I'm taking electromagnetism this semester and i often try to explain maxwell equations for first year students. Man, that's actually harder than i thought, you're doing a great job on your videos! Congrats and greetings from Brazil!
As a year 1 electrical engineering student, I’m so happy that I found your channel! Our professor just immediately dives into all the difficult stuff, without giving us any intuition. But you completely take care of that!
Thanks for the refresher, I studied Maxwell from the OU course electromagnetism 30 years ago while I was a technician, and it was one of the best studies in my career life. I was stunned by this beautiful equation and achievement by Maxwell, a union of electricity and magnetism. It washes away complex and difficult understanding via well-designed video. Keep it up!
You are very precious Your videos learn a much in no time. Thats a very rare quality that only the bests are capable of. You belong to this class of rare people. Thank you VERY much
You are the best more especially on Maxwell's equation explanations ,I will definitely recommend your RU-vid channel to my friends. Thanks a lot for this videos.
The good way of intuitive thinking of divergence is that this operator tells us how laminar the field is inside of an area or whether there are some 'disturbances in the force' in the forms of sources or sinks nearby.
You are simply awesome. Please keep doing this, explaining equation and theorems in a very understandable manner, esp we want more of Maxwell's equations. Thanks a lot bro. 🤗
Thank God! I have found you! I can understand your explanation so much! Please keep doing this kind of video. It really helps. You might be my favorite Physics Vlogger! Where is your video explaining the other 3 Maxwell's equations??
Your videos are so useful for me... U made understanding physics easy for me.. It's my request to you to make a video on the Maxwell's 4th equation... Hope u will soon make a video about it..
the method to remember the vectors direction of a positive charge and negative charge is by thinking the repelling and attracting property of charges.............. Basically properties of charges Thanks Mr. Higgs :)
This series of videos is a well-thought-out explanation of this topic. I always found the concept of an arbitrary enclosed “region of space” and a point charge(s) unsatisfying. 😀 I think a more intuitive example would be to examine Maxwell’s equation from a practical problem. The “region of space” should be a wire or dipole antenna. We should explain how an incoming Electromagnetic field at some frequency, say a typical FM station, impinging on the wire creates an alternating electrical current at the antenna terminals at the same frequency. The incoming E field magnitude and the geometry of how the E field interacts with the antenna determine the signal voltage at the matched antenna terminals.
just wanted you to know that the reflections in your glasses look like pink eye shadow. its cute AF. dude your videos are so brilliantly explained and put together. thank you!!!
Hii, thank you so much for explaining complex stuff like this so intuitively. You´re really helping loads of us but I was wondering if there´s a video about the 4th equation coming anytime soon. Love your work
Awesome videos! Really enjoyed the other two on Maxwell eq's. Could you please make a video on quantum spin? Especially what the heck it is and how it creates a magnetic dipole (I hope I got that right). I am a med student with a little background in physics (on which I am passionate) who is currently scratching his head in an attempt to understand MRI. Thanks again for your quality content!
Great content dude! I have been following for awhile and I love your intuitive explanations of complex equations and how they work! You should starting doing explanations of equations from mechanics too if possible!
Incredible. You gave me a better description about "divergence" operator. But in your Maxwell equation series you haven't talk about "curl". Can you please do a vedio describing about the curl.
Hey Parth, could you tell me which software/application do you use to make your videos? This sort of hand-written translucid half screen is really nice, I am looking for something like that. Thanks in advance, Cheers!
So, if you were studying electromagnetic fields underwater or inside of metal or anywhere else other than in vacuum, would you replace the ε_0 constant with the permittivity of whatever medium you were in, or would you always use the permittivity of the vacuum? (I would guess that the permittivity of materials would go into this equation and simulate the effects of the electromagnetic fields of all of the atoms(/etc.) in the material as they exist and align with your fields and what not.)
Hi Parth! Thank you very much for the overall presentation of the information. I found out this long ago that the poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits, but so many things are clear with your videos. Now I will start studying mathematical analysis, that is, integral and differential calculus. What would you suggest for a beginner like me who wants to become familiar with modern theories of physics which is a dream of mine from a very young age. I am an enthusiast by the way. From the easiest I mean to the hardest!
kudos to you Parth with your vivid explanation of quantum mechanics. I have watched a few videos of you and they are awesome. Please i would like to know whether you do tutorial on MATLAB programming.
HI Parth. I was kind of waiting to see which approach you would take for explaining the 4th equation. You could have just simplified this right from the beginning. In flat space time relativity, the four Maxwell equations collapse to two.
13:31 How do you know for sure from the graphic that the flow in is equal to the flow out from that region? Is the fact that "vectors flow in and also out from the other side" as you say (aproximately) enough to prove the divergence is zero? The vectors out could be larger than those coming in, or the opposite.
But the electric field generated by a point charge is such that this is not the case - the vectors pointing in do happen to exactly balance the vectors pointing out. There are other mathematical ways to calculate this too, for a (1/r^2) field, to confirm to yourself that this is true.
If you wanna do it the the hard way, take a point charge. Take a loop anywhere without including it, and integrate the d(phi) . If not, simply apply gauss law.😁
Parth, Please do a video explaining the "explanation" in your friend's video. The formulas were thrown on the screen with inadequate information about what the variables and constants represented. david
