When he went out there after Anderson was ejected....he didn't even try to pull Anderson away from the umpire. He just stood there and listened to the conversation.
Bring on the automatic balls and strikes technology. Eliminate home plate umpires. They have made many changes in the way a true baseball should be played, might as well keep going. They are destroying a great sports game.
Base line is established in the tag attempt. Since he never had the ball he never could attempt a tag which means no base line established to be out of. Safe.
Brandon Hyde is usually a cool customer, but when he gets hot he gets hot. I still remember when Chris Davis went after him in the dugout a few seasons back, Hyde does have a bit of spark to him.
BAD CALLS 0:52 Rodriguez 3:56 Garcia 8:33 Yelich 9:30 Stanton 15:38 Villar 20:17 Wisdom 10:18 Since the catcher never had possession of the ball there was no "tag attempt" , and therefore no "base path" established pursuant to Rule 5.09(b)(1). Since there was no base path established, it doesn't matter that the runner was way wide of the carcher/ home plate. (This comment has been amended since I didn't initially realize the catcher never had posesion of the ball in my original posting) GOOD CALLS 4:36 Pollick 5:33 Maldonado 18:01 Knapp 18:37 Aguilar
Agreed. I think in am article I read that the Rockies manager didn't see all of the play at home and assumed the out was for a tag, not out of the baseline. Someone needs glasses
10:18 was a bad call, the 3 foot rule is in regards to a tag attempt. The catcher never had the ball, thus no tag was attempted. Runner should have been safe
Mgrs should wear go-pros... approach the Ump/ref/judge and tell them."You are being recorded because I don't trust you to accurately describe in your report what you clearly got wrong"
Incorrect, rule 5.09(B)(2) the baseline isn't established until the fielder attempts a tag. Since the catcher never had possession of the ball, no tag was attempted, no baseline was established, runner should have been safe ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-C32d3m-FjNE.html
@Adam Lewis you are correct, he never had the ball, so he never attempted a tag. As a result, the runner never established a baseline and should have been safe
It’s hard for me to take a manager seriously when his name is Aaron. Idk why. It doesn’t even make sense to me. But I just imagine the umpire saying “Come back when your name isn’t Aaron” and, I have to say, I agree.
Aaron Boone literally said the Yankees lost game 2 of the ALDS because the roof was open at Minute Maid Park. So needless to say it’s a case of even I agree with Dodgers fans here on not taking at least one Aaron seriously.
Funny always listening to the announcers say you gotta bear down as an umpire. But as an umpire you also have to take control of the game or the coaches and players will walk all over you and think they can say whatever they want whenever they want.
MLB should implement some system of umpires needing a minimum % of correct strike/ball calls to ump these games, if they don’t meet the minimum percentage the get demoted to minor league games until it’s improved
Ummm they do have that system and the umpires who are in the pros have a strike zone % in the 90s. Well majority of them are in the 90s besides angel but we all know the situation with that.
The only way this is going to change is staying home and watching the games at home to let MLB know what you think. No one goes to the ball park to see their favorite Ump! They pay no penalty for a poorly called game and in some cases they look for trouble and that is way out of line, then the game becomes about them. This was never the idea of that position, then you have the other Umps jumping in to protect an ump that calls a poorly called game.
Manager: Good sir, I respectfully disagree. I really think that was a ball not a strike. Perhaps we could discuss it over tea after the game. My family would be honoured to have you as our esteemed guest. Umpire: YOU’RE OUTTA HERE!
I am a yankee fan and just need to say this: Don Mattingly is not a mlb manager. He does not give credit when credit is due to his players he does not come out of the dugout to protect his players when an argument with the umpire. He gives no motivation to his players and remember he is coaching a young team for most of his career.
9:05 "He's giving him a lot of leeway" followed 3 seconds later by an exasperated "Yellich has been thrown out!!!" Which is it, because if he gave him a lot of leeway, it should not be a surprise that he eventually got tossed.
Those umpires couldn’t even breathe Dusty Baker’s or Tony Larussa’s air. No one pays their hard earned money (except the umpires boyfriends) to see the umps.
The Rockies, Padres home plate call was ridiculous. You are allowed to evade the tag at home plate. He called it before the catcher even had control of the ball
I admit, most of the managers and players who complain don’t have a leg to stand on…but these recent crops of umpire really need to grow a pair and stop having trigger fingers. Best way to shut up a player or manager is to ignore them.
