eBay is a great place for Minolta lenses and cameras (AFFILIATE LINKS): $35 Bokeh king (55mm F1.7 PF): ebay.us/ZIv9JJ Another great bokeh lens: ebay.us/6FeGPD $100 macro for everyone (50mm F3.5): ebay.us/CPqWyj
Thank you for a very well put together video on Minolta lenses. I came across a Mark 2 prime 58 mm 1.4 for the incredible price of $3 at a local Goodwill.
I own approx. 15 Minolta lenses. Even the cheap ones have a decent quality. So you can't go wrong with Minolta lenses. Astonishing is the quite similar color rendering. Minolta was one of the few companies which applied the lens coating by themselves. Therefore you can create with Minolta lenses easily a set (especially for video) which won't cause you a lot of adjustment work in post.
Thanks, Harald. Great to hear from someone who knows their Minolta lenses! The point about a consistent look for video is important and overlooked by many.
You're preaching to the choir here. One of my favorite pictures I've ever taken was with a cheap 55mm f/2 lens I picked out of a junk bin for 1 USD. Over the last 20 years I've added a few more. Easily disassembled and cleaned.
Great Video on some very underrated lenses! I’m using many Minolta and SR Third Party Lenses on my Pentax DSLR’s and Lumix Mirrorless. One astonishing Zoom Lens I got recommended in Ireland by another Photographer, who used manual Minolta Lenses on his Canon 5D, is the 35-70mm 1:3.5, I’ve got the MD Zoom with built-in Macro up to 1:4 and the standard MD Zoom Rokkor. Also witht Third Party Lenses like Tokina, Sigma and Exakta I have made very good experiences. One of my favourite lenses on my Lumix is a MC Exakta WW-Macro 1:2.8/28mm with a damaged filter thread, which makes outstanding pictures at night.
Thanks for watching and for sharing your experiences with these old school lenses :) The 35-70mm has a great reputation, one day I shall try it out for myself.
It is ironic you say NOT to call them MC and MD lenses, then that is in your title and text! That does not refer to the mount, but the model of the lens and it shows that on the front of EACH LENS. Just because people confuse it with the mount does not mean they are not still MC and MD lenses! They still ARE MC and MD lenses, they just happen to share the same SR mount. They are still MC and MD lenses, with key differences as you show. The MC lenses were first coordinated by Leica to standardize the coatings to make them more uniform, which is why I still prefer the MC lenses over the newer, cheaper and smaller MD lenses which used plastic instead of metal, yet they did have improved coating over the older MC version of the same lens. They came in three versions for the MC lenses and I love them.
He did not say that the lenses should not be called MC or MD, that is what Minolta called them. It is the mount type which is used by both of these series of lenses which he says should be called SR mount.
I thrifted a Minolta camera + 2 lenses for 25 bucks a couple weeks ago. One of the lenses was a Sigma zoom lens that doesn’t zoom without a lot of force. The other was a 135mm macro lens that basically has two focus rings. When you focus all.the way in then the part that extended out can also be turned to focus even closer. Unfortunately it’s very soft and the aperture ring does not work without moving the tab on the back by the mount (have to take it off the camera to reach it). But as you say, it’s very nice to use! Super smooth aperture ring.
First of all, nice find for $25 :) Both of those sound like third party lenses for the Minolta mount. If you end up keeping the camera, I'd ditch the lenses and go for a nice Minolta prime, should be even more impressive in build quality - not to mention optical quality!
Minolta named them MC and MD to differentiate that the MD lenses worked on Shutter Priority and Program AE cameras such as the Minolta XD series and Minolta X-370, X-700, X-GM series, etc. MC came first, MD afterward. Yes same lens mount, just a differentiation for the aforementioned bodies.
Exactly! This was a VERY important difference back in the day (I had a X-700 myself). This is also the reason why the mounts are called "Minolta MD" resp. "Minolta MC", e.g. on third party lenses. YES, they WERE called like that.
Great video and love the Minolta SR lenses you have there! I bought mine 10 years ago when the mirrorless market was just beginning and not many cheap native lenses were on sale. I use them on a Micro Four Thirds system. Over time I added these to the collection (I use the 50mm F1.4 and the Macros the most). MD Rokkor 45mm F2 MD Rokkor 50mm F1.4 49mm thread MD Rokkor 50mm F1.4 55mm thread MD Macro Rokkor 50mm F3.5 with 1:1 MD Macro 100mm F4 with 1:1 MC Rokkor 135mm F2.8 MD Rokkor 200mm F4 I just could not justify/afford buying the 50mm F1.2, 85mm F1.7 or the 100mm F2.
