We used to call this one dude we worked with "Jeffy," because he was a.....treat...to work with. 😂 We used to bring apples and mess with him, but it was usually all in good fun. He just so happened to be an a-hole, too, so it ended up getting pretty malicious sometimes, like the giant "hotdog" with the name "Jeffy" written in rotten walnut pod juice on the back windshield. Looked like it was written in thick, black motor oil.😂
They weren’t, I did some research from a bunch of different sources and they all say the action shots are real pilots provided by the navy and the crew say in replicas. Tom cruise only actually flew his P-51 mustang.
@@Its.butter.they were in the jets, they just weren’t piloting, they were using 2 seaters with the actors in the back seat, some of the shots were done with cg though.
They filmed real fighter jets as reference, put the actors inside of fake fighter jets for motion, and then did the entire scenes out of CGI. The movie has over 2,400 VFX shots, and yet people still claim that it has no CGI, even though a 10-second Google search would prove that completely wrong
Another fun fact is that the L-39 is an actual fighter jet that you actually can fly as a civilian and the reason why they use the f-18 super hornets is naturally because the US military does not allow any civilians to fly a military fighter which is another reason why they needed to use that instead of the f-35 because the f-18 super hornet has a two-seater configuration which was able for the actors to do the scenes despite the fact that they're not flying the jet itself but still It would have been fucking awesome if the f-35 was used but it would be very tricky to get the actual actors to fly the jet because it's too state of the art of a jet that not even a civilian can fly it
An improvised scene does not count as A) a blooper, OR B) better than the actual scene. This is because it was left in and therefore it IS the actual scene, not an outtake.
@WinstonPoptart not really how that works. Some scripts contain scenes or parts of a scene with no specific dialog, just a bit of direction that requires improv. It's way more common in comedies given the nature of the cast.
@@xX-PookieBear-Xx They are in an F/A-18 Super Hornet which has one seat. However there is a trainer version of the plane with two seats which is the one being used in the film. They were not actually flying the planes. Same goes for the original Top Gun too.
Guess what? The “doing his own stunts” is mostly because he wants to do them and it’s a good marketing technique for the higher ups. Almost all of his hailed stunts use a lot of CGI. Tom Cruise is sick and deserves every praise he gets but come on people are acting like he’s Jackie Chan or something. A little bit overhyped imo.
I remember noticing that on the ringer and knew he broke character. That was the funniest part in that movie and I couldn't stop laughing for the longest time 😂😂😂
None of these are bloopers better than the actual scene, they ARE the actual scene. These are "movie bloopers that made the final cut". A true example of "movie bloopers that were better than the actual movie" would be something that was not in the actual movie, for example the many lines Stan Lee tried out for his cameo when recording antman 2 before settling on the one that made it into the movie.
The Ringer is an absolute classic, after all these years i always noticed Johnny breaking character but i never knew "When the f**k did we get ice cream" was improvised 😂😂😂😂
I love the one in CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, where the family sits at the dinner table, and the little girl says "I hate these potatoes. There's a dead fly in my potatoes."
The ringer is quite possibly the funniest movie in the history of cinema. So many great quotes like that one. Like whenever someone offers me an apple I say “Jeffy likes apples”. Or when someone used to scratch my cd. I think I’m gunna watch it again right now.
I was gonna say that and even if they somehow bought one just one would be more expensive then any profit the movie could make by like tens of millions
Uhh, they did get permission? You do realize that the military heavily invested in the top gun films because it was a massive recruiting boost. Hell in top gun 2 they got permission to fire off 1 actual missile. So yeah they did use real jets. A 20 second Google search would show that
@@Theatre_galno they didn’t get permission to fly the jets and if you believe that than you seriously need to rewatch this movie. Tom cruise and all other actors sat in replicas with action shots of real navy pilots flying. The only time he flew is when he was in the P-51 mustang because he owns one.
@@Its.butter. If you'd actually look into it. While they weren't operating them they were passengers in real planes. They didn't operate them because the didn't have training
The ringer. .i got that movie for my 15th birthday after coming back from seeing Revenge of the sith thay day...everyone who came to my birthday and went to the movie with us. Watched The Ringer that night...we had a blast. I'll never forget it when even my 7th grade texas history teacher came with all of us. Miss you Mr. Mooney
I remember watching the dumb and dumber scene as a kid and just being completely thrown off on how random it was, I was dying of laughter, no lie I reference that a lot lol
That ice cream line has been one of my favorites ever since I first heard it like 20 years ago. Dude follows it up with in the distance, asking everyone else,“…did you get ice cream?”
You cannot imagine how many people actually believe that these production companies saying "we used no cgi" are truthfully... like literally thinking that e.g. Top Gun Maverick was 100 % practical, even those fully sci-fi jets and each and every scene... yet nearly the whole movie used CGI in some extension. Yes they made a lot of practical flights and tried to use these very often for reference or real life interaction with the plants as example. And that's the only reason why thi CGI looks so damn good, also in Barbie and many other movies. Like, 98 % of all today blockbuster movies are heavily relying on cgi, which is totally fine and awesome because we can experience worlds and stories never imaginable before. The freedom is often than not supporting the filmmaker to create the deepest imaginary visions from his mind-it's bad then, and mostly only then, if Studios are using the hard work of CGI Artists like a cheap tool to cut corners. And whenever someone tries to cut corners to safe money or to make more money respectively... then you get the bad visible CGI. It's not the cgi that is bad. It's greedy studio heads without any knowledge about film making or cgi art that make cgi bad in the first place. Thanks anyway for showing respect to those that deserved it the most.
Those were genuine reactions as if it was an actual situation lol. You kinda do the head nod to be friendly but weirded out some dude tryna make up random convo
