Moon Zoom! Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Professional 125x Zoom Camera! (Nikon P1000) | VERSUS 

3:15 the pictures are different, do i get a reward or something 😅

You are using Pixel 7 Pro as your main phone, and not an Iphone.

Iphone noob...

Around 3:15 to 3:19, that small-rocky thing on the road has to be the easter egg

That small white thing on top of the hotel(waldorf) might be the easter egg 😏

ok pa j3eet

Those "details" are generated by the A.I... the moon shots are all fake and they are just an texture overlay thats generated by A.I. turn off scene optimization and see for yourself 😂

​@@-never-gonna-give-you-up-yeah and ? Even without the optimization it's still good and it's not like we can't recognize the Moon anymore 🤦

@@p1o_nutella650 i didn't say the camera was bad or did i? Fact is, the moonshots you see, taken from the S23 ultra are fake, and literally no one shoots pictures without scene optimization.

@@-never-gonna-give-you-up- they are not Fake 🤣 or else every photo is fake then, it only darker the area on the Moon but doesn't add any detail or texture to the moon (there is a lot of video explaining it 🙃), and yeah like i said, without the optimization, it's still good 🤦

You don’t get it Samsung add artificial details on that photo when on the zoom of the statues u see that when zoomed in all the golden parts are blurred while the camera is reproduicing exact the image without ai reconstitution

Yes. You can see it. The p Image is better. but Like raw​@@KnowYourDestiny-r3x

re you joking even huawei p40 pro plus from 2020 huaweis kirin 990 from 2019 beat the s23 ultra from 2023 in zoom and 50mp vs 200mp even huawei p40 pro is better lol/ and s20 ultra zoom that failed/ and huawei p30 pro from 2019 huaweis kirin 980 from 2018 beat the s21 ultra in zoom and yea p30 pro beat s23 ultra in photo/ i have seen many test's and ofc i tell the detail.

With the nikon p1000 too

But if you use raw than you dont get ai and without it photos looks worse

@@lore3334 that's why you then use Lightroom for editing

@@lore3334 raw with AI is stupid. You use raw so you can do everything yourself.

@@erikakselrod362 yes but its a basic raw, you obviously dont get as much information as a camera, yes its still something cool to use but even in really bright scenarios you can tell the difference between a camera and a phone, if you have also a good lense then the difference is massive

Yes, but a larger zoom is already a blur.

​@@Bigermansit's optical tho

But garbage

@@-never-gonna-give-you-up- best user name

@BigMan 3x and 10x are optical the rest is digital.. for a phone is g8

U don’t get it look at the statue zoom the Samsung use ai to add details it’s blurred when zoomed with fake details while the camera offer real details

@@KnowYourDestiny-r3x Whats not AI these days? I'd rather see an "enhanced" version of something otherwise invisible.

@@NomanJohan yes but what I don’t like is that thoses phones pretend to be as good a professional and they lies

re you joking even huawei p40 pro plus from 2020 huaweis kirin 990 from 2019 beat the s23 ultra from 2023 in zoom and 50mp vs 200mp even huawei p40 pro is better lol/ and s20 ultra zoom that failed/ and huawei p30 pro from 2019 huaweis kirin 980 from 2018 beat the s21 ultra in zoom and yea p30 pro beat s23 ultra in photo/ i have seen many test's and ofc i tell the detail.

@@HUAWEI99x Huawei Mate and series in incredible and was definately the top dog in the precovid era. That doesn't take anything away from Samsung S series. They are both incredible. I have Nokia 1020 from 2013 which can directly compete with them in many aspects although being weighed down by age and old software. But for 2013 what it was capable of is truly astonishing.

That's what I'm saying. However, the S23U was still quite impressive in the video. 😌👍

That's what I'm saying!

Na verdade o cara é fã do iPhone ele quer desvalorizar o celular Samsung Galaxy S23 ultra

Looks like smudge infront of lens. This isn't the way S23U click a pic. I wish he read this and confirm that.

Don't worry. Once iphone introduces that zoom feature his photos of iphone will dramatically capture better pics than the dslr with 125x optical zoom

No, they don't. Galaxy K zoom beats S23U at zooming and that thing was made in 2014. It's almost whole decade and zoom is getting worse.

maybe look at the size of the lens on galaxy K zoom and S23U, Galaxy K zoom literally looks like its has been made just for the zoom and S23U is just normal looking phone with insane zoom@@MJ-uk6lu

@@MJ-uk6lu No, that's not true. People don't want to carry a brick in their pockets, and no one uses anything more than 30x, let's be serious.

