MOST EXPENSIVE NFTs EVER SOLD! 

*being

@M I A •© shut up

@@ranempel7164 shut up

@dream women❤ shut up

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-n72kkazUgAs.html TOTALLY EXPOSED..😅😅😅😅😅 Cult group ksi

COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p5YFpv9ux7A.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ikKMexzKrMo.html

Wonder why this left hook is a thing

lol ok boomer

Exactly. Fuck NFTs

really?? he isnt trying he knows its good

Probably hard invested in it probably not going to get his money unless some idiot waste money on it.

@@hardym9532 that's sadly the thing with this. 99% of idiots only invest in is as a speculative asset and nothing else. Made by rich people to gain money from idiots for nothing of actual value.

@@rikittu yeah at this point the people who think this is a good idea probably have money on it already and trying to scam people or are stupid

@@hardym9532 bro haven't you ever spent money on skins in a game? How hard is it to understand?

It was bought i think by an owner of a crypto exchange, so yeah it's a tax right off but I guess he bought it just to say he owns it

All nfts are money laundering. I thought everyone knew that. A digital picture is not worth 69 mil and never should. Who the fuck wants a digital image let's be real. There's alot of really really good digital art that was made before nfts and literally 0 people cared. But when a pixilated monkey comes along that's worth 10 mil now people care. It's just a money laundering scheme and it's a pretty obvious one.

@@Unknownz000 what a stupid and uneducated blanked statement that is lmao

@@connor7096 "uneducated". What are you? A nft crypto punk expert? Don't make me laugh. How the fuck can you be educated about shitty pixels that go for millions for no reason. You don't. All I said was 100% true. If you genuinely think that 8 pixels can be worth millions then you genuinely need to seek medical attention. No one casually pays 69 mil from their own pockets for an online picture. How the fuck will they make their money back? There's literally no one other than themselves that can pay and is willing to pay that much for a digital picture except the person who bought it. It's just stupid, it truly is.

@@Unknownz000 let the guy cope lol. He might have lost bucks over it lmao. 😂

ppl are making millions of it lmao

@@nithinbiju938 people are also losing millions of it

The idea of actually own them and collect them is stupid, but the idea of making money out of it isn’t

REALLY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pFWy3o9TybY.html .q A

the tech is cool but the current use is dogshit lmao

He doesn't 😂 he just thinks it's stupid, because it means nothing.

Not at all. They're not dumb. The system is currently flawed, but it works, makes sense and is in no way dumb. Screenshotting it is like taking the picture of painting. It's your proof of ownership that matters. It's all about the money.

@@deepaparakkal4241 okay but taking a picture of the mona lisa and taking a picture of a couple of pixels is different Ik those pixels that took little time to make may mean a lot to some people but the peices of art from 100s of years ago mean much more

@@deepaparakkal4241 cannot compare nfts to the mona lisa one is a peice of art history the other is trash digital art with minimal effort

@@deepaparakkal4241 screenshot or original. It’s a jpeg. Photo or the Mona Lisa. Ones a jpeg the other is art. NFT are so stupid

@@deepaparakkal4241 lmao the whole concept of NFTs is dogshit and even NFT holders agree to this😂 they admit that they try to find someone dumber to sell it at a higher price 💀 there are many other ways to provide a proof of ownership and the blockchain technology is just one of them which is massively flawed

REALLY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pFWy3o9TybY.html Q Q .

Try to convince them this left hook is bad

They spread wealth. Anything that spreads wealth is beneficial

convince me gokus gay

get out

What's the point of owning them?

Exactly. You summed it up pretty accurately.

I still can't fathom the idea of pixel art being a commodity

It is stupid most people compare it with just take a picture of painting or in front of some expensive house." But if u own an nft I can use it just like u so there is nothing else in it.

@@tyrant_hermit it's art, you resell it and make profit and the artist gets a certain percent off it lol

REALLY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pFWy3o9TybY.html Q Q

ikr people just dont understand that its literally data. people keep comparing it to taking a picture of a painting, but i think its more accurate to think of it as pirating a game or movie

COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p5YFpv9ux7A.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ikKMexzKrMo.html

Lmao the cope

And they made 0. While JJ is is making millions. So who's really wrong?

@@haridaspalleeri6765 JJ can make millions because he has millions to waste. It's easy to make a dollar per dollar invested. If he was a normal man with a normal budget he would've been bankrupt 10 times over by now. For the amount of money JJ spent and wasted on imaginary things on the internet man could've bought property that will always have value.

