The reason why the Tupolev 144 looks similar to the Concorde is because Russia actually tried to copy the Concorde. And the Tupolev 144 was launched 4 years before the Concorde got launched. But the Tupolev 144 was soooo unsafe that it had to retire because it had 4 crashes in a very short time.
Brother what 💀 The TU-144 took off one year before the Concorde Also there is no evidence the Tupolev bureau directly stole from the Concorde There is evidence that the KGB (Soviet spy agency) had eyes on the project at the time, but this was only Because they were spies and the SST programs were kind of a big deal. The TU-144 was developed independently by the Tupolev bureau and may have some inspired elements of the Concorde to cut corners but it was not a stolen design. If you look at it it is actually very different than the Concorde
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
4:43 i mean if orange can succesfully animate the f35b vtol engine covers while it taking off vertically then orange can make similar things with the v22 osprey
@@randompolishguy119 Well when they remodeled the the A320 orange planned for it to be the Neo but changed it to the Ceo so it could be the XL or the A300 or he just polls it
I just want Orange to add actual jobs like civil or military related and he should also add more roleplay stuff and more boats for deeper water rescues or make the current and only boat ingame faster
An-124: shouldn't be a gamepass since we already have the an 225 and it'd be cool for some ppl to play a similar aircraft Airbus Beluga XL: idk why it should be added cuz we have the normal Beluga but if it's gonna come out it shouldn't be a gamepass Boeing 707: This would have so much potential since it's one of my favourite aircraft and the engines look a bit different. Shouldn't be a gamepass either. Airbus A300: It's a nice shorter plane that I saw irl today and it's kinda pretty. But anyways, it shouldn't be a gamepass too. Tupulev Tu-154: The door in the back would be a unique thing and for those who are skydiving a lot it would be cool too Tu-144: This could be a gamepass, since the Concorde is kinda for free. Would be another nice supersonic jet and we need more russian jet from tupulev, ilushin and suchoi. C-17 Globemaster: Definitely should be a gamepass and we need a military plane with jet engines. Would be interesting too👀 V-22 osprey: Gamepass too, would be a very unique plane and made of the same quality like the f-35b. But I don't know how he would do the rotating engines🧐 I think the c-5 galaxy should be also added for free with the c-17, cuz we need a free military transporter Give this comment a like so other ppl can see it too🙈
Planes I want added: BN-2 islander (we need a new light aircraft) Fairey rotodyne (it has to be accurate, though as we don’t have any vtol airliners yet.) Saab 340 (I love that plane and we need a loganair scheme) Concorde 001. ATL-98 (ripoff 747)
The C-5 could be a part of the AN-124 since they are similar, the DC-3 could be added so we could have a taildragger airliner, the B-52 could be perfect since we don't have a lot of bombers besides the B-29, and B-2, speaking about bombers, the B-1 Lancer is cool for old military, and Finally the Apache helicopter should be added with the C-17 to make McChord field since McChord is just a military Perth international.
Aircraft's that also must be added to ptfs: -Qatar executive bombarier learjet 45 -Qatar airways c-17 globemaster military plane -Boeing 717 and Fokker 100. -Boeing 747 Singapore Airlines cargo,Cathay pacific cargo,asiana cargo,saudia cargo and saudia passenger plane Boeing 747 -Toll aviation Boeing 737 and Fairchild sewaringen metroliner -Boeing 777 Indigo,Turkish Airlines cargo,Lufthansa cargo,ANA cargo,China Airlines cargo,Eva air cargo -Airbus a330 Qantas freight,DHL,FedEx and massage -Airbus A320 Qantas freight,Indigo cargo and Lufthansa cargo -Lufthansa bombardier crj200 -Oman air Boeing 737 cargo and fly Dubai Boeing 737 -latam airlines cargo boeing 767
