Modern Interperations of "Mother Anarchy Loves Her Sons" / "Кони Вёрсты Рвут Намётом" 

@@thotslayer9914 it's cat Alunya

He did He died

@@Thomas_times_two rip makhno

no, he trusted trotsky

@@NamorleCanarky that he did

Hurrah boys, hurrah

Based

Breadpill 1 is a version of redpill 2 you join the ranks of the woke who hate your race and country 3 communism is an inherently leftist movement. I think we've had enough leftism for now, "comrade" :)

We will conquer this bread and the bakery that produces it bois

@@JohnDoe-ek9ng hahaha liking vikings...kinda sus my dude, sure you hate racists? also if you want to conquer the bakery why not move to north korea, all the bakeries are conquered there comrade :)

Hey what ideology is your pfp I have been trying to find it?

@Schmuggums McGee thanks

Fedir Shchus and bro's wonderful moustache

only economically? fucking cringe.

You guys are fucking cringe.

anarchism is true communism

Lmao are u 12?

Based

@@BloodbornEnthusiast No, and I spit on that banderite flag

Anarchism is communism except it makes even less sense "let's organize a society by not having laws police or a government" can you say...power vaccuum and warlords?

Mother Anarchy got smacked up by Father "Common Sense" and Uncle "Truth".

i'll try to do Dragões do ar soon

@@KameradKorona ok

I mean they do say that the communists have the music so I thought that I would just come with the territory

Based

when this comment is reactionary

Czarists*

@@allgodsnomasters2822 And communists. And democrats. And UPR. And resistant peasants. The whole Russian Revolution was the greatest FFA to exist, I guess.

If it didn't then they probably wouldn't be communists.

Anarchists did not kill people, but devils!

@@donttreadonmemes says the one who probably supports pinochet

someone made a vid for the Granitsa version

@@eyeballpapercut4400 thank you

Anarchism probably hates you too

Oh no, cringe 😿

Cringeworthy

Sigh... Anarcho-Capitalism does not exist.

To clarify the above, unjust power structures are at the core of capitalist system. Taking what few restrictions currently exist off of capitalism will make for the polar opposite of an anarchist society.

Ah, then that explains why it can work and yours can't :^)

@@donttreadonmemes it cant work, mainly because it is ironically the worst form of tyranny. At least in modern democracies, the government is partially accountable for its actions, and the people do have something of a voice in decisions made. In private corporations, which ancaps would give all power to, no one has a voice in its decisions. Private corporations operate unchecked, you are handing power to unaccountable, corrupt organizations whose drive is profit. None of it matters though, corporations WANT a state, as their arm for protection and source of indirect political power. Anarcho-capitalism has never been achieved in any developed country, as countries from Britain, France, US, Japan, ALL developed directly because of government intervention and aid. It can be argued that it was put in place in colonial societies, but the people that lived in them didn't have a choice in the matter, not very democratic and free-loving wouldn't you think?

@@itsluger6278 oooh I caught a big one