Massive Russian Bomber Attack On American Battle Group / Fleet | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS |

Подписаться 610 тыс.

Просмотров 372 тыс.

50% 1

Thanks to MANSCAPED for sponsoring today's video! Get 20% OFF + Free International Shipping with promo code "GROWLING" at mnscpd.com/Gro...
Visit manscaped.com/tcs to learn more about how to “check yo self” while enjoying your @MANSCAPED products at home or make a donation to the Testicular Cancer Society today to save lives (and balls!)
Check out the Merch Store: growling-sidew...
Join the channel if you wish to support
/ @growlingsidewinder
APEX Gaming PCs: apexgamingpcs....
If You'd like to Support the Channel on Patreon:
/ growlingsidewinder
Join my Discord:
/ discord
Amazon Links for the products I use if you're interested:
_________________________________________________________
Link for Thrustmaster 16000M: amzn.to/2PQGYf2
Link for Trackir 5: amzn.to/2VSN4kt
Link for Warthog throttle/stick: amzn.to/2Vbfhyp
Social Media
________________________________________________________
Twitter: / growlingaim9
Facebook: / growlingaim9
Contact me:
GrowlingSidewinder@hotmail.com
Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core 3.4GHz (4.9GHz Max Boost)
Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS Elite WiFi
Memory: 128GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE RGB PRO 3200MHz (4x32GB)
System Cooling: CORSAIR H100i PRO XT RGB
Graphics Cards: NVIDIA 10GB GeForce RTX 3080
Operating System: MS Windows 10 Professional
Operating System Drive: 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe
Hard Drive: 2TB Samsung 980 PRO
Power Supply: CORSAIR AX1600i ATX Titanium
Tobii Head and Eye Tracking: www.tobii.com/
Virtual Reality: Pimax 8KX
HeadTracker: Trackir5
Thrustmaster F/A-18C Hornet stick and Warthog Throttle.
Thrustmaster TRP pedals.
On this channel we like to do a lot of dogfighting most videos are some sort of dogfight between 2 different aircraft as we explore their different capabilities. From time to time I like to dabble in Virtual Reality, I think VR is a great new technology and I love to show that stuff off for the channel from time to time.
If you enjoy war thunder or Microsoft flight simulator 2020 or even dogfighting in Battlefield 2042, consider getting yourself into Digital Combat Simulator by Eagle Dynamics, the Combat side of Aviation with the BVR and Dogfights really provides a different and interesting perspective on aviation. You can fly all kinds of combat aircraft including the F-16, F-15, F-14, JF-17, Su-27, Mig-29, Mirage and the F-18 Hornet along with many other aircraft and helicopters like the Ka-50 and Mi-8.

Опубликовано:

14 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 936

@GrowlingSidewinder 2 года назад

Thanks to MANSCAPED for sponsoring today's video! Get 20% OFF + Free International Shipping with promo code "GROWLING" at mnscpd.com/GrowlingSidewinder Visit manscaped.com/tcs to learn more about how to “check yo self” while enjoying your @MANSCAPED products at home or make a donation to the Testicular Cancer Society today to save lives (and balls!)

@AbyNeon 2 года назад

thats not how ships defend from cruise or any missile..... in rl not a single missile would have survived the counter measures deployed on ships.

@flightstatic4662 2 года назад

@@AbyNeon err yeah we dont have aircraft shooting down missiles anymore, though the ships launching anti missile missiles and using the CIWS is pretty accurate

@west_adv 2 года назад

Great vid, although for sure such big bomber group would be spotted much earlier than 80 miles. E2 has a radar with range of over 345 miles. The same for bombers, they would launch rockets earlier and turn back

@franklinhadick2866 2 года назад

@@west_adv Dont forget satellite coverage, I think having all those bombers take off may be a bit alerting.

@ВладимирАлександров-н5ю 2 года назад

@@franklinhadick2866 запуск Ярсов,Сарматов и Авангардов вас меньше насорожит.

@sykosocial 2 года назад

seeing the tomcat flying with all of those cruise missiles at such a low altitude was so fucking badass. top tier cinematography.

@GrowlingSidewinder 2 года назад

Thank you thank you, quite a difficult shot to get but seeing people recognize how cool it looked made it worth it.

@sykosocial 2 года назад

@@GrowlingSidewinder absolutely worth it. and choosing to have the tomcat not being the tracked target, allowing it to move about the frame instead of the missiles was an A+ choice. it was the cherry on top of an already great video!

@bruhmndm3051 2 года назад

@@GrowlingSidewinder Some people may not get it, but your fans are real connoisseurs who do get it!!!

@Dirtyharry70585 Год назад

@@GrowlingSidewinder wait until the navy fires up the lasers.

@brassflyer4284 2 года назад

That Tomcat in the beginning that was friendly fired had me laughing my ass off

@spiffyracc 2 года назад

Came to the comments to see if that's what I saw

@BRMCaptChaos 2 года назад

Blatantly go back through the review and see which "buddy" shot an Aim54 up my chuff. Who needs Russians eh? "it's why we check" well said GS.

