INR, completely unbeholden to scientific principles yet, I love the shear rendering and kinda wish I knew how to make whatever happen with some CG that looked/rendered as good as that bcz look out, I would do some crazy stuff with it, pontificate that in your lexicon then, serendipitously smoke it LOL!!!! YKW, is it difficult to make something, well that video and the quality of graphically rendered objects, etc??? IDK?
Thing I love about this video 1. Sound can travel through a vacuum 2. Sound travels faster than light 3. The meteor could be seen from earth making it very very massive 4. The meteor has a tail going off screen meaning it's several times longer than the moon 5. The meteor is white meaning it's very much hotter than the sun by several orders of magnitude 6. A shockwave forms despite no air being present in space 7. The shockwave has no respect for gravity
I love how the sound reaches us from thousands of miles into space quicker than a thunder rumble 2 miles away Edit: I did explain why in the comments off my comment.
No necessarily, imagination have no limits. Many space games would be boring without sounds in space and other mechanics, yet in some titles there is an option for realistic sound physics.
That's fairly clever but, could you reproduce it, and how long would it take you AND could you teach me bcz IDK how im kinda old, like bighair old lol! I remember playing an original Atari and the console was new out the box!
:) Great Video dude, Love the *animation* and *editing* you used. It’s so good that people don’t understand the concept of *Animation* and *video editing.* They are *scientifically debunking a really smooth animation for no reason whatsoever*
Pretty sure his quote was "big bang" when he survived he fixed the internet with Tom Brady and retired several times while Lincoln kept winning as a NASCAR owner for boner pills. They save lives ya no. I didn't get to go but I happily watched her leaf. She got in Lincoln's Lambo and I was astonished when they pulled out behind a busted power line, the energy was electric my neighbor Nikola told me. It's sad there was an eclipse on April 8th that year. Physics should be left to the right betweeners, ether way, Science because science. I hope you all enjoyed my time taking a crap!
Even though the video is bull shit, the fact is the sun's heat would have influence on comets deterioration. Plus surprisingly the earth's magnetic field is now said to stretch beyond the moon.
Which means you believe in bobs theory of bs.. suppositional and theoretical science is garbage straight up.. hey Bob I got a theory.. or hey I suppose it works like this.. ya real solid foundations there... and yet you fools believe it like it's fact...
@@IRONHEAD12701 The only problem with it is that is immediately noticeable and actually detracts from the overall effect. If he would have even put in a delay to show that sound takes time to travel it wouldn't have been as bad.
@@salbahejim Hollywood has been doing it for years. Star Wars had fighters that could move better than an F-22. When the Death Star exploded, the sound was instantly heard from easily 2500 miles away. Did you complain about it then or perhaps return to the movie theater several times and pay money to watch it? Either way, it’s just Hollywood special effects, people have been buying it for years. Ohh and RU-vid is free
first whatever object they want us to belive hit the moon would not have been visible there was no friction from atmosphere (meaning the smoke trail is wrong too) and since there is no atmosphere in space there should have been no sound from that impact Second If you watch the video closely you can see the shock wave effect or whatever that debris was supposed to stuttering another thing about the shock wave most of the energy from that impact would turn into heat so the debris would not be going faster than the actual impactor (and just to drive this into the mantle a bit more the far side of the ring of debris that should be hidden is clearly visible as it goes both I'm front of and behind the moon Third Just by eyeballing the speed of the impactor when it enters the shot (which is when its going the fastest)(it slows down before it hits the moon) the impactor is going about one quarter light speed which would (with an impactor of that size) destroy a much more significant portion of the moon and I might add that all of the destroyed material would be at least liquefied but possibly vaporized so those rocky chunks that flew off the moon are wrong too
And we wouldn’t have even seen but one angle of it or the whole circle if we saw anything at all and it would have to be enormous for us to see the asteroid it’s self so I’d say it would be much more dramatic than this
bruh what about the shockwave in the space and the sound that from the moon reached earth. sound and shockwaves cant be a thing in space in the firs place but also the sound that fucking arrived on earth in 1 second 💀 also the meteor speed and diameter would have gotten the moon vaporized like that was too small of an impact even though it got the fucking surface up by somewhat about 1k miles i mean thast fucked up
Well actually no, here is the real diameter of the astroid, just saying… Given info: - On my screen: - Size of the Moon: 1.5 cm - Size of the asteroid: 1 mm - The actual diameter of the Moon: 3,474.8 km Solution: 1. Convert 1.5 cm to mm: 1.5 cm = 15 mm 2. Convert the real diameter of the Moon from km to mm: 3,474.8 km = 3,474,800,000 mm 3. Calculate the scale factor: S = 3,474,800,000 mm / 15 mm = 231,653,333.33 4. Determine the real size of the asteroid: Da = 1 mm * 231,653,333.33 = 231,653,333.33 mm 5. Convert the real size of the asteroid to km: Da = 231,653,333.33 mm / 1,000,000 mm/km = 231.65 km Answer: The real size of the asteroid is approximately 231.65 km in diameter.
@@bafflingscience1224 I will not dignify you with answers based on the rhetorical nature which reflects a lack of due diligence, having even researched the subject at hand yourself. Respectively. “Anonymous”
@@BreakerOfChains219Trump went to Wharton. Biden claims he went to Delaware state yet there are zero records of him ever attending. Trump makes his money from the family business, where we see what he’s doing with his name everywhere. Bidens family business is shaking hands with China and other countries under the table. Need I go on?🤡
@@lordlucifer4471 No it is possible! A shockwave is a type of disturbance that can travel through a medium, such as air or space, at a high speed. In space, shockwaves can be created by events such as supernovae, when a star explodes, or when two galaxies collide. These shockwaves can cause changes in the surrounding space, such as heating up gas and dust and creating shock fronts, which are regions of compressed gas.
And the fact the asteroidos very large but isnt a sphere its literally so big u can compare it to the moon in size (prob the size of like enceladus or something)
@@blank69705 true but some kids do I mean under 6 they do fall for this if you're son is under six and didn't fell for this then that's very impressive
1) Wrong lunar phase for a Moon that is so high during the day. 2) The asteroid wouldn't leave a trail behind (there is no atmosphere) 3) The asteroid slows down in de video before the impact, which is absurd. 4) The asteroid is moving at relativistic speeds in the video. A lunar diameter in a fraction of a second is totally unreal. 5) The ejecta curtain moves also absurdly fast (even faster than the asteroid) 6) The sound does not travel through the vacuum of space between the Moon and the Earth so why we are hearing It? 7) The sound can't travel at the speed of light but in the video there is no delay (even conceding that sound could travel thought cislunar space in this fantasy). 8) The flash of the impact it too dim. The glare would make for a huge spike in luminosity, possibly saturating the sensor of the camera. 9) The hotspot dims too quickly (it would be minutes shinning brightly). It cooled extremely fast for the energies involved in this event.
There is no space especially a "vaccuum" one lol right next to an atmosphere? Can what guys in order for atmospheric pressure you need to be in a contained (enclosed) environment. AND the moon isnt a solid object when the missing part if the moon is sky blue and craters are see thru. Like the scuentist said in the 50s the moon is a plasma phenomenon.
@@e.capo1156it’s not about trying to sound smart. It’s about someone making a fake video so it “appears” like an asteroid hit the moon for views. Calling someone out on their bullshit is different than trying to sound smart.
