Budged in USSR was just paperwork because all the things they used to build with- tools, materials, manpower, fuels, electricity etc. were made inside and all the companies were government property so it means you move your money from the left to the right pocket. All the salaries you give to the people come back to you because all the shops everything is government owned. At the end it is not the numbers but the materials you have and the technology. USSR had vast amounts of all the materials known to man and more important oposite to USA they gave them for free or for misely prices to ally countries.
Японские станки появились в РФ, уже в начале 2000 годов, а до того, на заводах СССР, в изготовлении сложных деталей справлялись своими станками. Японский станок уникален тем, что может выполнять фрезерные, сверлильные и токарных работы без перемещения детали от станка к станку, что естественно значительно экономит время производства.
Main thing ruZZkies export to Africa is weapons. putin is failed leader who uses wars against neighbours to cover up his failed domestic policies. Majority of ru ppl lives in poverty while ultra-rich 10% reap all profits from oil and resources. Just because you have butthurt about being colonized in past by west doesn't mean that enemies of the west are better. They're not.
Igor Sikorsky, who is a founder of Sickorsky helicopter company, was a Russian marine officer, State engeneer close to Imperor Nikolay 2nd. His best projects except helicopters (first toy flying helicopter he built at age 12): - age 19-22 - first in the World co-axial helicopter; - age 21 - motor sledge and first light airplaine; - age 23-25 - First in the World multy-engine strategic heavy bomber "Russkiy Vityaz" (aka "Ilia Muromets"). 90 items built. On 1918 he skip Russia from Arkhangelsk (which was invided and captured by USA and GB colonial corpus) to France, and moved to USA on 1919.
@@seventhuser904 India does have multiple MI 26 , I don't know the numbers tho , they played a major role during their kargil conflict , lifting and transporting artillery pieces and other equipment, they've been grounded now , but there was a proposition to send them to Russia for overhaul but nothing seems to have come out of that , the IAF currently operates chinooks for heavy lift ops but the Chinooks lifting capacity is only half as much as that of the MI 26 , I just don't understand as to why they just gave up on the MI 26 when it's easily the best heavy lift option
@@shooter7a Well that ofc is not true, but there is a chance one day 100% of them to have running water while people like you have 0 chance to grow brain.
Mi-26 The Legendary In fact, whenever the US Army's Boeing CH-47 Chinook is in trouble in difficult places. The US would call on Russia, and off the Mi-26 goes to rescue and carry Boeing CH-47 Chinook like a baby.
I'm sorry but it's just facelifting a backwards 1960's soviet turd with the help of some tooling imported from the developed world. To put it brief, just your usual russian garbage with fascist propaganda layered on top.
you forgot to tell us about the multithreaded rotor reducer, which is unique in its power and lightness. This reducer is actually one of the most important parts of the helicopter, without which it would be impossible to create such a powerful model
@@hermes6910In Russia just few years ago arrived new engine PD-14, based on it PD-8 and based on it in development new engine specially for new version of this helicopter. It is pretty efficient. Efficiency - is abstract definition. Russia is country with unlimited source of oil, not so long ago it was communistic country where gas de facto cost nothing, from state point of view it was free unlimited resource (nowadays from state point of view it is also almost free resource, because produced by state and state buy it from self, almost like during communism). So Russian requirements to engines, e.g. fuel consumption, was different than in countries which bought gas/oil. From other side they had different abilities, e.g. possibilities to work in harsh conditions longer, be easy for in field maintenance and so on. So you are totally wrong, Russian engines is one or even most efficient. Based on POV. If talk about space engines, then in Russia created engines which is close to theoretical limit of own class. Better just impossibly, so efficient they are. That’s why in Russia created so lot different engines (from "cryogenic" to "hypersonic"), some of which non exist elsewhere in world.