@roryross3878 2 года назад

Besides following all the ASMs into the AA fire of the AAW ships. I don't know about the advisability of flying within a Vampire barrage into a defensive barrage of SM-2s...

@gungho57 2 года назад

@@roryross3878 If You squawk the IFF you should be good....the AEGIS system should not target you. Neither the R2D2 radar....

@ghoti221 2 года назад

@@gungho57 the key word there is should :). That’s why, if memory serves, public doctrine was for F-14s to defend the outer ring, SAMs from pickets for the middle ring, and then point defence for the short ring.

@ItsJoKeZ 2 года назад

that close over the water cruise missle shot was absolutely movie-like, dead gorgeous. the intensity.

@oladiedoo50 2 года назад

9:04 just blows me away.

@navillus7 2 года назад

It looks like that shot actually destroyed two cruise missiles at once.

@roryross3878 2 года назад

At 08:57 does he drop a flare or a missile into the drink?

@syfsaboetggher6308 2 года назад

@@roryross3878 flare

@TacoSallust 2 года назад

Still technically a "successful defense" but watching that Tico get rocked with that many missiles made me sick to my stomach as a former sailor. A very neat, very realistic mid-1980s scenario, thanks for sharing the video.

@kennethhicks2113 2 года назад

82-90 USN O7

@LongTran-em6hc 2 года назад

You were a tin can sailor? If so I can understand your feeling lol

@LongTran-em6hc 2 года назад

I would say that this is likely a late '80s scenario, by that time, the Tu-22M were operational with their Mach 3-5 Kh-22 and almost 1000km range. This one here show only Tu-95 armed with subsonic munitions.

@nanungw951 2 года назад

@@kennethhicks2113 R-Adm?

@Shoeg4zer 2 года назад

Video says Russia, so not mid-80's.

@GrowlingSidewinder 2 года назад

if you have any ideas for large scale videos like this let me know, I do enjoy doing these kinds of mass events like this it's pretty fun to watch and see how it plays out.

@Nicksanchez1122 2 года назад

Day 9: r37 vs aim 54

@nighpaw4651 2 года назад

Hear me out, ww1 style of 2 big groups of planes getting into a dogfight except they're fighter jets and there's way more of them

@peetabar2532 2 года назад

israeli f-16's attacking a nuclear core in iran

@anubhabpaul3654 2 года назад

Chinese carriers vs Indian Air Force and Navy aircrafts equipped with BrahMos and URAN

@SorryImFromOhio 2 года назад

This seems like the exact scenario that the track 6, shoot 6 with the Phoenix. Would be cool to see that

@BringTheRain 2 года назад

Absolutely LOVE large scale stuff like this!!!!

@mercbenz5885 2 года назад

yeah me too

@ednielmarreroduran3234 2 года назад

We love it, but it looks like Growling Sidewinder's PC doesn't

@icebolt0864 2 года назад

Yes, a large fighter/multirole dogfight would be INSANE!!

@ian_lewono 2 года назад

I don't think GS's computer does tho...

@Pete_Finch 2 года назад

The large scale stuff is so amazing. PC power just needs to keep up with what DCS can do

@KH-wv7po 2 года назад

This was sick. The cinematics of the tomcats running and tracking in the swarm of cruise missiles was A++

@RedneckRapture 2 года назад

The problem for the Russians in this scenario is that, with that rate of exchange, the next carrier battlegroup they attack will essentially destroy their capability to strike at carrier battle groups.

@Frugivorix34 2 года назад

They don't need bombers to get to a carrier with their new hypersonic missiles :)

@raptor4916 2 года назад

@@Frugivorix34 if it works

@ArmorKingEmir 2 года назад

@@raptor4916 they have supersonic, hypersonic, balistic. all kinds. if there will be an order, anything is gonna sink

@shinji1991 2 года назад

Indeed, it's time to remember that this is the "old way", since F-14's are not in service for 16 years now in USAF, such kind of involvement in arms would likely turn into nuclear warfare.

@kawasaki8051 2 года назад

@@Frugivorix34 they didnt have hypersonic missiles back then

@johnhrynkow776 2 года назад

While serving in the Navy during the 1980’s this simulation was exactly like what happened every time we sailed past Vietnam. The USSR at that time had a huge bomber wing stationed in Vietnam and would launch their bombers on a simulated attack at the USS Midway battle group. In turn the Midway launched F-18’s. Cruiser would have been 100+ miles from the USS Midway towards the known threat.

@Muschelschubs3r Год назад

Radar picket and missile sponge…

@popeyethesailorman7850 Год назад

I was on the Midway with VA-115 during that same time period

@nanungw951 2 года назад

In my days as an "aviator" in Microprose's Fleet Defender, if I recall correctly we should have already been flying when the bogeys were still beyond 150 miles or more. Launching the cats when they're already 80 miles away from the CVBG is a bit too late, considering the launch range of the Russian ASMs.

@x3grosso1967 2 года назад

I was thinking the same thing.

@richardbonham3976 2 года назад

Yes, much too close for real world. 200+ miles is more like what would happen. Anti-shup misses have a range of way more than 100 miles.

