Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) face was full of Noor but only handful Makkah people accepted him and saw that Noor majority rejected him. This mullah criticizing what non Muslim blames on our beloved prophet Muhammad SAW . Point to consider. May Allah enable everyone to do proper research and accept true Islam
But in his ignorant zeal to discredit Hasrat G.A.Mirza at leat he mentioned Hasrat Ghulam Ahmad is the given to him by his parents when he was born meaning slave or servant of Ahmad mentioned in Sura Jumma who the holy prophet saws described as the Mahdi a.s to appear for a people in the latter days or for a people who is to appear for another people who is yet to come . But these jahil mullahs will not accept G.A.Mirza a.s as the Mahdi who used hikma to destroy the enmies of Islam nd Christian nd Hindu extremists,or the Arias who were attacking Mohammad saws, the holy Coran and the holy missionaries .Their own scholars like Dr Israr Ahmad, who Dr Zakir Naik stated he was his mentor stated in a Pak t.v discussion that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad destroyed the missionaries in debates and his literatures nd newsmedia.His criticism resemble the criticism by opponents of all prophets including Mohammad saws, Jesus and opponents of all prophets who appeared before. The holy prophet Mohammad saws himself described the Mullahs of the latter days as apes and swines.
Mirza goulam qadiani is not even a Muslim. His books proves it.Miruza ghulam qadiani accused Eesaa Alaihissalaam being an alcoholic and his mother Mariyam peace of Allaah be upon her of having inappropriate with a man called joseph which goes against the Noble Qur"aan.
Abu Jahal said the same thing. Your hearts and mind are alike. I have met many people while doing dawah who said by looking at the picture of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam ahmad peace be on him that this face is not a face of a liar.
Abu Jahil NEVER said that about Hz Muhammad ﷺ . In fact he knew deep down that he was the truthful prophet. Everyone knows Ghulam Ahmad was a charlatan and a fraud.
@@aneeqahmed2928 you are totally deluded. How can any muslim believe in a habitual Liar like Mirza. Since you are a follower of the Liar you're also lying. Abu Jahl never said such a thing as far as know. How dare you compare Rasulullah Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and Your Mirza who was funded by the british empire.
It is very interesting to note here. I listened and seemed like some of traits of Qadiyani kazzab and pti Imran Niazi khan are very similar. 1. Use of narcotics 2. Foul Language about opponents 3. Iyyadak Nabudo (touheed false interpretation) 4. Misguide followers to abuse all previous vital personalities of Islam 5. Calling all other than themselves corrupt 6. Whoever disagrees with them they abuse them to a very low degree behaviour 7. Some group of liberals sympathize wrongfully with them specially west democracies with shallow knowledge of Islam and Pakistan 8. they have false image of being oppressed in the eyes of others. Infact they are the oppressors in reality in many ways.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed shb AS ((Peace be upon him) was & is the slave of Prophet Mohammed shb (Peace & blessing of Allah be with him) Mirza Saheb A S carries the same faith of Islam It is only revival of true faith of Islam .
@@AU-ic7ur Salam, brother. I have found brother Jake to be a very profound theologian in the online Dawah scene. is there any genuine reason for why you seem to dislike him?
According to Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, "Every prophet has been reincarnated by my advent, and every messenger is concealed in my shirt. Roohani Khazain, vol. 18, p. 290
It is very interesting to note here. I listened and seemed like some of traits of Qadiyani kazzab and deviant pti Imran Niazi khan are very similar. 1. Use of narcotics 2. Foul Language about opponents 3. Iyyadak Nabudo (touheed false interpretation) 4. Misguide followers to abuse all previous vital personalities of Islam 5. Calling all other than themselves corrupt 6. Whoever disagrees with them they abuse them to a very low degree behaviour 7. Some group of liberals sympathize wrongfully with them specially west democracies with shallow knowledge of Islam and Pakistan 8. they have false image of being oppressed in the eyes of others. Infact they are the oppressors in reality in many ways.
26:26. So true. Muslim authority and unity has gone rapidly downhill since Mirza Ghulham Ahmad was rejected by the mainstream ummah, til today when almost all Muslim states depend on non-believers for their security. 'Is not Allah sufficient for His servant' Why have Muslims abandoned Allah prefering to trust in material means given by disbelieving nations?
@@afishaque8458 Of course we have the prerogative to describe the followers of a false prophet as Non Muslims. Qadianis are the ummah of Ghulam Ahmad. Muslims are the Ummah of Muhammad ( SAW). Mirza himself has done Takfir of the Muslims "Allah revealed to me that any individual who receives my message and does not accept it is not a Muslim. Tazkirah, p. 519, 4th printing So instead of lecturing others on ignorance, it is better to learn about your own religion.
