Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah! *SUPPORT DAWAHWISE* ❤️www.patreon.com/dawahwise ❤️gofund.me/dba0c96f ❤️www.paypal.me/dawahwise ❤️Join DawahWise Membership: ru-vid.comjoin
don’t forget this one : Isaiah 46:11 New Century Version (NCV) I am calling a man from the east to carry out my plan; he will come like a hawk from a country far away. I will make what I have said come true; I will do what I have planned.
paul in acts 9.3 saw deviI of luke 10.18. In roamin 10.4 removed the Iaws so is faIse prophet of mathew 24.11. Jesus says follow the comforter in jon 16.13, matches deut 18.18 prophet like Moses. Isaiah 42.1 d sea scroIs says this is my Ahmad, v. 6 says a new covenant, v. 11 says rejoice mt selah or Medina. So prophet of Medina who is Ahmad short for Muhammed is the comforter. --- Mathew 21.38 to 43 says the cruciFICTION attempt will make the kingdom of God go to the fruitful aka Ismail in genesis 17. Mark 15.40, mathew 27.55, luke 23.46 all said Isa who you call Jesus's crew were to distant so maybe didn't see Jesus. Jon doesn't mention simon, puts them at foot of cross and differs on his last words, so cruciFICTION has no valid evidence. Similarly neither does resurrection.
in Isaiah 49 it says Jesus will leave Zl0N and join the light of nations, which in isaiah 42 is proven to be Islam. Isiah 42 :1 says this is my blessed Ahmad in the d. sea scrolls. in v. 6 it's the light of nations, in v 11 it says the light is from Mt. selah Medina w/ tribe of kadar or Ismail. view : **"Ahmad" found in The D. Sea Scrolls** - by Tedung Senduk.
@@Letmethink-x5l 1. Quran 2.106 - some rules were abrogated as ppl's situation changed. 2. Quran was revealed from Allah to Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him, simple. 3. Septuigent, masoretic and d sea scroIs differ. Ehrman said 95% of manuscripts is 9th century after Quran. 4. Quran has 7 ahruf, they are fine. None contradict, esp. With hadith. Bible contradicts itself. In luke there is 28 ppl between Jesus and David and in mathew there is 42.
During pre-Islamic Arabia, Jews would boast to the polytheists that when their prophet would come he would destroy them. It’s undeniable that many Jews were in Arabia waiting for a prophet according to prophecies in their scripture who happened to be Prophet Muhammad SAW. It’s interesting that nowadays you won't see any Jew talking about this.
@@hajaranouar3394 What about the Jews in Europe 😄😄, were they waiting for Muhammad? Wake up from your sleep! Also, if Muslims accept only four books Injeel, zabur, Torah and Quran how come you accept the prophecy books like Isaiah? If you accept that why not accept Isaiah chapter 53 😄?
@@brandonsaga3479 "mine came first bud by 600 years" something that comes first doesn't mean it's the truth. By your logic Judaism is closer to the truth than your religion since it "came first bud by 600 years". Your logic isn't there and instead of proving it you come up with terrible arguments.
For Muslims, the bible is not our yardstick. We do not live our life according to the bible. We live our life according to the Holy Quran & the Sunnah...That's really DEEP, bro...😮😅
All prices to allow the creator of the heavens and the Earth in all the world so why aren't they propagating this truth but the last and final Messenger is mentioned throughout their biblos their Bible their holy book and getting rid of the pornography the incest and the adultery attributed to the sinless messengers and PROPH ETS Then they can't call it a holy book you wouldn't be able to show that unless you were to cover it because it contains such filth it doesn't make any sense all these centuries at those stupid stories are still in the holy book
@@shaheenwaseem3742 Instead of blaming ISLAM you must prove Jesus(peace be upon him) wasn't a Muslim He was a Prophet sent by GOD for the lost sheep of Israel And he was a Muslim
@@gogirl299 Jesus in mark 3.35 Aramaic said my true brothers are Mushlem or Muslim in Arabic. Jesus follows Islam, you follow pauIy-theism. The manuscripts show how pauI and co. Changed Jesus's message, it can even be Iisted.
In Dead sea scroll you can clearly see “אחמד" mentioned which means Ahmed but they changed it to “אֶתְמָךְ־" (Hekmat) which means whom i uphold in Isaiah 42, let's use Ahmed in Isaiah 42:1: Here is my servant, Ahmed, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him, and he will bring justice to the nations.
That's a far stretch, plus his conduct does not show any sign of God's Spirit. Nor did he bring justice to the nations. How can a criminal be entrusted with bringing justice?
@@chriss2452 Says the dude where Jesus is theif (Luke 19:28-31), Says the dude where Saul is a criminal (1 Samuel 15:3) • No, Hekmat is only mentioned in Isaiah 42:1 and also even that's a far stretch still make a meaning or it would've not gone anywhere and It's also prove that Bible is corrupt cause the one word cannot be little different. This verse clearly mentioned Ahmed.
@@RIDE_26Allah is a name combined of 2 words: Al and Illah meaning: The God. Just illah on it's own means God in arabic. And Allah only exists in the singular form. You can't turn it into a plural
@@SoldierofJesus_John316 I can say the same about your self proclaim prophet name Paul..he betray his on oath,working under romans..simple story,Paul is the main candidate within your claim as wolf within sheep skin
@@AwesomeViews.Explain lol, only u cant accept it do u know more than 69% of people that converted to islam are christian? Islam js the fastest growing religion in the world and Christianity is the highest in declining thats shows people knw and accepted the truth
Also, one notices from the Gospel of John 1:21 that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of 3 distinct prophecies: The first was the coming of the Christ.The second was the coming of the Elijah. The Third was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ), from their brother tribes, who will be like Moses mentioned in Duetornomy 18:18 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles (Non-jews or non-christians) and a covonent for the people mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makkah). The Old Testament also tells us that Ishmael dwelt in a place called Paran: "While he (Ishmael) was living in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt." [Genesis 21:21] But, if christians priests/church or Jewish rabbis try to deceive you by telling the open lie that Ishmael is abandoned or banished, then never believe those lairs/deceivers. Because, Ibrahim sacrificed his love for Ishmael by leaving his beloved son in the desert to please the True God. Then GOD said, "Take your son, your only son (at that time Ishmael was the only son not Isaac), whom you love, and Sacrifice him..- Gen 22:2 (NIV) Because, Bible clearly talks about the Islamic sacrifices in Makkah by the sons of Ishmael And also the rising of the Last prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia. KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael. We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20] A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power rather it's spiritual, and not material.. That's why Isaiah talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Ishmael's 2nd son Kedar who lived in Medina. We know that both Prophet Moses and Prophet Muhammad migrated to Medina (Biblical Midian) following conspiracies to assassinate them...And Arabia rejoiced by his coming mentioned in Bible Isaiah 42:11. 📖 Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices; let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice. Let the people of Sela sing for joy; let them shout from the mountaintops. Where did Kedar settle❓The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130] One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar. We can see, like the Qur’an, Abraham is given glad tidings with respect to his descendants. In fact GOD promises to establish his covenant with all of Abraham’s “seed” without exception: 📖 Genesis 17:7 I (GOD) will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your GOD and the GOD of your descendants after you. God informs Abraham that the sign of the covenant shall be circumcision [Genesis 17:10]. And Abraham immediately circumcises himself and Ishmael, thus establishing God’s covenant with Ishmael [Genesis 17:23]. We can also see In 📖 Isaiah 42:19 & 42:24, that the 'Nation of Israel' is explicitly identified as the blind and condemned people therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the Arabian prophet) must be someone other than Israel. Yes, 📖 Isaiah 42:17-25 talks about those blind pagans Arabs, Romans, Persians etc. and also those Jews and Christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of the Bible Because, they neglected Deuteronomy 18:18 which clearly predicted that this Prophet must be someone from their brethren (their brother tribes, the Arabs), The first section of Isaiah 42, verses 1 - 17, describe a momentous servant in extremely positive terms, one who will be a “light for the Gentiles (non-jews/christians)” (42:6), will “open eyes that are blind” and “free people from darkness” (42:7) of idols worships. Isaiah 42:11 Even prophecies that This prophet will rise from the city of Medinah, Western Saudi Arabia. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) brought a new Law like Moses unlike Jesus (Isaiah 42:4). Prophet Muhammad became a light for the Gentiles and a covonent for people mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. Don't they (Christians and Jews) see ? Both Muhammad and Moses were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters (Isaiah 42:7-8), were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them. Both fled from their enemies (Moses to Midian, Muhammad to Medina, we know that geographically, Biblical Midian is located in modern day Western Saudi Arabia. Both encountered their enemies (Isaiah 42:4), and both were victors in miraculous ways (Isaiah 42:13-17), both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and, Both were given comprehensive law code of life (Isaiah 42:21), Both enabled their followers to conquer the Palestine. (peace be upon them both)---These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:18. And Our Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) passed all the conditions stated in Deuteronomy 18:15-22 for identifying the true prophet of the Bible. Analogies between Moses and Jesus overlooks not only the above similarities but other crucial ones as well (e.g. the natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad but not Jesus, who was regarded by his followers as the son of GOD and not exclusively a messenger of GOD, as Moses and Muhammad were and as Muslims belief Jesus was. (Peace be upon them all) “Paraclete” (Ahmad/Praised one) that Easa Messiah foretold to come after him was described as one who shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear (from God through angel), that shall he speak . . .(John 16:13) 📖 Isaiah 42:9 See, the former things have taken place, and new things (Al-Quran,Shariah Law) I (God) declare; before they spring into being I announce them to you. 📖 Isaiah 42:10- Sing to the Lord a new song, his praise from the ends of the earth, you who go down to the sea, and all that is in it, you islands, and all who live in them. The statement “a new song” means a new way of worship. This is exactly what Islam represents. The emphasis on the new song here is singing the praise of GOD all over the earth. The Qur’an opens with the statement “Praise be to GOD, LORD of the worlds” and is recited by Muslims all over the world during prayers every day. 📖 Isaiah 42:12- Let them give glory to the Lord and proclaim his praise in the islands. This seems to indicate that this special person’s impact will be far reaching. Islam spread rapidly throughout the Arabian peninsula, even reaching as far as Spain in just over a hundred years after Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ).] Isaiah 42:13- The Lord will march out like a champion, like a warrior and will triumph over his enemies. GOD uses Muhammad as an instrument to wipe out evil and manifest His judgment on evil doers. Let us see how the Qur’an confirms this in the battle of Badr when around 300 ill-armed Muslims faced a thousand strong army of the pagans. Al-Quran ch 8 verses 17-19 Why should you not fight in GOD’s cause and for those oppressed men, women, and children who cry out, ‘Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors! By Your grace, give us a protector and give us a helper!’? [Chapter 4, verse 75] …it's the proof of Isaiah 42:1 and he will bring justice to the nations
@@gogirl299 Jesus in mark 3.35 said my true brothers are Mushlem in Aramaic or Muslim in Arabic. Jesus follows Islam, you follow pauIy-theism. How pauI and co changed Jesus's true Islamic message can he directly seen and witnessed in manuscript tradition of bibIe.