@viscounttudon68 2 года назад

It is funny that, while it cost the US more, Russia likely spent every single bomber it had in the process

@mammerman5678 2 года назад

The US can build more destroyers but are the production lines for any Russian bomber still operational? Same with the US if they spent all B-1’s, B-2’s, B-52’S all those have been out of production, but Russia can build more destroyers

@chetnash5991 2 года назад

And the difference in manpower lost.

@Jr-uh2so 2 года назад

Size matters when it comes to defense budgets. No doubt.

@AlyoshkaNecro 2 года назад

@@chetnash5991 y'know, it is unpleasant for me as for russian to admit, but seems like manpower is the least concerning factor for Russia.

@theflyingfool 2 года назад

@@Jr-uh2so I have it on good authority that the Russian defence budget is currently 1/14th that of the USA.

@mardymarve2298 2 года назад

This reminded me of the naval battle in the book Red Storm Rising. As I remember it, Russians used a fleet of Bears to launch cruise missles at a US carrier group. The US took out the first wave, pretty much like here, but the russians had a follow up wave of newer, better, missles that crippled the carrier as defences were being reloaded and rearmed. I think you had more Bears though. Good shit man.

@eddiecharles6457 2 года назад

How so? In the book, the soviets used the Bears as decoys and the Backfires attacked from multiple points of the compass. Most importantly the Tomcats did not follow the missiles into the defensive missile screen of the carrier battle group. It was not done here. Still, this was an interesting video to watch.

@Shoeg4zer 2 года назад

Red Storm Rising was a fictional account of a conflict between the Soviet Union (Warsaw Pact) and U.S. (NATO), not Russia.

@GaCracker69 2 года назад

"Dance of the Vampires" is the name of the chapter in Red Storm Rising

@rwwr1975 2 года назад

Love this book!

@mikehoyle6092 2 года назад

@@eddiecharles6457 Clancy used the bears to locate the fleet with their Big Bulge radars. The Bisons launched the Celt missiles with ecm that mimicked bombers, and the Tomcats shot their load on them. Meanwhile, the Backfires came in from another direction and sank the frog carrier and busted up the Nimitz.

@asquithea 2 года назад

You should read Red Storm Rising, by Tom Clancy (one of his older books). It has a sequence following pretty much this scenario, except the Russians start by launching drones from old Tu-16 bombers with transponders and accompanying jamming to simulate an incoming Backfire bomber raid. This draws off all the air cover and their their Phoenixes, and also soaks up some of the SAMs. The real Backfires then come in from another direction and volley Kingfish cruise missiles, scoring three hits on the carrier and sinking some other ships. Incidentally, the whole war scenario is kicked off by some dudes destroying a major oil refinery in Russia.

@tearthemhindpartsup 2 года назад

"some dudes destroying a major oil refinery in Russia." - Pro-independence ,Muslim extremist as I recall.

@Snipe-uc8df 2 года назад

Only thing I find weird is that the battle group isn't at full speed of 30+kts and conducting evasive maneuvers

@scottcooper4391 2 года назад

30 kt ship speed vs 1000+ kts for the cruise missiles - the ships are really going to seem that slow...

@SpencerAK74M 2 года назад

Came here to say that.

@bosoerjadi2838 2 года назад

Yes. In reality the battle group would defintely have gone to full speed evasive at the moment of launch. At that time those AS-4 Kitchens would only have had an approximation of where the group would be, only hoping the 'enchillada' would still be in the narrow basket of their terminal radar-guided targeting. Between moment of launch and the 'Kitchen' going hot, the carrier would have moved about 3nm, with the battle group's ECM systems burning hot enough to turn seagulls into fried chicken mid-flight.

@goldmastersimulations 2 года назад

That’s what Sea Power is for.

@levidotson6610 2 года назад

@@bosoerjadi2838 those weren’t kitchens, if they were the carrier wouldn’t have survived, the kh-22 kitchen travels at Mach 4 something those were the subsonic kh-35

@paladin0654 2 года назад

The entire concept of fleet defense with the Tomcat was to "shoot the shooter" before the shooter could launch. That's precisely why the Phoenix was developed. Tomcats weren't intended to scramble an kill bombers at range.

@sgt.grinch3299 2 года назад

I would love to see a WWI complete air assault for Verdun or the Marne. That would be crazy and upclose.

@HerrWayne45 2 года назад

holy shit yes

@danielberger1378 2 года назад

A bit of math here....: The Americans launched a total of 115 missiles, 71 Russian aircraft got shot down, which (assuming that every missile was a killshot) leaves us with 44 missiles left do deal with the 390 incoming Kh-65.... That means, that (if the bombers didn't get shot down before launch) at LEAST 346 Russian missiles went through the fighter barricade.... nothing but luck that only two ships were sunk

@Harleqwin 2 года назад

Yes, I would like to see how the US CBG shot down 300+ missiles. I do not believe it could happen in reality. Would like to know how many Tico cruisers and Arleigh Burke DD's your CBG had.

