Mozart String Quintet K 593. James Buswell with Carpe Diem String Quartet 

Agree with the bow technique of the 1st fiolin. Excellent sense of the chord motion and grasp. And the sound is there. Almost a model.

Agreed. I do hate when a panning or zooming cameraperson tries to impose his/her/its idea of what we should watch.

quintet*

First movement Larghetto at Quarter = 42. Allegro 1:41 at Half = 84, first repeat at 3:37, development at 5:30. Second movement at Quarter = ca. 48. Third movement Allegretto at Quarter = 152. Trio 19:32, same tempo. Finale: Starts at around Dotted Quarter at 160 but settles in at around 144.

4악장

shame Mozart had to die so early. Perhaps one of the greatest shames in history. He was just getting started...

why AFTER his father died (1787) ? I would say 95% of all he did since he went to Paris and his mother died around 1778 were masterpieces!

yes his father was a pedagogue… never let his real talent shine. Wolfie by today’s standards would be a jazz piano player…pushing the limits of composition and improvisation. And can you imagine the operas and musicals he would have written?

​@@justinnoble6506jazz piano? Well let's thank the universe he was born in 18th century instead.

00:19 1악장

17:34 3악장

Couldn't agree more, specially THIS KV.

This often caused by the recording technician, here apparently not since there are probably only two microphones, but I think here cello and viola are well able to hold their own when needed. It also depends on how one listens. Headphones absolutely necessary for lower frequencies!

Yes, Beethoven borrowed a lot from Mozart. However, I like to use the analogy that Mozart planted the seeds and Beethoven grew the forest.

@@LachlanTyrrell2003 read the story on how Johannes Brahms felt later in life about Beethoven. He thought people were so caught up in the newness of some of Beethoven that they lost sight that Mozart and even haydn in some aspects were better composers. Beethoven couldn't write a melody or anything significant with dissonance like Mozart and Bach could. He simply was an average composer that spent years struggling with music.

Beethoven was above average in heart, but average in composing.

​@@beethovenlovedmozart Beethoven? An "average" composer? How dare you. Of course, Beethoven could write melodies. Take a look at the second movement of his Pathetique sonata or the second movement of his 27th sonata. Brahms can have his opinion, however, don't hold it as truth. There are plenty of other composers that have had negative opinions on other composers. Tchaikovsky called Brahms a talentless bastard and labelled his music an utterly empty wasteland. Does that make him one? What average composer revolutionises the purpose of music and has such a profound effect as to heavily influence the next century of composers? If he was an average composer, he would not be rated among the greatest by musicologists and his music wouldn't be as widespread and symbolic as it is today.

@@LachlanTyrrell2003 I love Beethoven..But Brahms brought up a lot of great points that people don't think about. For one, all of Beethovens commissioned works were below average. The reason? Because commissioned works meant he had to produce them more quickly. His 9th symphony literally took him over 10 years to write. I'm just saying, it better be good if you have 10 years to write it. Imagine if Mozart spent even a year on something. With that focus and time, Mozart would've produce even greater works. Beethoven didn't write these works overnight. It wasn't natural for him but also it's the reason they are so good..