Isaiah 42:10-17 is a song. Also when it says Sela it’s not talking about that Sela it’s taking about city around the Dead Sea. This verse is just talking about Israel. Isaiah 41:8-10 identifies Israel as a servant and has similar language. Also Muhammad isn’t deaf or blind (Isaiah 42:19.)
Sela is used in conjunction with Kedar. Kedar is in reference to one of the sons of Ishmael, who settled in the Hejaz. The only Sela in the Hejaz is the one mentioned in the video. In regards to it being a song, it is still clearly a prophecy of a future individual. Prophecies come in many forms. In regards to deaf and blind, that is in reference to Israel. But the first part of the chapter is in clear reference to one individual. The first part is prophet Muhammad, the second part is an admonishment of Israel. This type of shift mid chapter is not uncommon for the bible
@@r.a1301 🤦🤦🤦Sela is used in conjunction with Kedar because its talking about how everyone will sing his praises. Everyone will sing God's praises to the "ends of the earth." To demonstate this, the author picks locations that are spread out, to show how everyone will sing. He first mentions the islands (west of israel) then the coastlands (west of israel), then Kedar (syro-arabian desert, east of Israel) then Sela (Edomite city, east of israel) then the wilderness (east of israel) Also, its speaking of the same thing in both passages. It dosent shift mid-chapter. Isaiah 42:1 Here is my servant, whom I uphold Isaiah 42:18 "Hear, you deaf; look, you blind, and see! Who is blind but my servant?"
That the first time i heard some one said that's irrelevant at the first statement then explaining about the truth. Mostly directly explaining prophecies in the bibble verses Our believe based on Alquran. MasyaAllah... Well said brother.
Jewish people reject the notion that Jesus is the Messiah; So from their perspective, the servant of Isaiah 42 stands as an unfulfilled prophecy of nearly three thousand years as theit Messiah is yet to arrive. Now there is a serious issue with this understanding. We’ve already seen that the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) fulfils all the criteria mentioned in Isaiah 42, so the question must be asked: why would Isaiah set out criteria that can be fulfilled by individual (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ) other than the Messiah, if it is indeed the Messiah to whom Isaiah 42 refers? If Isaiah is speaking of the Messiah, then we would expect that he would set out criteria that only the Messiah can fulfil. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of prophecy in the first place, because prophecies are supposed to be specific. Because, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. And The 3rd was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian Prophet), from their brethern (brother tribes, the Arabs), who will be very like Prophet Moses mentioned in Duetornomy 18:18 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles meaning non-Jews or non-Christians and a covonent for the people clearly mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. This is obvious from the 3 questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (John 1:19-21) From this we conclude that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18. Prophet Muhammad brought a new Law like Moses unlike Jesus (peace by upon them all). Yes, Sharia law is mentioned in Isaiah 42:4 and Isaiah 42:21. Prophet (ﷺ) Muhammad became a light for the Gentiles and a covonent for the people mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. Don't they (Christians and jews) see❓ Both Muhammad and Moses were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters (Isaiah 42:7-8), were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them. Both were given comprehensive law code of life (Isaiah 42:21), both encountered their enemies (Isaiah 42:4) and were victors in miraculous ways (Isaiah 42:13-17), both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and both migrated to Medinah (Biblical Midian) following conspiracies to assassinate them (Isaiah 42:11). Both (Moses and Muhammad) enabled their followers to conquer the Palestine. The natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad but not Jesus. (Peace be upon them all)---These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:18 who Will be very like Prophet Moses to fullfil the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles (non-Jews or non-Christians) and a covonent for the people clearly mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. Being linked to Kedar and Sela geographically as well as Prophet Muhammad’s genealogy is also linked. His lineage can be traced back to Ishmael directly through Kedar: Abraham > Ismael > Kedar > Adnan > Nizar > Kinanah > Ghalib > Murrah > Qusai > Hasim > Abdul Muttalib > Abdullah > Muhammad [In summary, this verse (Isaiah 42:11) pinpointed the exact location of Prophet Muhammad, the city of Madinah in Saudi Arabia.] Yes, Isaiah 42 17-25 describes the pagans and those Jews and christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of Bible. Now from the point of view of both Christians and Muslims, Jesus is indeed the Messiah. Now If we compare the characteristics of Isaiah 42 with the life and teachings of Jesus as they are portrayed in the New Testament, then the Messiah Jesus falls short in fulfilling the prophecy. For example, Isaiah 42 states that the servant will not cry out:He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. [Isaiah 42:2] This disqualifies Jesus, who complained and literally cried out directly to GOD, according to the Bible, at many points in his ministry: From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My GOD, my GOD, why have you forsaken me?”). [Matthew 27:45-46] Actually Jesus spoke Aramaic which is the language that was closely intertwined with Arabic. He said "Eli, Eli" which sounds a little like "Illa, illa" pretty much like "Illah" in Arabic. No, it is not about Jesus. To understand the real identity, we must look at the translation done by the Jews, not the Christian version, because Isaiah is a Jewish book. Verse 53:3 says: Despised and rejected by men, a man of pains and accustomed to illness, and as one who hides his face from us, despised and we held him of no account. Was Jesus despised by all men? Was he accustomed to illness (was he often sick?) does he hide his face from other people? Was he “held of no account”, meaning ignored by others? Clearly, the answer to the above questions is “No”. So this verse does not refer to Jesus. Verse Isaiah 53:7 then states that he opened not his mouth. Wrong! Jesus spoke during his trial with both Pontius Pilot and the Jews. Verse 9 then says that he made his grave with the wicked and rich. Jesus did not make his grave, was buried alone. Yes I know he was meant to be buried like a criminal because he was considered one. But verse 9 says he was to be buried with both. Jesus was buried alone. It then goes on to say that God was please by bruising Jesus and that Jesus's seed would prolong the days in verses Isaiah 53:10-11. Jesus never had any seed. Verse Isaiah 53:12 (which is where your case is strongest) states that his soul shall be poured out unto death. However in the Hebrew and Aramaic texts the word death is not present. Now again assuming this is Jesus (AS) this description fits the Islamic story much better. Jesus was not killed as the word for death is not present. He MAY have been put on the cross. And he was exalted and lifted up (the ascension). But again, this is clearly not Jesus as he does not fulfill this.
📖 "And remember that the heavenly Father (True God) to whom you pray has no favorites. He will judge or reward you according to what you do. So you must live in reverent fear of him during your time here as “temporary residents." (1 Peter 1:17) Why Bible says that Once he (God) speaks up, he's going to act, isn't he ⁉️ Has he (God) ever promised and not carried it through ⁉️ Why Bible says that True God does not repent or change his mind ⁉️ Numbers 23:19: I am God and not a man (mere mortal) that's why I, the God your Lord never lie and never repent and never break my promises and never change my mind with repentance.. But if christians claim that their God lied and They know more than their God, then that's their way to reject the truth.@@Letmethink-x5l
'The nation of Israel' is identified as the blind and condemned people in Isaiah 42:19, and 42:24, therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the Arabian prophet) stated in Isaiah 42:1-13 must be someone other than Israel. Yes, The victory of the Muslims was foretold in Isaiah 42:1-17. And the Jews and the Christians say: We are the sons (childrens) of God and His beloved ones. So Ask them: Why does He (God) then punish (chastise) you for your sins (faults)? Nay, you (Jews & christians) are mere human beings (mortals) from among those whom He (God) has created, He (God) forgives whom He pleases and punishes (chastises) whom He pleases; and to ALLAH belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them, and to Him is the return (of all). [Al-Quran (5:18)]
3:186 (So, O believers, as a requirement of the wisdom in and purpose for your life of the world,) you will surely be tested in respect of your properties and your selves, and you will certainly hear many hurtful things (remarks, abusive words,ridicule, insults and affornts) from those (Jews and christians) who were given the Book before you and those (pagan arabs,romans, Greeks,persians, Hindu,Buddhists etc.) Who associate partners with GOD. If you remain patient (are steadfast in your religion and observe the bounds set by GOD in your relations with them) and keep within the limits of piety (in obeying GOD and in your conduct toward them), (know that) this is among meritorious things requiring great resolution to fulfill@@jhndavidjnr2996
@@hamzahmatise3333 they way uthman burnt all the original manuscripts and made his own copies, altering the order and giving names and removing verses????
@@Joshua-24.15 Oh... Ok.. I forgot that you were there. Yo guys, check this random guy out. He kinda like told us the truth and he named a guy named uthman burn the original Quran..All are burneddah.. 😔. In the meantime, can anyone explained to him that the Quran was memorised by the companions of Prophets Muhammad s.a.w of the day like 10K or so of them... The total numbers of companion are like 100K or so of them... Somebody help this ramdom guy out.. Just inform him now, in the so called modern day like millions memorised the Quran already... and just tell him that the Quran burner teams doing useless and unnecessary activities..
@@hamzahmatise3333 You:He kinda like told us the truth and he named a guy named uthman burn the original Quran..All are burneddah.. 😔. Me: Oh wow, lets read some thing.. Ref: Sahih al-Bukhari 4987 (last part) Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. ----------------------- so the truth is, you dont have the so called original manuscript that was in the possession of Hafsa, or the original 4 copies of Uthman.. also Your hadith says uthman burnt every other manuscripts, copies and fragments of quran... so if you show the original manuscript that was in the possession of Hafsa now, may be i ll learn that the original quran is still preserved.. else you can know i didnt lie..
It's very relevant for you, because if he isn't mentioned, then the Quran is wrong in 7:157 when it says the people in his time will find his description in the Torah and Gospel. By the way, Isaiah is not in either of them. But anyways, Sela is referenced multiple times in the Bible. And it's always in Edom, like 2 Kings 14:7 He struck down ten thousand Edomites in the Valley of Salt and took Sela by storm, and called it Joktheel, which is its name to this day. The dwellings of Kedar were to the far north of Mecca, where Muhammad is from. And these dwellings didn't rejoice for Muhammad, they were violently conquered. The most important part of Isaiah 42 is verse 1: Behold, My Servant, whom I uphold; My chosen one in whom My soul delights. I have put My Spirit upon Him; He will bring forth justice to the nations. More specifically: "I have put My Spirit upon Him;". The word for "upon" is עַל and means "on", always used literally. The Spirit never came on Muhammad, but He came on Jesus, as said in Matthew 3:16-17. Isaiah 42 is a prophecy about the Messiah, Jesus Christ
The bible today isn't the injeel. The old testament today isn't the preserved Torah. They aren't preserved. They have no validity to us. Is that hard to understand?
