke about needing 'a loicense' for everything here]

@@internetzenmaster8952 Oi, you got a loicense for that loicense?

F in the chat for our friends still loyal to the Crown.

Incredibly sad to see these allied countries saying their people don't have the right to defend themselves with a gun. Literally in a time where the world is more armed with highly advanced weapons than ever before. You'd think you wouldn't want your people totally defensless

@@internetzenmaster8952 blows my mind the Brits have to pay for a permit to watch TV. Slaves? Tv channels on the old 80s brainwash box are all corrupt anyway haha

At this point all that can be done is to use the red-flag laws against the people who pushed for them in the first place... The moment lefties start getting red-flagged their side will fracture even more and stir up a bunch of antipathy for those laws.

Since when do the gun-grabbing democrats (and RINOs) care about the lives or safety of law-abiding citizens?

Yep it happened in Maryland where I live

Oh yeah that black guy right?

Didn't that also happen in a swatting attack

Pretty sure multi-barreled hand weapons went back to the 17th century at the latest, probably earlier than even that. They knew their shit. Thomas Jefferson invented a swivel chair and Ben Franklin doesn't really need an introduction on his scientific endeavours.

Saying that the second amendment only applies to single shot muskets is like saying that the first amendment only applies to feathers and ink. There were actually experimental multi shot weapons around in the 1700's like the Kalthoff repeater and the founding fathers were aware of these weapons and were interested in them.

@@husariatowarzysz4924 they fully intended for civilians to have cannons and grape shot even if you ignore everything else I'd say thats enough

Puckle Gun too

Instead of getting into the semantics of firearms that talking box believing mouth breathing parrots won't understand, just leave it at 'the founding fathers believed that the average assault rifle toting citizen of the time had every right to have their military grade firearms in their home or on their person'.

That's called living in a safe country with a low crime rate. But I can understand for bigger countries like the u.s

@@ahab9712 yeah we are very privileged to live in this country or any other 1st world country, just we have a pretty high crime rate

@@ahab9712 um 90% of those countries are of 1 race and doesn’t have 1 party using the card to drag down the other

As a Canadian I can say it’s pretty shitty when defending your self can get you in more shit then the guy that’s attacking you

Security having all that shit, doesn't mean shit for their ability to use it

Unfortunately, some of them have already decided to not run for reelection, so your action will be for nothing. Just make sure to replace them with Second Amendment supporters without question!

Utah born sick of Romney as well? Me too. I sent multiple emails to his office detailing why I think the new 'bipartisan gun bill' is bad. But no response. What can I expect though? I tried my best, and he is definitely getting kicked out at the earliest convince.

I’ve done the same

@@Lethal_Bite Nope, disappointed Hoosier over here.

Leland Yee: Guns are bad, video games are bad. Also Leland Yee: Gets jebaited into trying to make an illegal arms trafficking deal with an undercover fed and goes to prison for it.

"Rules for thee but not for me" She'd argue she's personally not carrying and heavily armed security is necessary because she's super important. Like that fat black chick from the Squad™.

If she does we all kinda have to respect her commitment

I don't think there is enough money in this broken economy to pay those poor security guards to switch to muzzle loaders while there is a black market of automatics still in operation XD

That's nothing compared the the Chambers gun. Full-auto, 120 rounds/min for 2 minutes. And ounce you started shooting, it wasn't gonna stop until empty (or it malfunctioned). And both Washington and Jefferson saw it before the 2A was ratified.

@Courage Militaries usually have cheaper guns than civilians because they have to buy them in huge numbers. It's only thanks to the U.S.'s massive economy, taxes, and ludicrous military spending that our troops have better guns than most of us can afford.

@Courage They probably knew it would eventually be cheapened.

@Courage plate armor had become a lot cheaper in the preceeding centuries, they were not dumb enough not to see it happening to guns too

@Courage You're telling me 7 pipes and a flintlock is expensive? That's what the 224 round full auto is.

we need to do something or liberal heads will roll

“As long as I get muh free health care you can do/take anything else” - Every low info Canadian Voter.

The problem with Canadians is they want to be the opposite of the US to make themselves more distinctive and seemingly more progressive than the US. It's not going to work out well in the end though. They need to focus on their own country rather than gauging their decisions based off of US politics.

They are slaves in all but name. Absolutely pathetic.

