As salam u alaikum correction on the Hadith I narrated, Narrated Anas: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or he is an oppressed one. People asked, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! It is all right to help him if he is oppressed, but how should we help him if he is an oppressor?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, *"By preventing him from oppressing others."*.
Continue to expose their devil tongue and underlying intentions. Please don't stop here. In the Netherlands they are now a little bit active, but have become somewhat more indirect given the many disgraces that have occurred.
@@salmanalthani7753 this comes from almost two decades of experience in processing Spubs' pdfs; now they can process information and filter out much of the khayr (i.e. non-cult approved) in record time.
absolute nonsense. we listen to shaykh rabi, shaykh ubayd, shaykh fawzan not because the praise of other scholars. of course this is a good thing. but we listen to them because they speak with the truth and the proofs. then please name one person the shaykh spoke against without any proofs from the usul of the din? and if he makes errors no problem, he is not a prophet. but please give the proof where he erred agains an individual
Saleh Al-Fawzaan says: It is not permissible to exalt and praise the innovators, even if they have some truth with them. That is because raising and praising them will spread their bidah and place them amongst the sincere ones-those who are taken as examples amongst distinguished men of this Ummah. The Salaf warned against having trust for the innovators, (warned against) praising them and their gatherings.. The innovators must be warned against and kept away from even if they have some truth with them. Indeed, the most astray are not devoid of some truth, but as long as they have with them innovation, opposition and sinful views, it is not permissible to praise and exalt them. It is impermissible to not have an objection against their innovation because this spreads bidah, belittles the Sunnah and by way of this, the innovator will emerge and become a guide for the Ummah. As for giving consideration (to the fact) that the innovation has some truth, this does not justify praising him... This is - to a far greater extent - against what is of overriding benefit and it is known in relation to a principle in the religion that averting harm takes precedence over seeking that which is of benefit. And with regards to having hatred for the innovator, the harm that is averted from the Ummah is weightier than the benefit possessed by the innovator. And had we adhered to this concept (i.e. praising the innovator because he has some truth with him), then no one would have been judged to be misguided and declared an innovator. That is because there is not an innovator except that he has some truth and adherence to the Sunnah. The innovator (may) neither be a disbeliever nor be in opposition to all the Islamic legislation; rather he is either an innovator in some or most of the affairs. However, if the innovation is particularly related to affairs of Creed and Methodology, then the affair is dangerous indeed because it will become an example (to be followed); innovation will spread and the innovators will become active in spreading their innovation. So, this person who praises the innovators and makes their affair obscure to the people - due to some truth they (i.e. innovators) have - is one of two (people): He is either one ignorant of the methodology of the pious predecessors and their stance against the innovators, and it is neither permissible for this ignorant one to speak nor is it permissible for the Muslims to listen to him; or he is one who has an objection to the truth because he knows the danger of innovation and the innovators, but he wishes to spread innovations. Nevertheless, this is a dangerous affair and it is not permissible to be lackadaisical with regards to innovation and its people, whatever that may be. Ref: At-Tabdee Wat-Tafseeq Wat Takfeer - Fawzaan // Page 72-76
Asalamu alaikum Since they use sheikh al Ghudayan to refute sheikh ibn hassan al Halabi then they should have no problem with those who use sheikh al Ghudayan to deem sheikh rabi as irrelevant. Spubs and co can't do tabdee on those who hold that position against sheikh rabi. Because then they have done tabdee on sheikh al Ghudayan who holds that position.
I wonder what the spubs will say after Hijaab and Ali pass away. They’ll still be warning ppl against them. May Allah give us a good ending, grant us all the highest level of jannah. And protect us from the fitnah of this dunya and akhira.
Thank you so much for quoting i.T.'s actual words! it helps when having convo with such people. here the quote in arabic if any one wants : «فمَن جعل شخصًا من الأشخاص غير رسول الله صلَّى الله عليه وسلَّم: من أحبَّه ووافقه كان من أهل السنَّة والجماعة ومن خالفه كان من أهل البدعة والفرقة ـ كما يوجد ذلك في الطوائف من اتِّباع أئمَّةٍ في الكلام في الدين وغير ذلك ـ كان من أهل البدع والضلال والتفرُّق». [«مجموع الفتاوى» لابن تيمية (٣/ ٣٤٧)]
Even if Hijab was wrong in every case, I wouldn't treat him like this because of what he has done for the Ummah. Hijab's focus is the Non-Muslims. Why are these guys only focusing on the Muslims?
Lol 😊 I remember last year Muhammed hijab was very soft, nice and gentle to them. Begging them to come to the common terms while they were harsh on him. But now in return he became very harsh and aggressive on them because this is how they understand things. Believe me they will be soft and ask for a ceasefire soon because you guys are exposing them more and more and more and more...... 😂 after you started making videos about them, their RU-vid viewers have become very lower
They are many scholars that albani and major scholars praised who were even students of albani that the madkhalis consider as people of bidaa , i Don't understand these brothers reasoning because albani praised their sheikh 25 years ago therefore he'll always be on the manhaj and we test others by him , very strange
Salafi madhkali have completely distorted everything it’s best to just follow the salaf by following the Hanbali school and Athari and be traditional Sunni.
Mohamed hijab and ali macha allah walahi we are in fitna time and they clap for oppressors against opressed people and when you try to regroup muslims you have 100 of them making da3wa against you. Thank you guys allah guid us all love you bros ❤
Man Ali Dawah already watering down the oppression of Dr. Rabee by calling him an Imam. He's an extremist you don't need to be a Shaykh to understand this basic fact. Tearing Ummah into sects based on your extreme views is the biggest sin you can commit.
I haven’t reached the end of the video yet but just to point out that the hadith is incomplete when left till “speak out against corruption”, where the continuation is important and often not looked at by muslims including myself till recently. Will retract/modify this comment if the mention comes ahead in the video.
I don’t see my comments here so I again ask this question. Do you believe in Taqaleed of any of the Aimma Ikram Abu Hanifa, Abu Shafai, Abu Hambal or Abu Malik. If yes then from which Quranic Ayah or Sahih Hadeeth?
The name "ghudayān" is actually derived from the root word "Ghudān" (a Hindu idol), which the german europeans then created the terminology "god" that is why the term "god" should never be used for dawah. "ilah" (deity) is the best terminology to use when giving dawah.
Means you need to upgrade your Arabic so you can learn by yourself and don't need any biased translation my G. It's called 3ilm arrijel aka the narrators and it's about who spokes when about what and their hierarchy credibility who's narration is accepted and why. It's a part of 3ilm el Hadith.
Love Brother Hijab.... ✊🏾. But as for Ali Dawah... brooooo you need to stop man... you just love to jump in before Hijab finishes his point... chill bro.... and pls speak in a slower pace broooo.... it’s annoying at times
As salamu alaikum, please make video on the covid vaccines, lots of reports of the vaccines cause harm etc, and if we can’t do something that we know can harm/kill, how should we go about with the vaccine. And is anyone else curious about this.
I praise my brothers and if prophet mohammad was here today ppl including these to would call him a takfiri 😆 yasir qahdi and mufti menk said much worse
M. Hijab and Ali Dawah Is this authentic please could you get it verified for me May Allah (SW) bless all Ameen. BISMILLAH (3x). A'UDHU BI ' IZZATILLAHI WA QUDRATIHI MIN SHARRI MA AJIDU WA UHADHIR (7x). [Sahih Muslim]