We don't take scriptures corrupted by anonymous authors with no originals in the original language with hundreds of contradictions as the authority and the Words of God. In fact, we reject them. So, to argue using the Bibles of many different omissions and additions to Muslims is useless. Non-objective sources like Bibles cannot be used as a criteria to Objective Truth.
Quran supercedes and corrects corruptions made by man in the Injeel that as a result became the Bible that we all now see. Hence we use Quran as the criteria to verify the Bible (not Injeel).
And I think these also point out the right way: Foretelling of another future prophet after Jesus,pbuh: John 16:12-14 I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear [to hear] them now. But when that One has come, He will guide you in all truth. For He will not speak on His own initiative, but He will speak whatever He hears [from the Father] He will speak, and he will tell you what is yet to come. Jesus prayed like any other prophet before him: Then Abram fell on his face [in worship] Genesis 17:3 Then Moses and Aaron fell on their faces [before the Lord in prayer] Numbers 20:6 Then Joshua fell with his face toward the earth and bowed down, and said to him, “What does my lord have to say to his servant? Joshua 5:14 And after going a little farther, He(Jesus) fell face down and prayed Matthew 26:39 Then, Who is the God: John 4:24 God is spirit [the Source of life, yet invisible to mankind], and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” The Way: John 4:1-2 Beloved, do not believe every spirit [speaking through a self-proclaimed prophet]; instead test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets and teachers have gone out into the world. By this you know and recognize the Spirit(synonym, there for a prophet) of God: every spirit that acknowledges and confesses [the fact] that Jesus Christ has [actually] come in the flesh [as a man] is from God [God is its source]; An-Nisa 4:171 People of the Book, do not go to excess in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God, His word, directed to Mary, a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’- stop [this], that is better for you- God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust. *Islam is the only non-Christian faith which claims and speaks to the whole world that Jesus is the Christ! Who made us say that: Muhammad (pbuh).* John 16:14 For He will not speak on His own initiative, but He will speak whatever He hears [from the Father]...
@@SoldierofJesus_John316 Not really it's interpreted differently. So this meaning is quite available. Everyone else weren't jews, the people we're talking about are the same and the commandments they are given was similar to jewish tradition. But Judaism have been highly customised and edited. Every prophet was sent to guide people to one true God. And this is Islam. Not even closely related to today's judaism or its different sects.
@@efethecaptain6 Jesus says that He will send the Advocate. Did Jesus send Muhammad? Abraham, Moses and all other prophets were Jews. They also prostrate themselves
@@SoldierofJesus_John316 If you try to understand this assuming/believing that Jesus is god, then we have no common ground. But if you say as it says in the Bible: John 16: 14; For He will not speak on His own initiative, but He will speak whatever He hears [from the Father]... This is closer to our belief. Father is a figurative speech, a sign of sincerity. But never as literal father. How can you find him: John 4: 2; By this you know and recognize the Spirit(synonym, there for a prophet) of God: every spirit that acknowledges and confesses [the fact] that Jesus Christ has [actually] come in the flesh [as a man] is from God [God is its source]; *Islam is the only non-Christian faith which claims and speaks to the whole world that Jesus is the Christ! Who made us say that: Muhammad (pbuh).* Isaiah 1:18 “Come now, let us settle the matter,” Ali ‘Imran 3:64 Say, (O Prophet) “O People of the Book! Let us come to common terms: that we will worship none but Allah, associate none with Him, nor take one another as lords instead of Allah.” But if they turn away, then say, “Bear witness that we have submitted ˹to Allah alone˺.”
@@efethecaptain6 you ignored my statement. Jesus said that He will send the Advocate. You claim that Muhammad is the Advocate. Did Jesus send Muhammad?
Prophet muhammad is mentioned in the dead sea scrolls isaiah 42. The entire chapter is about prophet muhammad and i have evudence even prophet muhammad's prophesised heavenly name Ahmed is also mentioned in it.
@@Diego-gq5mc have u actually read the isaiah 42? There is no one in history all those descriptions match other then prophet muhammad. First off not many people even though this exists. All they know is that isaiah 42 all descriptions match prophet muhammad pbuh. Christian and jewish scholars will never agree because agreeing means they then have to change their faith, this is why they will continue to lie. Here is the prophecy: quran (61:6)"And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O Children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allāh to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Aḥmad."1 But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."" So quran makes claim Ahmed is mentioned in previous scriptures. Here is the evidence. Isaiah 42:1 "..."whom i uphold.." is a false translation, it actually is a name, to understand this u have to understand the letters of hebrew since isaiah scrolls r in hebrew. The name they translated into "whom i uphold." Is Athmch, there is no Athmch in history it is a wrongfully spelled name intentionally. How so? Well because the 2 letters in hebrew dalet and kaf r extremely identicle, the only difference between them is that kaf's tail is a big longer so it is easy to intentionally change dalet into kaf. So Athmch is with kaf, but if u change it to dalet the name comes out to Ahmed. I will now give u the hebrew: הן עבדי אתמך בו בחירי רצתה נפשי נתתי רוחי עליו משפט לגויbdיוציא The word in question is אתמך that is with kaf, now lets change it to dalet, אחמד. Now u see how easily the rabis in the past must have changed this passage on purpose. Why would they change it? Well if u know the context of the jews living in madina u would know they were waiting for a new prophet that isaiah 42 completely maps out at that location. But they never thought that prophet to be an arab. This is why they turned against the prophet. Infact there was a prominent arab jewish rabbi who became muslim during life off prophet muhammad pbuh who mentioned a passage from isaiah 42 describing prophet muhammad pbuh. The amount of evidence is too much. As u can see. P.s. that arab jewish rabbi name was husaiayan ibn salam whose name after he became muslim became abdullah ibn salam. U can look up what he said and u can see what he stated matched the isaiah 42:2-3 passages.
@@arss1057 If those were even changed why does it appear in the DSS? Not to mention how you say it maps put a location, where? Sela is referred to Petra from the Hebrew Selah = Rock. Even in the Masoretic texts it doesn't appear as Ahmad rather or the Aleppo Codex. Then, אחמד (the Hebrew word) means “I will delight”. Treating it as though it were a name can only be at the expense of ignoring the following word, בו, as this mistranslation does. Let's now see what actual scholars say shall we? The one scroll of Isaiah which has been studied more than any of the Qumran biblical scrolls, and more than any of the nonbiblical scrolls, is the "large" Isaiah scroll from cave 1, 1QIsaa, probably written in 150-125 BCE. This text was named the "large" Isaiah scroll since it has been preserved in its entirety, in contradistinction with the "small" Isaiah scroll, 1QIsab. Even today, after most of the Qumran texts have either been published or are known in some form or other, lQIsaa stands out as the scroll about which more aspects have been researched and hence are known better than the other Qumran biblical texts. It has been published in two facsimile editions (Burrows and Cross; see note 14), and one transliteration (Burrows, see note 14). The most extensive linguistic treatment of any of the Qumran texts has been devoted to this scroll. Likewise, the most extensive study to date on scribal habits is devoted to this and several other texts from cave 1. The only biblical text from Qumran on which a "literary analysis" was composed is the Isaiah scroll. More than 75 scholarly articles have been written on various aspects of this scroll. The readings of this scroll are listed as variants deviating from the MT in the third apparatus of the seventh edition of the Biblia Hebraica and in the Hebrew University Bible. Since it was a novelty to be able to compare the medieval Masoretic Text with an ancient manuscript dating from the time of the tum of the eras, virtually every aspect of the scroll was studied in monographic articles. The bottom line of any comparative analysis of the texts of Isaiah is that the amount of variation is relatively limited. The present textual data for Isaiah thus point to a picture of textual unity, such as might have been expected for the Pentateuch, but as it happens, Isaiah presents a much more closely-knit textual tradition than the books of the Pentateuch, or the other two comparable books of the Prophets, Jeremiah and Ezekiel. The main textual feature recognizable for the Isaiah texts is the existence of two different scribal traditions, recognizable in differences in the area of orthography, morphology, and scribal habits. In this regard, however, the situation in Isaiah is not characteristic of this book only. The two groups of texts are the group of the MT and the LXX on the one hand and on the other hand a group of texts probably produced by the "Qumran scribal school." (4) The scribe of this manuscript was more influenced by Aramaic than most other scribes of scrolls found in Qumran,54 although a relatively sizable number of Aramaisms is found in another scroll, 4QCantb, written in a different orthographic convention. - Emanuel Tov: "The Text of Isaiah at Qumran", in: Craig C. Broyles & Craig A. Evans: "Writing And Reading The Scroll of Isaiah Studies of an Interpretive Tradition", Supplements To Vetus Testamentum, Volume LXX,2 Formation and Interpretation of Old Testament Literature 1,2, Brill: Leiden, Boston, 1997. There's zero evidence that it was supposed to mean Etmak youre just intellectually dishonest.
@@Diego-gq5mc thats ur bias. Not strawmanning at all. I gave u the evidence, u accept it or not is ur bias. Besides why dont u go ahead look up the info i provided. U r strawmanning by not engaging with the claim and evidence, u r evading the evidence i provided. Also please explain how i strawmanned, if i first showed u the claim quran made that Ahmad is mentioned in earlier scripture. Then i show sufficient proof that it is. Even i went far as indiciating a hebrew rabbi in the past who saw the very evidence and converted because of it. Yet u ignore the evidence. Its clear ur bias is so blatant, u dont have any knowledge. Please dont engage with people who have been doing theological research for years if u lavk the capacity to properly debate with honesty. Saying oo this is strawman o this is redharring. When they arent is a clear way of dishonest evading. So if u cant be honest then move along.
@@nothing26375 he is in isaiah 42. The word in hebrew is אתמך. At the end the letter kaf was intentionally changed from dalet which comes out to this אחמד = Ahmad.
@@arss1057 You changed 2 letters in a 4 letter word to try to fit your narrative, and theres no evidence that this word ever said ahmad. The isaiah scroll ~700+ years before muhammad, says the same thing the modern text does. stop lying.