@@juliap.5375 It's not a point of view, you don't have your oil field in the air... It's pure BS... We can synthesize fuel and have an unlimited supply, that's just one point of view... But even with infinite fuel, you still need to maintain the logistics to support the use of your equipment, and that's a lot more complex if it's drinking twice as much as it should... And of course, in the air, limited efficiency is a real problem. If your PNR is at 300 when it should be at 600, having infinite oil in the depot won't help you go any further. It's even worse in the army, where equipment has to be placed closer to the front line to accomplish the same task. Russian hypersonic engines only use rocket technology, and there is no breathable air system... It's not as advanced as you might think, and that's not unusual since hypersonic systems have been studied for over half a century... The main problem is cost: they're expensive, which is why Russia didn't just use the kinjal to strike Ukraine. People need to stop being brainwashed and start studying the subject a little more... The basics of advanced technology are not as closed as military documents...
except that motors were built by Ukraine and all the precision tooling and machinery came from Japan and europe. The rest is basically a factory and designs unchanged since the 70s
really love how 2/3 of comments are "would be nice to destroy it with ______", even though it's a primarly civilian aircraft. keep up the good work, would like to see a video over the mi-8 and its variants - the most mass produced helicopter in history
The problem not it beeing civilian. The problem that this ruins ukrop's religion about Russia being backward poor and not producing any high technology. This belief justifies for them their separation from USSR 30 years ago and losing all industry USSR had. The sad (for them) truth that while Russia sends a lot of missiles to any point in former ukraine they can only find somebody who will try attack the factory with a drone or make small diversion.
@@beltar2 Actually all of these russian aerospace hackjobs are total crap if you compare them to contenporart deaigns from the developed world - always was and will be. I have my people inside top engineering communities in moscow since the soviet era and they gave me an inside scoop, off the record.
Cool video, but I have a small correction. The Moscow Mil Helicopter plant was a test production only and it was reorganized in 2020. Mi-26 is currently produced by Rostvertol in Rostov. Both the footage you use and the preview picture originate from Rostvertol factory. You can also see "ROSTVERTOL-AVIA" on the side of Mi-26 on 00:31
@@richardv9648Perhaps they are using previously stockpiled engines for now, but there's a rumour that ODK-Klimov currently manufactures D136 engines in some capacity. There's also "helicopter version" of PD-8 engine currently in development by Perm Motors.
@@penguinpeko PD-12V (not PD-8) is an option, but it'll have to receive Certification by the appropriate organizations-and only after sufficient testing. Hopefully Russia has enough engines in stock to carry them until the new engines are certified. PD-12V has been under development since 2016, the Russians saw this coming. 😉
You are wrong in some points. 1. Moscow Helicopters Plant was only renamed to National Helicopters Center. 2. It was allways only test production - serial types from Soviet era was produced in Rostov-on-Don. 3. 4. PD-8V (PD-12V was abandoned 'cause of overpower - it was based on PD-14).
If I may, 20 tons isn't a "main battle tank". It's a light tank or VDV tank destroyer at best, air transportable, air-droppable or being underslung an Mi-26. Other than that, the Mi-26 really is a beast.
@@utkarshg.bharti9714 Russian transport capabilities are a joke if you compare them to NATO... They are unable to provide proper logistic for Ukraine War theater and NATO got zero issues with providing logistic for Afghanistan and Iraq... Also in case of Heavy-lift cargo helicopters Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion is a serious competition for Mi-26, it is faster(310km/h vs.295km/h) and with significantly longer range than Mi-26 (850km vs. 500km)... In case of planes there is no real competition, as Russian heavy transport planes fleet is tiny. Russian army logistics is all about train ->XIX century in logistics and in battle tactics as they using human wave attacks to this day...
@@Bialy_1 " with providing logistic for Afghanistan and Iraq..." now calmly read again what you posted as a compairison to the ukrain situation and realise how utterly immensly stupid your remark is.
