The argument seems similar to what was given for anti-trust-laws in 1890 by republicans "The alleged purpose of the Antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market.
जेटलीसाब अपने सभी भाषण बहुत जोरदार तर्क और तथ्यों के साथ देते थे कि सामने वाला जो सबाल उठाता था ,उसे भी ज्ञान आ जाता था और चुप हो जाता था.जेटलीसाब ने ये सही कहा था कि समर्थन के लिये सरकार भारी कीमत चुका रही है.
No one can beat arun jaitely & susma swaraj in debate.....they are the real speechers after atal ji in bjp......I salutes u for getting all the real facts from your sources and such a delievery talent......
congratulations to arunji for delivering such a well researched and marvellous thought provoking speech...may it reach out to all sitting inside and listening outside the parliament and make us act for the cause and enrichment of our beloved country....ati uttam......
The Speech is just out of this world.. last time during Lokpal bill he had delivered such brilliant speech. i can say Sushma swaraj and Arun Jaitely nobody can beat them in debate!!! hats off to u sir! hate this SP BSP traitors and Hate congress from the core of my heart
Amazing Speech..!! Salute to Mr. Jaitley... His facts are logical and clearly signifies that there is no need of FDI in retails in India. If one scrutinize his speech, one will tend to realise that the UPA government does not think about common bank..
Its not only gud speech, he puts up valid points which none of the congis can answer. Irony is Our paid media never grills congress if they take wrong steps.
I wonder if the SP, BSP MPs including mayawati who is seen dumbfounded wandering their heads here and there on the bench, have understood any word of the masterpiece delivered by Sh.Arun Jaitley ji. BJP has proven their mettle as the most civilized, democratic, progressive, intelligent, disciplined force among any political parties today. Given the street violence, loot background of these UPA supporters, why are they even here in this esteemed Rajya Sabha is a question every voters should ask.
an example of the victims, the businessmen, taking the blame for the evils caused by the government, and the government using its own guilt as a justification for acquiring wider powers, on the pretext of “correcting” the evils." “Free competition enforced by law” is a grotesque contradiction in terms. The Objectivist Newsletter “Antitrust: The Rule of Unreason,” The Objectivist Newsletter, Feb. 1962, 1
After hearing Jaitley ji I am convinced on BJPs view about FDI in Multi brand retail, however congress is in govt and decision to allow is already taken.For me the only way to stop this out INC out of power in next elections. Irony is local parties who oppose govt view support it in crucial voting process in both houses.
Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy: by special privileges, such as franchises or subsidies, which closed the entry of competitors into a given field, by legislative action. (For a full demonstration of this fact, I refer you to the works of the best economists.) The Antitrust laws were the classic example of a moral inversion prevalent in the history of capitalism: contd..
Till 30 min, this discussion is not abt APMC and detrimental effects of businesses buying from farmers. It is about FDI in multi-brand retail n local manufacturing. As far as APMC is concerned, he always supported delisting of items from APMC and also allowing farmers directly to businessmen. Jaahilon , jaake Google karo wat his views were on APMC in 2014-15...you will find it
