ok,thank for permission so..he's a predator and thinks he can do whatever he wants behind the scene....only because he's a director which makes him a bellend
@@leonfontius5300 Better in what! The already set the bars,Michael is just a guy in the class who is ignored by everyone but loved buy his audience.”Silent Genius”
@@rahulgunwal3097 I know he is amazing when it comes to visuals but his ability to tell a compelling story for example like Christopher Nolan could use some more work.
@@leonfontius5300 First of all Both are way different but have same type shooting style Nolan make movies for scientists or smarter people and Michael Bay make fun movie for teenagers or maybe 12-25 age audience specially young people Nolan is good in high concept but not as stanly Kubrick or even Ridley Scott (The most underrated director ever)and it’s not necessary high concepts are great idea for example tenet people or specially critics (Smart audience)says it’s good idea but they don’t realise most probably 80-90% audience won’t get it,This is only for tenet it was kinda over the top concept.I’m not saying one director is best over another or Nolan is bad no way,he is genius but the thing is He’s not alone.Both are Best when it to there cinema.It’s just one loved 🥰 by critics and another one his completely hated by critics (Easy Target).
I used to hate Michael Bay. But I got smarter thatn that. He's genuinely in love with filmmaking. Look at his enthusiasm when he talks the technical stuff. He puts a lot of effort into what he does. That alone deserves some respect. He is, I think, one of the best directors in terms of production. Storytelling and some decisions in visual style are subject to criticism, as well as stories themselves and direction of acting, but damn do his movies look solid.
Are you high this guy has 0 respect for his movies in fact the dude is the Donald Trump of movies he has even stated he hated half if not all of his movies & only directed them because he collects a fat check from Hollywood dude is a embarrassment to the movie industry .
I like both Cameron and Bay. I don't know why critics hate Michael Bay, just because he puts too many explosions or because in his movies the camera never stops moving and as a result the editing is cut so fast?
Krystal Alien I personally find some of Bays movies entertaining but the Transformers movies are unbearable.They give me motion sickness cause the camera literraly NEVER FUCKING STOPS.In every fucking scene no matter what THE CAMERA SWERLS AROUND.
Ever since Michael Bay mentioned last year that the movie will be shooting in 3D with the 3D camera crew of Avatar, I became totally fascinated by the whole process. This video really puts an even better insight on it. I always thought that shooting with 3D cameras was just as simple as shooting it and then you're done but what they say totally addresses that and helps the audience understand that no matter if it is shot with 3D cameras or post converted, it is still a complicated process
Look at the body language of Bay and then Cameron. Cameron is so relaxed while Bay is jittery and restless and nervous. I think Bay has had a long undiagnosed case of public speaking fear. And at CES we saw it in full swing.
Looks like Michael Bay had sniffed coke off a woman's ass before coming here. and I hate to say this and please don't hate me folks. But I find some of Michael Bay's stuff hit and miss or so-so if you want to say. I like James Cameron's movies but I don't like how he acts in public or set.
RealMadridFClub wow you really are a bay bitch aint ya. why don't you stop acting like a little baby and ween yourself onto movies that don't represent the nutritional equivalent of a big mac.
Seeing these two directors together I can't help but think that Michael Bay would make an awesome Terminator movie and James Cameron could make an amazing Transformers movie,preferably the War for Cybertron
Despite being hated by so-called cinephiles, Bay stands as a top notch filmmaker and a pioneer. To the plebieans hating on Baysed, what have YOU done for cinema? Do you even have two films in Criterion release? Of course not, shut up and go back to watch any of the pseudointellectual Nolan's installments.
James Cameron is one of the best directors of the era and the winner of several Oscar awards and the owner of the best-selling films in the history of cinema, but Michael Bay has also made the best action films with the best skills. The main difference between these two people is that if you take the technology and special effects from James Cameron, he will not be able to make an action movie, but Michael Bay himself will be able to do this. He can make his own movies with the camera in hand and his editing.
Man, I can not wait for BotCon. I can't wait to see TF:3D. And I'd love to shake Michael Bay's hand. People give him too much hate and not enough love for the awesome work he does.
Difference between a good director and a great one: that last answer. Bay made it all about himself and the new toy that he gets to use. Cameron says it's about the audience and how their visual experience is enhanced wit the use of 3D cameras. Great directors are always more concerned for their audience than they are for themselves. Bay's still good though.
I love 3D! I am one of the few people who have noo problems wearing the glasses that came with my Panasonic 3Dtv, I even bought and love the 3DS. I'm also totally stoked that the X360 may just get 3D support. I honestly hope this techology is here to stay because i literally cannot get tired of it.
I was fan club manager for one of the top directors for years and we made a 3D film, matter of fact was in cooperation with James Cameron, and what was by far the biggest complaints from fans? "We don't care about 3D as long as the story and the film is good"
"i actually think that all films benefit from 3D in varying degrees." yes, what _My Dinner With Andre_ really needed was a post-production 3D conversion. maybe they should rush production of a re-release? _My Dinner With Andre: The 3D Experience._ i bet that would make tens and tens of dollars.
I understand Bay isn't the best at storyline but I have to admit he is amazing at visuals and his movies arenot great but there still ok. I've grown to enjoy his movie.
This is gold, two of the greatest talking shop. As an artist, I love the potential of 3D and when done right, is freaking awesome. Hopefully, future directors really use it to its fullest potential. Similarly, hopefully the studios in their quest to make a buck give creators time to do the 3D right, conversion or not. Also, @ 8:30, I wonder if Jim was doing a riff on SPaceballs? You, know the scene with Dark Helmut and Col Saunders and the whole,"When will now be now?"