@@tymon1928 Not the bible, The injeel brother, the book that was revealed to Jesus peace be upon him, not the writings of the unknown, centuries after Jesus
Prophet Muhammad PBUH is prophesied in the Scriptures of most if not all major world religions, including the Old Testament and the New Testament. Of course, Muslims regard the Christian Scriptures as interpolated, but interpolation still implies retention of some original truths. The Book of Isaiah states that the Book shall be given to a Prophet. Then the book is delivered to one who is illiterate, saying, ‘Read this, please.’ And he says, ‘I am not literate.’ (Isaiah 29:12). When the Angel Gabriel came down to deliver the Holy Quran to Prophet Muhammad PBUH, Angel Gabriel commanded him to recite it, to which Prophet Muhammad PBUH responded that he was illiterate, as the Bible prophesied. This story is very well known in the Islamic tradition. Prophet Muhammad PBUH is also mentioned by name in the Song of Solomon, Verse 5:16 in Hebrew. The Hebrew word used is Muhammuddim. In Hebrew, the prefix ‘im’ that marks the end is added as a term of respect. Without the ‘im’ suffix, the name would be Muhamud. If you were to pick up the Old Testament today in the English language, you would notice that the Bible has replaced the name Muhammad, which is translated in the Hebrew Bible as altogether lovely, even though the book has no right to translate a name of a person. The verse should have retained the name Muhammad instead of translating it in the Hebrew. Prophet Muhammad PBUH is also prophesied in the New Testament. According to the Gospel of John 16:12-14, Jesus Christ stated: I have much more to say to you, more than you can now them bear. The verse quotes Jesus Christ as saying, more than you can bear them now. Then Jesus Christ says, But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears and tell you what is yet to come. He will glorify me…” (Gospel of John 16:12-14). This Spirit of truth is none other than God’s last and final Messenger of humanity, meant to be followed until the last day. Prophet Muhammad PBUH came after Jesus Christ, preaching the same general Message as Prophet Jesus and every other Messenger and Prophet before him. Prophet Jesus PBUH referred to Prophet Muhamad PBUH as the Spirit of truth, and Prophet Muhammad PBUH was known as The truthful, the Trustworthy by his people in Arabia before becoming a Prophet of God. Prophet Jesus PBUH told his people that many things would be needed to be told, and Prophet Muhammad PBUH came down with additional laws and concepts to be introduced to the people. The verse states that this coming advocate would glorify me and testify of me, which Prophet Muhammad PBUH did. Not only does the Holy Quran honor the Prophet Jesus PBUH and mention him 25 times, but it also honors his mother and calls Mary PBUH the holiest and greatest of all women that ever lived. It has a chapter named after and dedicated to her. This verse was not referencing the coming of the Holy Spirit as Christians are taught. According to Christians, the Holy Spirit is part of the Trinity. How can this verse be referencing the Holy Spirit if it states, He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears. How can one who is supposed to be divine, part of God, and part of the Trinity not speak of his own volition but only speaks what he hears? Moreover, how can the Holy Spirit, who is supposedly God or part of God, need to receive Revelation from someone else? God does not need to wait to receive Revelation; He gives it Himself! Since this advocate needs to wait for a higher being to provide him with Revelation, it shows a deficiency, indicating that he cannot be God nor part of God. The verse implies that the one who is to come is dependent on God and is a servant of God; he would not be God or part of god! John 14:26 "But the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you". What has the Holy Spirit brought or taught for the last 2000 years? Christians say that the Paraclete means the Holy Spirit (John 14;26). Jesus said in John 16:7-8 "If I do not go away the Paraclete will not come to you". This could not mean the Holy spirit, since the Holy spirit was said to have been there before Jesus was even born as in Luke 1:41 "Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit". Here, the Holy spirit was also present during Jesus life time. So how could this fit with the condition that Jesus must go away so that the Holy spirit will come? In John 16:7-8, it says: "But if go, I will send him to you. And when he comes, he will convict the world of sins and of righteousness and of Judgment". What do "he" and "him" refer here? Don’t they refer to a man? This is clear proof for those who are not stubborn and arrogant and those that ponder and reflect instead of just believing what their Church preaches. “O our people, respond to the Messenger of Allah and believe in him; Allah will forgive for you your sins and protect you from a painful punishment” (Quran 46:31)
@@shanefrance5071 your god should have studied kindergarten books before revealing bible 😂 Regarding the concept of Earth, there are various Scientists who have described... ‘How will the world end.’ Hypothesis - Some may be right, some may be wrong. But either the world will perish or the world will live forever. Both cannot take place simultaneously - It is unscientific. But this is exactly what the Bible says. It is mentioned in the Bible, in the book of Hebrews, Ch. No.1 Verses No.10 and 11, and the book of Psalms, Ch. No.102, Verse No.25 and 26, that...‘Almighty God created the Heavens and the Earth, and they will perish.’ Exactly opposite is mentioned in the book of Ecclesiastics, Ch. No.1, Verse No.4, and the book of Psalms, Ch. No.78, Verse No.69, that... ‘The earth will abide forever.’ I leave it to you to choose which of the two Verses are unscientific - the first pair or the second pair. One has to be unscientific - Both cannot take place. The world cannot abide forever as well as perish - It is unscientific. Regarding ‘the Heavens’, the Bible says in Job, Ch. 26, Verse 11, that...‘The pillars of the Heaven will tremble.’ Qur’an says in Surah Luqman, Ch. 31, Verse No.10, that...‘The Heavens are without any pillars - Don`t you see? Don’t you see the Heavens are without any pillars? - Bible says heaven have got pillars. Not only do the Heavens have got pillars - Bible says in the first book of Samuel, Ch. No.2 Verses No.8, as well as the book of Job Ch. No.9, Verse No.6, and the book of Psalms Ch. No.75, Verse No.3, that... ‘Even the earth have got pillars.’ In the field of ‘Diet and Nutrition’ lets analyse, what does the Bible say. The Bible says in the book of Genesis, Ch. No.1, Verse No.29, that... ‘God has given you all the herbs bearing seeds, the trees bearing fruits - those that bear seed, as meat for you.’ New International Version says... ‘The seed bearing plants, and the trees bearing fruits bearing seeds are food for you, all of them.’ Today, even a layman knows that there are several poisonous plants like wild berries, stritchi, datura, plants containing alkaloid, polyander, bacaipoid - that which if you ingest, if you eat there are high possibilities you may die. How come the Creator of the universe and the human beings, does not know, that if you have these plants, you will die. In the field of medicine, the Bible says in the book of Leveticus, Ch. No.14, Verse No.49 to 53 - it gives a novel way for disinfecting a house from plague of leprosy... disinfecting a house from plague of leprosy. It says that... ‘Take two birds, kill one bird, take wood, scale it - and the other living bird, dip it in water... and under running water - later on sprinkle the house 7 times with it. Sprinkle the house with blood to disinfect against plague of leprosy? You know blood is a good media of germs, bacteria, as well as toxin. The Bible has verses mentioning dragons (Jeremiah 51:34), unicorns (Isaiah 34:7), and cockatrices (Isaiah 11:8). These passages led many naturalists in the Middle Ages to think such mythical creatures actually exist.[46] The Bible is also incorrect in saying the bat is a bird (Leviticus 11:13,19), the hare and rock badger chew the cud (Leviticus 11:5-6), and the mustard seed “is the smallest of all seeds” (Matthew 13:32). Finally, it’s inconsistent with science - and ludicrous - to believe that God confounded the language of humans because he was afraid they would build a tower high enough to reach heaven (Genesis 11:1-9).
@@shanefrance5071 The Bible is an unreliable authority because it contains numerous contradictions. Logically, if two statements are contradictory, at least one of them is false. The biblical contradictions therefore prove that the book has many false statements and is not infallible. Examples of Old Testament Contradictions The contradictions start in the opening chapters of the Bible, where inconsistent creation stories are told. Genesis chapter 1 says the first man and woman were made at the same time, and after the animals. But Genesis chapter 2 gives a different order of creation: man, then the animals, and then woman. Genesis chapter 1 lists six days of creation, whereas chapter 2 refers to the “day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.” Genesis 1:2-3 claims that God created light and divided it from darkness on the first day; but Genesis 1:14-19 tells us the sun, moon, and stars weren’t made until the fourth day. Chapter 1 reports that the fruit trees were created before the man, while chapter 2 indicates they were made after him. Genesis 1:20 says the fowl were created out of the waters; Genesis 2:19 alleges they were formed from the ground. Contradictions are also seen in the biblical story of a worldwide flood. According to Genesis 6:19-22, God ordered Noah to bring “of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort . . . into the ark.” Nevertheless, Genesis 7:2-3 relates that the Lord ordered Noah to take into the ark the clean beasts and the birds by sevens, and only the unclean beasts by twos. Genesis 8:4 reports that, as the waters of the flood receded, Noah’s ark rested on the mountains of Ararat in the seventh month. The very next verse, however, says the mountaintops could not be seen until the tenth month. Genesis 8:13 describes the earth as being dry on the first day of the first month. But Genesis 8:14 informs us the earth was not dry until the twenty-seventh day of the second month. The Old Testament contains an interesting contradiction in the story of the census taken by King David and the resulting punishment of the Israelites. God was so angered by the census that he sent a plague that killed 70,000 men. According to II Samuel 24:1, the Lord had caused David to take the census - which makes the punishment appear even more nonsensical. But an attempt was later made, at I Chronicles 21:1, to improve God’s image by claiming that Satan incited the census. Further, the Old Testament is contradictory as to whether the Lord commanded the Israelites to sacrifice animals to him. At Jeremiah 7:22, God denies he ever gave the Israelites commandments about animal sacrifices. In contrast, Exodus 29:38-42 and many other verses depict God as requiring the Israelites to offer animal sacrifices. Examples of New Testament Contradictions In the New Testament, there are contradictions between the genealogies of Jesus given in the first chapter of Matthew and the third chapter of Luke. Both genealogies begin with Jesus’ father, who is identified as Joseph (which is curious, given that Mary was supposedly impregnated by the Holy Ghost). But Matthew says Joseph’s father was Jacob, while Luke claims he was Heli. Matthew lists 26 generations between Jesus and King David, whereas Luke records 41. Matthew runs Jesus’ line of descent through David’s son Solomon, while Luke has it going through David’s son Nathan. The story of Jesus’ birth is also contradictory. Matthew 2:13-15 depicts Joseph and Mary as fleeing to Egypt with the baby Jesus immediately after the wise men from the east had brought gifts. But Luke 2:22-40 claims that after the birth of Jesus, his parents remained in Bethlehem for the time of Mary’s purification (which was 40 days, under the Mosaic law). Afterwards, they brought Jesus to Jerusalem “to present him to the Lord,” and then returned to their home in Nazareth. Luke mentions no journey into Egypt or visit by wise men from the east. Concerning the death of Judas, the disloyal disciple, Matthew 27:5 states he took the money he had received for betraying Jesus, threw it down in the temple, and “went and hanged himself.” To the contrary, Acts 1:18 claims Judas used the money to purchase a field and “falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.” In describing Jesus being led to his execution, John 19:17 recounts that he carried his own cross. But Mark 15:21-23 disagrees by saying a man called Simon carried the cross. As for the crucifixion, Matthew 27:44 tells us Jesus was taunted by both criminals who were being crucified with him. But Luke 23:39-43 relates that only one of the criminals taunted Jesus, the other criminal rebuked the one who was doing the taunting, and Jesus told the criminal who was defending him, “Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.” Regarding the last words of Jesus while on the cross, Matthew 27:46 and Mark 15:34 quote Jesus as crying with a loud voice, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Luke 23:46 gives his final words as, “Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit.” John 19:30 alleges the last words were, “It is finished.” There are even contradictions in the accounts of the resurrection - the supposed event that is the very foundation of the Christian religion. Mark 16:2 states that on the day of the resurrection, certain women arrived at the tomb at the rising of the sun. But John 20:1 informs us they arrived when it was yet dark. Luke 24:2 describes the tomb as open when the women arrived, whereas Matthew 28:1-2 indicates it was closed. Mark 16:5 declares that the women saw a young man at the tomb, Luke 24:4 says they saw two men, Matthew 28:2 reports they saw an angel, and John 20:11-12 claims they saw two angels. Also in the resurrection stories, there are contradictions as to the identity of the women who came to the tomb,[7] whether the men or angels the women saw were inside or outside the tomb,[8] whether the men or angels were standing or sitting,[9] and whether Mary Magdalene recognized the risen Jesus when he first appeared to her.[10] As a final example of a New Testament contradiction, the conflicting accounts of Paul’s conversion can be cited. Acts 9:7 states that when Jesus called Paul to preach the gospel, the men who were with Paul heard a voice but saw no man. According to Acts 22:9, however, the men saw a light but didn’t hear the voice speaking to Paul. The foregoing examples are just a few of the hundreds of contradictions contained in the Old and New Testaments. Each contradiction is an instance where at least one of the verses is wrong. Thus, hundreds of contradictions mean there are at least hundreds of incorrect statements in the Bible.
