Modern Feminism Destroys American Women | Janice Fiamengo EP 20 

❤️🙏

God bless & help you. The world misleads actually.

this is of the words that needs be to microphon(ed) via John Vervæke - via Philos Sophia; learn(ed) ignorance; may be it forms of redemption

The sad thing is how easily women are brainwashed into this nonsense - robbing them of their best chance to establish a nuclear family. The knock on effects in society and culture are severe.

Me too. I got suckered into the whole feminism stuff back in the 1970s. Even then I wondered why it was dominated by an extremely disproportionate number of gay women. That was a red flag that I saw and felt uneasy about but ignored. Now look at the total mess our culture has become!

Let's do it!

No one wants to hear this misogynistic drivil. We've heard enough. The statts on men harming women aren't lies. Grow up!

Have this for yourself. The rest of us don't want to live in The Handmaid's Tale!

I agree with you

Marxism said that it would free women from the slavery of domestic tasks where they were exploited by their husbands and subjected to their children, sending them to work in factories where their social work would be redistributed, no marriage, the freedom of not having their own home , a husband or crying children standing in the way of his emancipation as a human being. Seriously now, in the Soviet Union the result was that women had to go to work in factories for 10 to 12 hours to try to reach the exaggeratedly high production quotas and then go to a communal dormitory and visit their family one or two days a week... release?

That's so sad. Though even more sadly it's common in every country today. I've seen old research that shows that a child under the age of 3 suffers more abandonment than an infant sent to an orphanage. The child in the orphanage gets abandoned once. But children under three don't understand, so for them they are abandoned daily, what's more in modern daycare often twice, they finally try and form an emotional connection to a daycare worker and she goes home and is replaced by another. Day after day after day. My country Australia used to do a lot to assist married mothers to afford to stay at home with their children. But not anymore. Now "apparently" all mothers want is affordable daycare from six weeks of age. No wonder their is a generation of teens addicted to screens and confused about their gender.

@Alliebeth4072 really eye opening.

Janice has a whole series on this.

More to come 👍

​@@TammyPetersonPodcast what are your thoughts on the red pill ?

@@btb554 maybe you are referring to changing someone’s mind by educating them on the other side of issues

@@TammyPetersonPodcast I was talking about the red pill ideologies and youtubers like rollo tomassi, fresh and fit, and whatever podcast.

@@btb554 I’ll look them up

What an insightfull profound conversation. Brilliant gast. I am in awe of how she is able to talk hardly without having to collect her thoughts and being so clear, precise and on point with everything she says. She is an excellent speaker. She looks like from an old century and when I look at her it almost feels like she portraits the time she is talking about.

The first wave of feminism was made up of working women and widows who had to work to feed their children at a time when working conditions for both men and women were simply horrible, women were paid half than a man's salary, girls had to start working at the age of 12 and if they were injured or mutilated they were simply thrown out on the street, the situation was bad for men, much worse for women, the first of their demands it was "Equal pay for equal work", what they wanted was better treatment and recognition of their human rights, they did not question marriage, family or motherhood, quite the contrary, the second wave of feminism tried to obtain the right to vote, to hold public office, enter universities and have their own careers, the third wave is actually the problem, the third wave of feminism was made up of lesbian activists who were proud to recognize it at a time when it was scandalous and those activists rejected marriage, family and motherhood as misfortunes for women, their ideal of women were themselves, a minority despised and marginalized by society, it is natural that their attitude was hatred and contempt towards society, they developed an ideology full of of hatred towards men, marriage, family and children, the problem is that this class of women is a tiny minority, the vast majority of women are not third wave feminists, they are too busy first wave feminists being led by third wave feminists.

depends on what the “work” is. I’ve never had a good job where I’ve been treated well

@juliettezea9507 my daughter has had the same experience.

@@zarach9459 Watch some of Janice's other work on this topic, and you will end up with a very different notion on how feminism was in the early days. It was never about equality, never about fairness, and never about human rights. Yes, some of the things it achieved are a net positive, but that was never the goal, that was milestone.

