Maya and the Simulation Theory 

I guess there could be something after eternal and total consciousness which is beyond what we can perceive or imagine.

I wonder about those things all the time and I wonder even more why nobody else seems to wonder and is only concerned with trivial things.

@OntologicalOdyssey That's a good question. There's a few things going on with that imo. From a young age we're taught that pretty much everything is already figured out. People lose that sense of curiosity. Also, the ego likes to "know." Living in the unknown is a place of vulnerability in some ways. It is super interesting how 90% of people will never once question where the hell they are while I question it almost daily. Haha

I was once asked how often I think about death. People didn’t believe me when I said “everyday”. I realized over the years, nobody really knows anything for sure. If anyone knows, it is probably the mystic rather than the scientist, with their changing opinions and opposing ideas about everything.

Beautiful ❤️

Alpha is finished ❤️

A reflection of ayaM. Rorri Maesu says useaMirroR

It’s partially shielding you from „true reality“. If our senses would perceive everything as it is, we would probably go crazy. I think that is what sometimes happens when someone awakens their Kundalini.

​@@OntologicalOdyssey Well, it could also be a practical matter. In discussions about Dr. Donald Hoffman's "Interface Theory of Perception," he has compared it to a higher-level interface, such as an operating system's user interface. Typing this message would be very difficult if I had to manually manipulate the hardware components of my computer. Similarly, life as a human might be really difficult if we could perceive the entire spectrum of light and hear the entire spectrum of sound. The background knowledge required to even partially understand what is going on can take a very long time to acquire.

@@crypticnomad I think in Asperger and Autism one can see what happens if the filters are different.

There is probably also a reason why it exists (so that we can handle our life as embodied beings with finite senses). But it is also good to know that there is something beyond the illusion of our limited perception. I think forcefully removing maya (for example kundalini experiment seems to be such a thing) can be quite dangerous, I think. A middle path is probably the best: where one accepts that the universe created maya for a reason (or maya is an aspect of the universe) and where one tries to be aware that there is more than we perceive.

@@Trapster The name Hari is also Maya. In fact, one of the Divine 1008 names of Lord Vishnu in the Vishnu Sahasranamam is Maya.

Vishnu itself ’मायावी’ Mayavi

I am sorry you feel like this. The channel is dedicated to explore parallels between scientific and spiritual concepts and to ask “what-if” questions.

@@OntologicalOdyssey Don't feel too bad that guys just wrapped up in MAYA OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. I thought it was a decent video didn't go into depth but scratched the surface. either way you make a good video and you are a good narrator.

Much Ado About No-Thing That's what Maya is friend. It's a reflection of You. Say Maya in reverse to reveal that ayaM.

To imply this video says "nothing" means one didn't obtain any useful semantic information or meaning from it. Perhaps the content is truly just random nonsense, in which case it is unlikely anyone would derive much semantic information from it. On the other hand, it might contain deep and immensely useful information that someone is either unable or unwilling to see. For example, reading all of Einstein's papers to my roommate's cat would likely mean little to it. I view "epistemic humility" as a virtue; there is no point in anyone's life where they can truly say, "Today I know everything." This framing might not always be practically useful, but it is one way of understanding things among almost certainly infinite ways. Different framings may be more or less useful depending on the context.

@@omtheta1821 thank you