@@shanefrance5071 The Bible itself contains a test for determining whether a prophecy was inspired by God. Deuteronomy 18:22 explains: “When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.” Applying this test to the Bible leads to one conclusion: the book contains many statements that were not inspired by God. Old Testament Prophecies Genesis 2:17 says the Lord warned Adam and Eve about the fruit contained on the tree of knowledge. He stated: “[I]n the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” According to Genesis chapter 3, however, Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit and didn’t die on that day. Genesis 35:10 claims that God told Jacob: “[T]hy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name. . . .” But 11 chapters later, the Lord’s own act proved his prediction to be wrong. Genesis 46:2 relates: “God spake unto Israel in the visions of the night, and said, Jacob, Jacob. And he said, Here am I.” At II Chronicles 1:12, God promised Solomon: “Wisdom and knowledge is granted unto thee; and I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honour, such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like.” As Robert Ingersoll pointed out in the nineteenth century, there were several kings in Solomon’s day who could have thrown away the value of Palestine without missing the amount.[48] And the wealth of Solomon has been exceeded by many later kings and is small by today’s standards.[49] Isaiah 17:1-2 prophesies that Damascus would cease to be a city, become a heap of ruins, and remain forever desolate. Yet some 27 centuries after the prediction was made, Damascus is one of the oldest cities in the world and is still going strong. Jeremiah 25:11 predicts the Jews would be captives in Babylon for 70 years, and II Chronicles 36:20-21 views the prophecy as fulfilled. But the Jews were taken into captivity by the Chaldeans when Jerusalem fell in 586 B.C.E. And Cyrus of Persia issued an order in 538 B.C.E. allowing them to return from Babylon to Judah. Thus, the Babylonian captivity lasted about 48 years.[50] Examples of other unfulfilled Old Testament prophecies include the following: the Jews will occupy the land from the Nile to the Euphrates (Genesis 15:18); they shall never lose their land and shall be disturbed no more (II Samuel 7:10); King David’s throne and kingdom shall be established forever (II Samuel 7:16); no uncircumcised person will ever enter Jerusalem (Isaiah 52:1); and the waters of Egypt will dry up (Isaiah 19:5-7). New Testament Prophecies In applying the Bible’s test for identifying false prophets, the conclusion is inescapable that Jesus was one of them. For example, he was wrong in predicting the world would end within the lifetime of his followers. At Matthew 16:28, Jesus tells his disciples: “There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.” The people who were standing there all died eventually, and they never saw Jesus return to establish a kingdom. Similarly, Jesus is depicted at Mark 13:24-30 as listing signs that shall accompany the end of the world. These include the sun becoming darkened, the moon not giving any light, the stars of heaven falling, the son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory, and angels gathering the elect. Then Jesus announces: “Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.” His generation passed away long ago without the predicted events occurring. Jesus also erred in predicting the amount of time he would be in the tomb. At Matthew 12:40 he teaches: “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Mark 15:42-45 shows that Jesus died on a Friday afternoon. But Mark 16:9 and Matthew 28:1 tell us he left the tomb sometime on Saturday night or Sunday morning. Either way, the amount of time was less than three nights. Another significant false prophecy is at John 14:13-14. Jesus promises: “Whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye ask any thing in my name, I will do it.” Everyone knows there have been millions of instances where Jesus failed to respond to Christians who asked for things in his name. And the graveyards are full of people who prayed to him for health. As is the case with other incorrect statements in the Bible, false prophecies cast doubt on all biblical claims. If one verse in the Bible is wrong, it’s possible for many verses to be wrong.
@@shanefrance5071Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) became a light for the Gentiles (Non-jews or non-christians) and a covonant for the people as per Isaiah 42:6. Don't you see? Please don't be so much blind like other liars. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) brought a new Law like Moses unlike Jesus. Because your priests and rabbis misinterpreted your Bible verses to reject the last prophet. But why don't you use the criteria set in Duetornomy 18:20-22 to identify the true prophet ⁉️ And why do you neglect the characteristics and works of the Prophet mentioned in Duetornomy 18:18 and Isaiah 42
The first problem is the dwelling of Kedar which a rural Israeli settlement in the west bank. Secondly Selah indicates a pause in the text. Selah is a synonym of Hebrew words that mean “forever.” Selah is a derivative of the Hebrew root salal (note the s and l), which means to “raise voices in praise” or “make the instruments louder.”
Yeah...I too found Mohammad in Bible at the below verse 👇 Matthew 7:15 Beware of **false prophets**, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Verses in the Bible that predict the coming of our prophet Muhammad (s.a.v): “I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers and I will put my words into his mouth.” (The Bible, Deuteronomy Chapter 18, Verse: 18) “In truth, Moses said, “The Lord will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your brothers, and you will listen to whatever he says. And all the prophets, Ishmael and those who came in succession, declared these days that were always spoken of.” (New Testament Acts, Chapter: 3, Verse: 22) Now let's analyze these two sentences taken from the Bible: a. Hz. Moses (as), Hz. The son of Abraham (pbuh). To the Israelites, descendants of Isaac (as); The address "your brothers" was used by Hz. Brother of Isaac (as), Hz. It is a sign of the descendants of Ishmael (as), that is, the Ishmaelites. The prophet who will come from the Ishmaelites is only Hz. It could be Muhammad (s.a.v); because only our Prophet came from the lineage of Ishmael (pbuh). b. Hz. By saying "like me", Moses (pbuh) refers to our Prophet (pbuh). Because; About twenty issues such as jihad, the laws and provisions he brought, the punishments he imposed, the fact that his word was listened to among his community, etc. Resembling Moses (pbuh); Our Prophet Hz. Muhammad (PBUH); Hz. Joshua (as) and Hz. It is not Jesus (pbuh). c. The expression "I will put my words in your mouth" in the verse indicates that our Prophet (pbuh) was illiterate and could not read or write, but he could easily memorize the Word of Allah and read it to people. And this news came true exactly as it was given. We would also like to draw special attention to a statement in Deuteronomy 18 and 19: in these sentences; It is emphasized that “the coming prophet will speak words in the name of God”. One of the most interesting features of the Quran that came to our Prophet (pbuh) and that is not seen in other books is; It is the beginning of 113 of the 114 surahs of the Quran with "Bismilla", that is, "Bismillahirrahmanirrahim"
Muhammad was a Jew? Cause, according to Deuteronomy 18:18, God will raise up a prophet from among their fellow Israelites. Acts 3:22 says SAMUEL, NOT Ishmael. How dare you twist the Word of God!
@@SoldierofJesus_John316no.. deuteronomy 18:18 i will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.
@@D2012er Where did you get linguistics from? Samuel is the prophet who anointed David as King of Israel. Ishmael was long dead. Ismael is NOT Samuel and there's no connection between the words. Just because a name sounds similar, doesn't mean it's equal to that
@@D2012er "brothers" means fellow Israelites. It doesn't refer to the Arabs. Why would God raise up a prophet from among the enemies of the Israelites?
الحمد لله رب العالمين For ISLAM الحمد لله رب العالمين FOR MAKING US FROM THE BLESSED UMMAH OF THE BEST OF CREATION, AL-SADIQ, AL-AMEEN, JADDAL HUSSAIN, RASOOL-ALLAH ﷺ
The Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) was sent as a “man of war” for those who opposed justice and mercy. He fought 27 battles in person and was victorious against all the enemies of GOD who fought him. They employed all possible means to destroy the Prophet but they failed, as GOD had promised to protect his messenger. In the battle of the ditch (also known as the battle of armies (Ahzab) due to the participation of many tribes) over ten thousand men besieged Madinah but they failed to defeat the Prophet and his companions. Islam was victorious and Islam endured. 📖 Isaiah 42:13- The Lord will march out like a champion, like a warrior he will stir up his zeal; with a shout he will raise the battle cry and will triumph over his enemies. Here Isaiah, in Biblical language, is asserting that the foretold servant will triumph against the enemies of GOD. Throughout history GOD has dealt sternly with those who are sent guidance and persist in disbelief. If one was to pay a little attention to the life of the Prophet of Islam, one will see, without a shadow of a doubt, that this prophecy was fulfilled with his arrival. Almighty ALLAH says, 📖 It was not you (believers) but GOD who slew the pagans. It was not you (Muhammad) but GOD who threw dust at them. He did this as a favorable test for the believers. GOD is All-hearing and All-knowing. This is how GOD causes the (evil) plans, deceitful plots of the unbelievers to fail. If you (the pagans) are looking for conquest, you certainly had a great chance (at the battle of Badr). But if you were to give up such a desire, it would be better for you. If you again wage war against Us, We will be ready for such a confrontation. Your man-power will be of no help to you no matter how much you have; GOD is with the believers. [Chapter 8, verses 17-19] 📖 Isaiah 42:6- I, the LORD, have called you in righteousness; I will take hold of your hand. I will keep you and will make you (Muhammad ﷺ) to be a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles. And We know that gentiles mean non-Jews or non-christians. The righteous mission of establishing justice on earth will require special help from GOD, which is conveyed by the figurative words “And will hold Your hand”. Once “GOD holds the hand of anyone”, it is impossible to defeat that person. GOD uses that person as an instrument to wipe out evil and manifest His judgement on evil doers. See here Prophet Isaiah announces the advent of a figure with temporal powers who will establish global justice (judgement of True God). 📖 Isaiah 42:4- He will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. In his teaching the islands will put their hope. Prophet (ﷺ) was tempted by Pagan Leaders of Mecca. But Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) responded by saying: Even if they place the sun in my right-hand, and the moon in my left-hand in return for giving up this matter, I will never stop, until either God makes it triumph or I die defending it. [Ibid., pp. 265-266.] 📖 Isaiah 42:1- Here is my servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ) ; he will bring justice ⚖️ to the nations (throughout the world 🌎). 📖 Isaiah 42:12- Let them give glory to the Lord and proclaim his praise in the islands. This seems to indicate that this special person’s impact will be far reaching. Islam spread rapidly throughout the Arabian peninsula, even reaching as far as Spain in just over a hundred years after Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). The law of Islam spread as far east as northern China and as far west as southern France. In fact many isles did wait for his law and when the Islamic law came to them with the Muslim armies, they welcomed their liberators. This happened in Syria, Egypt and Spain. With the advent of Islam all the oppressive powers surrounding Arabia fell one after another and the masses could live in peace from then on. In the Qur’an GOD commanded the Muslims to go on a rescue mission. Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ) wrote letters to the kings of the different lands, calling them to Islaam; so this shows that he was a Messenger sent to the whole of the people of the earth. And he was commanded with fighting jihaad until the people entered into Islaam; so this shows that his was universal, covering mankind and jinn.