'be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ" Paul's advice for service, following that of his Lord's example. Compassion for all, but always with the flip side of responsiblilty and accountablility

yes, and she stuck to her Christian principles, even though her family was not

The problem is people are fascinated with mysticism I think because it's permission to kind of do what you please. No offense to anyone from the 70s as I'm in no way equipped with that many years.

@@destinymayberry6217 That generation was overreacting to the rigid roles of the 50s. Now I can see where the feminists of that era were venting a lot of resentment against men. Now we have to undo the damage of that time. The assault against masculinity is way over the top.

Because she can share her body with who ever she wants for manipulation

Thanks for the thoughtful comment. I’ll be interviewing Dr Sarah Hill about her book, This is the brain on birth control pills in a few days and another interview on narcissism. I have so much to learn and share with my listeners. Thank you for listening

Womens lib saved alot of women

Thats why both political parties are pushing for more executive power to the president. At current pace it wont be 20 more years and the president will be a dictator.

Tammy's remarks about negotiation, reminds of the Scriptural admonistion extending towards both husbands and wives to submit to one another; this out of reverence for Jesus Christ, Who had submitted to the point of laying His life down physically in order to redeem His bride. Tragically in the past, and still today, Scripture had been and still is being applied selectively by some; towards singling out only submission of wives to their husbands. Such treatment of a wife, which can be referred to as religious abuse, sadly is the source of much brokenness, and pain within a marriage relationship. Are you saying that the understanding of submission from scripture has been misunderstood and has led to abuse in modern marriages?

@@TammyPetersonPodcast Yes, sadly this is the case, and I believe many marriage relationships had been destroyed as result. Teaching in some churches/denominations had been insisting on obedience of wives to their husbands to the point of it being the ultimate virtue a wife could have. Had eventually found a section in the last chapter in Cloud&Townsend's book 'Boundaries in Marriage' (published in 1999), which points to mutual submission.

Women have been led astray by the feminists movements, that’s for sure. When we find ourselves giving up on who we are, and loose sight, in the highest sense, nothing good can come from that. It’s up to us to double down on our faith and stand up straight and tall. It’s up to us to reach up and move forward doing the next right thing no matter what

Thanks for your comment. That is a good theory

@@TammyPetersonPodcast Heartfelt thanks.

Thanks for your comment. What do you think stopped you from forming a romantic relationship?

@@TammyPetersonPodcast I just never found "the right one". Thank You for cemmenting back 😊

​@@debzdv3178So you decided to have a kid without father?

Why is that "important segment" of a society? What is it, 0,000001 % of humans ? I'd say it's one of the least relevant issues in society. Not pretty,but not that important.

@@ms-jl6dl We are growing, as the fad of cross-sex ideation grows. The reason our voices need to be heard now, is we've often had direct contact with the sham therapists who "affirm" cross-sex ideation, which is a social contagion sweeping across the younger generation. It will be the largest medical malpractice scandal in this century. That, user-kk1reb8ur5y, is why we are an important, but generally unheard of, segment of society.

Now that women aren't obedient sex slaves the incels are ANGRY and demanding pity. If only these terrible males were "protectors and providers" in the first place instead of failed husbands and fathers.

A great point to be made. But it doesn't account for today's society.

Women have that unlimited right today, and it has led to divorce stats in the mid-70% across the Western hemisphere, primarily and in overwhelming percentages initiated by women themselves. Please explain why you would believe unrestrained female sexuality in any way has been beneficiary to Western societies, when all it has accomplished is women competing over the top 20% of men, and the overall cultural consequences of widespread loneliness, that women's hypergamy has had on both genders because of it?

@@ErikDeMann You misunderstand me. The only part I was agreeing with is women should have some say about who they marry beforehand. It's a lifelong bond. Bit the point was moot. I'm saying in today's society women can already do that. So there's no need to chomp at it. Life didn't lead me to have a nuclear family I'm most certainly not better for it. Now I believe women should have basic rights. I don't believe in superiority of females because that's what modern feminism is. I very much enjoy being able to read write or explore a job though. When I say original feminist I mean the women who simply wanted girls to be educated and if they preferred and it worked for their family, work.