@boaragile82 2 года назад

Kh-65's range is in excess of 500 km. Aegis detection range is 250+ km. Tu-95 continue to bore down on target after entering SM-2 envelope, and it does not look like Aegis escorts are launching a lot. Hence: - American sailors were too busy watching porn, - Bear crew got carried away while fortifying themselves with 80-proof, and forgot the lsunch distance was 500 km, not 50. The world is crazy place, oh yeah.

@Pepsi-Mann21 2 года назад

What is the Tu-95's detection range against the group?

@anditsP 2 года назад

An overall Pyrrhic victory for the reds as their military budget is dwarfed by Americas far beyond the near 2:1 financial cost. Also the fact the carrier wasn’t even damaged let alone mission killed meant that really the red mission was a strategic failure. Could do one with supersonic Russian bombers like TU-22M3? Also when was the Russian bomber fleet detected? In reality the carrier would have an awacs up and presumably sport a large formation like that over 200 miles away! The desperate scrambling with the Russians ~80 miles away seems closer than it would be……..

@yurydmitriev4885 2 года назад

ok, ok

@emperor187 2 года назад

What form of arcane magic did you use to get the Russians to actually launch an Op time on target?

@ricbish 2 года назад

Holy smoke!! How many bombers did you have in the air during this mission? I don’t think I’ve ever seen that many in a modern mission before! Frightening stuff! Had me glued to my iPad monitor the whole time! Great stuff GS! Thanks for sharing this!

@Trainboy1EJR 2 года назад

Same but with a Fire HD10 tablet!

@trustbutverify485 2 года назад

Russians/Soviets estimated it would take 100 bombers to hit a carrier successfully - and 60% plus of the bombers would not return.

@skyhorseprice6591 2 года назад

Bruh, mad props to both you and Manscaped for Testicular Cancer Awareness Month. I am a survivor of Testicular Cancer, so I can tell you that awareness and early detection (which are _always_ key in any Cancer fight) are especially important in defending against Testicular Cancer. Men should know that there is a natural barrier between the right and left testicles, so that even cancer, which usually begins in one testicle, cannot cross it. A man's chances at survival approach 100% _if the cancer is detected before it enters stage 2!_ After stage 2, Testicular Cancer enters metastasis and enters the bloodstream, and then it's a stone cold killer. Early detection, mandude guys. Early detection. Go get a thorough physical exam at least once a year. Men from the ages (roughly) of 28-40 are the most likely to develop this form of cancer. If you were born with an undescended or partially descended testicle, you are in the high risk category. Sorry to take up your space with this, GS, but I have lived this and I'd be truly happy if no more men _ever_ have to face this cancer. I'd like to make one more point before I STFU and step off. The most common fear among men, because the treatment for Testicular Cancer is to remove the cancerous testicle and save the good one (unless some new treatment is in the works that I do not know about), is that they will lose sexual function. Well, I'm here to tell ya, that is a myth. I know because it worried me when I faced this. You can have full on functionality with no need for any medical intervention. But if the cancer is not detected before it metastizes, you _definitely_ won't have sex. Ever. Testicular Cancer can be 100% defeated by regular physical exams and paying attention to warning signs. K. We now return to your regular channel. Peace out.

@imrekalman9044 2 года назад

In the 70's and 80's the Soviets thought the effective defence zone of a carrier group to be 300 nm, so they developed plenty of anti-ship missiles with more than 300 nm range. P-500, P-700, Kh-22, KSR-5. These were to be launched from multiple platforms (ships, subs and Tu-16K, Tu-95K and Tu-22M bombers) from multiple directions. Two or three ships, 6-10 submarines and 1 or 2 bomber regiments with 40 bombers each, none of which would have stepped within the 300 nm bubble, with roughly 200 to 300 missiles, all big, heavy and most importantly supersonic. In this scenario subsonic Kh-35 were used with a range of 70 nm. The Kh-35 was meant to be used against smaller ships, frigates at most, not carriers. Limitations of DCS I'd like to say. Or not enough research, or just trying to ensure the desired outcome, I cannot tell.

@gabrielchad447 2 года назад

That one Tomcat that got friendly fired 😂

@williammathis6044 2 года назад

Here is an idea for some large scale battles. You could do a weekly battle mimicking the naval campaign in Tom Clancy's novel Red Storm Rising. The attacks on the carrier groups, the Tomcats helping retake Iceland, etc. It would be really cool to see, plus I that novel has been one of my favorites for almost 3 decades.

@darylcav6285 2 года назад

I absolutely agree!

@playon2235 2 года назад

You guys did an OUTSTANDING job on this video. The cinematography looks great and y’all picked awesome music to help build the suspense. Whoever did the music did a great job.

@SummaryNine26 2 года назад

The shot of the f14 flying in the pack of cruise missiles is the coolest most awesome thing I have ever seen.

@DustinBlaise 2 года назад

Crazy thing about the Phoenix Missiles is that they were not originally designed to be Anti-Aircraft missiles. The Phoenix was originally designed to to intercept and destroy Missiles like Cruise Missiles or ICBMs from far distances way before they can get near any populated area or fleet. However in testing it showed high marks in accuracy not just in destroying missiles but also in destroying Aircraft from far ranges. and that is when it became known as an effective Anti-Aircraft Missile with the capability to shoot enemy missiles too and the F-14 was specifically designed as a carrier for these missiles. Like how the A-10 was designed around it's Gun. The F-14 was designed for the Phoenix Missiles.

