MSFS 2020 vs X-Plane 12 vs Real Life! Landing in Padang, Indonesia 

Ugly not realistic

Can't wait for that time!

The one in the middle flies like an arcade-game on the XBox 🤣🤣

@@frankbyte The one on the right plays like a IOS Mobile game 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@activex7327 🤣🤣😂 You repeat yourself. Lonely and sad again? XP is used by Nasa, aircraft manufacturers and flight-schools. MSFS is used on XBox for arcade-gamers like you 🤣🤣🤣

@@frankbyte "You repeat yourself."

@@frankbytecould y’all quit bickering about which sim you all prefer? Opinions exist i don’t get why people always have to make a big deal about them

Thanks for the explanation

@@flightandfind you're welcome.

Thaanks!! Join the discord server, please!

@@flightandfind ok maybe tomorrow

That's a good one mate 🤣🤣🤣

Cool!

No they have been improved. It simply means you are seeing textures on lower settings with XP12 and compare them to higher settings in XP11. Otherwise you must be doing something wrong,

Stop using that as an excuse. Xplane still looks like shit after all these years. Physics physics yeah yeah we all know. Austin is an engineer and owns an airplane. He studies these things. GAME still looks terrible though.

It's not an excuse it's a fact - Microsoft is a company of great proportions and therefore is more able to create nice products, X plane is far behind - I agree to your statement, but that does not exclude the fact that it does its job perfectly and that is simulate conditions.Both do it in their way, and yet again - yes x plane is technologically behind. I will also leave you with a PS - the way you start the disagreement feels like you object with something that cannot be objected - although in our case - it can. If both companies were of the same size we would prolably have the perfect storm, although the future is ahead and tides come as they go. And by the way physics is the law by which we all live, thereby we cannot proclaim that we do not care about it . Wish you a pleasant day - Graphically ;) and Physically ;) @@denziiey

@@denziieyrealism>graphics

@smallgoose05 I would never disagree but reality is often disappointing. Even as it is I'd still pick MSFS. It costs less to enjoy the same level of immersion.

That's totally fine! As people we got opinions, and they're quite subjective!@@denziiey

The Zibo 737 has a very realistic wingflex. Look at the one from MSFS and how umrealistic it « vibrates ». That’s simply because MSFS-atmosphere model is inacurate (PMDG themselves admitted that) and the turbulences are overdone. Perhaps you should fly in a real 737 to realize that the wings don’t move the whole time, and even less like these strange « vibrations ».

@@frankbyte LMAO

@@frankbyte indeed, XBox-gamers think it is realistic when the wing vibrates on a very unrealistic way lol

It's a scheduled upload

They are already triggered. They just forgot how the X-Plane looks like without addons))

@@flightandfind let's not forget...their only come back is....GAME PHYSICS

@@user-si9mn9jo2y Hope Laminar Research and Asobo will unite someday and make the best flight sim possible

In this video, xplane is on the lowest possible setting, while MSFS isnt, its not really a fair fight.

You're wrong, X-Plane's graphics settings are 3/4 of maximum

@@flightandfinddid you use autoortho?

Those who don’t just gawp at how good the graphics are and that they can fly over and identify their house. Those who don’t have powerful PC’s, those who use Mac……..in short lots of people

@@tomstravels520 No, I can't get it working ((