Mirza even fabricated numerous hadith in 13/14th century thinking no one would find the truth but Allaah had exposed this lair. Even today those fabricated hadith are in r.hazain.
This so called Ulama can have his views but his talk itself shows his true self and character. He definitely is not receiving any divine guide. A person claiming to be a pious person will not utter such words. To sum it when a person calls another a kafir then he himself a kafir. This is very clear and no doubts about it. Period.
@@mharoonrs In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani.
According to Mirza Ghulam, "“(while on the cross) Jesus could not portray himself as pious man because people knew he was gluttonous alcoholic and these bad habits were not ever since claiming divinity but it seems from early age he had (these habits). Therefore to claim divinity is one of the bad after effects of alcoholism.” (Satt bachan, Roohani Khazain vol 10 p 296).
i would not bring on declan again, he isnt a good interviewer and seems to want to push his view of history instead of listening to the sheikhs answers
Sheakh, I want you to have a conversation with Mufti Sayed Mubashir based in Pakistan, he deals with the Qadiyani's on a daily basis, and he may have ready made and to the point material on the topic.
@@abdulrahmantemitope8515 So has the Christianity and Hinduism. Even Mirza Hussein Ali Nuri has followers across the globe. It doesn't make them legitimate.
@@abdulrahmantemitope8515 In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani
@@MehmudButt In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani.
@@MehmudButt In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani.
It is very interesting to note here. I listened and seemed like some of traits of Qadiyani kazzab and deviant pti Imran Niazi khan are very similar. 1. Use of narcotics 2. Foul Language about opponents 3. Iyyadak Nabudo (touheed false interpretation) 4. Misguide followers to abuse all previous vital personalities of Islam 5. Calling all other than themselves corrupt 6. Whoever disagrees with them they abuse them to a very low degree behaviour 7. Some group of liberals sympathize wrongfully with them specially west democracies with shallow knowledge of Islam and Pakistan 8. they have false image of being oppressed in the eyes of others. Infact they are the oppressors in reality in many ways...............
You yourself mentioned it’s a dream and dreams need to be interpreted. When Allah loves his prophet he used same expression. What is the meaning of ید اللہ فوق ایدیھم Is the Holy Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him become God? Obviously not but that’s how Allah shows his love to the Prophets.
@@aneeqahmed2928 Mirza Ghulam Ahmad writes, I saw in my kashf that I am God myself and I became certain of it… In this instant, I saw that the soul of Allah encased upon me and absorbed me, possessing my body until there not a single atom of me remained and I saw my body that my organs became His organs and my eye had become His eye and my ears had become His ears and my tongue had become His tongue… godhood ascended upon me very strongly and I was pulled towards it from my head to toe… godhood was infused in my muscles and veins… And at that instance, I believed that my organs are not mine but of Allah… Roohani Khazain, vol. 13, pp. 103 - 105
@@aneeqahmed2928 Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote “God came into my existence and then my anger, forbearance, leniency actions and tranquility became His. In this state I was saying that we need a new heaven and earth. I then first of all created the heavens and earth in a concise shape without any separation. Then conforming to the wishes of the truth I gave it its format and separation and I saw that I was powerful over the creation. I then created the sky of the earth and said we have certainly adorned the earthly sky with stars.” I then said, “We will create man from a piece of clay. Then my state was such that I was now transformed from a mere vision to inspiration and upon my tongue was the words: - “I intended to place a vicegerent (on earth) so I created Adam. We created man in the best of forms.” Source: [Kitabul Bariya pgs 86-87, Ruhani Khazain vol 3 pgs 104-105]
@@aneeqahmed2928 @aneeqahmed2928 Looks like you're having trouble understanding the Quran. How did you interpret "ید اللہ فوق ایدیھم" to come to that conclusion? Also, you're only responding to one comment. If you're really defending him, you should reply to all of @KhalidBinWalid-tn9eu's comments, not just one.
@@u172-m2n..he forget to read or deliberately left the sentence that says he became sure that what he dreamt was truth ....not just that ..that kazzab gulam even claimed to be Krishna reincarnated.
In 1895, MGA and his team finally called Esa (as) a drunkard, and its obvious that they copied Lekh Ram. Here is the quote: “Jesus was an Alcoholic and Gluttonous person, neither Abstinent nor a Pious Worshipper, nor a Truth seeker. He was a Proud and a Self- conceited Claimant of Divinity.” (Nur-ul-Quran, Roohani Khazain Vol 9 p.387).