@aryan7880 2 года назад

Why US don't use them anymore?

@Nyx_2142 2 года назад

@@aryan7880 Too expensive, both the missile and the plane that carried it. More cost effective solutions existed.

@thinlycut 2 года назад

watching a Tomcat, wings swept back weaving and banking around those missiles looked absolutely incredible! Awesome clip!

@skyhorseprice6591 2 года назад

Dude! @Growling Sidewinder This was your best cinematic video yet. Those initial shots of the cruise missiles screaming along, mere feet above the ocean surface, were exquisite! When the Tomcats began to descend upon them from the skies above, like raging birds of prey, the action approached cinematic bliss. That was really well done, man, big shout out to ya for this one💥💪💯

@Bad_Wolf_Media 2 года назад

The only part of this I'm not sure is portrayed correctly (and my well be a limitation of DCS, I don't know) is that the Phoenix/AWG-9 system with the F-14 was designed for multiple target engagement. That didn't really seem to be happening here (ripple shots at the bombers and then at the cruise missiles). All the shots seemed to just be one at a time. Not sure if that would really change the outcome, just something I noticed. For all the cruise missiles in the air, to only have lost two ships from the group is pretty impressive.

@Killerpixel11 2 года назад

If real fleet defense would be there (DCS limitation, I guess) it would've been even less. Have that BG going full flank evasive, with ECM, CM, SAMs and CIWS going off, not to mention that giant furball of missiles, ships and fighters, a lot of those ASMs would've wandered. The range was also waaaay low. Those cats could probably kill a lot of that launch before it even happened.

@tobiasnan 2 года назад

Superb cinematics! Reminds me on the Red Storm Rising book chapter: Vampyr. But there the end result was quite disastrous to the US carrier group. That book had an other epic air battle depicted: the first battle over the Fulda Gap, stealth bombers sneaking up on the Soviet AWACS to blunt the first wave.

@TexasWarbird 2 года назад

@2:49 you can see one of the phenoix go pit bull and lock the F14 infront it as a blue on blue.

@jaymac7203 Год назад

It's hard to believe that the basic foundation for the DCS sim is 14 years old and still looks so good. Imagine if they made a DCS 2.0 with all the graphical and physics improvements added that were made over all this time? 😳

@Ahounstadt 2 года назад

When there are so many contrails they might as well be just another cloud in the sky...

@darkalman 11 месяцев назад

9:13 - Watching a Tomcat chasing cruise missiles is straight out of a movie, so awesome

@ltitus8900 2 года назад

Even if it is a game, watching the fleet defend itself was awesome. The carrier sat in the middle and the rest lit the sky up with tracers. War ships are awesome. Thanks for another great video!

@stanburk7392 2 года назад

I wonder if it would remain in the middle if the attack was coming from one direction or if it would have all the escort ships go to one side?

@thewaraboo2824 2 года назад

2:52 Was that Friendly Fire there? Boy, that guy picked the absolute worst time to be a Blue Falcon. Round of applause. Though you'd think that the Phoenix would have had safety measures built in to prevent something like that...

@Bulletoc 2 года назад

These costs, subtracted from each countries yearly defence spending = heavier losses to Russia

@773-o2n 2 года назад

you mean like in terms of percentage of the total military asset?

@Takarde 2 года назад

LOL the Tomcat that shoot down itself in the forst Phoenix volley

@kl743 2 года назад

I honestly believe that the tactical cost of loosing so many bombers to the Russians is worse than the US loosing 2 cruisers. However I do believe this was down to not loosing the carrier, if the carrier was lost it would be different. In this scenario, the Us have not lost their Sea or Air superiority and have got backup carriers to fill tactical holes while ships are resuplied Anti Air in Safe Harbour, however 2 weeks later with 2 substituted Cruisers, the Carrier group would be back operational. Not to mention that still after this attack the carrier group can still defend itself semi effectively and steam unassited to safe harbour not retracting any further resources, while the Russians have gone seemingly all in. As a final point, financially, I believe the US could weather this hit much more effectively than the Russians

@DemonLordGamingAC0 2 года назад

It's not. Soviet stuff was dirt cheap, and their philosophy was quantity over quality

@Jr-mj3bw 2 года назад

@@DemonLordGamingAC0 well considering the entire Russian bomber command was destroyed for this operation I’d say it’s a win for the yanks

@deeformed2475 2 года назад

RIP that one guy who got friendly fired 2:50

@hansiminator69 2 года назад

Can we please talk about the amount of Russian bombers in that "operation"?!

@mastathrash5609 2 года назад

EVERY Bear ever made.

@sgt.grinch3299 2 года назад

More than are operational. They don’t have the flight crews for an assault like that. This scenario is a suicide mission for many people.

@Starbz 2 года назад

LOL @ 3D Printer

@runedragone 2 года назад

Thought we had better radar than that? 80 miles is about 120 miles more to close! Isn't anything within 200 miles scrambled on? Or I am just watching to many movies? LOL !!