@@destinymayberry6217 Oh, I absolutely agree that women should have a say in who they marry. But I also can't help noticing how completely destructive a majority of single mother upbringings have been to modern civilisation, and how it has affected the children that the State is now essentially raising them, because those single moms are out there feeling "liberated" as mere wage slaves. There's just a level of selfcentered egotism that needs to be addressed there, if it is not blatantly obvious to the individual woman, that feminism primarily provided the State with the opportunity to tax each household twice, as well as giving the corporations the opportunity to raise the prices on food and other necessities, which has furthered the friction between couples in relationships, because they now have to earn more money, and by extension have less time to eachother and the kids. Which brings us full circle back to the divorces, the State as a third parent, and the dysfunctional kids, that is the outcome of leaving them in the care of even more dysfunctional individuals, where a widespread social network of women supporting eachother used to be. Because there's no real aspect of feminism that has not been a lose-lose situation for everyone, women included, compared to the few benefits bestowed on only one link in the three-sided equation a Family represents, as *the* most important foundation of a functioning, healthy society.

Status for men is negotiated among men. How do women negotiate status among women?

@@TammyPetersonPodcast Good question. It depends on what domain or by what means they will decide upon for the sake of acquiring status, I would think ( and their personality, background and so many other factors.) But as any decent dating coach will tell you, whether you like the idea of the work angle of it or not, you will only be able to get the man you want ( or whatever else?) in your life by having the knowledge , on behalf of your own interest, of eliminating the ones you don't want in favour of chosing and hopefully cultivating the ones you will be happier with, (speaking of ones choice of status indicators, that is), and that will depend on how well you know and or value your own time or the trouble and time you will take to do so. Women bear a great deal of responsibility in either enabling themselves or disabling themselves directly and or indirectly from achieving success in many domains if they are not willing to take control of taking care of themselves no matter what situation comes up, and asserting their choices, even though their styles of doing so may vary according to their skill, taste, or the situations they encounter. But they must take charge of certain aspects of their lives or waste a lot of time in repeated failures/ unhappiness which is not in their best interest, for obvious reasons. I don't know what to say about men who think they can take charge in such situations, or try to do so. Is it pride? Or simply dullness? That is the question. For instance what may be a nuisance to a man, may be nuance to a woman, (or a lack of it) and yet the difficulty is left to the woman to get the guy to understand the difference. Its hard work with mixed results because it may be misunderstood and contradicted or downright ridiculed. A difficulty. That is, if super "female coaches" think they can't or won't negotiate, ( men, that is, or at least if not to favour their own interests in the main.) , then these coaches are only advising women of such aspects of life, for their ( the woman's own good"). Of course these women may be more than naturally high in disagreeable personality ( traitedness) even if they have a point. But are they right, in the main? It would depend on what domain or by what means each woman would try to distinguish herself or decide to acquire status, I suppose.That is the question. Not whether you would want them to be right or not, by some other socially imposed or outside standard. They have to decide for themselves and take the consequences.

@@janeproctor5542 The question of choosing a good life partner, a better question is what are you doing to become a good desirable partner.

