Motionless electromagnetic generator part 1 

Way ahead of you, I thought I was the only one looking into this.

Many experts claim this is impossible, but actually there are many systems that produce more work than we’re required to supply, because the excess energy is provided by the environment. A good example of this is the refrigerator. This ordinary kitchen appliance typically operates with a “coefficient of performance” of 2.0, which means that twice as much heat is removed from inside than the equivalent electricity used to do it. Most scientist believe that this kind of performance is only possible with heat systems, but many scientists have demonstrated these principles with electromagnetics as well. In 1977, Ilya Prigogine received a Nobel Prize for what is basically an extension to conventional thermodynamics, which only describe how heat operates in “closed systems.” Those are systems that are cut off from any external form of energy. Prigogine’s work helped to extend our understanding of thermodynamics to include systems that are open to the environment, which slows the appearance of entropy down and allows more total work to be done than what we have to supply.

They use the Aharonov-Bohm effect in their patented Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG). They are able to use the Aharonov-Bohm effect to first energize the surrounding vacuum outside the transformer core with curl-free A-potential, then perturb the core normally so as to send out A-field perturbations into that energized external vacuum (into its A-potential). From the perturbed local A-field vacuum the MEG receives back (from all directions) excess E-field energy pulses by the simple equation dA/dt = - E. The result is that the local altered vacuum - when subsequently perturbed - then sends back free E-field energy to the unit as an extra, free energy input from the active vacuum environment. By insuring some coherence in the received E-field signals, they also insure that the return excess energy input is usable EM energy from the altered local vacuum/spacetime. As you know, force fields exist only in matter, since mass is a component of force by the simple equation F = d/dt(mv). Placing m = 0 in that equation shows that in massless space, “force” does not exist. So instead of EM force fields in massless space, instead there exist precursor “conditions of spacetime” as pointed out by Nobelist Richard Feynman. What we call “EM force”, then, rigorously is the ongoing interaction of that “precursor field” with charged matter q. As the great John Wheeler points out, “Space acts on matter, telling it how to move. In turn, matter reacts back on space, telling it how to curve.” [Wheeler's principle, as stated in W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1973, p. 5]. Wheeler also pointed out the dominance of the interacting spacetime with matter and effects in matter. Quoting: “…elementary particles represent a percentage-wise almost completely negligible change in the locally violent conditions that characterize the vacuum...In other words, elementary particles do not form a really basic starting point for the description of nature. Instead, they represent a first-order correction to vacuum physics.” So the Aharonov-Bohm effect (together with many others) shows that it is possible to directly condition or change (or “engineer”) the local spacetime itself, and then use it to affect the physical system embedded in that altered local spacetime. What we call “force” is the ongoing interaction of the “condition of spacetime itself” with matter. The bottom line is that (1) the vacuum/spacetime can first be preconditioned locally (precursive engineering), without using force or work (which is translation of force), and (2) then the altered and energized vacuum/spacetime can be stimulated to provide excess EM energy freely back to the system. The system then has TWO energy inputs: (1) the one we pay to make, and (2) the one the surrounding activated vacuum gives us for free. So, like a windmill in a free EM energy wind, their unit can exhibit COP>1.0, even though its energy efficiency is always less than 100%. So “energy from the vacuum” is no more eerie than a common windmill or solar power cell array. Given the necessary input energy from the active surrounding environment, the system is legitimately permitted to function as an analogue to a common heat pump - which has an efficiency of only about 50%, but which normally has a COP = 3.0 to 4.0. In short, the heat pump wastes half of all its input energy from whatever source, but it receives so much excess energy from its activated environment that it can still output more heat energy than the electrical energy the operator himself pays to input. No violation of thermodynamics or of physics is involved. Instead, there is involved just a way to directly and freely alter the local environment so it is energized, and then to trigger it into sending free energy into one’s system to be collected and power the loads. Note that such asymmetrical overunity electrical systems are specifically excluded from the normal electrical engineering model. The Heaviside equations were deliberately symmetrized in 1892 by Lorentz, at the instigation of J. P. Morgan, just prior to the formation of modern electrical engineering. It was done specifically to remove the asymmetrical “energy from the active vacuum” systems that Nikola Tesla had discovered. Tesla had labeled them as “energy from the active medium” systems. Tesla had just destroyed the dream of Morgan and Edison for their great DC power empire (a DC power plant every two miles in cities and built-up areas) by putting in practical AC generators at Niagara Falls. Since AC could be transmitted fairly efficiently for long distances and DC could not, then with AC power one did not require most of those expensive DC power plants. So the world adopted AC power stations and transmission. With that blow to his dreams of empire, the ruthless Morgan was immediately determined to destroy Tesla utterly and his backer Westinghouse also. And he thoroughly accomplished both goals. Here is just one statement by Tesla of what he intended to do. Quoting: "Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is, for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time]. During an address in 1897 Tesla stated: “We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].

I've made a Tom Beardon's MEG it put out 55 volts AC @ 12 volts input. I tried doubling the input but fried the mosfets because I didn't heatsink them properly. The motor rewind shop tech complimented me on hand wound coils where I bought the wire.

Hi, how do you assemble the cores with the magnets to not damage these parts or injure your body?

I think you are correct about why the center part of the core works better using the laminated plates in line with the direction of the ferrite sides. I have an idea about how to improve the center part of the ferrite by making your own ferrite core out of one piece using a toner and mold then poring the melted toner in the mold while the magnets are exactly where you have them on the video. Results in the magnetic field lines aligning through out the core all in one piece with no breaks. I have experimented with this kind of core before. What dimensions do you need for your core? If I have the correct size magnets I can get the field lines perfectly on the 8 core as long as they are aligned in the proper or same polarity when you get it. If you want I will attempt to create this coil for you no charge just want to see if it will make a difference in core designs. I love what you are doing.

U-shaped cores on four sides, it will be better ;)

Where did you get this cool magnet gyro for showing pole side?

kindly share details and diagram

Does its principle work like tpu

👍👍💖🙏💖👍👍

I have the same amplifier. You would be much better off with getting 2 mosfets like I did. You can switch much more power with them. And fast. That amplifier has a rise and decay time alone you've probably already seen. I got Cree C3M0040120D I believe. They were about 22 bucks each. Cree is 1200v and 100a max pulse power. Uses only 3.6v threshold. My function gen will open the gate perfect set at 7v amplitude. Totally surprised me

Привет из России.

I can 3d print bobbins