I would say that: - it would provide comfort to the patients by knowing that they have easy access to physican consultations without worrying about the long way to the hospital or the costs of a journey if they come from poorer backgrounds - the diagnosis could not be comprehensive because a doctor cannot examine the pacient by for example taking their blood pressure - it is both for and against the justice medical ethics principle because on the one hand it enables people from underprivilidged areas to have easier access to a physician but, on the other hand, excludes elderly people who are not well acquainted with technology and don't even have internet access sometimes - it should be more widespread because if the condition of joining is leaving your local practice and being allocated to a practice based on London, people outside of London would struggle with a distance to get real life medical care Sorry for my language, I'm not a native. Would you say these are valid points?
My GP has told me that she is overworked due to constant over bookings. Could this be something to mention in terms of how it would be beneficial for the workforce in reducing wait times and overall stress?