@@TammyPetersonPodcast well, if I take your case, for instance, I can see that your alliance with a Christian perspective would help you gain a more tolerant outlook upon how to navigate a marriage because the primary parnership gradually shifts toward a focus upon Jesus as the primary friend and advisor, comforter and that is an asset when it comes to building one's tolerance or improving upon it, as in becoming genuinely more gracious to your human partner and possibly far superior, even, if he does not or can't find it in himself to respond in kind and to grant you better access to finding a better partner in him, likewise, out of his connection to a higher power committedness. But then look: The whole church is pretty much collapsing because men do not want to do exactly that. They seem to feel that it would make women their true equals even though they, themselves, are only supposed to be the servants of God. In the storey of Mary and Martha one of them is ministering to her duties in the kitchen serving to create a physical repast. The other has her mind available to a coming situation that will involve pain , change, loss and tries to adress that by making a different offering, as well as being criticized for it. But Jesus uses the incident to opine upon what is his set of bearings on the situation/subject, and that is not to rule out the second offering in preference that she should have stuck to the first. This was a negotiated settlement as regarded his view of her "status" and that the offer she made was not an impairment of either his status or hers and it was also in keeping to be a " teachable moment", as would benefit them all; an "on-the- spot training session that he used to give them some actual knowledge and insight if they could be open to it. Well, two thousand years later and...." You can lead a horse to water, etc., etc.... After all he, himself, knew them well, cared for them and wanted to help them to care for each other and be willing to go on supporting each other without him being around to help out when it came to short-sighted quibbling. It might have been a segueway into the attitude of today's priests, themselves, supposeded servants who preach from the pulpit, the gospel, and yet will not accord women the equal priviledge solely on the basis of their sex, as if this would lower their status as men.... Or is it priests?Hmmmmmm! Coming back to the question of just how men manage to negotiate status among men and looking at the supposedly parallel question of how status is negotiated between women. Its two bad a well- loved and once respected religious institution is crumbling into the ground before our eyes because it takes a lot of human resouces to run churches, and half of the " manpower" of humanity is being considered unfit for the job. As they say, "Follow the money". Ask who is being blamed? Are those the questions to be asked? I really don't think so. Although the "Woke" remake- of- human -nature seems to be a factor in persuading themselves and gays, also, or vice-versa into the "goodgraces" of the church. Fine, but I don't agree with them using the pulpit to proseletize for their woke views and ideology which in, essence has already declared Christianity a dead and redundant entity, I don't see why they would bother aside for utilizing the time and space and "bums in seats" for the purposes of indoctrination. This is an excess that they must be enjoying immeasurably because it is scandalous and of course its delicious because of that fact, in itself. Its a form of drunkeness, in contrast to a sence of the positive respect for an individual's matured consideration of himself and others which is the fruit of sobriety or the beginnings of a semblance of it and mental health and well-being in general.

But how do we stop that to begin with. I try to teach my son empathy but stand your ground peacefully. And if you can't walk away. The idea of respect from the beginning. I don't believe men are inherently bad. But just like being raised into being an extremist. You could raise a boy into a man that doesn't understand as well. But most men I know like specific things about women. She's nerd like me. I love the way she wrinkles her nose. Not unlike women. But I don't like to discourage him from just being interested in dude things. Because theirs nothing wrong with that.

@@destinymayberry6217 I think men are awesome, just very simple. they think it`s truth what they hear others are saying. so, they think nudes, feminists, strongies, celebrities, pornography people are wantable / beautiful / sexy, strong etc. when we all know is quite the opposite - none of them is either beautiful nor sexy. perception through mind can alter anything. males just want to be seen successful by their peers and thus will proceed any formula in the given trend/market/culture. not sure anything other than a choiceless love can help here.

@@everitadave I don't think I can agree with that. I have a son and he's very boyish and likes manly things. But he has other interests and picks girls he likes based off of similar interests. Now he usually thinks their pretty of course. But he's actually told me he's stopped liking a few girls because they were pretty. But they were mean stirred up problems with other girls. Bullied. I know grown men like that too. I don't think their shallow I do think it's possible we've been told to see them that way. That could go vice versa a man could assume if all a woman ever wants is to be better then them because their hot and money. Then they aren't the women they want to marry. Most guys I know are attracted to a woman but will back off if she isn't a great person. The men that don't are the ones I would argue are stuck in loveless relationships.

"my understanding is that men are simple," Then you don't listen or hear what men are saying.

Generally men are not that bothered about a woman's career. A tiny percentage might be but most are not. Men also don't really care about a woman's fake-up and make-up - we're not dictated to by culture at all which is why most men instinctively respond to curvaceous women more than skinny women - it's based on the probability of fertility and the woman historically living through child birth. On a physical level, men have an extraordinary ability to discern the fertility and health of a woman based on her looks - men have literally adapted for hundreds of thousands of years for this. Beyond this - there are some basic requirements - women need to be decent cooks and to respect men's time by not stirring up unnecessary drama. If a woman looks decent (not spectacular but just makes an effort to be presentable), cooks and respects a man's time, she beats 99% of the competition out there - even more beautiful women. A man WILL respond to this and will happily put his time, energy and resources into the woman's life and children. If a woman fails to meet these criteria, it's likely that the man will either be unhappy or leave her. It's actually incredibly how little women in the modern Western world understand what men want - and then they complain, blaming their single-status on men lol.

