Movie Theories That Will Ruin Your Childhood 

Bro even as a kid I knew that Mary Poppins had to be some kind of immortal deity

Similarly, I think that Mary poppins is either a witch, or an angel, but leaning towards angel more becauyes. Well, she doesn't seem like the type to curse.

​@@christianndlovu-lh7vuit spelled because

@@shahidsiddiqui2836 bra

I think Mary is a hogworts witch her wand is her umbrella like hagrids and hermoine had an enchanted bag like Mary's 😂

I was going to say the same

Ooh

The spider in the original doesn’t eat him either. He puts him out of his misery with a rock if I can remember rightly.

​@@MasterBlaster3545Being just a child when I watched The Fly I don't recall the manor of death, but yes, he puts him out of his misery before the spider can get him.

Dam, thx for the info

Oh, Humans. Yay. We get the theory that's a definite Stretch more likely.

@@ronturcsak5123 My bros in the Garage: "Yep. We're just a Joke to you." Don't Overthink it.✌️😜

The Manufacturer would be their God.

There is possibly somewhat relevance to this theory while not being 100 percent accurate obviously, little differences and such, it still pretty much hits the nail on the head . their is ANOTHER new willy wonka movie coming out called Wonka, i got 2 different trailer ads yesterday on youtube while watching stuff and decided to not click skip cause you could tell right away it was willy wonka so i was curious enough to let it play. in the trailer they show how willy wonka met the Oompahs and on top of that it shows halfway thru that willy wonka and the Oompah's had/have a literal war with the humans/human world/chocolate cartel lol (it shows the oompahs as seemingly tribalistic, living on a secluded island from humans and wielding spears/polearms/axes ready to F**k some S**t up lol and if thats the case then they should have no problem morally, murdering people and children lol) (theres also a couple different violent and dark ass jokes from the oompahs in the two trailers i saw. one of them ends with the main oompah saying hes going to quite viciously stab willy wonka with a cocktail stick lol) the oompahs are def more aggressive/bloodthirsty/capable of heartlessly murdering people and kids than wonka does wonka seems batshit crazy sure but he doesnt put off violent crazy vibes or murderer crazy vibes lol

That’s a good theory

​@@majinvegeta420I haven't seen any trailers yet but you just made me want to watch the movie lol. I'll definitely have to check out.

@@Kanojo22 lmfao ill try and do you a solid and search up the ad/trailer that i got/was talking about and post a link in reply

Awesome! I love this theory and can't wait to see Wonka!

Oh yeah.

"Blamed" is the keyword, my friends :)

Ariel's mother died because that dumb bitch decided an easily replaced music box was worth dying and leaving her children without a mother for.

Wait... wouldn't he be in Neverland?

@@madelinearmstrong-tuapola3965 i think Ariel's mother lived in neverland and Hook was blamed for allegedly killing her

I recall actually reading about that twist having been an actual plan for Binks, his character being an actual Jedi. Unfortunately think the source is lost or was removed. Sith, Dark Jedi. Binks is interesting to me whichever way he's portrayed.

cope that starwars had good writing. it was a cool concept done poorly

I WAS ABT TO WATCH HARRY POTTER WHY DID U SPOIL😭😭😭 Its okay tho ig

@@bellathesuperpoms the very first movie yes. Move on

@@gabrielgyorffy1373 my mum said i could only watch it when i turned 13 so yeah that was a spoiler for me its okay tho

The same count for the 2005 film

@@sonicfanboy3375 I remember reading it, Mike ended up like, 7 feet tall

I don't blame him The Gene Wilder Wonka has a horrible temper!

In the Oompa Loompa song in the book it says that Augustus gets melted and cooked in to hot fudge and in the 2005 move Augustus’ mum says the folowing “please don’t eat you fingers” “but they taste so good!” So Augustus got melted into hot fudge

😳😰😱😨

Yeesh

He'd have to do more than that, they'd also have to explain WHY they had a room FULL of kid's beds and toys, AND, that's just ONE thing I can think of! However, it's an interesting theory.

Grinch theory is not right

Actually In the original story of Peter Pan, he closes the windows 🪟 to make the children 👧 👦 think they are unloved 💔 and will live in Neverland with him. Though still yours is still interesting.