@kennethhicks2113 2 года назад

@@runedragone Yes, very good point. SA would have been much more even with older E2B's and if that close to an enemy... they'd be in the air or the task force wouldn't be there... imo.

@LeHatton 2 года назад

9:43 should have been a scene in Maverick. That was so badass watching all those CIWS light it up.

@warhammerchieftain9795 2 года назад

To be honest, i think its a win for the American Battle Group on a strategic lvl. Most important ship, the carrier, was not destroyed. 2 Escorts and 8 Tomcats lost. The Escorts hurt, but they are not of such strategic importance. The carrier can still commit strikes. On the other side, the loss of 65 Bombers is a large hit for the commander in the operational area i guess. The russians would be able to fight for air dominance maybe, but would not have sufficent bombers for another airstrike of significant level any more in that region.

@Curtislow2 2 года назад

Props to Jester for hanging in!

@scottcooper4391 2 года назад

Like to see this with TODAY's airwings (all Super Hornets / F35s), AAMRAMS (no AIM 54's). And the Aegis systems in full Auto. This would also mean just about all escorts would be VLS and AAW capable. And have the attackers be the Chinese PLAN. And yes - the E-2s would be up as well. Otherwise - yes, Red Storm Rising describes type of battle (at least a couple happened). I was in CICO school and read the book all in one night (started at 7PM, went to bed 3 AM, then went to class in the morning).

@Utubesuperstar Год назад

Unfortunately dcs doesn’t have the new aegis systems and sm2/6’s as well as the essms they only have the old version and sm2’s

@jefferyscott5007 2 года назад

The ones where you fight multiple bandits are my favorite. It really shows the performance of the plane & pilot

@berengerchristy6256 2 года назад

Tbh doesn’t even look like the carrier was targeted. The two ships sunk each got hit by several missiles that I’d call overkill. I think if a carrier group was hit like this everything is going to be lost. I also think that if a carrier group is hit like this the world will soon end

@ret7army 2 года назад

The problem with 80s tech, good, very good but still limited. Seekers probably would have trouble ( I'm guessing here) with discriminating between ships. Not shown would have been chaff launchers to try and further confuse the missiles not to mention the ships also attempting to maneuver

@hmmjedi 2 года назад

The missile on missile kill was AIm-54A vs either an Exocet or a H-2Y Silkworm... either way it's a damn good shot even better was the claim that the Iranian's fired an AIM-54A at a blob and got 3 kills due to the size of the warhead and the subsequent explosion of the Mig-23 it hit and fatally damaging the other 2 aircraft... it was a truely outstanding missile and with the Tomcat's radar it was an amazing weapons system. Also as an aside this fight would have started out at 300 miles+ but hey plot magic... great video and thanks for making it...

@jjhilldodger 2 года назад

That many bombers would (you'd think) necessitate more escorts. That could have tipped the balance imvho.

@mcintoshdev 2 года назад

What's really scary is that we don't have ANYTHING like the F-14A/B Tomcat in the entire US Navy. Fat Mary (F-35) may have stealth but it doesn't have the F Pole that an AIM-54 gives the Tomcat. Also I would argue that the engagement is a resounding success for the USN because the CVN survived to fight another day and was able to recover the Tomcats that were not lost. I was FC1-1138 USN 82'-92'. My speciality was the SPS-48 C and E. The one aspect of the engagement is the 80's NTDS system. The 48's on the CVN, any CG's or CGN's along with SPY would have been passively tracking those bombers and launching 100's of SM-1, SM-2 and maybe even SM-2ERs. DCS does not model this very well. Anyways great video and it defintely created a pucker factor!

@goldmastersimulations 2 года назад

This video shows how much optimization work DCS needs.

@colinboone9920 2 года назад

The poor guy at 2:56 that blew up as the phoenixes were launched ☠️☠️

@romainlavoie1526 2 года назад

Truly appreciated and fantastic! Sea battle at it's best ! That's the cost of saving a carrier. However for Russia - it lost the bulk of its bomber capabilities. Definitely not worth it.

@hirsch9634 2 года назад

For what it's worth the ships lost were a Ticonderoga and an Arleigh Burke. (If this was already pointed out, sorry about that.) Great scenario showing exactly what the F-14/Pheonix were designed to do (as opposed to dogfighting.) But surprised that the Tom's didn't engage multiple targets simultaneously. Is this a DCS limiting factor? Great video as always!

@Husker5454 2 года назад

God damn this was filmed like an episode of battlestar galactica that was awesome

@danieldunlap4077 2 года назад

As I'm watching this video, I hear in my head "Missile inbound portside. All hands brace for impact. (Large explosion), "relax brace".

@MadeByForce 2 года назад

Im surprised your PC didnt catch fire while running this. I know mine would have lol

@GrowlingSidewinder 2 года назад

it did lol.

@jonharper4478 Год назад

Id love to see this same scenario play out, only this time with F-35s and up to date defense systems from the Navy ships. See what the difference is.