18:18 was a horrible call. Rule 5.09(B)(2) the baseline isn't established until the fielder attempts a tag. Since the catcher never had possession of the ball, no tag was attempted, no baseline was established, runner should have been safe
Why don’t more managers and coaches protest these games under the marginal calls? Not balls and strikes as it’s established you can’t argue them, but perhaps not arguing a reviewed play but protesting because it changes the tenor and outcome, or on a play like you discussed where there’s no opportunity to tag a runner.
@@davidbryantpiano6003 there's nothing to protest on that play, the rule is very clear. The catcher never had possession of the ball, so the runner couldn't have left the base path
You can’t run behind home plate and expect to still be in the base line. As a little league kid your taught to slide if there’s a play at the plate. If he would’ve done that, he would’ve been safe
Is the point is to try and intimidate the umpire so that he changes the way he looks at future calls??? Fairly counter productive if you ask me (and I realize nobody is asking me). Butafter all is said and done, the call will stand and you've lost at least one player/managerl and maybe more for the rest of the game. Section 9 of the rules is pretty clear. I guess we'll just have to see how they implement pitch trax and what difference it will make.
also remeber the umpire must be in the position he or she cannot move at the place must be exact place of all times peroid according to the rule bookalso the umpire cannot follow where the catcher reposition catcher can do anything but the umpire cannot !!!
Ross is totally right about that balk call. The pitcher used two different set positions on the first pitch shown, which is technically illegal, but if you do it the same every time, they let you get away with it. He went from pretty much a set at the belt, then reset up by his chin on the first one. It looked like Ross mildly bitched that he double-set. On the second one, he set from the belt only, then pitched. You really can't do that. It's one or the other, but not both. The announcers didn't know what Ross was arguing. The video editor for this clip understood.
@@dkdeesee Here is a video of the game in fast motion. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--m-xeMTcqNo.html Although he USED TO ALWAYS set high back in his days with Cleveland, he essentially never does it now. His set at the belt on MANY pitches here could be called a balk, as he doesn't really stop. So when he does what he does on the first pitch in the video we are on here, it is deliberate scam. That is how he USED to come to a set. But when you virtually never do that anymore, in favor of the semi-balk set at the belt that he has adopted, you are intentionally using a semi-balk set to throw off the timing of the hitter AND the runner. You don't get to wiggle to a set and simultaneously pitch and then ALSO wiggle to a set and then come up to another set and THEN pitch.
@@kevindobo1425 Here is a video of the game in fast motion. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--m-xeMTcqNo.html Although he USED TO ALWAYS set high back in his days with Cleveland, he essentially never does it now. His set at the belt on MANY pitches here could be called a balk, as he doesn't really stop. So when he does what he does on the first pitch in the video we are on here, it is deliberate scam. That is how he USED to come to a set. But when you virtually never do that anymore, in favor of the semi-balk set at the belt that he has adopted, you are intentionally using a semi-balk set to throw off the timing of the hitter AND the runner. You don't get to wiggle to a set and simultaneously pitch and then ALSO wiggle to a set and then come up to another set and THEN pitch.
With all the time clocks it is time to give players and coaches 30 seconds to say whatever they want without these quick trigger, hurt my feelings umpire ejections. Half of the ejections come when the umpire knows they made a bad call and then insist on looking towards the player and dugout for the ejection.
Just accept the calls-- regardless of whether they were right or wrong or whether you agree or not agree. Life on or off the field isn't always fair. Y'all are paid to PLAY BALL! Bunch o' spoiled babies.
Man that strike zone on YES or whatever it was during that yankee game with Carpenter was wayyyyy off. In their strike zone they show it at Carpenters ankles or mid shin but in the side view with the camera it’s clearly at the knees. That’s a strike
Worth noting that the zone that a lot of broadcasts use are generally a little off from what it actually should be. It’s gotten better but take those with a grain of salt.
Rule 5.09(B)(2) the baseline isn't established until the fielder attempts a tag. Since the catcher never had possession of the ball, no tag was attempted, no baseline was established, runner should have been safe ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-C32d3m-FjNE.html
Basically, I think that what some of these managers are mad at in regard to the strike zone is that some pitches that are way off the plate (and would ordinarily be fourth balls for walks) are called third strikes against their side, but if the same pitches happen for the other side, they are called balls and walks are granted; that inconsistency is, I think, owing to the fact that some umpires seem to want certain teams to win, so they will call certain pitches in certain locations for one side and against the other.