And then there's the "rated R" version Corridor Crew made, where we actually see them die

Yeah, Augustus was covered in chocolate. I hated the Depp version but I'm pretty sure he's leaving the factory and his mom says "stop licking yourself", to which he replies "but I taste so good" due to the chocolate. (I admit, I didn't care for either movie but if I had to pick one, it would have to be the first one, lol; Though I never read the book so I can't judge from the book vs movie point of view)

The scene where Charlie and his grandfather sneak some of the fizzy lifting pop isn't in the book.

@@dragonfan2815 Yep

Yeah, Augustus was "thin as a straw" according to Grandpa Joe. And according to the oompa loompas, they said "he won't be harmed" and "I must admit, he will be altered quite a bit", they knew Augustus would be changed. They knew all the children would survive, but they would also be different in the end. I must admit, I enjoy the book version more than the movies, no offence. Willy Wonka tries to stop bad children from being in danger too. But of course they won't listen.

OH MY- MOM COME CHECK THIS OUT

Matpat is that you

I think that because a Mary Poppins x IT theory was shown, it would be a bit awkward to introduce another, but maybe in the next one.

Pennywise wasn’t a thing when they made the first Mary Poppins movie

I honestly think she’s some form of goddess because time lords can’t make or bend reality the way Mary Poppins does

I'd be very interested to find out what happens every 25*27=675 years!

Makes sense with what we know theory wise and whatnot!

I mean, they could be the same multi-faceted character...

Totally I prefer Pennywise to Poppins

I like the time lord theory better

Bestie he dropped a hot iron on someone. If you have seen a horror movie where someone used one and burned themself or someone else, you know how those scars work

Also the “Hallucinations”, he’s Eight years-old. It’s his imagination.

Lowest common denominator of 25 and 27 are 675, 1350, 2025... What happens in the year 2025 when IT feeds off of joy AND fear?

.out watch now masochists them after going Pennywise

?guh baxkeards spoke It

They aren't the same being, but they could be the same kind of being but of opposing forces. She would be stronger than he is because fear is short lived, but joy helps you live longer. It's an intriguing thought about Rumpelstilzchen, perhaps it's not the child he truly wanted but the mother's Despair over her situation. Despair can be as powerful a feeling as Fear or Joy. But if there exists a being that feeds on each of these what other emotions are there beings for? Do fairy Godmothers feed on Hope or Love?

How do you explain the realms that they visit in the different situations they end up in time lords can’t do that because they are still essentially human I would say something along the lines of either a goddess or an angel

Yeah. However, nothing makes sense in the series anyway, for two reasons. 1) The Horcrux in Harry didn’t die in the Chamber of Secrets. (which may be due to the fact (my assumption) that for living Horcruxes, the Horcrux object must die for the Horcrux to get destroyed) 2) They don’t swear enough to be realistic teenagers.

Well, Voldemort killed the bit of his own soul that was in Harry.

Learn something new 😂

"The Golden A$$" you mean, that kinds seems like a more traumatic version of Jack and the beanstalk on the part where a chicken can lie golden eggs tho that appears more natural for the animal, but the donkey one sounds more unnecessarily or ridiculously hilarious 😅

But do any other donkeys in the movie talk? That's bc in Pinocchio, the kids that get transformed can still talk

@@BabySeal84Good point. So maybe donkey is from Pinocchio. That would explain why he is so childish.

@frankbauerful OML I REMEMBER SOMETHING. In the shrek movie where rumplestiltskin is the villain, donkey meets shrek when he's dragging a carriage and getting whipped so he sings different songs. What if those songs that donkey is singing, were played in the carnival where he got transformed

so much potential wasted I bet, nobody should feel that way, give him some respect.

Oh! I never knew that but that begs the question though where did that term come from and why is it seemingly used by magicians or at least people pretending to be magicians

doesnt avada kedavra mean something like "I destroy as i speak"?

Lol Peter Pan is a Minnis team hook all day

Yt shorts ahh comment

You know film theory too

Yessss

Yup This is the third comment before it gets popular

And this is the fourth

Film theory is the best theorist on RU-vid

Harry was a descendant of the last of the three brothers. The deathly hallows were actually his. It would make sense the prophecy implied harry could be immortal cos in the original story, the 3rd brother wanted something to escape death. The invisibility cloak. Which harry now has. Death only caught up with the last brother on the choice of the 3rd brother when he took off the cloak (which he gave to his son). Man the Harry potter story is never ending in it's background details

I wonder if the creators are referencing Mary as the movie was made? Maybe they were scared of her as a kid for some reason

The original idea was very simple, though. The concept of a "good witch" is something that exists in European folklore as well. Most of these theories are laughably bad, but people keep trying like a high school English teacher to find symbolism in the oddest places.