Fine, you found mistake in poorly managed video. But it's much more than any helicopter from west can do. King Stallion, which is world's most expensive helicopter is on 15 tonnes
amazing. knew a guy from HS. went into the CG after and did 20yrs as an eletrition and then got on with Sikorsky with the blackhawk. retired E7 and was doing well living in california. luv to do that. the teamwork, ect and knowing the importance of your work. hard to belive for 40+yrs..cultural exchanges with russia, for years they were our only ride to the space station. summits. champagne and toasts and meeting. ect. clinton/obama and the "reset" button move (even though misspelled in russian) with their foreign minister. elect 2021 a laughing hyena (harris) and a clown and dementia patient and we as spending billion$ to kill and harm russian citizens today (soldiers) as part of the constant bs of defending "democracy". biden refused to serve and defend our nation in 1968 after law school. getting 5 made up deferments. but tells our nation how this "proxy" war is good and he knows "best" for the US. tally up how much that cost the US in lives and money in afghanistan and vietnam? and look at today. afghanistan is back to a terrorist taliban and vietnam went communism. so the answer in DC. well, will now do that by "proxy" just the waste of tax payer money no US personnel (for now).
Worked at Ericsson in a big building that needed two big cooling units lifted intact in one go up to 14th floor. So that was first and only time a saw one. No room to land unfortunately so having the load hanging in a 14 floor long cable he moved oh so slowly it took the entire afternoon.
@@edthebumblingfool after the sanctions, they switched to their own, a little more expensive, but internal resources allow. This is not for you to put Cuba or the DPRK on the sanctions list. And although I looked at your subscriptions, I feel sorry for you.
Dont like Radio Kalahari? Just out of interest you do understanfd that American sanctions on Cuba only effect American companies dont you, they are free to trade with anybody else as they wish but their economy is stuffed becase of their own politics not anybody elses.@@ня.ш
@@edthebumblingfool I "like" Ukrainian news channels or propagandists such as Denis Davydov, who expose themselves all the time as white and fluffy. Cuba is probably very good at trading with impoverished Mexico Guatemala Honduras Venezuela, etc. so also the water distance "helps" its economy a lot! Why can't the USA bring order to its part of the continent, but climb into another hemisphere and bomb cities? Even now they are in Syria without an invitation. This money could be used for the development of the nearest countries, and not for enmity.
I first saw this in Venezuela. It was parked in the main airport in the city of Caracas. Its Huge to say the least. Its like the size of a house when you see it in person.
@@tsugumorihoney2288 overall, - China has the largest country (people) and built the largest number of everything - the old country of "the West" have to learn this
@@philippe2715 thanks for the tip, i directly checked it out on google maps. Even if i will not be in the baltic region anywhere soon i ll visit the Museum one day.
Nice video, but with one fatal flow: it isn't a Moscow Mil plant in any way. Mi-26 since the very beginning produced only on a Rostvertol plant in Rostov-on-Don.
This is impossible, for one simple reason, only in Russia it is possible to produce such large rotor blades! In the early nineties, the Americans tried to buy the technology for the production of these blades, but the Russians had the intelligence not to sell it.
Seems to me that all those controls could be compiled to within 4 glass screens for pilot and co-pilot, maybe a couple for flight engineer. Add weather radar for good measure.
So Russian can no longer build its outdated helicopters without western machine, not a good position for Russia to be in in a futile war. Machines for building from Japna engines from Ukraine and Russia is now at war with Ukraine who is backed by Japan.
O que eu acho bom nestas engenharia é que o povo tem trabalho sonhos e realizações. Enquanto o povo brasileiro vive sem o que fazer sem dinheiro buscando viver de coisas erradas. Como tráfico de drogas. Numa guerra interna.
2:15 You can see the blue and yellow jigs that are used to get everything lined up together in the right place. The engineers don’t guess where the panels will go. 2:51 As for “accuracy and precision crafted parts are joined together like and intricate jigsaw”. If the panels don’t fit then the edges just get filed down.
It's not pronounced "am-eye". It's supposed to be "me twenty six". Both the M and the (lowercase!) i come from the same word - the name of the constructor. It's an abbreviation, not an acronym.
