Тёмный

Motorweek 1998 Saab 9-5 Road Test 

Hondata97
Подписаться 7 тыс.
Просмотров 2,7 тыс.
50% 1

Motorweek 1998 Saab 9-5 Road Test. I don't own this video.

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 18   
@doug6191
@doug6191 Год назад
$1,800 ventilated seats. Whoa! That's substantial money today, much less in 1998.
@patrickmichael3384
@patrickmichael3384 Год назад
And very noisy too. Ridiculous, eh?
@jacobyo99
@jacobyo99 Год назад
I’ll take the 2006-2009 with the 260hp 2.3T
@Nathan_Jay
@Nathan_Jay 4 месяца назад
Or 2010-2011 with 300HP 🗿
@jacobyo99
@jacobyo99 4 месяца назад
@@Nathan_Jay it’s slower than 06-09. Bigger, heavier car
@hduncan2587
@hduncan2587 25 дней назад
The sound of the 3.0 pulling away sounded sooooo lazy. Might as well have been a diesel. I just came out of the 2008 9-3 Sportcombi reviews and was surprised how pleasant it revved away down the quarter. I will say, though, watching this 9-5 flinging through the slalom... I don't see the car bouncing on the bump stops harshly, which is a relief. I recall seeing the IS300 slalom and how violent it seemed to be as it maxed out bouncing on the stops (as many cars I've noticed), but this one stood out as not bouncing like that.
@barenekid9695
@barenekid9695 2 месяца назад
Wasn't the "quirky" that Killed Saab. But the perennial "Saab Stories" and their Constantly expanding prices. These were EXPENSIVE cars. PS; Saab Aero has Eff All to do with any saab car after1970. SCANIA is the actual maker /pedigree. Note that the Drag coeff is .32 to .36... dependant on info source. Use a valid reference .. next time Gee ...it's as fast as a current Civic.
@Al7amed
@Al7amed Месяц назад
Looks like he is singing not speaking 😒
@davidaubin3902
@davidaubin3902 Год назад
2:58 Lisa Barrow
@herrgolf
@herrgolf 11 месяцев назад
The NG900 of 1994 was charming but the 9-5 was a def downgrade from the suave 9000.
@CynicalBastard511
@CynicalBastard511 Год назад
That Turbo V6 engine was way underpowered even for 1998 standards.
@doug6191
@doug6191 Год назад
Indeed. A naturally-aspirated 3.0L V6 in a non-luxury Camry was somewhere around 190HP in 1998.
@3piridacius806
@3piridacius806 Год назад
It only had a turbo on one side of the bank
@CynicalBastard511
@CynicalBastard511 Год назад
@@doug6191 The similar era Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable 3.0 Duratec V6 had 205 hp.
@CynicalBastard511
@CynicalBastard511 Год назад
@@3piridacius806 So what? It should be more powerful. It should produce at least 255 hp. But then if it had 255 hp, that would put it dangerously close to the Cadillac Seville, which had 275 hp and GM would never allow a Saab to be -better- more powerful than a Cadillac.
@doug6191
@doug6191 Год назад
@CynicalBastard511 As is, the power was comparable to the others in its class. Still, a turbo should have given it a decisive edge in power.
Далее
2001 SAAB 9 5 Goes for a drive
16:06
Просмотров 95 тыс.
Провал со стеклянным хлебом…
00:41
Motorweek 2003 Saab 9-3 Road Test
6:58
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.
Motorweek 1994 Saab 900 Turbo Coupe Road Test
4:58
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.
1994 Saab 900 | Retro Review
5:36
Просмотров 33 тыс.
The SAAB 9-5 - Throwback
6:19
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Motorweek 2006 Saab 9-7X Road Test
6:15
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.
Saab 9-3 Aero vs. 9-5 Aero: Which is Better??
11:50
Просмотров 111 тыс.
MotorWeek Review | 1993 Saab 9000 Aero
6:12
Просмотров 24 тыс.