don’t forget this one : Isaiah 46:11 New Century Version (NCV) I am calling a man from the east to carry out my plan; he will come like a hawk from a country far away. I will make what I have said come true; I will do what I have planned.
@@balikci035 what more is there to explain? This verse is talking about Cyrus the Great as a hawk, juxtaposing him with Nebachaneezer who was also described as a bird of pray. Your blinded by islam
There was no Jewish tribe called 'Kedar'. Kedar was the 2nd son of Abraham's son Ishmael. Genesis 25 : 13. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is a direct descendant of Kedar. "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their BRETHREN, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him." Deuteronomy 18 : 18 No way, no way this can be any other than Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).
Don’t be ridiculous. It literally has to be an Israelite. Muhammad was not an Israelite. As for Isaiah 42. This is not about Muhammad either. U lot don’t know much about the bible do u!
@@briemuss05 - The proof that you don’t know, “has to be an Israelite”. HAS to be? How? What’s your evidence! Genesis 25 : 13 says already that Kedar was the 2nd son of Ishmael - Abraham’s eldest son (Kedar was a grandson of Abraham. Why would you ever call him ‘Israelite’!!
@@autumnicleaf Kedar in Deuteronomy 18 has nothing to do with Ishmael or his son. It’s not even talking about Israel anymore, it’s talking about people to the east and people to the west, singing a new song to Yahweh.
@@autumnicleaf The Hebrew word Miq-qir-be-ka From your midst appears in the Torah 11 times. Every single time that this appears without exception it explicitly means from the midst of your people, the Israelites not your brother nations.
@briemuss05 "Kedar in Deuteronomy 18 has nothing to do with Ishmael or his son." Did I say Deut 18, or Gen 25 : 13? Why does Gen 25 : 13 say Kedar was Ishmael's 2nd son?? "not talking about Israel anymore..." Does it mean Gen 25/13 is a lie?
Muhammed SAW is mentioned in the Bible in Old Testament in Hebrew language in the song of Solomon chapter 5 verse 16 but Christians changed his name in New Testament in all together lovely, watch the video with Sheikh Ahmed Deedat debates with preachers.
: Isaiah 42 is part of a collection of passages known as the "Servant Songs." These passages in Isaiah (Isaiah 42:1-4; 49:1-6; 50:4-9; 52:13-53:12) are often interpreted within the Jewish and Christian traditions as referring to the servant of the Lord, who is typically understood as representing Israel or the Messiah. The context of Isaiah 42:11 is within this broader theme of the servant of the Lord. When examining the language and imagery used in Isaiah 42:11, it describes a group of people singing praises to the Lord, particularly from the ends of the earth, including the desert and its towns. The language used does not specifically mention Muhammad or provide any direct prophecy about him. The book of Isaiah was written around the 8th century BCE, long before the time of Muhammad, who lived in the 6th and 7th centuries CE. Therefore, any claim that Isaiah 42:11 refers to Muhammad would require significant evidence to establish a connection across such a vast temporal gap. Mainstream biblical scholars, both Jewish and Christian, do not interpret Isaiah 42:11 as referring to Muhammad. Instead, they interpret it within the broader context of the Hebrew Bible and its historical and literary context.
We have more references from the Bible. Matthew 3:11 is the eleventh verse in the third chapter of the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament. It reads, "I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me comes one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire".
No excuses will make sense on the last day (judgement day) no one will say I never heard or seen people calling others for the Truth only arrogant will deny
We SHOULD worry about it. Because of people like Ahmed Deedat. Not because he was famous but because he knew the side of the Christians. If we know their side, that’s intelligence, and we should use this to our advantage because every interaction is an opportunity for Dawah, no matter how small.
Prophet Muhammad is mentioned by name in the Song of Solomon chapter 5 verse 16: "Hikko Mamittakim we kullo Muhammadim Zehdoodeh wa Zehraee Bayna Jerusalem." "His mouth is most sweet: yea, he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem." In the Hebrew language im is added for respect. Similarly im is added after the name of Prophet Muhammad to make it Muhammadim. In English translation they have even translated the name of Prophet Muhammad as "altogether lovely", but in the Old Testament in Hebrew, the name of Prophet Muhammad is yet present. John chapter 14 verse 16: "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever." Gospel of John chapter 15 verse 26: "But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me." Gospel of John chapter 16 verse 7: "Nevertheless I tell you the truth; it is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you". "Ahmed" or "Muhammad" meaning "the one who praises" or "the praised one" is almost the translation of the Greek word Periclytos. In the Gospel of John 14:16, 15:26, and 16:7. The word 'Comforter' is used in the English translation for the Greek word Paracletos which means advocate or a kind friend rather than a comforter. Paracletos is the warped reading for Periclytos. Jesus actually prophesised Ahmed by name. Even the Greek word Paraclete refers to the Prophet who is a mercy for all creatures. Some Christians say that the Comforter mentioned in these prophecies refers to the Holy Spirit. They fail to realise that the prophecy clearly says that only if Jesus departs will the Comforter come. The Bible states that the Holy Spirit was already present on earth before and during the time of Jesus, in the womb of Elizabeth, and again when Jesus was being baptised, etc. Hence this prophecy refers to none other than Prophet Muhammad. Gospel of John chapter 16 verse 12-14: "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth is come, he will guide you unto all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me". The Spirit of Truth, spoken about in this prophecy refers to none other than Prophet Muhammad. Case closed.
Isaiah 42 is often claimed by some to refer to Muhammad, but a closer examination of the text within its context shows that this interpretation is not supported by the content of the passage. Isaiah 42 speaks of a "servant" chosen by God who will bring justice to the nations and be a light to the Gentiles. The Christian interpretation, supported by both the context of Isaiah and the New Testament, is that this servant is a prophecy of Jesus Christ. Jesus fulfills the characteristics described: He brought justice, established a new covenant, and was a light to the Gentiles (as seen in the Gospels and Acts). Furthermore, Isaiah 42 mentions the servant as someone who would not cry out or lift up his voice in the streets, and who would bring justice quietly and without causing harm (Isaiah 42:2-3). This description fits the peaceful and gentle nature of Jesus' ministry rather than the life of Muhammad, who led battles and established a theocratic state. The prophecy also speaks of the "islands" waiting for his law, which can be seen as a reference to the widespread impact of Christianity across the nations and islands of the world, especially considering the Christian missionary work throughout history. Additionally, there is no direct mention of Muhammad or any clear reference that could be interpreted as referring to him specifically. The characteristics and mission described in Isaiah 42 align much more closely with the ministry of Jesus Christ, as understood within the broader narrative of the Bible. Therefore, the claim that Isaiah 42 refers to Muhammad does not hold when examined in its biblical context.
This passage is not about Muhhamad. When you read the chapter from verse 1 down wards, it is about the message of Jesus Christ that will spread from Jerusalem to the islands and the remote areas in the world.
I missed the part where he tells us all what passage of scripture proves this… we need a book, a chapter, and a verse my guy. Provide this or it didn’t happen.
He said we don’t care if Muhammad was prophesied in the Bible yet he believes Islam is religion if Abraham also You should embarrassed to quote that verse because it wasn’t talking about Muhammad and also if you think he was talking about Muhammad the verse says he will be blind and deaf 😅
He wants to compares the Bible and the Quran, ok the Quran says Allah is the best of the Deceivers and the Bible says satan is a Deceiver. Which one is right. So muslims need to read the Bible for this puzzle, Quran is the opposite of the Bible. The Bible condemns wrongs. The Quran accepts wrongs .
Don’t pick a word or two from the quaran and take out of context nevertheless there is no compulsion in faith Man can accept or deny there is no purpose for anyone to try persuade other of their beliefs as states in the Koran God (Allah guides whom wills and misguides whom he wills so) so what I or others may warn you is meaningless
Repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. Romans 5:15-16 "But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification."
Why can't this verse be talking about Muhammad? 1. When we read the verse preceding Deuteronomy 18:18, we can clearly see what was intended in the context. This is what the paragraph looks like as a whole: "Just as you asked Yahweh, your God, at Horeb, on the day of the assembly, when you said: 'I will no longer listen to the voice of Yahweh, my God, nor will I look at that mighty fire any more, lest I perish!' Then he said to me Yahweh: ``They said the truth. I will raise up for them a prophet from among their brothers, like you. I will put my words in his mouth so that he can tell them everything I command him" (Deuteronomy 18:16-18). The main problem in this passage for Muslims, which they persistently avoid looking at, is that God says that He will raise up a prophet from among their brothers (the prophet will come from Jewish ranks). Was Muhammad of Jewish blood and did he have any connection with Jews in general? It's not! Therefore, by the very fact that Muhammad was not of Jewish blood, nor did he come from Jewish ranks ("among their brothers"), Muhammad automatically falls away as the prophet to whom this verse might possibly refer. 2. Furthermore, have you ever wondered what it means to be like Moses? Well, God answers this question in the same book. "No more prophet appeared in Israel equal to Moses - Yahweh knew him face to face! - for all those signs and wonders in the land of Egypt for which Yahweh sent him to perform them on Pharaoh, on all his servants and on all his land, on that powerful hand of his and on all those great and terrifying deeds that he did in the eyes of all Israel " (Deuteronomy 34:10-12). In other words, being a prophet like Moses is about two things: 1. Knowing God face to face, 2. Performing the signs that God performed through Moses. However, when we read the Koran, we see that Muhammad did not perform any miracles like those performed by Moses. "Why was it not given to him (Muhammad) the same as it was given to Musa (Moses)?" (Sura 28:48).