@@samuelneil2691 u.s. policies are more liberal than even European policies when it comes to some of these cultural issues such as children being vaccinated or getting sex changes

I actually read the opinion in the voice of Morgan Freeman. Made me feel such a peaceful catharsis that I took a nap.

Guys! This comment “Armed Scholar” has an INCREDIBLE channel on the laws/bills/updates coming on 2A from an attorney perspective. Usually dont do this but for 2A awareness I highly recommend following this guy!

Ed is right on the money. Armed scholar does the world a great service. Legalese is confusing purposefully to prevent "us dumb plebians" from understanding, but he puts things on an easy to understand context for people who don't have time to dedicate their life to reading overburdened legal documents. Which is pretty much everybody. Kinda important to do other things like... everything that the American dream is made of. Haha.

Hey there! Great to see you here and congrats on 300k!

@Unknown User Cry more... Clarence Thomas just followed the constitution.

Another Great line from the same piece “And accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” Should remind all of us of how accustomed we’ve become of having our rights taken away piece by piece.

Oh make no mistake, they remember it, that's why they are terrified of it.

Them, and a lot of "right-wing" commentators, too.

Amen brother Amen!

Yeah, the constitution was made with the expectation that another revolution was probably gonna be needed at some point. It's honestly impressive the country has gone this far with completely turning over. The Civil War was closest, but that was only a half turn.

Shalailee, its a walking aid not a club govener.

Literally what??? How does that make sense to anyone?

@@sanctum2fan he is saying to bring a cane everywhere, so you can say that you need it/just like carrying it around. long sticks beat short knives in my opinion

Man, I hope a body builder doesn’t turn to a life of crime.

Come to the United States and be free

That one's a gem

Haha

I always tell people that I will go back to muskets if they go back to Quill and Ink and manually operated Presses. I imagine that Ben Franklin could imagine an automated Printing Press but Satellites and Laser Communications... Ben be smoking the good stuff.

Original copypasta [feel free to copy! ;)] Own a musket for home defense Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

@@thecube5861 hell yes

"Living in CA."

Going by the decision in full, it also appears to nullify CAs stupid approved gun list.

Here here

@@ObservationofLimits Hopefully. I want my UMP and I want it now

Same bro I hate this state for gun rights

She's also blatantly lying, she would _not_ be willing to have her security carrying muskets and anyone who believes that she would is an absolute _moron._

That’s nice… I’m prepared to move forward to machine guns, artillery, and tanks!

@@timothyevans4323 my backyard ICBM silo is coming along nicely

She does not have the first amendment right to spew her shit on the private broadcast network she was hosted on. She could’ve been booted off at any moment.

@@cuhyotepowered1201 they provided a venue, and probably vetted her speech beforehand for content, so yes, she was expressing her 1st Ad. rights with the express consent of the venue, or "platform." And yes, I agree, it's BS. You are also correct that no venue, be it TV (cable or broadcast), newspaper, radio station, internet message board, social media platform, etc., is obligated to let anyone speak at all on their "platform." If no one of the above lets you "on" their platform, you're down to carrying a sign on the street, and yelling at passing cars.

Sad, really?

@@rcbronco yes

( The right to kill !)

@@JoseReyes-wo2lm Criminals in your dem jurisdiction had that right anyway kiddo

Yeah. Clicked the instant i saw this, in my notifs.

I can only imagine New Yorkers with a cannon in their house, an intruder gets into their house they are like: Hello there motherfucker and boom, the intruder is erased from existence along with the floor or wall.

They also fail to grasp, that there wasn't the internet back then. Do they need to be denied from using that.

It's purely a lie to say it was about muskets. The Framers were far more intelligent than most politicians today. If they meant muskets, they would have written muskets. This fascist governor of New York went even further by claiming muskets were the only arms around at the time. Instead, citizens could and did own other arms, such as pistols, rifles, and cannons. Also, swords and knives, two lesser forms of weapon that New York puts heavy restrictions on.

most colonials used rifled barrels as they were more advantageous for hunting since a slower reload was worth the higher accuracy. Which in turn helped them win. Altho this is controversial as to if the benefit made a difference.

@@joshuaspath6923 it is definitely a disadvantage on a battle line. Faster reloads are better when both armies line up and fire. But if you're not an idiot, you don't fight on a battle line against redcoats.