Don't you fear Allah brother?? He was talking about the Jesus of the Bible, the Jesus of the Christians.. remember that they have changed the words of and about Jesus. Please read this: "Therefore, wherever we have used harsh words in our discourse, we have meant the fictitious Jesus of the Christians. The meek servant of God Almighty, Jesus son of Mary, who was a Prophet mentioned in the Quran, is never intended in our severe rhetoric. We have adopted this approach after having heard for forty years abuses [of the Holy Prophetsa] from the Christian clergymen. Some ignorant maulvis - who should be called blind and sightless - excuse the Christian clergymen saying that these poor, helpless people do not utter anything wrong from their mouths and do not disrespect our Holy Prophet saw. But let it be remembered that, in reality, it is the Christian clergymen who are at the forefront in expressing contempt, insults and abuses. We have a repository of books by those clergymen who have filled their writings with hundreds of abuses. Any maulvi who wishes can come and see for himself. And let it be known that in future, whichever clergyman will shun the ways of abuse and speak respectfully, we shall also deal with him respectfully. But at present they themselves are responsible for the attacks on their own Jesus, for under no circumstances can they refrain from abuses and insults. We have grown weary of listening to them.” (Nurul-Quran, Pt. 2, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 9, p. 375) The muslims can't even appreciate the defense of the Holy and last Prophet Muhammad. "Be like apes..." Quran.
Wolahi, Ahamdiyyat is true Islam. The unreasonable opposition of the so called scholars to Islam Ahmadiyyat is clear testimony of its truth. Alhamdolilah to be an Ahmadi. Salaam from Africa with love ❤
This Quranic verse is the kryptonite for qadiyanis. Quran 33:40] "Muhammad is not the father of any of your men; but he is the Messenger of God, and the seal of the prophets".
@@ababacarrms290 In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani.
@@LoveForAllHatredForNone.bd6677 In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani
@@LoveForAllHatredForNone.bd6677 In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani.
The Quran proves itself. There’s a challenge in it which is if you believe this book is not from Allah bring a chapter like it.. which no one has been able to do in 1400 years. Mirza’s Tichi Tichi angel saying ‘I love you’ does not compare. Get a brain 🧠
How can people believe a new prophet taking photos for identity cards and college passes😂 , when as genuine Prophets peace be upon them all were not educated in man made educational institutions but they were teachers for their followers.
He could not answer that Jesus was taken to sky bodily. یا عیسٰی انی متوفیک First is Mutwafika that I will cause you death (not Jews) then رافعک raise you to me. How he is lying because he does not want to accept that Jesus did not die on cross but as natural death. He will be punished by Almighty Allah accordingly.
00:00 🕌 Sheikh's View on the Ahmadiyya Movement 06:09 📜 Differences Between the Ahmadiyya Sects (Qadiani and Lahori) 10:07 💬 Declaring Ahmadiyya Followers as Non-Muslims 24:06 📜 Description of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's Character and Influence 25:50 🔄 Dispute Over Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's Impact on Islam and Scholarship 31:12 💊 Examination of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's Personal Habits and Claims 48:19 🤔 Misinterpretation and Lack of Knowledge Accusations 49:15 📚 Failed Debate Attempts and Challenges 51:21 💬 Discussion on the Return of Jesus and Challenges 54:40 🏛 Potential Outcomes of a Debate with the Ahmadis 57:53 ⚖ Persecution of Ahmadis in Pakistan and Civil Liberties Discussion
This Sheik is saying Ahmad is the name of The Holy Prophet(saw) mentioned in Torah, Ghulam mean servant, so, Mirza is servant of Ahmad or Muhammed (saw). So, HAZRAT MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD IS THE TRUE SERVANT OF RASOOL KARIM MUHAMMAD (saw).
This Quranic verse is kryptonite for the qadiyanis, Quran 33:40] "Muhammad is not the father of any of your men; but he is the Messenger of God, and the seal of the prophets"
@@newstherapy5900 What utter nonsense, SEAL does not implying the mission of The Rasool Karim Muhammad(saw) is to seal or close all the spiritual blessing avenue in the last shariaat Rasool Karim(saw) delivered, as mentioned in surah An Nisa verse 69, should that be His mission then the last shariaat He delivered is meaningless and useless( NAO ZUBILLAH MIN ZALIK) so, KHATTAM in surah Al Azab verse 40, is not implying the seal, the end or the closure of spiritual blessing in Islam shariaat, your understanding of KHATTAM is not only flaws but quiet INSULTING TO THE HIGEST STATION OF RASOOL KARIM(saw) MAQAMAN MAHMOODAH. Stop your mind blowing game by propagating that whoever claims prophethood after Rasool Karim(saw) has become a new prophethood to nullify or revoke the HIGEST spiritual station of Rasool Karim( saw) you deliberately made it so, with the intention to instigate and invite hatred against Ahmadis community, now take my challenge, prove that how is it prophethood after Rasool Karim(saw) is said to be new prophet whilst the prophethood IS SUBJECTED AND IN THE DOMAIN OF RASOOL KARIM(saw) PROPHETHHOD? you seem to be deliberately ignored what Allah said in Surah An Nisa verse 69, Allah clearly said it is CONDITIONAL that prior to attain the spiritual blessing of prophethood one needs to obey and even after having attain prophethood one is still requires to obey Rasool Karim( saw) if that is the case, how on earth one is said has become new prophet revoking or nullifying the HIGEST spiritual station of Rasool Karim(saw)? take this challenge, explains pls.
