*LIKE & SUBSCRIBE* - Don’t forget to ring the bell so you don't miss a thing! Watch the full debate here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uVf5CoeUExU.html
He likely didn't know that Knowles has these beliefs lol. In that panel Clay had the kind of reaction most people would have after hearing Knowles speak his mind. He's crazy, we all know that since we watch him haha. But it's really funny to watch people try to figure him out because he's so comfortable and confident not making any sense.
He wasn’t asked about Nazis in general. He was asked specifically of those “Jews will not replace us” protesters. You and I can agree that those are Nazis and they’re bad, but if Hillary Clinton has answered it the same we’d call BS
@@FoodLiquorCool No we wouldn't. His answer implies two things, one, that anyone who shouts that is a nazi and two, that they are bad. It's, in fact, about as explicit a condemnation you can get because not only does it malign the specific case, but asserts that specific case is part of a braoder group whitch, as a whole, are bad.
I literally thought Clay was a debater until I read the comments. The man literally debated more than Chris. 2 on 1, and Mike still mopped the floor with them. Just more proof that truth always wins.
@@brianbayot8347 Well except .45 acp cause why shoot twice when you can shoot once. Ill show myself out now. But seriously the truth always does win especially when debating someone, as long as the people listening to the debate are open minded free thinkers.
@@brianbayot8347 clay should stick to being an obsolete, singing mediocrity, rather than delving in politics, predictably as a leftist. That was some objective moderating job he did.
Love that amazing shoutout, surprised he remembered that season. Ruben was my favorite contestant and I listen to his cover of 'This Christmas' every year as a tradition.
Love how clay says, with a straight face, "instead of going through all the specifics…". What else are you going to go through? It's like saying, all the facts prove me wrong so let's talk about something else.
The best thing humanity could do for the climate would be to invest heavily into nuclear fusion as well as encouraging more people to major in the STEM fields so that we can creat better more efficient technology!
You can only encourage people so far before their own passion has to take over. If people aren't into the sciences and you push them into the field, they're probably not going to be making the large advances that we need at this point.
Connor S that’s why I said encourage and not push, we as a society need to start looking up to the scientists, engineers and stop looking up and idolizing athletes and celebrities. Why has it become a bad thing to want to be smart and learn? So yeah we should encourage people not push them into those fields, I understand it’s not for everyone
Clay Aiken spent more time matching his glasses to his shirt and his wrist bracelets to his socks than he did trying to put together an honest list of unbiased questions for Michael.
I don't understand how Aiken didn't understand how Rabid he was. Forget that he's the moderator but when he asked Knowles that LOADED question before Knowles could answer he was already shouting him down looking for a yes or no answer. He wouldn't even give him the chance to answer in his own way since that's his prerogative. He could have very well said after the fact...that's not what I asked you. Instead Aiken does what any "good" pol pundit does and that's get into rhetorical disruption match. What ends up happening is I end up siding with people in Knowles position because the whole thing comes off as someone who doesn't want to here him speak.
I wish he would have included on this clip the part from the q&a where Nuance Bro got up and asked Clay "do you still beat your children, yes or no?" Just to prove how dishonest his loaded question was.
I have never seen a "moderator" be the one to answer the questions for the left side and the right side, fight and argue with the right side, and interupt 25 times during a 1 minute answer.
Thanks you for your video.you are so so smart and speak so so very well I wish you can run for office to safe our Great America citizens we need more America citizens to protect our freedom God bless you and your families you are so so smart Thank God America has you
I love how they just assume the problem they claim is as they claim, therefore you need to do something, and if you don't, they will, so you gotta agree with them no matter what,and just let them do what they want, because.
One day....people will say of 2019...."you realize you're quoting things from 2019, right?" Pseudo-scientific knee-jerk alarmism is pseudo-scientific knee-jerk alarmism...history repeats...if one is unable to identify it in a previous year, how would one identify it in the current year? Patterns....some logic is required to spot them...many people don't have the little it requires to do so.
If anyone lives in a suburb, a city, a place where you can't see the sky, a place where you are not surrounded by nature and working with it every day, literally engulfed in nature every day because your house sits in the middle of nowhere without traffic, noise and people...then you most likely have no real clue what the environment is doing. But sure, let's refer to some numbers some scientists are talking about who most likely live in a lab 24/7. Don't ask people who actually live in nature and know it...but definitely ask people who don't. That makes sense. 👏
i think the main issue with controlling the CO2 emissions is people are always looking in the wrong direction. the raising, processing and delivery of livestock, particularly beef represents a huge majority of the carbon emissions. this includes cutting down more forest land to plant more crops to feed animals we intend to eat. it also includes all the emissions of the tractors and other farm vehicles to plant, maintain, and process the foods for the animals. the plants used to process the meat all use fossil fuels for energy and electricity. then there are the emissions of trucking the product to the stores. none of this includes the massive amounts of methane gas produced from the waste of the animals. michael brings up some good points as far as jobs lost but if you try to ban fossil fuel without a reliable replacement, not solar or wind, you will throw humanity back into the stone age.
Michael Knowles, If it wasn't for you & several other journalists, speakers & politicians I would not have the knowledge I do today about the climate change topic. For years I was surrounded by people, some friends, some family that would talk about our world as if it were going to be in obliterated within the next few decades. And before I was educated, I was genuinely a bit scared because I just wasn't sure and I actually some what believed these people. Luckily for me, I am a huge fan of George Carlin and he was the one who gave a great speech during his stand up acts on climate and 'saving the planet'. It was then that I really started to question the hype on the climate change topic. I started to look online & did my own research, surprisingly I found that a lot of articles back up the idea that human emissions are heating up the planet. It wasn't until I heard you, Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder, Jordan B. Peterson, Candace Owens, and several others talk about the topic & actually called out scientists for being wrong on their research. That a lot of it was politically motivated, the NASA research was based on 4 articles that were debunked almost immediately. So I say to you thank you for your extensive knowledge. It helped & motivated me to do my own research, read more books on it and read more articles from many scientists on the topic.
Michael knowles has so much substance, the other two both had so little to offer but insults and bully tactics.when so many people lose their jobs trees will disappear so people can keep warm.
Trump is the right guy to combat the Left and the Swamp. A nice guy wouldn't cut it. Perhaps he is a just a tool, but he's the right tool for the job. When the Left becomes more moderate, I guarantee a more moderate president will be elected.
