@@A2woodArt I just finished honing up mine and I concur! Perhaps it's one of those misconceptions that have pervaded the community because of the shape and look of the tool started by those who have not used the tool.
@@bilal11 I even checked the original patent. It states it allows for more surfaces, but doesn’t explicitly talks about concave. I was told that Miller Falls No.2 should be better for concave, now going to be looking for one