@@lensvana I managed to buy a collection from a deceased estate. Included was a 16mm fisheye, 28mm, 50mm, 55mm, 58mm, 85mm and 135mm. I sold the fisheye as it didn't suit my style of photography and have bought a 50mm macro, 100mm and a 200mm seperately. Nearly all are in very good condition, but my 55mm has the aperture stuck at f1.7.
@@stephenreynolds6414 That's a really nice set - the classic focals between 28 and 200mm. And I see you're a member of the 55mm stuck wide open club :) I really like my 100 macro, it's just a bit bulky with the 1:1 adapter so I'm more inclined to leave the adapter for home use
Chapters: 0:00 Introduction 1:06 Adapting Minolta to Mirrorless 3:15 Minolta Lenses: Quick Overview 5:10 Generations of Minolta Lenses 9:55 Finding Bargains Online 10:34 Lens Recommendations (Forgot to mention in the video: the table of 30 lenses contains the absolute best Minolta lenses -- not just the best value ones. According to my experience and reviews from all over the web)
THis may be of some interest? In the days of film cameras, I did not own a Minolta camera. Howevever I did use a Minolta El Rokkor lens on a Durst Enlarger for printing in monochrome. Minolta lenses for enlargers were very good indeed.
Pyramid stones were poured. That's why they fit so well together and are all different seizes. In natural sandstone the shells are layered horizontal because they were deposited that way. In the pyramid stones shells are pointing in all directions.
Excellent... I ❤ Minolta!! In mid 70's Minolta work with Leica!! Leica R3 y R4 = Minolta XE y XD... I think that Minolta was the great japanese undervalued brand!! His lens are awesome... 🔥
Mine was the k-100 in the mid 80s on a trip to Florida. I picked up a minolta x-700 I have been shooting it ever since. It's only 2 ft from me now. I have never had a problem with it or the lenses apsalutly love and still shooting with it.
Great video! Do you have any experience with the newer 28mm f2.8? Or how the Vivitar macro lenses stack up to the Minolta (Specifically the 90mm f2.5 or f2.8 zoom)? The Vivitar 2.5 has incredible reviews but seems pricey, but the 2.8 macro zoom is about the same price as the Minolta macros.
@@jaxmanf Thanks for watching! I haven't tried the 28mm F2.8, but I have heard great things and it probably should've been in the table. Also, if you ever resell, it's far easier to resell a 2.8. I have tried the 58 F1.4 and can recommend that one - I'd go in that direction from the 50/1.7, unless you really need a 50mm specifically. From what I've read, the 50/1.4 isn't worth it over the 50/1.7 (but nothing beats personal experience - with prices as they are today, you could just try them all!)
Do you recommend leaving the aperture open, closed, or other when not in use? Or opening and closing lenses that aren't being used on a regular basis? Thanks.
Great question, I've tried to research this myself. Some recommend keeping it closed down to minimize pressure on the springs. Others say it really doesn't matter too much. In any case, the consensus is that they should all be used at least once a year
Im waiting on my minolta to come and its coming with a 50mm f2. I want to buy another lens but do you think i Should i go with a 50 f1.4 or a 28mm 2.8 ? Or a 35mm 2.8 ?
I started with a SRT and got a few lens that I really like. I see you also shoot on a aps c, do you still enjoy the lenses with the crop factor? I’m torn between getting an xt1 or a first gen a7. I like the controls on the fuji and simplicity but I’ve seen people say that legacy lenses look better on full frame.
It's an interesting discussion. On one hand, using APS-C with older manual lenses may be better for overall sharpness, but that's not why we shoot these older lenses. I also like the controls of the XT1, but for pure legacy lens use I'd go with the A7 Mark I. For example: with lenses such as the old Soviet Helios series, the "swirly bokeh" effect will be more pronounced on full frame. Ultimately, you can't go wrong with either camera.
Auto Focus in my user experience and opinion is THE WORST thing to ever get implemented into Photography. I will say I have found the Auto Focus Abilities of the old 35mm Film Cameras from decades ago to be less of a pain, but any of these new age Digital Cameras, it's the worst in Point and Shoots and Mobile Devices (smartphones, tablets, etc). With manual focus, there's no waiting, there's no weird things you have to do with your hands or pieces of paper behind the foreground object to get it to focus, there's no shaking around devices to hope it eventually focuses, and there's none of that bullcrap of it going into focus then suddenly deciding to go back out of focus. Auto Focus is HORRIBLE! Manual Focus is and will always be the absolute best and most reliable choice.
@@shtngro yep, the same can be said with Konica. In 2003 Konica merged with Minolta to become Konica Minolta Ltd. In 2006 they created a partnership with Sony and six months later sold the company to Sony. So Sony are a very good fit for Minolta lenses.