@@syedsulaimansyedadnan7695 I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani. In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. Mirza qadiyani was a balant liar Waiting for your answer.
@@syedsulaimansyedadnan7695 In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty. I am challenging you to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani.
@@syedsulaimansyedadnan7695 I am challenging every Ahmadi/qadiyani to answer these claims of Mirza qadiyani. In rohani khazain 23:226 he said that Maryam the mother of Jesus was a hermaphrodite. He said that she had male hormones in her body and her own sperm impregnated her. He rejected that miracles birth of Jesus Chris. Which totally goes against the Quran. And in rohani khazain 22:50-51, he said that Jesus Christ was born as insects are born in monsoon. He said that those miracles that you attribute to Jesus, that was mesmerism. Those were not miracles but tricks that Jesus performed and people thought them as miracles. So basically according to Mirza qadiyani, Jesus was a trickster. In rohani khazain 20:356, he said that Jesus lacked male organs. In rohani khazain 9:31, he called people bastard (harami). Mirza qadiyani had no character of a prophet. In rohani khazain 23:382, Mirza said that prophet SAW said that there was a prophet in India who was black skinned, and his name was "kahin" in other words "krishna". There is not a collection of Hadith where you can find that prophet Muhammad SAW ever said this. In review of religions Sept 1907, Mirza qadiyani claimed about the prophet SAW that prophet SAW said if there is a plague leave the town.but in reality in a authentic Hadith prophet SAW said if there is a plague do not leave the town. If you are outside, do not come into the town. Hence Mirza qadiyani doesn't even qualify to be a good person. Let alone be a prophet of ALLAH almighty.
According to Mirza. “(Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and frequently using foul language. He used to get angry over petty things. He had no control over his emotions.” (Zamima Anjam-e-Atham, Roohani Khazain , Vol 11 p.289 ).
@@AkbarAllahabadi007 I am aware of the "Ilzami Jawab" and "Biblical Jesus" gymnastics played by the followers of Mirza. I am surprised that you did not include "Metaphorical" in your argument. These are favourite mental gymnastics used by Mirza followers to defend him. The reality is Mirza deliberately targeted Isa ( AS) and his mother- the most honoured woman in Islam. I have more evidence to prove my point from Mirza's own writings. As Muslims we do not differ on the "Person" of Isa (AS), we differ on the "Nature" of Isa ( AS) as portrayed by Christians. So we do not attack Isa ( AS) or his mother. We attack the Christian concepts. Hope the point is clear. May Allah guide you to become part of the Ummah of Muhammad (SAW) and not the Ummah of Ghulam Ahmad .
@@AkbarAllahabadi007 You are unable to debunk my claim through reason, logic and evidence. Let me make it clear. I don't hate Mirza followers. I feel sorry for them. I have realised that they are born into a cult and it is difficult to leave the cult. Doesn't matter how you sugar coat it, Mirza has attacked Isa ( AS ) and his mother. He even questioned the miraculous birth of Isa (AS). This is in direct contradiction of the Koran. Ruhani Khazain, volume 6, Jang-e-Muqadas, page 280-281 “Do you believe birth of Jesus without father? Birth of Jesus without father doesn’t amaze me, Hazrat Adam was born without father and mother, Now rainy season is near, (you should) must go out and see how many insects get born itself. Therefore it’s a mistake to take it as proof of Jesus’s being God.” Unlike Mirza Ghulam, we do not attack Isa (AS) or his mother. Isa is Isa. We challenge the Christian's view of Isa.
Mojaddidin has said Mollahs will main enemies against Imam Mahdi(a) to fail inner meaning of his sayings or writings.This Mollah is the truthfulness of Mirza Gulam Ahmad(a) like other Mollahs
According to Mirza Ghulam, " “”The Messiah used to get oil massages from adulterous women, if he had begged allah for forgiveness (istighfar), then he wouldn’t have been as such” Transliteration “”Maseeh tho khud kunjereeo say thail malwata rai, agar istighfar karte, to yeh khalat nai hote” 2016 edition of Malfuzat, Volume-3, Page 279, Initially Published in Rabwah, 1961, in Urdu, covering the period from November 1901 to October 14, 1902.