It seems pretty clear that universal suffrage was a huge error. Sadly the conservative, Christian women in my direct circles do not remotely represent the female voting bloc. I see no alternative to crippling taxes to pay for generous welfare, mass immigration precipitated by insufficiency low reproduction & out of control female compassion. Doom, in short.

All the Best Ruth, I’m sure you’re giving your all :)

I would like to read some of your work.

Is it public? I’d love to read a book about men’s/boys issues

Nah, these pathetic males bare the responsibility not to be an abuser and if more males were not abusers these harmful males would not think being an abuser makes them manly 🤡

@@terrorists-are-among-us I definitely think there's some weight to that. But the truth is if someone grows up in an abusive household it's about 50 50 I think. They'll either pick up the behavior or in the best case scenario run the exact opposite way with it. My biggest issue is now we have children that are consumed by trying to figure out that plus all the social influences. And the social influence is. A man who even raises their voice is being aggressive. And that just isn't true. If a guy pushes a woman out of the way when she punched him to leave. He's abusive. If you don't put woman on a golden pedestal and understand that's where she should be. Your misogynistic. Now this being flung at a 13 year old testosterone filled boy. Oh i get angry and my voice deepens, but I'm told to knock it off something must be wrong with me. Then how are they supposed to function their natural instincts are being dogged.

@@destinymayberry6217 you sound desperate. any guy that values women will say "never shout at a female" 🤡 a good father would say this to his son and set the example. Tantruming assholes are incels for good reason. Not fit for survival. Bottom of the barrel. Women don't owe these pity seeking wankers sex or children to abuse. A woman of value wouldn't sacrifice herself or her children to these turds just to "get/babysit a male". Maybe 100 years ago it made some sort of sense as a trade, now there is no value in humoring a guy that demands a woman "carry her own weight", often his weight too, and harms the family. They're a harm and burden to us when not high value, if only their dads were not deadbeats.

@@terrorists-are-among-us Dude I didn't mean shout at a woman specifically. I mean that men are slightly aggressive by nature. Should that be directed at girls specifically. No. Also I'm a former dv survivor. When I say I encourage men to be manly. I in no way mean that to translate too be aggressive towards the opposite sex.

Even worse,if you "intervene" and use violence if necessary you'll get persecuted and demonised by both the victim and the perpetrator,particulary If they are/were a couple.

I haven't watched this and have no intention of watching. But I was curious enough to look through the comment section and really agree with you. This idea that life is "hard for women" because they have to "do everything" is seriously aggravating. It's a purely self-inflicted problem. I never wanted "everything", just specific things. Why don't these women consult their genuine preferences? I'm a great believer in personal autonomy over blaming society.

That’s such a beautiful thing you taught your children ❤

yes, when God is thrown out, then something must take his place. If one doesn't stand for something, one will fall for anything.

Majority of men don't, it's only about 1% of mentally ill men do that. That being said having boundaries and vehemently enforcing then on the relationship is naturally masculine trait. Leader is the man no matter how your wanna slice it. Men and women are quite different genetically, hormonally and psychologically. In fact even in these modern times most women love to be submissive and feel protected by a masculine man, feminism is what ruined that purely natural feminine.

Yes, Bettina is an Australian treasure. Like Janice, she has a very clear vision of men's issues, and is also an incredible public crusader.

That’s great! Marriage needs a lot of nurturing. It’s like a flower that needs sunlight and water and love (flowers do need love). I’m so glad your marriage ended up well. I believe in the power of prayer and that’s what I do. God is my strength and my daily companion. We’re not strong enough and wise enough to take care of our problems; we need God’s help. 🙏

Love can and should be both a spiritual and physical bond. Otherwise you're just really good friends.

The joys and pleasure that result from intimacy within a loving bond of marriage is God given when it comes from a genuine place of connection 🌹

Wishing your family all the very best. Blessings to you.