Miniminter Reacts To CHUNKZ choosing the SIDEMEN over BETA SQUAD (TruthAsylum) 

Isn't harry in the Sidemen?!

@@BillionaireBriefs. Pinero

@@BillionaireBriefs. harry pinero

@@BillionaireBriefs. the one that features in the sidemen cooking/back to school vids

@@GRAFFITIBOT oh

Legend

@@jalaj4161 shush

Legend

@@abiwalala shush

Thanks

@@DSfrmda6 i cant say anything to that

fam its more about views and ads NOT subs

@@TharsanJeyachandran more subs= bigger audience Bigger audience= more views More views= more money

@@declanmalone3350 not really you can have 1 million subscribers and only get 5k views

@@JP03 But you cant have 100 subs but not 5k views not at least regularly. So it depends on subs somewhat. Even getting the play button is a proud moment

He probably will

I mean the sidemen, beta squad, eboys have the same talent management op talent. I think after the success of sidemen they created the beta squad and eboys but they haven't received such success and have sort of ended.

@@kashyapshah9009 I guess I mean a little less management company a little more... Beta Squad - video ideas, set up big stuff Chip - content ideas, make him upload more BB - get her exposure, content ideas Ellum - get him exposure, big collabs Randolph - music content, big music yt ft.s Lexie Marie - exposure, content ideas Reev - content ideas, exposure Stephen Tries - mainstream exposure, big collabs Theo Baker - big content ideas, exposure

ru-vid.com/show-UC5c85aqrGiHO6qJJzYF1GpA

yung moneymaker mint

This just in he will never answer you 😂😂😂

@@NoName-fv1gw sym

True

And...

@@user-yw6wd5vx8s it just reminded me of that one parody

@@mikieman6021 ok i thought you were referring to something else

Because Harry darkest and filly aren’t in beta squad

@@binrobberracc247 didn’t think about that, that’s exactly the reason lol. Those dudes are too funny

i feel the same way

Yeah, they are funny as hell, they're good as individual creators but the whole "beta squad" thing for me never worked. All these other groups basically tried to do what the sidemen did, which isn't necessarily how you should go about things. But like Simon mentioned it's frustrating because they're all so very talented, it's just that it never really pieced together as "the beta squad" they should have just kept it focused on their individual channels but collabing as a squad.

don't worry man currently in terms of content they are doing wayyy better than the sidemen rn

They ain't going to upload ever again

@@boii6569 Lol hell nah... You trippin hard

@@boii6569 nah now thats too much

Still even if they did they wouldn't get close to the goats Sidemen.

@@BillionaireBriefs. not the point dude. Dudes were nice with their content. Would've been cool to see them continue.

to that point lie detectors aren't as reilable as a lot of people think they are. Which is why in the US they aren't used as evidence in the court room

No sorry it’s definitely Harry pinero

Chunkz is a king 👑

Stolen

yeahh but to get proper results i'd rather hava a professional to do it to get the most accurate answers

I hope it happens more tbh

@@windsurfer8824 samee

Are you high, they are very funny

They r funny but ok

Agreed

@@toufikhb253 they’re very funny but beta squad are just extremely funny😭😭😭😭😭😭like every character is tooo funny! Whereas sidemen there’s the funny ones and the more not funny ones

@@toufikhb253 fair enuff, getting done in by wording. I mean the Beta Squad as a group make you laugh out loud every other shot. The sidemen are entertaining so a chuckle here and there but they aren’t exactly comedians, there are still funny moments though.

Rah

They are very funny but I wouldn't say underrated. Not every group can be at the top.

“New videos every Saturday” Last upload 7 months ago

@@karkang aaaaaand thats why they arent doing that well

Hahahah I more mean individually the beta squad, they don’t post enough

@@Aymless03 ur irrelevant shush

They're bad, but they are significantly better than 50%. 50% is literally completely guessing, no matter what information/signals/behaviours the person exhibits. If done properly (by someone actually qualified, as well as all the proper controls), they can be up to 75-90% accurate. But that also takes hours, and still obviously isn't sufficient for a court.

@@tensemurm5924 like I said we are literally taught in classes about law and the system that it is about 50% accurate most of the time. It is literally a coin flip rather they are accurate or not. Yes they can be up to 80 to 90 % accurate but the majority of the time they aren't that accurate and usually are only around 50% accurate. Simply bring very nervous can make your results show a lie when it's true, simply getting flustered about a question can make it show a lie when its true because it only measures things such as heart rate, sweat levels, breathing, etc. All which can change by a flip of a coin.

@@facilitysh5462 The 50% number is made up by your teacher, and isn't supported by the actual data. First of all, it doesn't even make logical sense to be 50% accurate. Regular people themselves are, on average, around 55% accurate when telling if someone is lying. It makes no sense that a professional who is trained to try and detect lies who also benefits from far more information would somehow be less accurate than a random person with less information. That clearly can't be true. Secondly, there have been many scientific studies (and meta studies of those) on this topic. They clearly show that, when done properly (which also excludes every RU-vid lie detector, since none are done properly), they are significantly more accurate than 50% (70% - 90% from the ones I've read). One example: "A comprehensive meta-analysis of the comparison question polygraph test" (Hounts, Thurber, Handler, 2020) Obviously, this is still not good enough to use as evidence in court, because it would be stating something as a fact which clearly isn't close to 100% accurate. And the ones done by RU-vidrs are also completely worthless. But genuine tests DO have a significantly better than 50% rate of accuracy

@@tensemurm5924 it wasn't a teacher, it was multiple professors (one of which was trained in polygraph analysis) and it was also multiple college approved textbooks. However, whatever floats your boat dude. Clearly I'm not gonna change your mind and I promise I will continue to believe the information that I was provided by my University for my degree. Let's not waste each other's time. I honestly hope you have a good day 😊

@@facilitysh5462 "Textbooks and professors" aren't sources for an exact figure. If they can't show the research which gave that number, its worthless. That's the whole point of scientific studies - such as the one I mentioned which proves it is way more than 50%. Studies are literally the only way to get a reliability percentage

here you go: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IdaAI3iZO50.html :)

Thx

ur mum does