Why haven’t they already gone to scotus, Florida does 3000 a year alone!

red flag "laws"* you mean cause they're not real laws cause of the second amendment but if we dont use the second amendment as intended to fight the tyranny physically then its never gonna get any better all these "wins" are just a trick to get us off gaurd so we won't actually do what's necessary to stop them which is fighting physically again like i said like the second amendment is for cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that

@@freedomfighter1861 cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force like the second amendment intends we should be allowing them to say any weapons are illegal in any way or for any reason etc like that cause of the second amendment but if we dont use the second amendment as intended then it doesn't matter whatsoever cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that all these "wins" are just tricks to make it look like we're winning without having to fight they'll come back twice as strong the next time they know of we fight back how we should they'd lose so they have to go with the nonviolent route

If that ever happens, and the guns that are confiscated still exist by that time, it could be years from now 🤮 How much damage, to the people w/o the means to protect themselves, will there be? 🤬

Well they will be removing rights for anyone who isn't straight or cis first so fuck the supreme Court

Well, yes. But you don't expect to be allowed to buy Tomahawk for "self-protection", do you?

@@user-ns5di9on9n I have a constitutional right to a medicinal M1 Abrams.

@@user-ns5di9on9n Depends on where I lived. If I were on the southern border of Texas? Having a cruise missile wouldn't be so bad, might result a few less beheadings of random civilians by cartel members. What about that Mormon family that got nearly wiped out in a cartel ambush after living on a Mexican homestead for generations? I'm sure a few "big sticks" as Teddy would say, would have made them think twice.

@@user-ns5di9on9n I would love to operate tomahawk cruise missiles.

@@major_kukri2430 Its a support animal, actually.

Didn't know Italy even let people have guns.

That's great man I hope they let y'all keep that and don't try to take it away. Remember when a goverment wants to disarm the people it's because they're scared of a rebellion. When the population is disarmed is when the elite are essentially free to do as they wish. Our second ammendment wasn't written with self defense or hunting in mind it was to keep politicians in check and this'll probably get me flagged but all I'm saying is our government has been out of line since far before I was born.

@@robertthebruce7176 You would be surprised when it comes it Italy and guns. They due have berretta the world`s oldest gun factory in the world. here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2CSkOTfaULo.html

​@@robertthebruce7176 you can have them at home and carry them to/from range and hunting. Carrying guns for personal protection is NOT allowed, the law is similar to NY state, you can THEORETICALLY ask for a permit but you need to be friends with "a special someone" to actually get it.

As a side note you Italians make some great firearms

Amen brother

@Arc supreme court is unfathomably based

@Arc Next is Loving v. Virginia

Maybe, but it won’t last; keep your eyes out for other things the government will do to infringe your freedom.

I’m just worried these recent SCOTUS victories will be enough for the dems in Washington to stack the court.

Tell everyone you know to donate to the FPC, GOA, and SAF. They'll need all the money they can get to file these challenges and continue the current ones in the courts.

Yes, killing the 2-step approach nonsense was an absolute godsend.

@@internetzenmaster8952 I was praying that Justice Thomas would address that in his opinion. I'm also overjoyed to see that he also addressed the "sensitive places" work around that NY politicians were already planning to use. I made the comment that they could define that so narrowly to make carrying anywhere would be impossible.

I wonder if this means anything for the NFA?

Yeah bro consitutional lawyers can make a killing in this enviorment. Esspecially if they gain momentum by taking cases to increase gun rights rather than trying to convince their people to take plea deals when they're actually innocent haha

Thank you sir 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

Pinochet.

@@regulardudegam1ng lol huh?

Dear northern Rep Sir The USA Court didn't let us have guns knives cannons or any Stick. GOD GAVE EVERYONE THIS RIGHTS WHAT EVER COUNTRY GOD PLACED YOU IN MAN CANNOT REMOVE IT

nj subject here as well. id wait to submit until nj actually updates its carry/permitting laws. as of now nothing has changed here on paper, so they can still deny you and in the future they'll try to use your past denial as precedent to keep you from ever carrying. We need to understand what inevitable red tape were gonna have to cut through.

Same here man, hoping future generations won't need to fill that out

Me too but I’m not doing it yet. I have an FPID already so I’d have to imagine it won’t be much harder once the guidelines are updated (something tells me I’m being optimistic though).

Congrats gents

Apply and when they reject it, use them. That's how NY did it. Everyone sitting around the sidelines waiting aren't the ones who get our rights back.