Islam Ahmadiyyat zindabaad. The true Islam, may Allah guide the Muslim ummah to the truth of Ahmadiyyat and may they accept the messiah of the latter days, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as), as prophesied by the Holy Prophet Muhammed(saw).
@@zara67901 There is nothing called Islam Ahmediyyat. Writing "True" infront doesn't prove the truthfulness of falsehood. Mirza was a characterless, compulsive liar.
@@KayMe-vc2li really great question, I wish more people would ask this. I cannot even describe what it is like to accept him, it is truly a blessed jamaat and a true privilege to be an Ahmadi, the followers of him are guided at every step in the correct way, in the way of Islam, through his teachings (he revived Islam), you do not have to look to for the guidance in other scholars, it is all there being taught to us constantly by our Khalifa who guides us on every matter. There is a security and progress one constantly feels in being guided in this correct manner and being around momins in the community, you aspire to reach the highest spiritual level of morality. And you strive to do better as a community, to grow and to practice and preach the real Islam. And there is a real difference in the way Ahmadi Muslims conduct themselves compared to other Muslims, which solidifies my belief that it is the heavenly sect
@@zara67901 you sound like a sweet and genuine individual, I’m happy to give you as much respect as possible. But Mirza Sahab is not Ibnu Maryam, he’s was the son of Chiraag Bibi. He did some good scholarly work & could be seen as a reviver, but not the second coming of Esa, or a Prophet
the information presented was informative, good and helpful but the flow of the conversation was not a pleasant to the viewer, due to the impatience of the man asking the questions, not letting the sheikh answer fully before asking other questions.
Hudhayfah reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “In my nation, there will be twenty-seven great liars and impostors, among whom are four women. Verily, I am the seal of the prophets, and there is no prophet after me.” Musnad Ahmad 23358
The Quran makes it clear that Messengers always receive revelations in the language of their people, so that first recipients can understand them: "And We sent not a Messenger except with the language of his people, in order that he might make [the Message] clear for them... Al Quran 14:4 Allah never changes his practices when it comes to his Messengers (48:23). Yet Mirza’s ‘revelations’ were in Arabic, Persian and English in addition to his people’s Urdu. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad boasted that he himself did not understand some of the languages he received revelations in! : …sometimes the revelation is being received in a foreign tongue, of which this humble one is wholly unacquianted.
@@drtahseenayurveda Nope. Ahmedis are not part of the Ummah of Muhammad (SAW). Mirza was a characterless, compulsive liars. There are enough evidence in his writings to prove his falsehood.
Mr. Rashid, surely you do not have any evidence against Ahmadiyyat. Where did you get the word "NEW" prophet? In La Nabi Badi? And Khatamunabiyeen you translated as finality of prophethood... It translates "Seal of the Prophets".. Mr. Rashid, May Allah show you right path. Ameen
Even if he show you proofs you won't believe because you deny your own liar ghulam mirza words from his own writings.😂😂 Get some guts and read his books boy
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed using fake hadith. In 1908 and via Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, MGA alleged that Muhammad (saw) allegedly said “that there was a prophet in India with black complexion and his name was Kahin, meaning Kanahya, who is also called Krishan…..”. However, this is a total lie, MGA quoted “Tarikh-i-Hamdani”, however, these words (Kaala Rasoolulah) are not written in the text
I am commenting as an Ahmadi Muslim. Let me start with saying that I head the whole podcast and it was really difficult to hear it because the tone and language Shaykh Asrar Rashid used. It was very disappointing to see the use of this language from a person who claims to be a sunni (follower of the Sunnat of Hazoor (SAW)) and a religious scholar. He started the podcast by attacking how Hazrat Mashi-e-Maood (AS) look with his mean a derogatory words. This is a true sign that he has no answer to the Ahmadi Muslims and now he is taking the looks of Hazoor (AS) to stand up. I could easily say many things about how he looks, but as Hazrat Mohammad (SAW) ordered us not to say anything bad even about other's false gods so they will not say anything about our true God, so I will leave it to people. I listened to him to see what Islam he is inviting us toward. After listening to all his interview, I will say if that is the Islam he represents with mean language and lies, I am better off as an Ahmadi (Muslim) or Kafir as he think. What he thinks of us? Who cares any ways. I can write a whole book about how many times he totally disregarded Hazoor (SAW) ordered about how to conduct themselves, but I will say this the Abul Jehal was once called Abul Hakam. I though about him a lot while listening to him. May Allah forgive us all and bless us all.