Look, we love and respect our brothers and sisters of the book (torah, bible, quran), our differences doesn't have to be the end between us. We can have civilised arguments if both parties wishes and can be respectful towards one another. Peace be upon you!
What we have of the Torah today presents a greatly juxtaposed picture of Ishmael: on the one hand Ishmael is included in the covenant of Abraham and told that he will be blessed by GOD in Torah, and on the other hand a very anti-climactic and even negative picture is painted of him. a careful analysis of the various incidents relating to Ishmael in the Torah reveals irreconcilable contradictions and prejudiced readings in the text. It shows that the stories about Ishmael have been corrupted by human hands and passed off as “scripture” According to their Book, ALLAH commanded Ibrahim to sacrifice his only son, and in another text it says his firstborn son. But here they falsely inserted the name of Isaac. This is not right because it goes against what their own Scripture says. They inserted the name of Isaac because he is their ancestor, while Ishmael is the ancestor of the Arabs. They were jealous of them, so they added this idea and changed the meaning of the phrase “only son” to mean `the only son who is with you,’ because Ishmael had been taken with his mother to Makkah. But this is a case of falsification and distortion, because the words “only son” cannot be said except in the case of one who has no other son. Furthermore, the firstborn son has a special status that is not shared by subsequent children, so the command to sacrifice him is a more exquisite test. This shows that Ibn Kathir was aware of the variant “firstborn son” in the Old Testament tradition that was in circulation during the 14th century. Such a reading makes it even more explicit that it was Ishmael that was to be sacrificed, as he was 13 years older than Isaac and thus Abraham’s first born. But they (Jews and christians) say that Ishmael is banished or abandoned---it's totally false. Because, Ibrahim sacrificed his love for Ishmael by leaving his beloved son in the desert to please the True God. The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: 📖 Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to 📖 Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makka). And to know more about the Last Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible, I highly recommend everyone please go through Isaiah 42:1-17. Also, one notices from the Gospel of John 1:21 that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of 3 distinct prophecies: The first was the coming of the Christ. The second was the coming of the Elijah. And The Third was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad (ﷺ), from their brother tribes) who will be very like Prophet Moses mentioned in Duetornomy 18:18 to fullfil the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles (Non-jews or non-christians) and a covonent for the people clearly mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. Yes 📖 Isaiah 42:1-13 speaks about the Final Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ ) of Bible will fight idols worshipers to guide them and then establish God's justice ⚖️ on earth 🌎. Isaiah 42:11 connects that awaited one with the descendants of Ke’dar, 2nd son of Ishmael (📖 Genesis 25:13), the ancestor of Prophet Muhammad). We can also see In 📖 Isaiah 42:19 & 42:24, that the 'Nation of Israel' is explicitly identified as the blind and condemned people therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the Arabian prophet) must be someone other than Israel. Yes, 📖 Isaiah 42:17-25 talks about those blind pagans Arabs, Romans, Persians etc. and also those Jews and Christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of the Bible Because, they neglected Deuteronomy 18:18 which clearly predicted that this Prophet must be someone from their brethren (brother tribes, the Arabs). Some Jews and Christians try to resolve this issue by claiming that Ishmael was not a legitimate son of Abraham, an accusation that is demonstrably false from a number of different angles: - The Bible itself bears witness to the fact that Ishmael was Abraham’s “son”: On that very day Abraham took his son Ishmael and all those born in his household or bought with his money, every male in his household, and circumcised them, as God told him. [Genesis 17:23] - Some claim that Ishmael is a “lesser” son than Isaac because his mother, Hagar, was a slave woman. This is not the case according to the Bible: So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian slave Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife. [Genesis 16:3] So the Bible confirms that Hagar was Abraham’s legitimate wife. In fact, if this were not the case then Abraham would be guilty of adultery, a serious accusation indeed! - Moreover the Bible tells us that Ishmael remained the legitimate son of Abraham until even after his death: Then Abraham breathed his last and died at a good old age, an old man and full of years; and he was gathered to his people. His sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah near Mamre, in the field of Ephron son of Zohar the Hittite. [Genesis 25:8-9] Clearly, Ishmael is every bit the legitimate son of Abraham as Isaac is. This suggests that the editors of Genesis altered the story and thus tried to deny Ishmael his rightful place as a legitimate son and heir of Abraham. Because, we can clearly see the practices of Islamic sacrifices by the sons of Ishmael in their own Bible. KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael. We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20] A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power rather it's spiritual, and not material.. That's why Isaiah talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Ishmael's 2nd son Kedar who lived in Medina. We know that both Prophet Moses and Prophet Muhammad migrated to Medina (Biblical Midian) following conspiracies to assassinate them...And Arabia rejoiced by his coming mentioned in Bible Isaiah 42:11. 📖 Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices; let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice. Let the people of Sela sing for joy; let them shout from the mountaintops. Where did Kedar settle❓The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130] Now we can see that Bible clearly talks about the Hajj and Islamic sacrifices in Mekkha. And also the rising of Last prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia. One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar. We can see, like the Qur’an, Abraham is given glad tidings with respect to his descendants. In fact GOD promises to establish his covenant with all of Abraham’s “seed” without exception: 📖 Genesis 17:7 I (GOD) will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your GOD and the GOD of your descendants after you. God informs Abraham that the sign of the covenant shall be circumcision: [Genesis 17:10] Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) became a light for the Gentiles and a covonent for the people mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. Don't they (Christians and jews) see❓ Both Muhammad and Moses were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters (Isaiah 42:7-8), were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them. Both were given comprehensive law code of life (Isaiah 42:21), both encountered their enemies (Isaiah 42:4) and were victors in miraculous ways (Isaiah 42:13-17), both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and both migrated to Medinah (Biblical Midian) following conspiracies to assassinate them (Isaiah 42:11). Both (Moses and Muhammad) enabled their followers to conquer the Palestine. The natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad but not Jesus. (Peace be upon them all)---These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:18 which clearly predicted an Arabian Messenger Will be very like Prophet Moses from their brethern (brother tribes, the Arabs) to fullfil the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles (non-Jews or non-Christians) and a covonent for the people mentioned in Isaiah 42:6 to bring justice ⚖️ to the nations (Isaiah 42:1). Although, there is enough evidence in their own Bible to accept the final and true prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible, but only the liars will reject the last prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible after going through all the proofs. 3:187 (And remember) when ALLAH took a covenant from those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) to make it (the news of the coming of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) and the religious knowledge) known and clear to mankind, and not to hide it, but they threw it away behind their backs, and purchased with it some miserable gain! And indeed worst is that which they bought.
Jesus Christ pbuh was never ashamed to admit that John the Baptist pbuh and the last prophet Muhammad pbuh were both greater than himself in Matthew 11:11& Luke 7 vs 28 because John the Baptist pbuh was the expected prophet Elijah pbuh in Mathew 11:14, and Matthew 17 Vs 11 -13 and the last prophet Muhammad pbuh was the expected prophet in John 1:19-21, and the last comforter after Jesus Christ pbuh was casted out of the world John 9 vs 5, John 12 vs 31, John 16:7-17, and to confirm Matthew 21:43 and the last testament Quran confirm the complete message as expected in 1 Corinthians 13 vs 9-10
He didn't need to.. because when he gave the message of God to the people of Makkah.. there were 2 types of people then.. a group of people who understood the message and realised that this is indeed from God and accepted Islam.. the other group who understood the message and realised this is from God but didn't accept Islam because they felt it was against their pride to the religion of their forefathers to accept Islam.. So people understood that he was indeed a messenger of God even without him giving any references from the Bible.. The other group didn't want to leave the religion of their forefathers is because of Pride and other reason is since their religion was manmade and drinking alcohol, interest on lending money, buying and selling slaves, treating women as an use and throw tool were all allowed, since Islam restricted all these they didn't wanna leave these activities..
That passage is not talking about a prophet. It’s talking about people rejoicing in that area. Why would you think that would be referring to any prophet? Let alone Mohammad? That doesn’t make any sense.
@@ropol2x because they are praising God. Also, note that the next verse talks about people declaring his praise in the coastlands. And that in the verse prior, the author talks about singing the Lord’s praise from the end of the Earth. These verses are here to illiterate how far the praise of God will spread, not bring forth a prophecy about the region where a future prophet will hail. It’s like saying God shed His grace on America from “sea to shining sea.” It illustrates the same sort of idea. God‘s praise will be from the end of the Earth and from these regions to the coast lands.
