Mh youre right! But I think its hard to say. Its difficult to stay objective... Master Wong comes over very arrogant... Dewey is a nice guy so I would like to see hin as the winner... On the other hand I want to see a guy to win the fight using kung fu or tai chi... And from a technical perspective I think Dewey would win cause Master Wong does his techniques only as a reaction to incoming attacks. I think thats pretty uneffective and difficult to do. You have to lead the fight to win the fight. Waiting for incoming punches to react to it is quite the opposite of leading fights. So a good strategy would it be to build up the contact to his guard as often as possible to create a situation where he could use his techniques...... It seems to be that Ramsey Dewey knows how to do fights with tai h... some years ago he did a video about this idea. So I thing he has a better tactical view on fights than Wong. Wong is too impulsive and not cool enough. It could be that this is a huge disadvantage of Wong...
@@KeytoKungFu Very good comments! Thanks! You favor Dewey! I think tai chi is great for exercise, preserving joints and range of movement but has been shown ineffective for fighting. Maybe I'm wrong! Master Wong teaches self defence so you're right, it's mostly reacting and not not leading. That does not mean he doesn't know how to land first and take the initiative. Also countering moves or counterstriking (as boxers do and some specialize in this) can be effective. Some of what Master Wong does is self defence to save your life against thugs. It's different than MMA to some extent. To save your life you can go for the eyes, throat and groin. You can bite. If this is a no rules fight which Wong knows and Dewey would also know, I don't want it to happen. Someone can be seriously injured or worse. They can lose an eye, have their windpipe broken, etc. They both seem like good people, are working and have families. If it's MMA rules I'd like to see it and I guess Dewey has the edge but I don't know much about him. Wong wouldn't be allowed to use some of his techniques so that makes it harder for him. Are you sure you want to be so offended that Wong uses the name Master Wong? There are different definitions of Master. "having or showing very great skill or proficiency." "acquire complete knowledge or skill in (an accomplishment, technique, or art)." You are using definition 2. I doubt that Wong claims complete knowledge or skill. He probably just picked the name for marketing purposes. In chess, a player becomes a Master when he achieves a rating of 2200. That does not mean he/she has acquired complete knowledge or skill. In fact there are at least 3 levels above him/her: International Master (about 2400); Grandmaster (2500) and World Champion (currently over 2800).
@@rickrick5041 Hey thanks for your comment. So at first I am not offendet that master Womg uses the term master... Everyone can choose a nickname he or she wants. So I am not conservative in this way. But if he wants to do fights the term master would be a problem for himself. Imagine Lei Lei vs Xu Xiaodong everyone is laughing about... If Lei Lei only would be an average MMA guy nobody would care. But to have a big mouth would cause that you have to prove yourself. And if you cant prove everyone will laugh about you. So all this guys believe that they are the best cause they are able to do nice forms. But they dont understand their own styles. So it is not the fault of tai chi its the fault of dumb guys never train in a proper way and have not the slightest tactical understamding but then try to fight someone who has 100 times more fighting experience... Tai Chi can be pretty effective but only if one understand that its a wrestling style. Similar to Brazilian JuJitsu. The idea is to get the opponent to the ground. But a fighting distance over 2meters is suicide.... you need the direct wrestling context. The problem is all this self called masters doesnt seem to know that.
@@KeytoKungFu Thank you too. I'd like to see a Tai Chi fighter with a lot of fighting experience fight an MMA guy. So far they haven't done very well. I'm not covinced Tai Chi is effective at fighting. Yes, if you brag it's best if you can back it up like Muhammad Ali
@@rickrick5041 The point is I even dont think that selfdefence should be done in a reacting way. I even dont think that there are selfdefence techniques etc. I think selfedefence is about a selfdefence situation. That means of course youre in a bar taking some drinks with your buddies but suddenly an ashole is throwing punches to you. In my oppinion this would save your life: First you have to note that you have to defend your self. Secondly note that selfdefence is not a one-way street that you only may reacting to the opponent. (By the way thats the reason why Aikido does not work.) 3. Do a switch in your head "Oh I am gonna attacked now I have to fight. 4.Fight.... so you have to understand that you have to switch the situation from being the victim to becoming the guy who leads and wins the fight. Every fight is the same. Anyway if youre on the street or in the ring. Of course on the street you have no rules. But if you fight in a ring and try to lead fights cause you know that its effective to win why should you do the opposite thing in a selfdefence situation? That does not make sense... So tai chi and kung fu are very agressive styles. If you use it in a too defensive way you will loose