@@haridaspalleeri6765 in one of the moresidemen videos didn't we find out (indirect based on their reaction) that Vik had more money than jj, and he also bought a massive house as well

@@darklord279 no ones talking about the net worth. I'm talking about profit made from NFTs

@@ravemasterdbzwwe ofcourse. I agree hundred percent. Its a high roller game. If you got money, you can make more that's it

He is richer lmao

Man just took all that out of one sentence. He's just letting his made money sit in USDC and could sell it anytime and make it realized gains. So he has made profits, but just hasn't converted them back into fiat money. Especially here in Germany it's a thing to wait one year before selling ur crypto, because you'll have to pay taxes on it if you made more profits than 600€ in a year.

unrealized means that he hasn’t sold it yet, but he’s still made money on it, he still made the right investment

And he's the one making money off of it.

@@deepaparakkal4241 and?

Just say you’re broke

@@DylanDocker “subscribe with notifications on or you will have seven years of bad luck” clown ass

@@deepaparakkal4241 he literally said he hasn’t sold any yet

well people want you to see private sex becoz you have too much knowledge bout nfts

This.

Beeple puts allot of skill into his art, check his website out. Those crypto punks though, I mean anyone can create that

Okay first of all just cause they're digital does not mean they're easy. You should try making actual good digital art. You'll see it requires a lot of skill. A huge chunk of the value of NFTs come from the ability to verify the originals. When they mint or what normal people call "upload" they are uploaded with data verifiable on the blockchain. Even if you upload tens or thousands of the same image, people can easily look up the metadata of your NFT and identify that it's not the original. btw physical art can be copied. Why are NFTs expensive? easy. cause people like to flex. a bag does not cost a lot but a gucci bag is worth a few months salary in some country. A lot of things don't make sense but just cause you think that way doesn't mean the same for others. Money follows people. as long as there's demand people would continue buying.

how you be hanging physical art on the wall of your home in the Metaverse though?

You are so lost you’ll learn one day tho crypt and nfts are all connected we will be the rich you will not be unless you decide to learn watch Ellios trades and Alec Becker your welcome

I think they are comparable to a physical painting. The point is that they have "artificial" value. It's demand pricing, same as anything else

i swear to god, nobody can actually explain what an nfts actual purpose is, they always say you get to own ur media as a token or some bs smh

@@ryanm4074 it basically a receipt showing proof of a purchase and ownership of something

also your comment got stolen by some next guy called pepper verified guy robbed you lmao

@@ryanm4074 there arent a lot of purposes now but many people buy into nfts because they believe the team behind nft will create a utility like a game or access to an exclusive club or benifits that will provide value

@@christianhoy8447 I belive most people buy them in hope of great returns (like lotto ticket in a sence). They rarely look past that and see it as a potential way to get rich fast.

You just don't understand them, when JJ's a billionaire from it you will regret cringing.

@@KentVigilante He just said he doesn’t mind financially dipshit. But NFT’s on their own are indeed embarrassing, like they have no tangible value to them, they are just rights to a digital image which you can just look at for free.

Fax

@@KentVigilante imagine protecting NFT just because someone you "idolized" really into it

It IS just financial. In fact, I'm impressed at JJ.

@@calfr4231 crypto is untraceable, as opposed to going to an art show and paying cash lol

@@calfr4231 you're the one who don't know what you're talking about

@@calfr4231 dude If you don't go to art auctions then what are they for?

@@notjhoan yeah but ntfs are not art they are ret@rded pictures of monkeys

I use nft to sell my art as well. So thank you for understanding. 😊 I wish some people did understood it more 🙄

If you think nfts are dumb then you just don't worship money the way those people do

Poor person mindset

@@uatom Cope

Exactly, and the digital version will stay the same throughout all devices when bought or screenshotted, whereas the photograph/printed version of the Mona Lisa will never be the same as seeing the real oil painting with your own eyes

That's not the point. It's that screenshotting NFTs is like printing an artwork. In the end you'll just have a fake version you won't be able to sell. If you just want it for the art, go for it and screenshot or print every artwork. But if you wanna make money, that screenshot ain't nothing but taking up ur phone's storage. And tbh, NFTs are less about art and more about supply and demand. There's many lit and bad NFTs, but in the end I won't buy the lit one if there's no demand and will buy the bad one if there is demand.

@@talldado449 That's just brokering. And that's what makes these million dollar NFTs a joke. Because people believe their value would only increase in the future. But the problem is it's being valued by brokers like you whose only intention is to sell as quickly as possible. A Monet in a private collection only becomes rarer after being out of the public eye for few years. Museums would pay a lot for it to exhibit it. There is no intrinsic value to NFTs, just piled-on broker fees. Even a bling guy wouldn't showcase NFT art on a digital display.