Bay's early work seems to be a lot better then his new work. For example, he did Bad Boys which doesn't to be that bad (even through I've never seen it) Cameron however, even through I'm not the biggest fan of Avatar, I did like the visual effects and the battle scene at the end. It was plausible.
Definitely. The man knows how to tell a great story without getting lost in his own -industry revolutionizing- special effects and how to develop great characters (specially females). Same can't be said for Bay...
3D and visual effects and sound effects is important but the story is mostly important aswell in the your Transformers movies. Like have more transformers screentime not alot of human screentime
Michael Bay remains as one of the most visually-talented directors there is. the problem with his movies isn't explosions or action - the problem with his movies is the fact that Michael Bay clearly has the sense of humor of a 4th Grade dullard. i wouldn't be complaining about his movies if they didn't have pissing and farting robots who can't read.
I used to consider James Cameron the thinking man's Michael Bay (Terminator 2, Aliens), but after Avatar, which I did not really like, I now consider Christopher Nolan to be the thinking man's Michael Bay (The Dark Knight, Inception)
Well the way i compare them is that they have both mae big summer blockbusters that earned a lot of cash, it's just that Nolan's movies are for the thinking person while Michael Bay's action movies are more brainless and at times even racist.
I like 3D only if it's used correctly, sometimes 3D now a day's is being used as a gimmick, just so people can waste more money, very few director's know how to use 3D, such as James Cameron, Robert Zemeckis, and most recently, the director's from the old day's that are completely unfamiliar with 3D use it perfectly, such as Steven Spielberg for Tintin, and Martin Scorsese for his masterpiece "Hugo", Micheal Bay uses 3D fairly good, so does Dreamworks Animation. more directors should do the same
I think, um, Michael Bay, is like, um, trying to do stuff, um, like a, um, interview. But, um, in all seriousness, um, this is hilarious, like, um... uh... *stutters and shrugs* give me, um, money, I mean, uh, a chance.
Yes I know about Nolan's take on CGI, I have the Inception dvd features, I know how he shot the hallway scene, and I am fully aware of him prefering good old props instead of CGI, which is why I admire directors like him. Plus I said if you're going to use CGI, at least a damn story behind it. Note I didn't bash Terminator 2, that has CGI yet the story of the film was pretty incredible. If you have a good story, shows work was done in the film.
Agree. Generally speaking, these silly blockbusters are a waste of creative resources. I'm sure that the directors, cinematographers, special effects teams etc that are involved in making these films could do so much better, but at the end of the day it's all about the product.
The blockbusters that these two created do not exist anymore. They made hundred of millions on movies that were not attached to an IP. That is unheard of today.
no man michael bay the best director chris nolan the best writer i mean have you seen inception it takes a genius to write that stuff and michael bay is just amazing the man is a genius a movie written by nolan and directed by michael bay will be just perfect
Prometheus will be in 3D so it is not unlikely that we will get a Cameron/Scott interview. But I don't think Cameron is very interested in changing Ridley Scott's mind. He is very old. Cameron's biggest targets are Michael Bay and Christopher Nolan because both of them are young, they make blockbusters and they have huge fanboy crowds. Both of them actually disliked 3D but Cameron was able to convince Bay. Let's see what Nolan'll do. He opposes Cameron in digital vs analog issue also.
Today on our ted talk we have two artists here to talk to you about their craft, please welcome, leonardo di vinchi, and my sister in laws dog that can hold a paint brush in its mouth.
Simple: I love film and was browsing videos about it. I clicked on this one only because I wanted to see if they gave reasons for using 3D, because I have never liked it, nor have I understood why so many choose to film in it. People can watch videos without necessarily liking the subject.
KayZee hahaha you’re asking who I was talking to when I posted this 8 years ago? Heck dude I don’t even remember writing it. It was probably a reply to an account that got deleted.
@@kayzee3595 Haha um okay? I am a girl, FYI. Also, I've watched tons of movies in 3D-- never ended up liking it. To me, it's just a gimmick that gets in the way of the actual movie. But to each their own. I'll take my non-3D and sex with just my boyfriend, and you can have your 3D and sex with two or more girls. A good time means different things to different people.
no nolan is my favorite "filmmaker". James cameron is my all-time hero because of the things he has accomplished not just as a filmmaker but as a incredible person he is. but hey if you dont like him thats perfectly fine but i must ask, why are you here?
Because the truth of the matter is that regardless of what online sources (articles, reviews, videos etc.) may have you believe, the world of movie fandom doesn't hate Michael Bay with determination. If that's the impression you have, then you probably spend too much time on the internet. Like T.V., it's not real life!
cHeStEr5434 life's amusing. I do not hate anyone I was simply shocked these guys have haters around the world and no one ever tries I'm a little shocked
Dialogue okay, narratives fine you got me there, character development is a basic film need, every film MUST include it so that doesn't really count mate. As I mentioned, if you want to show of CGI, please put in a nice story. I stick to tradition film making, cause it's art and it is actual film making, not depending on computers to do your job. Creating a language is hard, but no biggie, just extra support to the story.
no not every film needs character devolpment zero dark thirty has no character devolpment at all and looks how great that came out. thats just a recent movie there are more examples. the smart thing cameron is doing is waiting to make avatar 2 and 3 to provide the full on back storys. avatar is already too long if he were to provide back storys it would have been 7 hrs long so he dealt with that situation correctly but dialogue welll.... you know
you just changed the subject compeltly but fine. forget transformers they are not movies just commercials. but, is there any othwer way to make another world as convincing as avatar without the way james cameron did it? if they shot it live it would still look like earth and it wouldnt work. if thats not your thing thats completely fine its your opinion but im just saying
I'm sure there are other directors out there who can do exactly what Bay did for Transformers, thing is I'm sure it's not their style too, movies like Transformers are high in demand so some sad reason.
