MQ-4C Triton: The Largest US Navy UAV! 

Shit they have sound healing, anti gravity vehicles, non combustible engines, look at the new submarines that go into space no windows how do you know where you are

FACT‼️🇺🇸

Yeah, with this thing, who needs a satellite.

Or tell us

@@RickMahoney2013Like that’s gonna happen…😂🤣🤪

We won what in Afgan war? They are no different today then when we went in. They just went and hid

Wth lol. It killed more innocent ppl and made more Soldiers which got you Isis…. Taliban took over Afghanistan, Iran influenced Iraq and Syria is in assads hands… hell we don’t even have a peace of libya… you know my friend math?

Huh. US withdrew from Afghanistan because they lost. Taliban control more territory than 20 years ago.

for the enemy there is just nothing to fight. pretty insane

Military strength is no substitute for diplomacy. Isreal, case in point. Use military to replace diplomacy? Then you are just committing war crimes left and right. Next thing to look out for are those trigger-happy, why-waste-our-cool-toys, war-nuts getting elected. For any kind of "super advanced" conventional weapons, there is always a counter - nukes, submarine nukes. So keep the cool. Put the toys back in the pockets. Those toys are only good for bullying those that don't have nukes.

哦好怕怕😱啊， 等中国把她完美无缺的捕获时，你会更惊讶🙀

Not to fear-monger, but if you really are an ex-skunkwork -type guy, you really shouldn't post it online. I know the chances of you having digital records of the program on your devices is close to nil, but cybersecurity begins with preventing data leaks on the human side - it don't matter how many firewalls you put up if an idiot keeps his password posted on a sticky note next to their PC or plugs random flashdrives into the damn thing. Keep that shit locked tight and to yourself.

china not scared, china ever not!

Everyone says that at first... until you and your buddies start blowing up even though its clear skies and you cant hear the aircraft lmao@@theSpicyHam

@@shrk128They don’t let you take your work home in those places

Tienen altas capacidades de ataque contra países pobres que no tienen radares avanzados 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Waiting for Iran to capture it and reverse engineer it

No. It should most definitely not be made capable of landing and launching on any current aircraft carrier. The wingspan of a C2 Greyhound of 81 feet is about as large of a wingspan that could safely do that. This has a 130 foot wingspan. A new design of a carrier without a command "island" would work but it will probably be decades before we see that...because it is a good idea. Mid-air refueling is kind of a good idea but it already has a ridiculously long range compared to other planes, so the probe would cause less range to the point that the benefit tradeoff is not worth it.

Wait till Iran brings it down and captures it 😂

No, too big

@@nqviper some of then just not the global hawks or variants of global hawks they are to big

Me too😂

I can get you one cheap 20 million fully loaded. Please forward deliver details asap.

But USA has never won any war in past 20 years! Explain that Plz

Alot

American mail trucks were mostly built ages ago with modern replacements being mostly civilian vans

It’s different from an AWACS, it’s a signals intelligence platform. Designed to replace the EP-3 which was manned. Its primary mission is to use an array of antennas and sensors to ‘listen’ to the enemy and gather intelligence.

Depends on the encryption... ;)

I have no inside info, but it's safe to assume that every US military aircraft can get itself where it's going, and back home, without interacting with any satellites, including GPS. Autonomous inertial navigation using laser ring gyros have been around for about 40 years. I'm not saying there's not a chance of a software screwup where the INS is updated with spoofed GPS data, but because it's been a problem, it's probably a problem that's been fixed. As to using satellites to send the surveillance data, that's just one data path, and if someone knocks out even two of our satellites, much less all of them, we will know who they are before they get them all. It's really only an all-out WWIII scenario where these are more affected by electronic threats than by simply being shot down, and in that scenario, we'll have no shortage of known targets not needing updated surveillance.

Iran..

Longer range better sensors and fusionI think

It's small for an AWAC plane, though

Many business jets are larger, except for this thing's long, skinny wings to keep it aloft for 30 hours. It is a Navy aircraft, and there just aren't that many SAM sites floating around trying to shoot it down over the ocean. Over land, it is vulnerable, but so is everything else. A big deterrent is who owns it. Not many countries actually want to go to war with the US, even if they wish they could.

Meant for networking and relaying data... intelligence work. ;)

It will be able to communicate with other long range maritime aircraft like P-8 with LRASM

This is a variant of that

@@nqviper Okay. Thanks!

It can fly at 3-4x the altitude manpads can reach. But plenty of SAMs can reach it, just like they can reach all military manned aircraft.

I'd say that Russia is more advanced than Iran, and these routinely conduct surveillance over the Black Sea against Russian interests, without too much worry of being shot down. Some fly from Italy, some fly from the USA and return home without refueling. Shooting one down is not a huge accomplishment, it is like shooting down a very slow private jet at high altitude. But it is also true that shooting one down does carry a big risk of consequences. The US does not need to go to war against a country over losing one aircraft, or 10 aircraft. But they could if they wanted to. It is a game of Russian Roulette. You can get away with small consequences sometimes, you are suddenly dead sometimes. Playing the game is not smart. Continuing to play the game many times, is even less smart. There are not many games Putin is afraid to play. Maybe it is not out of fear, but just out of understanding game theory, being from the land of many chess grandmasters, that he chooses not to make a bad move like Iran made, even if Iran got away with it.

People like this crack me up. Thinking their take based on a youtube video outweighs the years if not decades that teams of researchers and engineers put into the design.

That's silly. Any plane can be taken down with "a missile"