Yeah try lugging around a 1700s cannon or gatling gun and report back.

True. I mean they had those nasty as blunderbusses. Like that would just rip someone apart but yeah the issue is that 38 special someone has to protect there kids incase of an incident.

@@xenoborg007 load it up in a bed of a truck back your truck toward the direction you want to shoot get out of your truck because the windows will shatter and fire the cannon

@@xenoborg007 With modern vehicles, it’s a cinch.

And that muskets were standard weapons used by the military. People used weapons the military also used

I'll happily take a torpedo boat, tbh

@@mercwiththemouthsnewphone6798 try on a guided missile destroyer

furniture., NFA1934 might be the easier one to strike first. GCA '68 would be harder.

I want the Hughes Amendment gutted

*Until our tyrannical communist governmental and the Democratic party and Liberal sidekicks are abolished,* you mean

Can we throw border patrol in there too?

How about the ATF becomes the AT? They do some good stuff with alcohol and tobacco

As a Finn: absofuckinglutely.

@@oz_jones As an American I had to look ya'll up on a map just to be sure I remembered right. Yup, Finn right next to the Russians and the Sweed safely behind the Finn.

Simply put, yes. Quite. I do draw the line at tactical nukes on up.

@@w.reidripley1968 perhaps, just maybe, could i convince you to allow Davey Crockett nukes?

It is within my constitutional right to own and operate a Nimitz class super carrier with a full compliment of f-35 multirole fighters provided I have the money and means to do so. Now brb I'm gonna go start a proxy war in the middle east.

God bless the real patriots! Greetings from Hungary 🇭🇺🇭🇺

I'm sweating the stupid pistol brace check list. They need to put a muzzle on the ATF. I would cry tears of joy if they made SBRs and suppressors a non-stamp item.

@@Sauerbrew777 My stance on SBR's/SBS's is simple. I would bring a chart into congress with photos of different guns; some AOW's, SBS/SBR's, "firearms" like the 590 shockwave and then AR pistols with/without braces. If at least 60% of them couldn't tell me which ones are and aren't legal federally despite the minimal changes, especially considering they're the ones that write the laws on them, then how should they expect us, the American people, to understand it either? We can't all afford personal lawyers to constantly keep us out of hot water.

Saint Thomas could probably convince at least 5 of those 6. Just read his quote at 5:23.

We really need to enforce the 2A because the problem is when every state designs it's own gun control the. It becomes impossible for us to travel armed without being lawyers and checking the laws every time before you cross a state border. Most people aren't doing that and they just "illegally" legally carry their gun into that state because it's not worth the hassle. That's why gun laws outside 2a endanger people. I can be in Texas and conceal carry with no permit but if I drive west to my home state, theyll get mad at me for doing that. USA is one country. I'm supposed to be able to conceal carry in all 50 states with no permits. It's clearly the only way. All these conceal carry laws are designed to make law abiding citizens appear as criminals. The consitution says shall not be infringed and conceal carry permits are clearly an infringement that is causing problems. Who in the hell doesn't want to conceal carry if they find themselves driving through a bad area of chicago? You shouldn't need a permit for that. It's already nearly a war zone

You waited till 19 to get your first gun dang you were missing out. I’ve got 11 fire arms of various caliber and shape and I too am 19. Be safe and have fun

And me here in Europe with no chance of ever owning a real firearm, only a self-defense less-than-letal pistol after a very lengthy bureaucratic process and most ironically no rights to ever use it for self defense

@@alexreitler not quite true. im from finland and i own multiple firearms. my dad loves Colts and i love Glocks. we go shooting together

@@lesliepreyer9047 Although I had easy access to firearms, I personally didn't buy my own first gun until this past November.

One sided you could not be more correct and with that we live in a world where school massacre's are the normal good job.

Just freaking once it would be fanfakintastic if the criminals had to compromise instead of the citizens. 🤦‍♂️

@@Devin-O guess what, even if they didnt have guns they could still do those massacres. home made bombs are in fact a thing, and way easier to make than you think. not to mention how easy it is to stab a LOT of people in a crowded room. just ask the UK, they have no guns but an insane amount of stabbings. almost like guns dont kill people, people kill people

@@sway696 they will pay.

In the legal system, there's a legal term: consideration. It says that any contract that does nothing for one of the parties is automatically invalid, whether they signed it or not. If only our lawmakers knew anything about the laws they make.