D- "Our opponents are like the pigs and their woman are like bitch" (Najmul Huda, p.53, Roohani Khazain, v.14,p.53). This is the language of your Mirza qadiyani, what you think about thisss, ???
@@omanmalik9927 I will rather go to the hell with Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) and Hazrat Mirza Sahib than what ever this guy is. He is for sure not a religious scholar. He has his shop open and many like you are buying from him.
@@maqboolahmad2746 روحانی خزائن جلد ۱۴ ۵۳ نجم الهدى ap اقوم لدعوة الأنام، وفعل ما شاء وهو أحكم الحاكمين. والله يعلم ما في کے لئے حکم کیا اور جو چاہا ۔ کیا اور وہ احکم الحاکمین ہے۔ قلبي ولا يعلم أحد من العالمين. حِبُّ لَنَا فَبِحُبِّهِ نَتَحَبَّبُ ہمارا ایک دوست ہے اور ہم اُس کی محبت سے وَعَنِ الْمَنَازِلِ وَالْمَرَاتِبِ نَرْغَبُ له ہیں ۔ اور مراتب اور منازل سے نہیں بے رغبتی اور نفرت ہے۔ میں دیکھتا ہوں کہ دنیا اور اُس کے طالبوں کی زمین قحط زدہ ہو گئی یعنی Oh جلدی تباہ ہو جائے گی اور ہماری محبت کی زمین کبھی قحط زدہ نہیں ہوگی ۔ لوگ دنیا کی نعمت پر جھکتے ہیں مگر ہم اس منہ کی طرف جھک گئے ہیں جو خوشی پہنچانے والا اور طرب انگیز ہے۔ ہم th na ssia إِنِّي أَرَى الدُّنْيَا وَبَلْدَةَ أَهْلِهَا جَدَبَتْ وَأَرْضُ وِدَادِنَا لَا تَجْدَبُ يَتَمَايَلُونَ عَلَى النَّعِيمِ وَإِنَّنَا مِلْنَا إِلَى وَجْهِ يَسُرُّ وَيُطْرِبُ إِنَّا تَعَلَّقْنَا بِنُورِ حَبِيبِنَا حَتَّى اسْتَنَارَ لَنَا الَّذِي لَا يَخْشَبُ ma on ep sel اپنے پیارے کے دامن سے آویختہ ہیں ایسے کہ جو صاف اور شفاف نہیں ہو سکتا وہ بھی ہمارے إِنَّ الْعَدَا صَارُوا خَنَازِيرَ الْفَلَا وَنِسَاءُ هُمْ مِنْ دُونِهِنَّ الْأَكْلَبُ لئے منور ہو گیا ۔ دشمن ہمارے بیابانوں کے خنزیر ہو گئے اور اُن کی عورتیں کیتیوں سے بڑھ گئی ہیں ۔ Read this carefully, and check the vulagarity level of your Mirza qadiyani, you can check this from your own source , it's 1000 percent true
@@maqboolahmad2746 "Our opponents are like the pigs and their woman are like bitch" (Najmul Huda, p.53, Roohani Khazain, v.14,p.53) Check the vulagarity level of your Mirza qadiyani.
Jazakallah Sheikh nice interview. I enjoyed listening to it and lesrned nrw things qbout them, i also followed adnan rashid and his many hour long live stream to dismantle all Qadiyanis. These Qadiyani defient people filled your commentsection with there trash. That means you did something good mashallah. I dont know whose studio that is. But in my opinion the sofas need a rearrangement.
Just like Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Protestants don’t consider Mormons “Christian”. Same way Sunni and Shia don’t consider Ahmadiyya Muslims simple 🤷🏾♂️
Mirza lusted after a married woman by the name of Muhammadi Begum and he stated as one of his prophecies that if he does not marry her then he is a liar. This is his character. Guess what, he never married her? End of cult?
Mirza Ghulam contradicted the Koran, Ruhani Khazain, volume 6, Jang-e-Muqadas, page 280-281 “Do you believe birth of Jesus without father? Birth of Jesus without father doesn’t amaze me, Hazrat Adam was born without father and mother, Now rainy season is near, (you should) must go out and see how many insects get born itself. Therefore it’s a mistake to take it as proof of Jesus’s being God.”
He claimed to be Jesus and Mehdi at the same time which in itself was a blatant lie. How could a son of certain Punjabi woman, after almost 2000 years become son of Mary, and Mehdi who would be having different father and mother? This is enough to expose the LIAR. Moreover not a single prophesy regarding Maseeh and Mehdi is fulfilled in Mirza. He was extremely reluctant and frightful to touch the voluminous Hadith literatures. If he was receiving revelations from Almighty, he could have easily clarified the difference of opinions regarding the Hadiths, weak Hadith or even false Hadiths etc. Don't Ahmedis have any grey matter left inside their heads?
