You all liked the last video of the most outstanding trick plays in football history so I decided to make a part 2. I do not own any of the content, no copyright infringement intended. Part 1 - • Most Outstanding Trick...
4:02 This is called the "low resolution" play. THe play is done at 144 p so that the defense can't see who has the ball because there is no pixel small enough.
You can't really compare his 40 speed in that situation because you're starting him off at full speed. Everyone who is measured in the 40-yard dash starts at a stop.
Tyler Mills good catch, I didn't see that the first time thanks for pointing it out. I guess that's what you get when you run out on the field during play!
haha i wonder what would've happened if one of the band members had tackled him. penalty sure, probably untimed down as well, but if it stops the TD i'd do it.
Ah the old "Dress your entire practice squad up in the opposing team's band gear, steal their band equipment, and go out and set 50 screens" play. Cal took trick play preparation to another level.
The offensive set used by the Bengals (orange uniforms, 7:50) is called a swinging gate formation, or basically some version of it. The standard set up for that formation is Center, full back and QB in the center, one wide receiver split out alone, then 5 linemen and two backs split out to the other side. The QB usually will read the defense and if they are confused/misaligned then go to that area, slant pass to the weak side wide receiver, hand off to the full back, or screen pass to the strong side and the back can follow the wall of 5 blockers. This is the option that the Bengals used on that play.
Ignatius you don’t generally see the ball after it leaves your foot, you are still looking down through your follow through. If you weren’t trying to coffin corner it, you might get an idea of it leaves your foot left or right but tracking it the entire flight? No.
KC trick play against Denver was actually stupid. winning by 17, 2 minutes left and they pull off a trick play that could've been used later in the season at a more important time that up 17 with 2 minutes
Nicholas Dunn idk how it's butthurt, we get blown out either way, I'm just making an observation that instead of wasting a trick play on a team you're blowing out, save it for when you need it. It's like using your last bullet on a dead body
@@nickflint9947 Maybe it was, but part of me is thinking that when you're up by 17 with 2 min left, running a trick play like that seems a lot like rubbing it in, and may just end up riling up the other team later in the season or in the next season.
As a former rugby player I really don't understand why trainers don't teach their receivers to pass the ball backwards if another receiver is free to gain extra yards by running further. That's something rugbyplayers learn very early and it's definitly not too difficult for pro football players.
Dead Phoenix they don't do it because there is a risk that the other receiver won't catch it, resulting in a fumble which is detrimental. also most of the time their teammates don't expect it because they are more worried about blocking for the ball carrier than getting the ball from him.
Gavin Walch but in Rugby you also have risk to fumble the ball. Still it's done in every play. It's probably that rugby players are better thrower and catcher than football players.
MJUSlK you're taught to block for the ball carrier unless instructed otherwise. it's just one of the differences in the sports, doesn't mean either athlete in either sport is better than the other
Yes, there is a risk of a fumble and yes with the current training routine they're doing they don't expect the other guy to pass the ball. But that's why I asked for them to train it. Also the situation where it would work out well is the one where for some reason the guy carrying the ball is between the defender and his own teammate, so his teammate would be in no possition to block.anyways.
I think both are equal for catching, but maybe you're right for passing as football receivers rarely train passing. Still I don't think it is an impossible thing to learn for them with just some training. IMO the biggest issue would be that in football they want to do superstructured plays where everybody learns his part by heart and does that no matter what. With the kind of plays I'm suggesting they would need to change that mentality which probably would be a long process. Still a college or highschool team that is determined and doesn' have too much to lose might be able to pull off something great by thinkng out of the box.
I actually wouldn't have put that one in since it was just a repeat of Marino's original (though Ben did sell it better). I liked Matt Stafford's fake spike, where he did a QB dive at the goal line instead of a pass. Something a little different.
speaking as someone who plays rugby and (real!!! ;-) football... After watching this, "American football" has a lot more room for innovation and initative than either of the sports I'm used to. or imagined. when I've seen "water boy" and the fonze with his book of plays... never realised how impressive a good new play can be and so how important that plot line was. New convert here I think :-)
Gridiron football is way more interesting (at a technical level) than Rugby or Soccer will ever been. Both of those sorts are fine but just don't have as many possible tactics or as many moving parts.
In gridiron football, you aren't constantly moving. You know each minute, minute and a half you are going to get the opportunity to put a hurt to someone. No chasing, no rush, plenty of time to get yourself ready and go. Head to head. Line up, get ready, and do it again. Especially the interior linemen who get their fingers bent back, or stepped on. Get a knee attached to a 320 lb. guy stuffed between you solorplexes.
Btw...its pretty stupid to call it "American Football"... Its Gridiron Football. Played in the US sure, but also Canada and Europe. Its also dumb to insist that Association Football aka Soccer is the only sport allowed to be called "Football".
fishyc150 If you had done research, you would know that "american football" as you put it, is actually simply football. Soccer and rugby are no longer actually named football, although most countries still call them so.