@@SlashyClapton Yeah, most of the million dollar NFTs are pointless tbh. But there's many NFTs with utility now. NFTs is just buying (mostly) Ethereum, with a picture as bonus and being able to spot trade that Ethereum with the art often deciding the demand. People in the NFT space always say art is secondary, if the demand is there go try to flip it. It all sounded dumb to me at first, but if it brings me money I don't care. I'll probably buy my first NFT soon (Hapebeast) if I get pre access. I'll maybe update y'all on how much I made.

NFTs are good for copyrighted material, buying a photo of a ‘crypto punk’ is fucking retarded. We are in the equivalent of a .com boom. Stay safe.

JJ NFT NEEK OLATUNJI

@@alexfx7500 i agree, nfts that are worth less than hundreds is understandable.

JJ about to spend a couple million on Keemstar nude NFTs n hope that eventually he can sell a pic of a gnomes junk for a profit but admit in a future video that he lost 10 mil on those NFTs

Yes 😂

Lmao fr

If you invested into NFT’s you wouldn’t be poor.

REALLY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pFWy3o9TybY.html A A A.

Just because you can't wrap your head round why some people would spend so much on them, doesn't mean that they're money laundering schemes.

@@JYGtube It also doesn’t mean they arnt. Wrap your head around this: normally the rich (like most recently Ken Griffen who bid the US constitution for 50-something million dollars and then immediately “donated” it to a museum), don’t do it out of the goodness of their hearts. But of course, this is tax evasion and not money laundering. So where does crypto come in? Well first off crypto is decentralized (or centralized but that defeats the whole point of its existence) and damn near impossible to track. Oh, and when you create an NFT you can make it any price you want. No auction. No appraisal. No witnesses. No nothing. You can one man clean your money. Its almost too easy. Of course to piece this together you need not to be so naive. Yes NFT’s have a future, because it allows for making pretty much anything unique. But the current jpegs selling for 1-500 million dollars are not for art appreciation. Hell, even the Mona Lisa is appraised near the same price of these 5 minute jpegs. Are NFT’s revolutionary? Maybe. Are these JPEG prices natural? No.

@@muzafferozen1887 I never said they are or aren't, you're the one that made the claim that they're all money laundering schemes. I ain't reading that essay either, don't know who you typed that shit for 😂

@@JYGtube >I ain't reading that essay either average crypto bro

People were saying the same about Crypto when it started. You'll see. NFTs are all about ownership and money, not the art. People need to realise that.

​@@deepaparakkal4241 doesnt change anything lol, nfts are going to fall off like how vine was - remember when some thought vine might genuinely overthrow youtube?

@@deepaparakkal4241 "nft is about the money" thats the problem

@@deepaparakkal4241 and you'll notice that those crypto currencies whjch don't have any signs of utility in the future have all died down. The market eventually corrects itself and it will happen to the nft market as well.

you are so stupid... 2.0 already in the work and be ready for next year... NFT is the future

REALLY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pFWy3o9TybY.html .....

Bruh and people comparing it to real world item are actually dumb it not even close to it first off nft is digital that a huge difference and card game are different from nft cause of the branding of the card like pokemon, baseball card, basketball card, they’re based off something people enjoy and have a huge brand behind unlike these random 2d avatars

You can use nfts in games where the cards are nfts

It's funny because there are actually nft trading card games already.

nfts that are worth 10-100$ i understand, but the rest is just....

All NFT’s aren’t worth millions. What warped perception do you have

Obviously

If the demand dies, of course value drops.

diamonds and gold are valuable because there is a finite amount of them, NFTs are "valuable" cuz rich people wanted to launder their money.

You’re acting that question as if you’re Einstein trying to figure out the wonders of the world, no shit Sherlock.

Nothing because it’s all nonsense. A fad but for crypto investors it’s good for them to stimulate demand lol

That's not the NFTs fault tho. It's the fault of the token. And that's only if the token is proof of work (mining). Most token are proof of stake, with Ethereum (most NFTs are on Ethereum) going over to proof of stake too. So NFTs on Solana or Polygon are definitely not insanely bad for the environment.

@@talldado449 yes yes kill the planet for a ms paint monkey, sounds good.

@@halcyoned Proof of stake is eco friendly, proof of work (Bitcoin) is not and is requiring a lot of computing power and all that hardware. There's no NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain.

