Wuw I am preparing my exam tomorrow with studying much cuz the way u explain my children by chose main point .u really made thing for easly for ❤️❤️❤️❤️ and u are really good at what u are doing keep it
You can agree or disagree in this question. Yes Mr M's death is justified because he was an informer. The act of killing Mr M was a self defense from the comrades. Mr M defied the boycott by being at school thus provoking the angry mob. Mr M refused to listen to Thami and join the boycott. Thus making Mr M's death to be justified. No Mr M's death is not justified because all he wanted was for learners to come back to school since he believed in education. Mr M's death is not justified because he was unarmed. Mr M's death is not justified because all he wanted was to protect his learners and he died for the love of Education thus making his death to not be justified
Mr M and Thami are from different generations so their ideas often clash because they do not see things the same way. For example. Mr M says when he speaks Thami should do as he says but Thami doesn’t see it that way instead he says I do not listen to what Mr M says. This is generational conflict
@@sibusisolamula3913 Over the course of the play, Thami also befriends Isabel Dyson, a white student from a private, all-white girls' school. After they first meet during an inter-school debate at the beginning of the play, Mr. M convinces them to join forces for an English literature quiz competition.
@@sibusisolamula3913 i can’t say for sure which questions they like to ask. The best way is to download English paper 2 previous papers and study using them.
