Meta/Facebook Product Sense MOCK Interview 

🤩Comment below: ✍what other mock interviews do you want to see? 🥴Struggling with product interviews? 🚀Book 1:1 COACHING @ superpeer.com/dyau

Everyone always says in the comments of these various product sense interviews "this is the best one I've seen" - but having watched a ton of these videos now, I'm sure that this truly is the best one out there. This was a total masterclass by Abhishek. I'm kind of shocked how well he did that, how well he structured the interview and just the flow of conversation, how he came up with such unique insights about user pains and creative solution ideas, and how methodically he prioritised them. Truly the best product sense video on RU-vid and I learned a ton.

This guy is on next level. He has so much clarity on topic and a great great product sense

Thanks Dianna and Abhishek for recording this session. Great product sense interview! I love the structure and prioritization I have two concerns: 1. The time it took to do the entire mock was too long as compared to the time you usually get 2. In the value chain section - we talked about deciding the 'itinerary' has unmet needs and then we basically prioritized the same problem under pain-points section. It feels like we could gotten to the pain-point early on without doing the entire exercise. 3. The solution don't solve for the problems of families. It applies to all user segments which defeats the purpose of doing the user segmentation exercise Would love to hear more thoughts!

How is the product specifically focussing on family? The solution described applies more or less to all leisure travelers.

Hi Dianna, This is a great interview and Abhishek has done fantastic job in creativity. My Question - Do you have a suggestion how to time bound the solution to 27-30 minutes please (other than service provider point)? My concern is with timing which is where I was burned in my prior meta interviews. The answer ended at around 40 min in the video and it does not include the time he took to write the text on the doc which might potentially take it north of 45 min. From my experience at interviews at Meta, Lyft and Google, interviewees get 25 to 30 min to fully finalize the solution.

This was so insightful. Loved the way he explained every single aspect of the structure and his decisions.I would have loved to hear his gtm strategy at the end.

theres no way this is being done in 40 mins in an actual interview setting without knowing the prompt beforehand

Great interview! Would love to see more of this. Thank you Dianna for taking he time and effort to do these, there is so much to learn here.

Best video I have seen in a very long time, great strategy and clarity on what is being built and why. Solutions were very creative. Awesome.

One of the best product sense interviews I have ever seen. Kudos to Abhishek for driving a very powerful discussion!

Diana. This is very good example. But have you seen candidates do this thorough of a job in real-time in interviews. While the interviewee might know all these things, doing this while writing on the doc + actually taking time to think as travel is something not everyone does + thinking through solutions and also putting this in clear communication is tough to do in 30 mins. Seems thr individual had written the structure already, plus all the time he might take to write down the text is also skipped. Plus time building table is also skipped. Plus thinking time is also skipped. This seems like too picture perfect. We need to see a good enough interview that would get you in that way we know what the threshold is.

One of the best Product Sense interviews I have seen! Superb work!

Thank you Dianna , this was very helpful please upload more videos like this

AWESOME content. I have two final interviews for two different Sr. Product Mgr positions next week. THANK YOU!

This is a great interview, but this seems unrealistic to think this quickly on your feet and deliver naturally. Im assuming since hes head of product hes had alot of mock interviews or he prepared for this before hand.

it would be really hard to cover all of this in a 45 min interview.

Very good interview but it could have been called out if we are looking at b2b or b2c as in b2b space it’s a quite different with different players like Amadeus, Sabre , Travelport etc

Thanks!

great as always. It would be helpful to have the guest introduce themselves before the mock starts. Otherwise I keep asking myself who this person is that I'm listening to.

On the TAM, Frequency of Use, ARPU section, how often does one find themselves not using quant data? As intuitive as things may sound, it def. still is subjective, and if encountering another strong willed, informed person, there might be pushback nonstop at this step where nothing moves forward (understandably so) Can you do a mock interview where this back and fourth nudge is showcased, both parties are using their own "intuition" but arriving at different answers. Create a scenario where the conversation lasts several meets, with the camera turning on and off, a title at the start of the scene highlighting 5 days later" or something nice like that, very interactive experience IMO

Another solid interview! Thank you Dianna and Abishek. Quick question - under what scenarios would it make sense to solve for monetization as the business goal for a startup question like this? I understand the rationale here but another consideration is business viability risk. We could build a product that gets significant adoption but users aren’t willing to pay 10:20

Thank you for this @diannayau and Abishak I was thinking on crunching the families cohort even further. I think that there's a big difference between traveling with kids and teenagers, vs traveling with babies and toddlers. What do you think?

How do you share screen like that?

Is it typical to define such a specific business goal before walking through pain points and solutions? In other words did he converge too quickly in this process?

get your guide solves for what is discussed here

Yup, like other commenters have mentioned, definitely rehearsed, prepared beforehand and NOT a mock interview. At no point, he stumbles/takes time to think deeply. It's not like it's technical knowledge that you either know or you don't, it's an art. However, looking at the response (which is really good BTW), it feels polished. We need to see the un-edited version 🙂 I believe at some point I could see his eyes L-->R moving which may imply he's reading off of some notes

this is another rehearsed interview

I think the user segmentation was not great. The solutions proposed did not have any impact on the type of solution to be developed

Seems researched and prepared, not capturing a true example of a mock interview. I appreciate sharing the thought process and framework though.