I won't lie, I can totally see this somewhat canon as well! Though I don't think I've seen either one (I've definitely never watched IT because I'm a huge coward), but with all the listed similarities between the two, I wanna see this as a canon just for fun. :P

Home sweet home alone is the movie you're talking about

Btw there's home alone 2, 3, 4, 5

I’m pretty sure Prophecies aren’t actually that accurate so Harry is probably not immortal after Voldemort was killed because he’s no longer a horcrux

@@Cat-pv6yx Exactly - the issue was that as long as a part of one was inside the other, it effectively meant immortality for both. And since Harry had to essentially kill the thing/purge it inside him, it makes sense as well. Once they were all destroyed, well, he's just a very old man anyone could kill.

@@Cat-pv6yx The only way for Harry to become immortal is upon possessing all the three Deathly Hallows - the Elder Wand, Resurrection Stone, and Cloak of Invisibility. Be Amazed made a mistake about the phrase in the Prophecy.

@rogueascendant6611 That’s a misread on your part, being “master of death” by wielding the three hallows doesn’t make you immortal

If it does, then it isn’t mentioned anywhere in the books

Funnily enough, thanks to "The Dark Tower" bookseries we know that Pennywise belongs to a species called "emotional vampires" and that they are a rather rare sight, since there's almost none in the multiverse, at some point in The Dark Tower our protagonist meet 2 emotional vampires, one who feeds of the admiration of the people (becoming something akin to a rockstar) while the other feed of sadness (I'm pretty sure the Gunslinger kills this one), this means that each emotional vampire feeds of a different emotion and that not all of them are bad or dangerous. So Mary Poppins could very well be the same species as Pennywise

@@hasturthekinginyellow5003 Have never heard of this book series but I am intrigued. & will definitely look more into it. Thank you for the information & topic insight!

@@hasturthekinginyellow5003 Just out of curiosity, do the emotional vampires leave their victims feeling weak or emotionless after the EV's feed on the victims' emotions?

@@lyndseystrait1513 for what we can see, no

@@hasturthekinginyellow5003 Interesting. ok good to know. I am definitely reading that series you recommended. Thank you.

Similarly, Abra Cadabra, from the same Aramaic, translates to “Let the thing be created”, or “With my words, I create.”

In the original treatment he was actually going to be a back stabbing mercenary that betrays Qui-gon

Thank you for making this.

thank you 😀

Thank hyou😊

Exactly

There was a show like that on ABC I think that's what you mean

@@homelesshannah50 could be

Most of the rest are laughably bad or simply wrong, but this one I immediately recognized when I saw the movie. The oddly "human" donkey.. not a lot of fairy tales that that is possible to be, really. And Disney/Pixar loves thinking exactly like this, with everything in those movies' being a nod or link to some character or story. Oh - the two that he got actually wrong were the Fly (( reference to the old 50s sci-fi movie ) and abracadabra. It's a very old mix of Aramaic and Arabic that first appeared in stories about magic (the famous 10001 tales) Roughly it translates into "As I said/say, so shall it be created/done" in a compressed acronym of the first syllables of the words. This is not hard to find online, either. And it makes perfect sense as well as to the original audience they would have figured out the meaning almost instantly and connected it to the genre/type of character. To Western ears it sounds odd, but 1000 years ago, perfectly normal, like how we see "WYSIWYG" and immediately say the words in out heads.

Well the hook one is pretty legit I believe. I think that was the underlying inference in the story. As I read it anyway.

@AnothaGuy87 Yes, I agree. I also believe the emperors new groove one as well. I was just baffled by the proposition that out of all the theories he is spewing, that one was far-fetched to him. lmao

That’s riiiiiight I remember that from the Disney version of Pinocchio Or donkey could’ve just waited until nightfall and then sneaked out that’s a possibility as well

hsawaknow what is that japanese?

Pinocchio

No thank you. They should honestly do a what if version of the whole prequel trilogy without Jar Jat so it might be palatable.

@@paulrichards2544 You don't ave to watch it.

Lots of potential, good and bad. Star Wars: What if... *Luke loved moisture farming. *Luke missed his shot at the death star, creating an atheistic zeal for anything 'the force'. (And entered into intense therapy for his old man hallucinations) *Amidala (sp?) was corrupted by power *It wasn't a trap? *R2D2 was a sadist, oh wait- pretty sure that one's real. I could go on for days.

I agree, it sucked.

Oooh very scary