Your Calm Yet Firm Respect U Show Is Truly Inspirational.. May Allah B Pleased Wiv All Ur Effort. ❤ Look Forward Seein U Bak Luton Central Masjid 🕌 إن شاء اللّه
I witness in the name of Allah, my 25 years experience proves that Mirza Gulam Ahmad (as) is the true Messiah and Imam Mahdi. And the opposing Mullas are liars and followers of their whims.
Now its little job for all the sunni Muslim's, to spread this nice discussion on the issue of deviated qadiyani sect. We appreciate the efforts of Sheikh Asrar Rashid. God bless him and give him long and healthy life ameen.
It is very interesting to note here. I listened and seemed like some of traits of Qadiyani kazzab and deviant pti Imran Niazi khan are very similar. 1. Use of narcotics 2. Foul Language about opponents 3. Iyyadak Nabudo (touheed false interpretation) 4. Misguide followers to abuse all previous vital personalities of Islam 5. Calling all other than themselves corrupt 6. Whoever disagrees with them they abuse them to a very low degree behaviour 7. Some group of liberals sympathize wrongfully with them specially west democracies with shallow knowledge of Islam and Pakistan 8. they have false image of being oppressed in the eyes of others. Infact they are the oppressors in reality in many ways.
@@mazharqadri9357 Qadianis are not a deviant sect. They are not even part of Isalm. Please do watch session by Adnan Rashid and the dialogue with Imtiaz on RU-vid every Saturday. They have been exposing this cult for the last whole year using Mirza's own writings.
It’s amazing that Sheikh denies the persecution of Ahmadis in Pakistan and says that there are other groups who are considered Kafir. Are the other groups declared non Muslim in the constitution and do they have an ordinance against them to jail them for practicing Islam.
This Sheik is talking nonsense, there is no such thing as new prophet who comes to abrogate, nullified the supreme status of Rasool Karim Muhammad(saw) KHATTAM NABIYIN. In Surah An Nisa verse 69 Allah clearly makes it CONDITIONAL that whomsoever, prior to be blessed with the spiritual blessing of prophethood must first and foremost obey Rasool Karim Muhammad(saw) and even after been blessed or attained prophethood he is still required to obey Rasool Karim Muhammad (saw), in other words, prophethood after Rasool Karim(saw) is SUBJECTED IN THE DOMAIN OF RASOOL KARIM MUHAMMAD'S (saw) PROPHETHOOD, if that is the case, how is it possible someone has become NEW PROPHET eventhough he has attained the blessing of prophethood? infact, there is no issue of new prophet, it is merely fabricated by the opponents of Ahmadiyya to instill hatred and animosity against Ahmadiyya community. KHATTAM NABIYIN does not implying the closure of the spiritual blessing in the SHARIAAT delivered by Rasool Karim Muhammad (saw) rather, it is implying the end or the last SHARIAAT ITSELF, there can never be NEW SHARIAAT after the Shariaat of Islam, nonetheless, whomsoever amongst the followers of Rasool Karim Muhammad (saw) truly and sincerely obey His last Shariaat can attained the spiritual blessing guaranteed by Allah in SURAH AN NISA VERSE 69, NABIYIN, SIDIQIN, SHUHADA AND THE RIGHTEOUS (SHOLIHI). It is quite insulting to believe that the mission of Rasool Karim Muhammad (saw) is to close all the spiritual blessing in Islam bcos that is just tantamount to believe that Rasool Karim Muhammad (saw) mission is MEANINGLESS (NAO ZUBILLAH MIN ZALIK).
It is so interesting to listen to how those who reject Mirza Ghulam Ahmad explain their rejection. They remind me so much of all those earlier people described in the Holy Quran who rejected previous prophets. So many claims in this video are incorrect. NOTHING in the Holy Quran or sunnah is rejected by Ahmadi Muslims, unlike those who believe that some verses are abrogated. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote books of explanation, he NEVER replaced or rejected any word of the Holy Quran. The word Kafir means disbeliever - so it is quite correct to describe those who disbelieve in his teachings as kafir(of those teachings). I would like to ask this shaykh where he got he rules about a Khalifah's eyesight from and the need for a Khalifah to have land and an army??? Also, when Muslims pray, in their prayer 30+ times a day they pray 'bless oh Allah Muhammad and the people of Muhammad, as Thou did bless Abraham and the people of Abraham'. What blessings did Abraham and his people have that Muslims want so badly and Muhammad taught them to pray for so much??