@benoitlevesque9609 2 года назад

So 65 Bombers for 2 auxiliary ships, Russia would not be able to sustain that level of losses.

@benmodel5745 2 года назад

Ticos are not auxilliary ships, they are the largest surface combatant of the US Navy. It would be akin to loosing a battleship. An auxilliary would be something like a fleet oiler.

@bluewater82 2 года назад

Just had to stop and say that when all of those bombers rolled in it totally reminded me of Animatrix when it showed us trying to black out the sky against the machines.

@davidfoley1204 2 года назад

Such an incredible video. Gotta say your ideas and production have been through the roof recently.

@GrowlingSidewinder 2 года назад

really appreciate it man, been working hard to keep the content interesting.

@matthanks2803 2 года назад

Absolutely awesome scenario- camera angles, scale, and an overall just badass dynamic made this one of my favorite missions from you (shooting down cruise missiles..so cool!)). Love to see this kind of dynamism and scope…shows your progressing towards some truly enthralling next level entertainment. Your a great pilot and teacher, and we love seeing you expand your repertoire. Nice Work!!

@SpaceNavy90 2 года назад

This is what makes hypersonic, stealth cruise missiles so scary. You can launch them from much further away and they are much harder to detect with radar. You could very well be dead before you even know they're coming. US side should be lucky most of those ASM went after the two ships instead of being more evenly distributed amongst the fleet.

@victorshikhman 2 года назад

Oh man! This was better than a movie! I remember hearing once about an F-14 out of missiles and guns which took down a cruise missile by tapping it with its wingtip. Maybe something to try, if the game physics allow it? It may have come from a Tom Clancy novel, so, kids don't try this at home.

@smittywjmj 2 года назад

I think whoever you heard that from may have been 'borrowing' from a WWII tactic, where pilots intercepting V-1 'buzz bombs' would fly alongside and tip the V-1 over with their wingtip.

@drupiROM 2 года назад

It takes me back to highschool when i used to play jane's Fleet Command. Wish someone made a modern game like it.

@gregbagel791 2 года назад

This is a really interesting scenario that really points out the important of costs, both physical and monetary. The US lost out monetarily, but in all honesty the extra billion is hardly anything in the grand scheme of military spending, but an extra billion to Russia with their more depressed economy can be more devastating. Russia also lost out physically in terms of units lost, there's no way they will likely mount an assault like that again or else they would never have bombers or deployable cruise missile capabilities. Russia also failed at achieving the targeted result, the destruction of the battle group, and most importantly the destruction of the carrier, which came out completely unscathed. Even if they succeeded in doing a lot of damage, the US still has the capabilities to assemble several more carrier groups. Its safe to assume that unless Russia was really backed into a corner a scenario like this would probably never play out.

@Z06KILA 2 года назад

Its not interesting…. Just keep watching sponge-bob kid…

@BeingFireRetardant 2 года назад

The more important cost is the dead Russians... because just like today, it would be extremely hard to convince the next ones in line to join in on another suicide mission. Because when even Russians know they're going to lose eventually, the next thing that follows is usually revolution in that country. It just takes enough dead soldiers. So we simply keep giving them more dead soldiers... It's hard arithmetic, but eventually they understand.

@loxachi1291 2 года назад

This was really good and a great Cinematic. Loved the water shots of the missiles as it really puts into perspective the term "saturation attack" That said I've run a modern day version of this scenario in a tactical simulator (CMO) just with TU-22M2 & TU-160s instead of bears, F-18C & E/F (True to the CBG I was wargaming). In 10 scenario and engagement sets Redfor landed a singular missile on a DD. SM-6, SM-2, ESSM layered ECM and decoys are incredibly effective. On the flip side in most scenarios the bombers were able to get away with fewer than 10 losses due to the forward fighter screen they had.

@drksideofthewal 2 года назад

Quite frankly, 3.95 billion dollars ain't shit to the US Navy. 2.1 Billion and the loss of their entire strategic bomber force means a lot more to the Russian military.

@InfraredSpace 2 года назад

Naah.. it's also same to Russia ain't shit to the Russian, because they can produce anything else in rapid manner.

@Anarchy_420 2 года назад

2:54 friendly fire doesn't inspire hope!😆

@CaptainSpacedOut 2 года назад

I am genuinely surprised that only 2 ships were lost. Did you use am updated carrier mod?

@Mike_Romeo 2 года назад

The carrier of the "Super carrier" module was used.

@Bellthorian 2 года назад

The AIM-54 was designed to shoot down both bombers and cruise missiles. It should have a high hit rate on a cruise missile since it is a large non maneuvering target.

@StevenG415 2 года назад

I'd love to see some F4 phantom content I don't think I've seen you fly one man

@candle_eatist 2 года назад

there isn't one in DCS???

@Nyx_2142 2 года назад

@@candle_eatist They've teased the F-4E

@Dirtyharry70585 Год назад

John Wicks flight wings: Winston;’John they’re coming-how many missiles do you need?’ John Wick;’All of them cause I’m going to kill all of them!’

