Material Properties 101 

Real Engineering Did you consider Pluralsight for providing more in depth courses? I love it, professional and viewer friendly material with monetary compensation baked in. No university required, I hope. :)

Maybe get some friends to work on the second channel.

Awww... as an overly bored seventh grader that would be amazing.

Hi İndustries are not responsible for implementing sustainable practies. Embodied energy of a material/object is a fundamental index of impact on the sustainability. Are these T or F?

Please don't give up on a more technical channel. I am a starting my third year of mechanical engineering and I very much value your content.

his other acc has 0 videos and 15 k subscribers

Hey, martis, what is that icon from? I see it everywere!

it's a brush from gimp 2.8

martis martiis 15,000/0 (infinity)0 = 0 Ratio of subscribers to videos: beyond infinity (or, y'know, undefined) Absolute perfection

Sounds like a business channel.

Nelson De Vera I agree

lol.

This is why the internet is a miracle

We only spent like 5 hours on this lol, but the video is very clear and well done

thats college for you

Hi, I thought ductile meant can be drawn out into a thin wire? :-)

That's an excellent idea ! You should contact the guys in CrashCourse, I'm sure they would be interested in patronizing you as well.

well a non-ductile material certainly can't be drawn into a wire. Ductile just means the material deforms significantly before failing. The opposite of that is brittle, where the material shatters suddenly.

Real Engineering ahhh thanks

Real Engineering man i understand english well but as a 13 years german dict.cc I'm coming xD

What's harder, Material Engineering or Electrical Engineering ?

Sunny shah hahahahaa EE is the hardest by far

@@BangMaster96 Material, as all fundamental engineering is based on the Materials you can use.

@@BangMaster96 I'd say electrical but that's pretty hard to determine. It mostly depends on who's learning it I'd say. I'm studying material engineering btw.

@@Max-pn8dk anything electricity related is just fucking annoying. I hate it so much i avoided it like the plague during my formative years as a chemical-technical lab assistant.

As an Mech/aerospace guy I can def say a lotta material scientists/metallurgists really like playin around in the lab haha this is what I observed when I was taking my mechanics of materials course lab they were putting all sorts of stuff in the utm needless to say the lab tech was mad😂

Thanks Inés!

@@RealEngineering THE UNIVERSAL, SIMPLE, CLEAR, AND TOP DOWN MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA (ON BALANCE): It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, carefully consider what is THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Very carefully consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. (LOOK up at what is the blue sky, AS THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider what is THE EYE. So, LOOK at what is the fully illuminated (and setting) Moon AND the orange Sun ON BALANCE. Now, think about what is LAVA. E=MC2 IS F=ma. SO, we then multiply ONE HALF times one half in order to determine the size of the Moon. (It IS about one fourth the size of the Earth.) This is CONSISTENT with the fact that the Moon IS (on balance) LAND. Therefore, the density of THE SUN is (ON BALANCE) about ONE FOURTH of that of what is THE EARTH; AS E=MC2 IS then CLEARLY proven to be F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Again, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!! The BULK DENSITY of the Moon is comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on the Earth. The energy density of LAVA IS about THREE TIMES that of water. SO, now, get a good and CLEAR LOOK at what is the ORANGE SUN !!! We WOULD then multiply ONE THIRD times one half in order to obtain the surface gravity that is experienced by the man on the Moon. (It IS one sixth of that of the man who is on the Earth.) The maria ("lunar seas") on the Moon do take up ONE THIRD of what is the near side of the Moon. Excellent. The Moon is ALSO BLUE on balance. Great !!! Now, in conclusion, the land surface area of THE EARTH is 29 PERCENT; AND this is EXACTLY ON BALANCE WITH BOTH one third AND one fourth; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY F=ma !!!!! GOT IT !!! GREAT. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY proven to be gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It must be, and it is. By Frank DiMeglio

10 hours a month?

Two one and a half hour lectures / week

StealthPlatypus1 cool cool.

Today I Found Out hey, I showed your monopoly video to my family! love your channel, I'm subscribed.

Allegedly

@@BirdRaiserE Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio

@@frankdimeglio8216 erm, wrong comment section?

And all of those were termed networks IBM long before encryption method and the business had you back two play mirror mirror n the spoils,owe dear matter as say,objected old chap,goose March next.

Nathan Soper NO, "Physical Properties", which is a sub speciality of metallurgy.

I agree Nathan

I'm not complaining.

Biggest confusion in material science about stress-strain related stuffs, is that whether it should be considered under "mechanical" properties or not. In reality it's basic to thermal, electrical, magnetic, optical and acoustic properties as well. Because the nature of external force can be anything. eg. electric potential difference/voltage applied on the material can also cause strain and thus stress, which are actually internal reaction forces to the external action forces. Ironically, internal reaction of a material, ie the stress is fundamentally of electromagnetic type.

The second channel will be seldom used for now. It's purely for videos with lower production value and more technical content. I want to keep this channel for really high quality fun videos.

Ah I understand what you mean, btw you've got a nice growth curve going on youtube :p gratz

I hope it wont be inactive for long, I really enjoyed this and would love to see more.

ductile, but yes, these are it.

ductule

I'll be covering steel and it's ability to be hardened in detail soon.

Real Engineering great!

I'd like to see that, I'm making some mixing blades from steel rod and could use some insight fine tuning them. Soon?

Fantastic. That makes me happy.

its a very refreshing change not to have some yank rarh-rarh'ing at me and waflling on ....