That's what is so interesting about Russian tanks. For decades during the Soviet period their design strategy and doctrine was smaller, lower profile and lighter. They favoured that approach over our approach which is bigger, heavier etc. I didn't know that until recently. And I didn't know that because we don't do any honest reporting in the west anymore.
The broom crew was was on a good one that day. Russia dose things like that for propaganda purposes, they'll clean things up real nice. Make it look nice for the cameras then everything goes back to normal afterwards. What is amazing is to see all the hand labor. Airbus, Boeing and Lockheed use mostly automation. This is how aircraft were built in the 1950's. WOW!
@@artemg9753 "pays off the market" doesn't even make sense in English. But nice try orcish bot. LOL. Ruzzia doesn't have any money to upgrade these facilities. That's why they look like something out of the 1950's. They have a few machines that they buy from the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese. But are unable to fully automate or develop their own technology like they are doing in the west. But it's okay, just keep dreaming. Maybe in a few more decades the Ruzzian's will finally catch up to where the West was in the 1980's.
@62guitarguy I don't think russia uses Six Sigma or Iso 9000 standards or anything like that. What is funny for me, is that you see all these new Mi-26 aircraft. However, according to what I could find online, russia only delivers 5 new air frames one year then nothing for the next two or three then another 8. Then none for another few years. So russia has a really low production rate, I am pretty sure that all that we see here is just for propaganda purposes.
PD-12V engine is being evaluated for Certification, but I don't think it has been approved yet. This company is probably using stockpiled Ukrainian engines as a stopgap. The production rate for Mi-26 can't be too high, these are expensive helicopters.
Ukrainian engine, japanese lathe milling machines, russian design: this documentary is a history lesson. I am pretty sure today they are not manufacturing these helicopters anymore.
@@adolfocornavaca2544 yes but why overcomplicate things when you can upgrade to the late 1980s and only need two pilots to fly instead of 4+, it makes no sense to build anything of that size with full steam/analog gauges.
They have some of enemmy hardware as they have special units that using enemmy hardware/tactics to train american soldiers... there are the enemmy on the training grounds...
We have all of weapons that all of the world uses at our disposal. We use it to train our troops during training exercises. Our training is so unbelievably realistic we use the actual weapons that our opponent uses to fight against us. We can do that because we are rich. What country are you from?
it is not new, it is just modifications of old helicopter same as for example Mi-26T2V is latets modification of good old Mi-26, yes both Russia and NATO use 40+ years old heavy modernized shit
Well, you're not wrong. But it was designed in the USSR and the only plant that made those engines was located in Ukraine (in currently contested Zaporozhye region). However, manufacturer plans to replace it with a more powerful PD-8V engines, produced by Perm Motors.
6:39 This interior shot has been mirrored. As the Navigator should be sat on the right hand side and the Flight Engineer should be sat on the left hand side.
Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion have longer range -> 850km vs.500km of Mi-26 and it is faster 310km/h vs. 295km/h. It is slighty smaller but claiming that "U.S doesn't have anything like this." is just typical Russian BS...
00:08 power to hoist a Main Battle Tank, and then proceeds to show a Infantry Fighting Vehicle for Airborne (Boyevaya Mashina Desanta). That weights is only a 12.9 tons. A Main Battle Tank, like example T-72M3, weight is 45 tons. Something that Mi-26 will not lift at all. It can lift only 20 tons. So nowhere close to lift MBT. IFV's, yes, but not MBT's.
Couldn't watch after he said main battle tank that weighs 20 tons, the m1, the only us tank weighs 77 tons, I'm sure the t seventy whatever is close to the same lol.
A) An MBT's weight starts at about 40 (metric!) tons. Russian designs are usually lighter than western ones. B) The latest version of the Abrams weighs 67 metric tons (= 74 Imperial short tons).
On top of that, every one of their main battle tanks in service since 1950 have been no less than twice that. And that's still not considering that they're generally lighter than western MBT's