@@popovicialincatalin Even if they don't use more than 30x, then S Ultra only has tiny 1/4" quad bayer sensor with actual color resolution of 2.5 megapixels and uses AI to upscale images. And that's at 10x optical zoom. At 30x zoom you are essentially only getting a third of that, which is 0.83 MP image. Meanwhile, K Zoom had 20.7 MP classical bayer camera with 1/2.3" sensor and 10x optical zoom. So you get all full 20.7MP at 10x zoom and if that phone had 100x digital zoom mode, then you would still get 2.07MP pictures. And if you think that K zoom is downgrade at no zoom shots, then you are also wrong, because it has way superior optics that allow smaller sensor to be utilized better by letting in more light and by having sharper glass. Also when S Ultra has to take pics at like 6x zoom, it has to crop it digitally, meanwhile K zoom only adjusts optics, but doesn't sacrifice resolution. So K zoom wins in all cases. The only way it loses is by not having ultrawide camera, but I would argue that having great zoom is way more valuable. Ironically, K Zoom is also lighter by 34 grams and is way shorter and more narrower, but thicker. So actual brick is still S Ultra and S Ultra is harder to fit into pockets while having inferior cameras. Let's be serious and just admit that K Zoom is more pocketable and better photographic device

@@MJ-uk6lu I trully appreciate your detailed answer, but I still believe Galaxy K is not for an average consumer. Consumer don't want a literal camera in their pockets, they just want a phone good enough to capture moments they want to remember at a reasonable price. As a whole, the concept of the K was not entirely bad, but the consumer class didn't really like it. The Galaxy K didn't sell well. Let's not forget that this is a smartphone and not a real professional-grade camera. Consumers don't use their phones as professional-grade cameras. They just scroll on social media, watch movies/videos, possibly play music, maybe even play a few games. The Galaxy K was too specialized - it targeted people that want good cameras. But people that want good cameras buy *real* cameras. Not smartphones.

S23 Ultra is definitely overlaying extra details and sharpness on the moon shots and I've confirmed that. But the thing is that, the software does a pretty convincing job of doing that cause you can frame the shot with a leaf in front of the moon and still have that overlay placed pretty accurately. I never had this experience with my previous phone the mi 11 ultra even with the dedicated moon mode. The second a leaf is placed in front of the leaf and the photo turns out to be a white dough like blob with no details at all.

Samsung completely fakes moon photos. Liers...

We wait for fix old s22u is fixed and have luxis quality .

I think samsung had much more sharper images, if those titles were right on the pics in this comparison.

well we see only one side of moon all the time so Processing the image to look better is no problem. As with a Actual camera you will see the exact thing.

With slightly less zoom coming in at 83x zoom, is the P950 in the bridge camera realm. Thats it. There are better zoom-able lenses, but the price goes into the hundreds of thousands just for them.

the whole premise is it being unfair, smaller sensors, smaller lenses, ai proccessed, but mobile and easy to use, vs great sensors, great lenses but very raw photos and cumbersome. its meant to simulate a one and done point and shoot scenario on both platforms cause you can get external zoom lenses on phones, and you can use external laptop/hardware for post proccessing cameras but that wont really work would it

It scales complex objects very poorly, as well as people's faces.

Ok smart guy, would the iphone do better?

​@@Bigermansok, let me see you do better with your iphone, big man

@Cam Long I don't know I only have s23ultra. I never tested 30x zoom on human subjects so I was suprised to see such crap details on faces knowing how well zoom works zooming into objects, text etc. I think they could fix this with software

It wasnt bad. It just wasnt perfect.

are you looking at jupiter?

@@ЛеопардЯгуарович-в9э ahora mismo se ve en latinoamerica

The nikon p1000 is $950

P1000 is being discontinued. Keep it for a year or two with box then sell it at an exorbitant used price to a flat Earther or moon-landing denier.

S23 ultra is $400 more expensive the nikon p1000 🙃

What??

@@MitchellN2002nl Marte English.

It's not. The p100 is no where close to being a professional camera.

Even a Smartphone cannot beat physiks. No Smartphone will ever reach 4 example the result of 80mm . Compare in bad light condition or fast Objekts.

Já testou modo pássaro? Excelente!

@@rui7773 if I want to photograph birds I prefer manual mode when they are not in move. When they are moving I choose bird mode.

@@johnspathopoulos1432 , Bird mode has better focus and the image result is satisfactory, unfortunately it doesn't produce raw but the P1000's raw I'm sorry but it's very bad, I don't see any advantages. I've already edited here that the bird mode jpg was better than the raw mode post editing, colors, focus and final file size.

