MG4 Full Review 2023 - The Best Value Electric Car? 

That's why you have a vol down button

@@Greatdane-qf8kd No, it is not. If the original sound. is distorting, there is no amount of Vol - that will remove the distortion. Peak Vol levels should hit approx 90% on VU metres, with RMS levels between 50% and 70%. These are just my experiences of recording pretty much everything from rock concerts to voice-over-nature, but if you want the full low-down on recording levels I could ask my son-in-law for his dissertation on the subject that led to his PhD. But you might find that somewhat dense reading. But as a rule of thumb, if the sound is distorting when being played back at 50%, it's the recording at fault, not the playback. This video was distorting at way less than 50%.

​@@davidcolin6519Yeah well my uncle's father-in-law did sound for Vanilla Ice's hit song, Ice Ice Baby. He also works on the sound for the both Antiques Roadshow and Saw 1, 2, 4 and 5 (there was a dispute over mic levels for 3 and he rage quit), but he says that 51 to 73 is the prime range. Or you could ask my Dad's grandma's other half who wrote a pretty interesting murder mystery novel where the killer lets the mic levels get to 93%. Ironically the audio book didn't do too well. Anyway, it's subjective, so it doesn't matter what family member studied what.

@@artiomcdodge except that distortion is not subjective and is measurable. Distortion can be good, just look at Marshall amps. But when you are trying to impart information it's generally not, especially it bothers your audience.

I despised the ID4 when I tested it. those buttons were horrible on the wheel, and it felt cheap inside. the MG4 does a little bit... but it IS cheap. the ID4 isn't.

Hey Chris. Thanks for the kind words! EV’s are cool, just got to find what suits you. Where in the US are you?

@SHETALKSCARS I'm from Warsaw Indiana, I'm about 3 hours from Chicago Illinois Where in the UK are you from because I dig your channel and your very Emma Thompson-esque humor and manner of speaking

Thanks Eddie! Yep… fab car

It’s the 2022 - as you can see from the plate Glenn. 👍

@@SHETALKSCARS Sorry I'm from New Zealand so not familiar with UK reg plates sequence, thanks.

This is one of the first versions you can see at the face recognition sensor above the steering, from the later 2022 versions there are all removed.

yeah, bit weird she mentioned things that are missing in the car... when they aren't if you order now.

Hi - so the updated version has improved? This is what MG had available on their press fleet.

@@SHETALKSCARS it's improved in many ways. they now have rear wipers, rear middle headrest. full one pedal driving to a stop. have grab handles and the software was improved. it also removed the camera above the steering wheel which never worked properly.

Welcome. It’s the best value for money in my opinion at the moment :) any q’s just ask

Hey thank you for the kind words. Appreciate that. I’m partial to super car blonde, I think she’s fab. But my reviews are for people considering the cars. I guess hers are more to showcase them quickly :)

Thank you 🙏

C'mon be honest - just say it : she's hot!

Hmmmm lucky you then Brian. Good for other people to know. I have very sensitive hearing so I hear everything - I’m like a bat. 😂 Glad to hear you’re enjoying your Mg4

The MG4 is getting a centre head rest in the refresh. If you order one now you'll probably get that, and a rear wiper and 18" wheels, but no black roof

Many thanks Billy 👍

Latest car has grab handles front and back ,rear wiper, centre headrest

Plus no rear wiper and no passenger seat height adjuster

@@The-Salty-Bager yes lacking the most basic items. Luckily the aussie version will have rear wiper as mg realise that was a big mistake

@@wcrash9361the 2023 version has some serious upgrades. Including rear wiper. And 360 degree camera was already there (on the luxury version)

@@supermario9598 well apart from the wiper those. Other basic things are still missing

@@wcrash9361 it always had a 360 degree camera, just not on the poverty spec.

I suspect that it tries to kill you because you've become lazy in your driving habits. I recently had an MG hire car (can't even remember which model, it wasn't a BEV) and I found the lane assist intrusive, but not too bad. There again, I'm really quite anal about using my indicators everywhere. I know that not to be the case for something like 90+% of drivers. Your comment is certainly not uncommon. But there again, something like 90% of drivers barely use their indicators. Maybe the advent of lane maintenance systems might encourage drivers to think a bit more about their use of indicators. WTF am I kidding? We'll keep on getting complaints ad nauseam about Lane Keep Assist etc., because it's much easier to blame intrusive electronics than our own sloppy driving styles.

@@davidcolin6519 I spent 20 years as a police officer. When I took my police test I would have failed if I indicated and there was no one to indicate to. This showed that you had all round awareness of your surroundings. I still do not indicate if there is no one to indicate to and I believe this is a sign of good driving skills. I have no problem with lane assist providing I can turn it off permanently. This is just another sign of the nanny state to me. I believe lane assist will probably kill someone one day, although we are unlikely to hear that it was the cause of the accident. I do agree with you about drivers failing to indicate though, but it is just another sign of the times and common place bad driving..

@@rogerwilson6367 My brother was also a police officer, and I do not recognise your descriptions of what was expected. I am aware that different forces have different requirements, but my question would be; would you fail your course if you hadn't seen a pedestrian or some other `potential unforeseen hazard? Which is why I'm calling BS on your claim. And yes, LKA can be turned off on every vehicle that I'm aware of, so again, your BS is being called out. Isn't it curious that those who most object to "The nanny state" are often those who never had nannies? Yet one of the first things that super-rich people do... is employ nannies when they have sprogs? If nannies are such a terrible thing, then why do so many rich people employ them? So what is so bad about a nanny state? There again, if you really had been a PC, you'd know that reporting of tech that results in accidents (or may have done so) is extremely rigorous, and failing to report such can be reason for dismissal, so again, I have every reason to suspect your veracity.

@@davidcolin6519 If you take the time to read what I said, ie 'Turn it off permanently'. I would therefore call BS on your ability to read and understand what is in front of you. This tells me everything I need to know. As for the rest of your comments, I believe you are bordering on Clinical Insanity.

@@rogerwilson6367 Yeah, that's more like it, a PC jumping to insane conclusions. Maybe you are a cop after all. There again, the BS about not indicating is still BS.