There are blockchains such as WAX apparently where you can mint nfts super cheap or even with ETH it may be possible with MATIC or Loopring etc

@@talldado449 there's no point arguing with these idiots. They just read something on twitter and know absolutely nothing about the technology

I don't disagree that they're not stupid but taking a picture of a NFT and a picture of art are two very different things

Oh look a pro-NFT comment on a 2 day old video, that mysteriously has over 700 likes in under 2 hours. But only one reply. That's not suspicious at all.

@@pismodude2 lol mans suddenly dedicated his acc to nfts

It’s probably one of the stupidest things I have ever found out about.

i didnt actually think ppl like u were real ngl

Money Laundering babyy, thats how the world for the rich works, we might call them dumb for spending millions on KBs of data but they r the ones having the last laugh Also this isnt just limited to digital art, ever wondered why artists like Damien Hirst r able to sell their lame art pieces in millions? Same reason, money laundering

luckily not American or else it would’ve been way different

Aren’t stocks, Bonds, and Index funds also for investments? Lmao acting as if making money is wrong

But how is that evolving backwards? making investments for future digital valued art is risky but well paid off if succeded. If you already have bank, i suggest taking the risk.

And avoid tax

So is art, the entire high end art world is a scam for laundering money and has been for years, children on the Internet have only just found out nfts are the same and think this is something to be mad about, it's not, your own government launder money on a daily basis and you pay no mind

Yep but wait for the fans to raid this comment and tell you they’re a smart investment 🤣

@@michaelhamilton4133 my friend literally made $100 profit flipping an nft today lmao, ignorance is bliss

@@DankSwegSkuxxXhayel u mean scammed someone?

69 Mill for that tho?

@@luan4753 yeah I guess your kinda right, but any body can make a 16x16 pixel zombie, but not everyone can make a collage of amazing artworks

English?

It's about power, we stay hungry

@Pined° by SidemenRea.. shut up scammer

COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p5YFpv9ux7A.html

Right??

Is so happy*

I mean if you were early, you could of bought a beeple for $1, or $900 and re sold for around $200,000. There's stil artists you can do this with today, just have to be there at the right time

he is an intellectual. u should try

JJ always participates

I think that's a crazy story, my dad tells me about it a lot. How he made and kept the WWW free. Imagine if he did Monetise it

It’s sad how rare this is

bruh why you gotta find a way to insult americans man? Just leave the last sentence out.

@@user-hq1pz9pc6u No

@@user-hq1pz9pc6u no

I agree but you haven't even seen the video

REALLY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pFWy3o9TybY.html Q Q

nah hes a nerd

i've been watching ksi for 10 years i feel super old

and the people that send hate to the person into nfts like ksi.. All I see is fucking social rejects hating him for something he didn't know.. he doesn't know that NFT's are money laundering schemes

COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p5YFpv9ux7A.html

COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p5YFpv9ux7A.html

I agree. What's the benefit of owning a wierd ass JPEG file spending thousands and millions on it. Its just for monetary gain cuz the art itself is trash.

But you dont get the benifits, there are many nfts that you have to own that give you access to games or exclusive discords and giveaways so just screenshotting it wont give you those benifits

@@christianhoy8447 but these benifits are not worth millions of dollars though.

@@GoodGuyBolt Exactly.

People don't buy NFTs to use them. It's an asset, a virtual one. So the only real benefit you get from them is that you can sell for a higher amount. And you can't, because yours isn't an original. So you lose the only one benefit that they have. Therefore screenshoting it does nothing other than if you wanna use the actual art itself

It's not about how you replicate them, it's about how you won't be able to sell them. Screenshotting an NFT and thinking you'll make money is like printing the Mona Lisa and thinking you'll get rich. Both are dumb.

ignore these fkn bots hope you feeling better bro

c'mon just leave him alone.. He doesn't know yet about the flaws of nfts..

‘Real world value’ in the next 20 years we’ll be living in the internet.

nah the last point is dumb... you still hold the chain.. you can right click all you want

Yeah they're extremely bad for the environment

Very few people know or care about it.

Just like he did when he lost 8 Million in crypto

@@jakub9640 you lose some, you win some. Just as you're gaining nothing but a few pennies on interest, by keeping your money sat in a bank which is owned by the government :) KSI is the winner in the end.

@@ayshabee8603 cuz hes already rich he has the moeny and time to spend on NFTs. for people who are not rich it is a dumb idea. NFTs is a way for rich people to get richer.

@@prathvk6266 yup, just the gas fee is high enough to make me hesitant in going to the nft market.

@@yashburman7640 if you wanna sell as an artist go for tezos or any other platform, gas fees is a matter of cents