@@johnspathopoulos1432, I never get the color or sharpness right in the raw edition of the P1000 in the PS, the jpg (md bird) makes me happier, for example the blue sky is different in the raw and I can't get the same result in the raw edition. But I found a "way" to take advantage of the raw, I convert it to jpg mode in Nikon's own program and edit this jpg in PS, I get a better result and an even bigger file than other results! Amazingly!

and also because its a big aperture camera

I'm an immigrant, sorry! Hahahaha 🤣

Yea imagine if they took it up real seriously. Combining the best of smartphone sensor and processing tech, Something like a Samsung HP3 1/1.4in 200mp sensor (binned to 50mp and 12.5mp if needed). Vivo X100pro plus is expected to have that sensor with 5x optical zoom, and it can probably pull off a fairly impressive 20x zoom with that. So if Nikon uses the same sensor and processing, but adds an 80x optical lens, one could get impressive 320x(4x of 80x) out of that. Then they could refine the optics further too with better coatings etc. as done for smartphone lenses, And have far better stabilization, shooting ability of 8k 30fps and 4k 60fps. Processing features for multi-stack frames can be added, that can also remove atmospheric distortion, or perform focus stacking for macros.

How did apple get into this? Stop letting Samsung live in your head.

I THINK... The camera app allows you to shoot RAW photos and videos? I would think that would remove any post-processing and only give the raw sensor image, unless it doesn't allow it for some insane reason. Maybe OpenCamera on the app store has more options?

@@longplaylegends yeah i think i can do raw to solve that! ty

Not really how that work... It recognize the crater or thing on the moon and then make then darker to look like crater, it doesn't replace anything or create any detail, there is video explaining how these things works

Ai enhanced Not over lapped

Tell us you have an IQ of a 1 without telling us you have an IQ of a 1

Fool

29 dumb people

Zoom to 100x at photo mode then press and hold the shutter.

your video resolution was high so you couldn't zoom

Berlin

That's no longer the case these days. Come visit Berlin again and you will realize how multicultural this city is. 🙂

you would need a lens 3 meters long

It still destroys the phone 🤦‍♂️ get some glasses and yeah your talking nonsense

@@smguk2412 pretty sure I got better eyes than yours, the Nikon is better cuz optics but the sensor is some old bridge garbage, iPhone 14 pro one spanks them both

@@v_stands_for_value124 not close, nikon have bigger sensor and still have nice optical zoom which give you more depth of field not just stupid blurry ai

Right

That’s not a DSLR

@@tubecated_development true but it's still weird

Yeah, people buy it because it zooms to awesomeness but the sensors aren't right, hope the technology is still improved so that the picture quality becomes perfect. The best "UFO" camera on this planet. 🔷

Why hasn't any other professional brands made an update or rival product with superior quality? You'd think for a 5 year product, there'd be one already..

Professional probably not. Hobbyists piece of equipment, yes. It's actually a bridge camera. I'd say most point and shoots don't let you experiment with aperture/shutter speed modes, nor do point and shoot camera layouts, while holding, even remotely resemble a dsrl/mirrorless.. You just point and shoot, and hope for the best, with a point and shoot. Thats not the case with the P1000. While I don't see many people using them for weddings or family portraits, as it's not made for that. Which I'm sure that's what you would define as professional, its ability to make money. I've seen many enthusiasts & hobbyists, me included (not the only "camera" I own), use them for wildlife or landscape photography. I would say the zoom, which at super far ranges is meh(not its fault-atmosphere), but when used on closer up objects is nice to have. Making it a good starter camera. Not having to swap out lenses, while still having control of the settings is nice. That said.... "It's important to note" -No it isn't. Seems like the title irked you enough to make a comment bashing the camera. As a user of the P1000 your comment equally irked me. That said take your snootie ass elsewhere.😁

@@philipchesleyiii I totally agree with your points about the P1000 as a bridge camera. I wouldn't call my comment snooty since I didn't have that goal in mind when I wrote it but, in hindsight, I can see how you read it like that. The P1000 is by no means a bad camera. I haven't used one personally but I also know that lots of people really like them and I have looked at it in the past as a possible investment. My argument was more meant to say that I don't think it's a proper "apples to apples' comparison to compare the image quality of an older camera that wasn't exactly using the highest quality sensor on the market in the first place to a modern flagship smartphone camera. One that doesn't have a shabby optical zoom of it's own even it's not in the same league as a P1000 specifically. I personally feel that if it weren't for the immense optical zoom of the P1000 then this contest wouldn't be nearly as close when it comes to capturing distant objects. I think the comparison would have been more interesting with a more traditional pro camera equipped with a lens with the same optical zoom as the phone itself for a direct comparison of image quality at roughly similar distances and focal length even if that has its own problems too.

the difficult thing is larger sensors in a small battery would be not doable. Unlike Nikon or other competitive dslr have larger sensors, bigger model heavy components

@@Saras_Photobox2015 I wouldn’t mind having the phone be thicker to accommodate that.