@paez4779 2 года назад

Flying with and shooting down the cruise missiles was the most adrenaline pumping part of the vid... That was awesome

@adriandanielvalidomorales6130 Год назад

THIS is what the Tomcat was designed for, to protect the battle group from the Soviets

@PatriotPlus179 Год назад

If this had occurred, Russia would have lost a lot of bombers and support aircraft. The F-14's radar and the AIM-54 were the real deal. With the F-14's speed, it would have been very effective.

@aybaws 2 года назад

2:54 was that friendly fire lmao

@harrisongilbert 2 года назад

There’s the question of whether an attack like this is even possible of happening today. As we saw in the video, Russia wasted a huge amount of strategic bombers in the attempt of taking out a CSG which only grossed them 2 sunk ships, and a untouched carried. This video is really a testament to show the defensive power that a fully kitted out CSG possesses. Even a country committing almost all of their bombers is only able to take out a couple ships, neither of them being a high value target like a carrier. Of course, the human factor and fail rate isn’t shown here, but it’s still interesting to see.

@notaulgoodman9732 Год назад

That wall of fighters must be the coolest thing I have ever seen.

@danpatterson8009 2 года назад

Pretty sure you could take a Bear in a rate fight- oh wait, he's got a gun on that end...

@acerimmer8357 2 года назад

The AIM 54 was a follow on to the AIM 47 originally designed to intercept ballistic missiles and armament for YF 12, which later became the SR 71 (very short version)

@swordmonkey6635 Год назад

That music at the beginning makes me think I'm watching Colonial Vipers launching from the Galactica to engage a Cylon attack. lol

@wstavis3135 2 года назад

The AIM-54 seeker was so good it could track and intercept an ICBM. This was tested several times in the 80s. The tracking/seeker systems were taken and placed in rockets launched into space and tested against a second rocket launched. I want to say the tests were 100% successful but I don't actually remember the number of tests. I just remember that as a proof of concept it showed we already had the tech to track and shoot down an ICBM successfully. I think this may also have been the origin of the Brilliant Pebbles concept of space based interceptors.

@RagsHSC-7 2 года назад

Awesome demonstration of a theoretical probability. The question I asked myself, bombers already sent the missiles. Only a few escorts. Knowing the Phoenix missiles can take down the bogeys missiles. Why not leave a unit to go after escorts & the remainder to go after the majority of The missiles because the bombers unloaded their total package & or ordinance. Tom cat being so fast and the love of my life all time military aircraft. That is my question ? Knowing that the defending package strike Force that is to protect the carrier. I believe today they can handle it but a helping hand is a good friend indeed. Thank you so much and I’m going to share this one with everyone I know. Thank you so much and doing it with the F-14 tomcat loved it thank you again and I’m gonna thank you for all of your subscribers. Loved it and thank you for your precious time and Massive EFFORTS. Can’t wait to see the next one and again all spades ♠️♠️🦅♠️♠️

@jeffperkins8921 2 года назад

I don't know anything about anything, but since there are so many bombers, I would want those first, for strategic reasons. Everything you say is correct. But if the bombers get home, they can come back and do it again. If this is all of their bombers and we get them, we may take a greater hit this time, but it would be their only hit on us. Just thinking out loud here.

@khalifstigler7493 2 года назад

1:58 oh my God that's a alot of bombers

@craigharris41 2 года назад

lol, that music playing when the bombers are shown.

@gr1pen 2 года назад

Me: *Sees title and starts to panic Also me: *Sees Tomcat in the thumbnail and calms down

@solidkreate5007 2 года назад

Depending on the year you're simulating (1992-1999) The skipper of the bird your flying (which we called "Nuts" because id was aircraft 100) would have been CDR. Carry M. Silvers or Kenny "Pink" Floyd.

@learningtoprepper 2 года назад

I just lost a fellow brother in arms on 4 July 2022 to testicular cancer. So thank you for the awareness.

@benh745 2 года назад

Imagine the sound of all that CIWS when the wall of missiles was coming at the ships.. BVVVRRRRTTTTTT

@Anarchy_420 2 года назад

This was an incredible intense battle with an amazing cinematic aspect! Exceptionally Entertaining!!👍👍 Definitely leaves me asking PLEASE more large scale cinematic scenarios😁✌

@brandonschwertley2723 2 года назад

DRADIS contacts, Cylon raiders inbound, Launch Vipers!

@jackpitw 2 года назад

Very 'Battlestar Galactica' sound track choice!

@Mark13376 2 года назад

Sounds like a McDonalds inside the F-14

@thecowboyfromcali Год назад

This cinematic sequence was unmatched by any other DCS 10 min movie I've ever seen. Holy Christ

@jinchoung 2 года назад

actually, should we be surprised that phoenixes can take out subsonic cruise missiles? in the f/a-18c, i'm having a hard time NOT shooting down r-77s! like i would like a way for radar to NOT target missiles. i once shot down an incoming r-77 that was 3 plane lengths away from me. i would have thought that this kind of missile v missile shot was exceedingly difficult but at least according to dcs, it's commonplace!

@solidkreate5007 2 года назад

Todd Pendleton OMG!!!!!! I know him personally. That was the Sailor of the Year you have on the nose landing gear door.