This Maulana Sahib appears to have a limited understanding of Islam, as there are numerous contradictions in his statements. He seems unfamiliar with basic Islamic concepts and is openly denying the prophethood of Jesus (peace be upon him), which contradicts Islamic teachings. Furthermore, he is engaging in personal attacks on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace be upon him), which not only goes against the principles of Islam but is also an unethical and disrespectful way to discredit someone. After listening to him for only 13 minutes, it became clear to me that he should first deepen his knowledge of Islamic teachings and morals before coming online to attempt to defame Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace be upon him) or advise Ahmadis to renew their Islam. Even then, I am confident that he would not succeed.
Dear Sheikh. Are you the best man to represent Islam, including the Syiah, to represent Islam for this debate with the Khalifah of Ahmadiyya Muslim? Will the Muslim world, including Syiah, agree to have you as their representative?
It is very interesting to note here. I listened and seemed like some of traits of Qadiyani kazzab and deviant pti Imran Niazi khan are very similar. 1. Use of narcotics 2. Foul Language about opponents 3. Iyyadak Nabudo (touheed false interpretation) 4. Misguide followers to abuse all previous vital personalities of Islam 5. Calling all other than themselves corrupt 6. Whoever disagrees with them they abuse them to a very low degree behaviour 7. Some group of liberals sympathize wrongfully with them specially west democracies with shallow knowledge of Islam and Pakistan 8. they have false image of being oppressed in the eyes of others. Infact they are the oppressors in reality in many ways.................
So the Sheik believes that a Khalifa should have an army.... So he can't accept the holy prophet s.a.w cause he didn't have an army when he proclaimed as the prophet of Islam... 🤔
He just sat there and did Tehreef of Quran and Hadith. Khatamun nabiyeen means seal of prophet, not finality. And Hadith translated to theres no "new" prophet after me. Atleast present the correct meaning and say that we derive our understanding in such and such way
Declan is weird, its like he wanted to say he was muslim so he can use it against islam lol, i don't like him, he just believes anything he reads that benefits him so he can use it, i really hate ppl who don't do their research, everyone knows and its common knowledge that qadiani etc. are not within true islam, Declan playing dumb and asking Dodgy questions lol, if he asked me i would have asked him back lol, uno reverse card 😂
19:01 "that's between him (Ghulam Ahmad) and God" when it came to being faithful to Quranic teachings from an early age? Yet when it comes to his claim of prophethood apparently that's between Ghulam Ahmad and this looney tune 😂. Jesus descending from the heavens yea? Sounds like a Marvel Avengers movie 😂😂 Jog on. Ahmadiyyat Zindabad. Time will tell indeed
He became famous because during 1835 and before that people were very poorer. With little help in their life or food and shelter, easily they follow any cult. Just look at similar Mary tressa . She went from Albania to India and gather many homeless children and feeding them and give them shelter. Now there are mothers tressa followers and even they have uniform hejab. This is how ahmedia take advantage of inability of poorer people for he's interest
This Mr Sheik is saying Ahmad is the name of The Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw) as mentioned in The Torah, Ghulam mean servant, as such, Mirza is the servant to Ahmad or Muhammad (saw).
Personally i don't think the qaidianis will put anyone forward to debate with Shaykh Asrar. It's clear they lack the level of intellect required to commit to the debate. Anyone who thinks mirza ghulam was a prophet or messiah is messed up in the head.
@@AkbarAllahabadi007Razi is pathological liar. He talks lot of BS without any substance. I have read articles in his Amhedi answers which is full of error. Hope to expose the liar soon.
Mirza said in Kitab-ul-Bariyah, Roohani Khazain vol 13 p.350 “”I am the ‘Self-implanted-Plant’ of the British Government. “Government should take great care regarding this ‘Self-implanted-Plant’ . . . . .should instruct its officers to treat ME and MY JAMA’AT with special kindness and favours. Our family has never hesitated in shedding their blood in the way of British Rulers and did not stop from laying down their lives neither do they hesitate now.” …..”From my early age till now when I am 65 years of age, I have been engaged , with my pen and tongue, in an important task to turn the hearts of Muslims towards the true love & Goodwill & sympathy for the British Government and to obliterate the idea of Jehad from the hearts of stupid (Muslims).”
These false prophet followers are making a modern quran, trying to challenge Allah Swt that the Quran is faultless and has Allah SWT direct protection. So lets see how far you get with your new publication
The bible mentions 2 Jesuses at the Trial and Piolet saved Jesus beacuse his wife warned him and he was reluctant and washed his hands...he gave the wrong man to his guards.