Yes, According to their Book, ALLAH commanded Ibrahim to sacrifice his only son, and in another text it says his firstborn son. But here they falsely inserted the name of Isaac. This is not right because it goes against what their own Scripture says. They inserted the name of Isaac because he is their ancestor, while Ishmael is the ancestor of the Arabs. They were jealous of them, so they added this idea and changed the meaning of the phrase “only son” to mean `the only son who is with you,’ because Ishmael had been taken with his mother to Makkah. But this is a case of falsification and distortion, because the words “only son” cannot be said except in the case of one who has no other son. Furthermore, the firstborn son has a special status that is not shared by subsequent children, so the command to sacrifice him is a more exquisite test. This shows that Ibn Kathir was aware of the variant “firstborn son” in the Old Testament tradition that was in circulation during the 14th century. Such a reading makes it even more explicit that it was Ishmael that was to be sacrificed, as he was 13 years older than Isaac and thus Abraham’s first born. But they (Jews and christians) claim that Ishmael is banished or abandoned---it's totally false. Because Ibrahim sacrificed his love for Ishmael by leaving his beloved son Ishmael in the desert of Makkah to please the True God. Because, we can even clearly see the Practices of Islamic sacrifices by the sons of Ishmael in their own Bible. KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." Who are Kedar and Nebaioth Mentioned in the above verse❓Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael. Don't they (Jews and christians) see ❓ We can see, like the Qur’an, Abraham is given glad tidings with respect to his descendants. In fact GOD promises to establish his covenant with all of Abraham’s “seed” without exception: Genesis 17:7 I (GOD) will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your GOD and the GOD of your descendants after you. That's why Isaiah 42:11 talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Ishmael's 2nd son Kedar who lived in Medina (Biblical Midian). Both Prophet Moses and Prophet Muhammad fled from their enemies (Moses to Midian, Muhammad to Madina, and we know that geographically, Biblical Midian is located in Modern day Western Saudi Arabia). And to know more about the Last Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible, I highly recommend everyone to go through Isaiah 42:1-17. Also, one notices from the Gospel of John 1:21 that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of 3 distinct prophecies: The first was the coming of the Christ. The second was the coming of the Elijah. The Third was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad (ﷺ), from their brother tribes), who Will be very like Prophet Moses mentioned in Duetornomy 18:18 to fullfil the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles (Non-jews or non-christians) and a covonent for the people clearly mentioned in Isaiah 42:6. Yes 📖 Isaiah 42:1-13 speaks about the Final Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ ) of the Bible will fight idols worshipers to guide them and then establish God's justice ⚖️ on earth 🌎. Isaiah 42:11 connects that awaited one with the descendants of Ke’dar, 2nd son of Ishmael (📖 Genesis 25:13), the ancestor of Prophet Muhammad). We can also see In 📖 Isaiah 42:19 & 42:24, that the 'Nation of Israel' is explicitly identified as the blind and condemned people therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the Arabian prophet) must be someone other than Israel. Yes, 📖 Isaiah 42:17-25 talks about those blind pagans Arabs, Romans, Persians etc. and also those Jews and Christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of the Bible Because, they neglected Deuteronomy 18:18 which clearly predicted that this Prophet must be someone from their brethren (their brother tribes, the Arabs). A careful analysis of the various incidents relating to Ishmael in the Torah and reveals irreconcilable contradictions and prejudiced readings in the text. It shows that the stories about Ishmael have been corrupted by human hands and passed off as “scripture”! Because in one hand Ishmael is included in the covenant of Abraham and told that he will be blessed by GOD in Torah, and on the other a very anti-climactic and even negative picture is painted of him But the real truth is that The Bible tells us that Ishmael remained the legitimate son of Abraham until even after his death: Then Abraham breathed his last and died at a good old age, an old man and full of years; and he was gathered to his people. His sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah near Mamre, in the field of Ephron son of Zohar the Hittite. [Genesis 25:8-9] And Yes, their's still enough evidence in their own Bible to accept the Last and true Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible, but only the liars will reject the last prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) after going through all the proofs. Because, The blind followers of Jewish rabbis and christian priests always demand the proofs from their own Bible. That's why we use their Bible to expose the liars as well as the followers of antichrist, those Jews and christians rabbis, popes, saints, priests hide the real truth from people as they reject the Last Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible. 3:187 (And remember) when ALLAH took a covenant from those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) to make it (the news of the coming of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) and the religious knowledge) known and clear to mankind, and not to hide it, but they threw it away behind their backs, and purchased with it some miserable gain! And indeed worst is that which they bought. The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makkah). We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20] A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power. Throughout the Bible, many disbelieving and evil nations achieved great wealth and power, so it makes more sense that GOD’s promise about Ishmael must amount to spiritual, and not material, blessing. 📖 The LORD your GOD will raise up for you a Prophet like me (Moses) from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.' Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 predicted prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs.. Since "from your midst" does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) or the Samaritan Pentateuch, the original text must state the prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs. Now we can see that Bible clearly speaks about the Islamic sacrifices and Hajj in Mekkha. And the rising of the Final prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of the Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia. Because, Arabia shall rejoice by his coming. Moving to the verse--- Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and the cities thereof lift up their voice, the villages that Kedar doth inhabit; let the inhabitants of Sela sing, let them shout from the top of the mountains. Where did Kedar settle❓The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130] Prophet Muhammad brought a new Law like Moses unlike Jesus (peace be upon them all). Yes, Sharia law is mentioned in Isaiah 42:4 and Isaiah 42:21. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) became a light for the Gentiles and a covonent for the people mentioned in Isaiah 42:6 to bring justice ⚖️ to the nations (Isaiah 42:1). Don't they (Christians and jews) see❓ Both Muhammad and Moses were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters (Isaiah 42:7-8), were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them. Both were given comprehensive law code of life (Isaiah 42:21), both encountered their enemies (Isaiah 42:4) and were victors in miraculous ways (Isaiah 42:13-17), both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and both migrated to Medinah (Biblical Midian) following conspiracies to assassinate them (Isaiah 42:11). Both (Moses and Muhammad) enabled their followers to conquer the Palestine. The natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad but not Jesus. (Peace be upon them all)---These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:18 who Will be very like Prophet Moses to fullfil the prophecies of Isaiah 42 to become a light for the gentiles (non-Jews or non-Christians) and a covonent for the people clearly mentioned in Isaiah 42:6 to bring justice ⚖️ to the nations (Isaiah 42:1).
CONCLUSION So, are all these verses really talking about the coming prophet of Islam? So if you assumed they were talking, we hope this article helped clear up that question for you. In all four cases we have shown that it takes gross misinterpretation and taking the verses out of context to even hint at such a claim. And in our opinion, we can somewhat sympathize with why such attempts are made. Because if Muhammad is mentioned in the biblical story, then that gives at least some credibility to their writing. Although this is not the case, the Koran forced them into a difficult theological dilemma. But if we look at all the facts, according to the biblical writings Muhammad is nothing but a false prophet who presented himself as a minister of light, but in fact he carried the spirit of the Antichrist and led people away from the true God (2 Corinthians 11:14-15; 1 John 2:22-23). Source: Reasons for Jesus
Those mentioned villages was because of the jews who was on exile because of Babylon. They should be happy because the hour of return to Israel was come. Thats what Isaiah is talk about. Thats the context.
Both Muhammad & Moses enabled their followers to conquer Palestine. Each gave a law, fled from their enemies (Moses to Midian, Muhammad to Medina, we know that geographically, Biblical Midian is located in modern day Western Saudi Arabia), marched to battle against their enemies, wrought miracles. These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 Both Muhammad & Moses (Peace be upon them) were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters, were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them. 📖 The LORD your GOD will raise up for you a Prophet like me (Moses) from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.' Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 predicted prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs.. Since "from your midst" does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) or the Samaritan Pentateuch, the original text must state the prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs. 📖 Duetornomy 18:20 states that false prophet must die without fulfilling the prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42. GOD of Bible also informed us that the true prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) would talk about the same GOD of Moses and fulfill prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42. 📖 Deuteronomy 18:20 But any prophet who falsely claims to speak in my name or who speaks in the name of another god must die.’ 📖 Deuteronomy 18:21 “But you may wonder, ‘How will we know whether or not a prophecy is from the Lord? 📖 Deuteronomy 18:22 If the prophet speaks in the Lord’s name but his prediction does not happen or come true, you will know that the Lord did not give that message. That prophet has spoken without my authority and need not be feared. Our Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) passed all the conditions stated by TRUE GOD of Bible in Deuteronomy 18:18-22 for identifying the true prophet of the Bible. Also, one notices from the Gospel of John that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. The first was the coming of Christ. The second was the coming of Elijah. The third was the coming of the Prophet. This is obvious from the three questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (📖 John 1:19-21) The word “the Prophet” occur in John 1:21, that these words refer to the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:18. We conclude from this that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18. Because, In 📖 Isaiah 42:19 & 42:24 the 'Nation of Israel' is explicitly identified as the blind and condemned people therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the Arabian prophet) must be someone other than Israel. Because Bible 📖 Deuteronomy 18:18 also predicted that this Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) must be someone from your brethren (your brother tribes, the Arabs). Just who is this condemned servant? Isaiah makes it clear that the servant of condemnation is none other than the nation of Israel: 📖 Who is blind like the one in covenant with me, blind like the servant of the Lord? [📖 Isaiah 42:19] The “one in covenant with me” is a clear reference to the nation of Israel who were in covenant with God at the time Isaiah made this prophecy. Isaiah goes on to make it even more explicit: 📖 Who handed Jacob over to become loot, and Israel to the plunderers? [📖 Isaiah 42:24] Yes, 📖 Isaiah 42:17-25 talks about those blind pagans Arabs, Romans, Persians etc. and also those Jews and Christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of Bible. The prophet spoken (in Deuteronomy 18:15-22) of was not to come from among the Jews themselves, but from among their brothers, i.e. the Ishmaelites. Muhammad (ﷺ), a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet. Any sincere person that interprets Isaiah 42 consistently will see that it simply cannot apply to Jesus, regardless of whether one takes it as a reference to his first or second coming. The fact is that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is the only person in history that has fulfilled all of the criteria set out in Isaiah 42. 📖 Isaiah 42:4 He will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth... The second part of the verse in 📖 Isaiah 42:4 mentions: “…In his teaching the islands will put their hope” Isaiah informs us that this special person will bring forth a new law. Yes 📖 Isaiah 42:21 also stated that the God of Bible would magnify the Law to make people righteous. It hints about Al-Quran, Shariah Law. 📖 Isaiah 42:8 I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images. 📖 Isaiah 42:9- "See, the former things have taken place, and new things (Al-Quran, Shariah Law) I (God) declare; before they spring into being I announce them to you." This makes it clear proof. 📖 Isaiah 42:21 "The LORD is well pleased for his righteousness' sake; he will magnify the law, and make it honorable." 📖 Isaiah 42:10- "Sing to the Lord a new song, his praise from the ends of the earth, you who go down to the sea, and all that is in it, you islands, and all who live in them." Isaiah informs us that this special person will bring something new. The statement “a new song” means a new way of worship. This is exactly what Islam represents. The emphasis on the new song here is singing the praise of GOD all over the earth. The Qur’an opens with the statement “Praise be to GOD, LORD of the worlds” and is recited by Muslims all over the world during prayers every day. Why does 📖 Isaiah 42:11 talk about the rejoicing of the settlements (western Saudi Arabia) where Kedar (2nd son of Ishmael) settled ⁉️ And Sela (a famous mountain in Medinah) ? So the last prophet of the Bible had to rise from the city of Medina (Biblical Midian), Western Saudi Arabia (Land of Kedar) ⁉️ Yes, Isaiah 42:1-13 speaks of the servant of GOD (abd - ullah), His “chosen one” (Mustafa) in whom I delight (Habibullah’) and “messenger” who will bring down a law. “He will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. In his law the islands will put their hope.” (Isaiah 42:4). see Isaiah 42:21 talks about magnified laws (Al-Quran,Shariah.) Also Isaiah 42 Verse 11, connects that awaited one with the descendants of Kedar. Who is Kedar? According to Genesis 25:13, Kedar was the second son of Ishmael,the grandfather of the Arab nation, the ancestor of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad, Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar. Hayden’s Bible dictionary states: Mohammad is said to have been of the Bene-Kedar [sons of Kedar] [A Bible Dictionary, Hayden Series, edited by Rev. Charles Boutell, p. 386].
With all due respect my friends this verse is not referencing the prophet. The first part of the chapter (Isaiah 42:1-9) is talking about the "Servant of the Lord"...versus 10-13 is telling the inhabitants of "Kedar" and "Sela" to sing a new song of joy because of the servant that Yahweh gave as a covenant(testament) and a light to the gentiles.
